8&q=von+willebrands+factor+clotting&um=1&ie=UTF- 8&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi&biw=987&bih=503 Von.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular mechanisms of long-term memory
Advertisements

Applications of optical tweezers in protein-protein interaction analysis Ran Yang.
1 Outline Basic Idea Simple Theory Design Points Calibration of Forces Selected Biological Applications.
Reaction Rates (Chapter 13)
Visible and IR Absorption Spectroscopy Andrew Rouff and Kyle Chau.
Cantilever sensor with “sample inside” Burg et al (Manalis lab) Weighing biomolecules…in fluid. Nature 446:1066 (2007) Basic mechanism of cantilever as.
Single Molecule Studies of DNA Mechanics with Optical Tweezers Mustafa Yorulmaz Koç University, Material Science and Engineering.
Certainty Equivalent and Stochastic Preferences June 2006 FUR 2006, Rome Pavlo Blavatskyy Wolfgang Köhler IEW, University of Zürich.
Optical Tweezers F scatt F grad 1. Velocity autocorrelation function from the Langevin model kinetic property property of equilibrium fluctuations For.
1 Oscillations oscillations_02 CP Ch 14 How can you determine the mass of a single E-coli bacterium or a DNA molecule ? CP458 Time variations that repeat.
Lecture 8: Measurement of Nanoscale forces II. What did we cover in the last lecture? The spring constant of an AFM cantilever is determined by its material.
In practice, optical tweezers are very expensive, custom-built instruments. These instruments usually start with a commercial optical microscope.
Class 7 FET, WGM and GMR based signal transduction
P = h/λ Slides from Yann Chemla— blame him if anything is wrong!
Announcements Mid-Term Test next Tuesday in class! (Oct. 7 th, 9:30-11am, Rm 136LLP) Will cover all of classes Lec 1-10 plus (qualitatively) on Lec 11–
Shaobin Guo 11/20/2012. various types of Single-molecule force spectroscopy Optical tweezers Magnetic tweezers Atomic force microscopy (AFM) Micro-needle.
Summary of single-molecule experiments Motor proteins:  Are uni-directional, and move along straight filaments  Exert 1-6 pN force  Typically go ~ 1.
Rates and reaction mechanism ► The reaction mechanism is the sequence of individual reaction steps that together complete the transformation of reactants.
Verification of the Crooks fluctuation theorem and recovery of RNA folding free energies D. Collin, F. Ritort, C. Jarzynski, S. B. Smith, I. Tinoco, Jr.
Class 10. Motor proteins that move along polymer tracks. Kinesin. Yildiz et al, Kinesin walks hand-over-hand. Science 303:676 (2004). Goals: Learn about.
Observation of RecBCD helicase/nuclease activity Bianco et al., Nature (2001) 409:
Blackbody Radiation: The light from a blackbody is light that comes solely from the object itself rather than being reflected from some other source. A.
Thermodynamic and kinetic characterization of proteins that destabilize duplex DNA by single molecule DNA stretching Prof. Mark C. Williams laboratory.
Bioen Lecture 24: Cell Adhesion
Towards DNA sequencing by force Josep Maria Huguet, Núria Forns, Fèlix Ritort Small Biosystems Lab, Facultat de Física, UB
Experimental Protein Folding Atomic Force Microscopy The precursor to AFM, called the Scanning Tunneling Microscope, won the Nobel Prize, Can see.
Copyright©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 1 Chemistry FIFTH EDITION by Steven S. Zumdahl University of Illinois.
Introduction and applications 1.Homework #3 will be assigned. 2.Quiz today 3.Bending & twisting rigidity of DNA with Magnetic Traps. “MT” Many slides came.
Cavity ring down spectroscopy 14 February 2012 CE 540.
What can we learn about dynamic triggering in the the lab? Lockner and Beeler, 1999.
Direct Observation of the Three-State Folding of a Single Protein Molecule Introduction: -E.Coli Ribonuclease H (Rnase H) -155 residue single-domain protein.
Single Ion Channels.
Introduction and applications 1.No HW assigned. 2.Quiz today 3.Bending & twisting rigidity of DNA with Magnetic Traps. “MT” MT is a single molecule biophysics.
Today’s Announcements 1.Next Tuesday: Diffusion (Why moving in a cell is like swimming in concrete.) 2. Homework assigned today Last graded Homework:
Introduction and applications Bending & twisting rigidity of DNA with Magnetic Traps. MT is a single molecule biophysics tools. As a s.m. technique, can.
Introduction & applications Part II 1.No HW assigned (HW assigned next Monday). 2.Quiz today 3.Bending & twisting rigidity of DNA with Magnetic Traps.
3.052 Nanomechanics of Materials and Biomaterials Prof. Christine Ortiz DMSE, RM Phone : (617) WWW :
Chapter 7 The electronic theory of metal Objectives At the end of this Chapter, you should: 1. Understand the physical meaning of Fermi statistical distribution.
Describing Reaction Rates Kinetics How fast does the reaction go? Reaction Rate : the change in the amount of reactant or product per unit time.
Volume 75, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Neutrophil-Bead Collision Assay: Pharmacologically Induced Changes in Membrane Mechanics Regulate the PSGL-1/P-Selectin Adhesion Lifetime  K.E. Edmondson,
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
What could these tough materials have in common?
What could these tough materials have in common?
Jen Chao Presentation November 20, 2008
F. Benedetti, C. Micheletti, G. Bussi, S.K. Sekatskii, G. Dietler 
Mechanically Probing the Folding Pathway of Single RNA Molecules
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
J. Christof M. Gebhardt, Zeynep Ökten, Matthias Rief 
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 100, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Ambarish Kunwar, Michael Vershinin, Jing Xu, Steven P. Gross 
Discovery Through the Computational Microscope
Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Probing the Energy Landscape of the Membrane Protein Bacteriorhodopsin
B-S Transition in Short Oligonucleotides
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e4 (January 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Michael Schlierf, Felix Berkemeier, Matthias Rief  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 104, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
Jing Chen, John Neu, Makoto Miyata, George Oster  Biophysical Journal 
Christina Karatzaferi, Marc K. Chinn, Roger Cooke  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 99, Issue 9, Pages (November 2010)
Marco Capitanio, Francesco S. Pavone  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

8&q=von+willebrands+factor+clotting&um=1&ie=UTF- 8&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi&biw=987&bih=503 Von Willebrands Factor = protein involved in blood clotting, forms large multimers, binds platelets and vessel wall, subject to large shear forces. How does force affect its interactions?

Novel experimental set-up to study effect of force on interaction between A1 and GPIb 

Experimental readout of force at which domains separate Note they are watching individual molecules they can repeatedly test the same molecule unbinding and rebinding forces are stochastic

Some technical details How long is linker? 43 amino acids,  16nm fully extended Has to be long enough to see rupture Why use DNA “handles”? To keep proteins off surfaces, separate laser trapped bead from rest of assembly, apply force at single point How to attach proteins to DNA? via S-S bonds with extra unique cys in protein and SH in synthetic DNA

How does the laser trap work? Idea: refraction changes direction (momentum) of light Since momentum is conserved, bead’s momentum changes by –  p F = -d  p/dt, mainly directed toward most intense part of beam pp for more detailed explanation of trap set-up used here Watch videos at orhttp://tweezerslab.unipr.it

Optics – counterpropagating laser traps beam position force Infer bead position from force, knowing stiffness, x=F/k

Relation between force and  extension  x = length of “open” A1-linker-GPIb  + DNA - length of A1-GPIb  complex + DNA DNA length should be constant at given F If A1 and GPIb  domains don’t stretch,  x due to extension of flexible aa linker and rot. of A1, GPIb  Bin data by force, show mean and variance of  x at rupture or rebinding Results c/w expected stretch in linker w/force, hence, c/w single tether

How does loading rate, F(t), affect d n of unbinding forces? E pulling direction x EE Rate of escape at F=0  e -  E/kT For constant pulling force F, energy barrier decreases by F  x, so rate  e -(  E-F  x)/kT => av. lifetime = e -F(  x/kT) = e -F  xx analysis to determine relationship between probability of unbinding at force f for a given F(t) and the average lifetime at constant force,  (F), which should depend exp’lly on F If F changes with time, F(t), d n of unbinding forces changes, and need careful

Dudko-Hummer-Szabo provide this analysis (PNAS 105:15755 (2008)) Relation between p(f) given F(t) and  (F) is: If data grouped into force bins of size  F; h i = p(rupture in i th force bin); in k th bin, F = F 0 +(k-1/2)  F evaluated at F=F 0 +(k-1/2)  F =

calculated Obs. p(f) Kim et al observe p(f) at different loading rates, find bimodal distributions at intermediate loading rates, then calculate for each peak according to D-H-S k 1(or2),off =    extrapolated to F=0

2 Note ln  (F)  F for each peak as in simple theory Their interpretation: 2 different bound states, each with its own exp’l dependence on F (slope  /kT) and predicted zero force unbinding rate k 1,off, k 2,off 1/k 2,off 1/k 1,off

Repeat expts at constant pulling F close to value at which bound/unbound states are equally likely, watch transitions back and forth B UB From these data calculate prob. of staying in bound state for time t

Two exponentials at intermediate forces, c/w 2 bound states with different unbinding rates (that are fns of F) straight line => p survival  e -kt ; k = rate of unbinding exp’l survival prob. expected for process with single random event (like radioactive decay)

Their model: 2 bound states interconvert at (force- dependent) rates k 12 and k 21 estimated from data Note both bonds are weakened by force (  >0, “slip” rather than “catch”) but conversion to bond with lower k off and smaller  -> tighter binding at high shear (“flex” bond)

Ristocetin (antibiotic) and botrocetin (snake venom toxin) are drugs known to affect vWF They promoted conversion to state 2 and decreased response to force (  )

Main points Novel set-up to repeatedly measure interaction between 2 protein domains in single protein as function of force Nice “corroboration” of D-H-S theory that relates unbinding force distributions at different loading rates to lifetimes at constant force, with complication that… Their system had bimodal unbinding force distributions at some loading rates. This suggests protein complex exists in 2 different states, each state behaving as expected for simple model with ln(  F  )  F  /kT, but different sensitivities (  ’s) for the 2 states

The 2 bound-state model is biologically interesting since it leads to a more graded response to force loading for an interaction naturally subject to comparable forces Will it turn out that many protein interactions have alter- native binding states? Single-molecule pulling experiments reveal complexities of protein interactions that would be hard to see in bulk assays Compared to AFM, newer pulling methods allow study in lower force regime (pN vs nN), and away from surfaces which can -> artifacts

Relevance to nanotechnology in other areas methods to detect forces  10pN distance changes  10nm ways to relate rupture-force distributions at different pulling rates to lifetimes at constant force ? interest from ME point of view – combining 2 “slip” bonds with different force sensitivities can mimic “catch” bond (increase in F -> sudden increase in bond strength)