Arguments Arguments are lines of reasoning using propositions (claims or assertions) Arguments are lines of reasoning using propositions (claims or assertions)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Advertisements

Visualization Tools, Argumentation Schemes and Expert Opinion Evidence in Law Douglas Walton University of Winnipeg, Canada Thomas F. Gordon Fraunhofer.
The Cosmological Argument for God’s Existence. Argument’s basic theme: Everything that exists must have a cause. The universe exists, therefore it must.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 More Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking
1 Hypothesis Testing Chapter 8 of Howell How do we know when we can generalize our research findings? External validity must be good must have statistical.
That is a bear track A bear has passed this way. What is the nature of the transition from the first of these thoughts to the second? Is it DeductionInductionAbduction.
Aquinas’s First Way – highlights It’s impossible for something to put itself into motion. Therefore, anything in motion is put into motion by something.
Cultural Relativism : A actions rightness or wrongness depends entirely on the attitudes of the culture a person finds him or herself to be in.
Phil 1000 Bradley Monton Class 4 The Problem of Evil.
Persuasive Speeches Just try to convince me!. Types of Persuasive Speeches 1.FACTS Persuade that your fact is true. Prove that your claim is the best.
Persuasion. What Is It? Persuade – To convince someone to change their stance or opinion of something.
Metaethics and ethical language Michael Lacewing Michael Lacewing
The Cosmological Argument. Aquinas’s Cosmological Argument Cosmological Argument is ‘a posteriori’ Attempts to prove the existence of God There are three.
Cosmological arguments from causation Michael Lacewing
Matakuliah : G1222, Writing IV Tahun : 2006 Versi : v 1.0 rev 1
Cosmological arguments from contingency Michael Lacewing
RS Exam Revision Stacked, 3-D text at dramatic angle (Intermediate)
Capstone Seminar Mr. Dana Linton. Logical fallacies are common errors of reasoning. If an argument commits a logical fallacy, then the reasons that it.
Fallacious Reasoning vs. Logical Reasoning (Persuasive vs. Argumentative Writing)
The Great Debate! What it is and How to do it!. BASIC TERMS! Debate: a game/discussion in which two opposing teams make speeches to support their arguments.
Tactics : A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions.
What Christianity explains that Naturalism cannot Naturalism (materialism) and Christianity (theism) are considered the two possible positions or worldviews.
Debate: Claims. Claims Each claim is a statement within the argument that the arguer needs accepted. These statements are given to logically lead the.
Eng 111 Dana Frierson Fall Types of Reasoning (Logic) n Deductive u Inferring particular “fact” from general assumptions u General to specific n.
Writing a Response Paper English III. What is a response paper? Your reaction to a text that you have read.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument By David Kelsey.
Responding Critically to Texts
Writing a Position Paper A position paper presents an arguable opinion about an issue. The goal of a position paper is to convince the audience that your.
Introduction to Critical Thinking Developing Critical Thinking Skills.
Three Modes of Persuasion Qualitative/Quantitative September 2011 Rhetoric: Communication Techniques.
Argument Language is a form of motivated action. Argument as Discourse It’s important to understand that for the purposes of this class, Argument means.
Evidently the Cosmological argument as proposed by Aquinas is open to both interpretation and criticism. The Cosmological argument demands an explanation.
Argument Diagramming Part II PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 1, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
LECTURE 19 THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT CONTINUED. THE QUANTUM MECHANICAL OBJECTION DEPENDS UPON A PARTICULAR INTERPRETATION WE MIGHT REASONABLY SUSPEND.
Let’s see some more examples!
LECTURE 17 THE MODAL ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT (A VARIANT OF HARTSHORNE’S VERSION)
The Cosmological Argument for God’s Existence or how come we all exist? Is there a rational basis for belief in God?
History of Philosophy Lecture 5 Formalizing an argument
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
Empirical or Rhetorical? The Hunger Games was the best movie of the past decade.
What it is and How to do it!
Can We Know That God Exists? Learning Set 3 Reasons For Christian Hope Chapters 5 & 6.
 To know and understand the Kalam Argument for the existence of God.  To evaluate the Kalam argument.
Give definitions Give an opinion and justify that opinion Explain religious attitudes Respond to a statement – 2 sides.
Claim, data, warrant.
Chapter 24: Persuasive Speaking
Introduction to Logic Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument By David Kelsey.
METHODS IN ANTHROPOLOGY SCIENCE AND INTERPRETATION.
Aquinas’ Proofs The five ways. Thomas Aquinas ( ) Joined Dominican order against the wishes of his family; led peripatetic existence thereafter.
The Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological Argument for God’s Existence
METHODS IN ANTHROPOLOGY
Debate: Claims.
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
The Problem of Evil.
Explore the use of inductive reasoning in the cosmological argument
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Kalam Cosmological Argument
Or Can you?.
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Philosophy of Religion Arguments for the existence of God
PERSUASIVE TEXTS.
Assess the weaknesses of the cosmological argument. (12 marks)
Assess the strengths of the cosmological argument. (12 marks)
Chapter 5: Inductive Generalizations
Argumentation.
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Responding to Religious Apologetics
Presentation transcript:

Arguments Arguments are lines of reasoning using propositions (claims or assertions) Arguments are lines of reasoning using propositions (claims or assertions) Propositions come in 3 forms: factual claims, opinions and ideas (including hypotheses and theories) Propositions come in 3 forms: factual claims, opinions and ideas (including hypotheses and theories) Premise/Conclusion structure Premise/Conclusion structure

Examples of Arguments You shouldn’t hit people, Johnny. Hitting hurts people, and it’s wrong to hurt people. You shouldn’t hit people, Johnny. Hitting hurts people, and it’s wrong to hurt people. My client was at the bar when the murder occurred. Several eyewitnesses have reported seeing him there, and his receipt indicates that he didn’t leave until after the murder occurred. Thus, he could not have committed the murder My client was at the bar when the murder occurred. Several eyewitnesses have reported seeing him there, and his receipt indicates that he didn’t leave until after the murder occurred. Thus, he could not have committed the murder If the Cubs want to start winning, they need to redesign their uniforms. This always seems to give teams a new, winning attitude. You know, kind of a break from the losing days of the past. If the Cubs want to start winning, they need to redesign their uniforms. This always seems to give teams a new, winning attitude. You know, kind of a break from the losing days of the past. Bill cheated on you once before; he’ll do it again. Men like that just don’t change. Bill cheated on you once before; he’ll do it again. Men like that just don’t change.

2 Key Distinctions Strong v. Persuasive arguments: Arguments are strong (or cogent) if they are well reasoned; arguments are persuasive if they succeed in convincing. Strong arguments are not necessarily persuasive; persuasive arguments are not necessarily strong. Strong v. Persuasive arguments: Arguments are strong (or cogent) if they are well reasoned; arguments are persuasive if they succeed in convincing. Strong arguments are not necessarily persuasive; persuasive arguments are not necessarily strong. Descriptions v. Inferences: Descriptions are reports; inferences are conclusions from or interpretations of those reports. Descriptions v. Inferences: Descriptions are reports; inferences are conclusions from or interpretations of those reports.

Assumptions Many arguments contain assumptions or missing premises—i.e., incomplete presentations of the argument. Many arguments contain assumptions or missing premises—i.e., incomplete presentations of the argument. Assumptions can be warranted or unwarranted Assumptions can be warranted or unwarranted

When are assumptions warranted? Readily available evidence Readily available evidence Factual claim shared with target audience Factual claim shared with target audience Value claim shared with target audience Value claim shared with target audience

When are assumptions unwarranted? Based on speculation Based on speculation Based on evidence not readily available Based on evidence not readily available Disagreement over factual matters Disagreement over factual matters Disagreement over value judgments Disagreement over value judgments

Some Examples It’s wrong to spank your children because it’s abusive. It’s wrong to spank your children because it’s abusive. We should put tighter restrictions on divorce. As Jesus told us, “What God has joined, let no man sunder”. We should put tighter restrictions on divorce. As Jesus told us, “What God has joined, let no man sunder”. Jim wouldn’t have developed lung cancer if he had quit smoking. Jim wouldn’t have developed lung cancer if he had quit smoking. It was wrong of us to go to war in Iraq, because it’s killing innocent people. It was wrong of us to go to war in Iraq, because it’s killing innocent people.

Types of Evidence I Speculation or Opinion Circumstantial Evidence Cause/Effect Reasoning All these are evaluated by abductive methods—by Inference to the Best Explanation

Types of Evidence II Testimony Evaluated by: observation interest interest background information background information personal characteristics personal characteristics cultural factors cultural factors expertise expertise

Types of Evidence III Factual claims Statistical data Evaluated by empirical observation and analysis

Types of Evidence IV Value claims (incl. taste, aesthetic judgment, moral judgment) Analogies (including Precedents) Conditional claims Evaluated by coherence, relevance and applicability

Multi-Step Arguments Some arguments have preliminary conclusions as steps toward a major conclusion Some arguments have preliminary conclusions as steps toward a major conclusion Some arguments provide evidential support for their premises Some arguments provide evidential support for their premises ^ These are called Lemmas

An Example: William Lane Craig’s Cosmological Argument P1: Everything that begins to exist has a cause P2: The Universe began to exist L1: Big Bang Cosmology L2: The logical impossibility of an actual infinite PC1: Therefore, the Universe began to exist P3: Nothing can cause itself to exist PC2: Therefore, something else caused the Universe to exist P4: The only plausible cause for the Universe is God L3: Because God is omnipotent and omniscient C: God caused the Universe to exist