Page 1 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Apertures LSS6 l Position MKQA l Vacuum chamber between Q4 and TCDS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transparent Re-alignment of the Diamond Storage Ring M. Apollonio – Diamond Light Source Ltd ESLS – XXII Workshop, ESRF Grenoble, November 25 th /11/2014M.
Advertisements

Energy deposition in Q0 Elena Wildner 19/04/07. Strategy 1. Define a TAS to protect the Q0 2. Optics:  *= 0.25m 3. Calculate, with some optimization.
1 Commissioning ABT Equipment in the LHC Jan Uythoven ABT TCM 13/01/2015.
Short bunches in SPEAR J. Safranek for the SPEAR3 accelerator group November 2, 20101J. Safranek CLS THz Workshop.
LHC 18 & 19 April 2015 At 450 GeV with bumps, no increased MUFO activity. Beam screen 15R8 warming up to 80 K, ongoing for the day 09:00: Orbit studies.
MERIT Beam Collimator Design Nicholas Olesen 9 August 2006.
Effects of wake fields in ATF2 low aperture kicker and IP nano-BPMs Karl Bane April 19, 2005.
1 August 12, 2005 Running 2mrad IR in e-e- mode: BDS constraints A.Seryi August 12, 2005.
The ATS MD part III (Achromatic Telescopic Squeezing scheme) Participants: Any (active) volunteers Goal: 1)MD1 (S. Fartoukh & R. Assmann  10h): “Pre-squeeze’’
PSB h- injection Layout issues –Are 3 or 4 KSW needed –Geometry of the injection –Element lengths and locations Element performance specifications H 0.
March A. Chancé, J. Payet DAPNIA/SACM / Beta-beam ECFA/BENE Workshop The Decay Ring -First Design- A. Chancé, J.Payet CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Few slides from J. Fox’ talk in last November’s LARP meeting LARP CM
Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3 Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology.
1 LBDS Testing Before Operation Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Based on the work of many people in the KSL, EC and TL sections.
INVESTIGATING THE FEASIBILITY OF A TRAVELLING-WAVE CHOPPER FOR THE CLEAN SEPARATION OF 10 MHZ BUNCHES - AT HIE-ISOLDE Abhisek Mukhopadhyay.
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
Considerations on laser-p+ beam merging for CB, BG, PM.
Sketching Basic Kicker System Parameters W. Bartmann, T. Fowler, B. Goddard, T. Kramer.
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
18 July Reminder Dilution kicker system MKB is staged (2H, 2V) –Limits extracted intensity at 7 TeV to 50% of nominal –For 25ns spacing, this is.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
Primary beam production: progress - Extraction from LSS2 - Switching from TT20 at 100 GeV B.Goddard F.Velotti, A.Parfenova, R.Steerenberg, K.Cornelis,
1 Sector Test – Preparation Layout in LSS7 Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Thanks to Mike Lamont and the other ‘sector testers’
Orbit related issues of the spin tune control at RHIC V.Ptitsyn, M.Bai, W.MacKay, T.Roser.
Review on shorter PSB main bending magnets Injection layout with short magnets Advantages & Disadvantages Wim Weterings
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Impact of Errors and Damping Wigglers on the Lattice W. Guo 02/26/2009 NSLS-II ASAC Meeting Acknowledgement: M. Borland.
LHC beam dump, injection system and other kickers B.Goddard, with input from L.Ducimetière, W.Bartmann, V.Mertens, J.Borburgh, M.Barnes, C.Bracco, V.Senaj,
SPS DAY Aperture History 01/19/2016 Stéphane Cettour Cavé.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Issues Concerning Different Beam Lines Integration C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements: WP3 and.
Some ideas to optimise PSB injection chicane Wim, Brennan, Jan, Masamitsu.
Optimization of beam envelop at the injection point of PS Chenghui Yu Jan. 30, 2012.
CLIC Permanent Magnet Quadrupole update 27 th January 2011 Mechanical Engineering status update N. Collomb1.
1 Transport calculations for beam line 4N Marco Schippers, Aug 24, 2007 Transport plots have been made with Urs Rohrer ‘s transport (PSI) Mind that above.
Status and plan of Beta-matching in Extraction line Kiyoshi Kubo.
HL-LHC WP14 2 nd meeting: Intercepting devices and failure cases to be studied Anton Lechner, Jan Uythoven.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
April 17, Dejan TrbojevicFFAG07 -Non-Scaling FFAG gantries1 Non-Scaling FFAG Gantries Introduction: Motives: The most challenging problem in the carbon/proton.
Investigation of Injection Schemes for SLS 2.0
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
HWR, SSR1 and SSR2 transverse kick summary Paolo Berrutti, Vyacheslav Yakovlev.
1 April 1 st, 2003 O. Napoly, ECFA-DESY Amsterdam Design of a new Final Focus System with l* = 4,5 m J. Payet, O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Baseline Injection/Extraction Configuration Aimin Xiao and Louis Emery, September 12th 2006.
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
C. Bracco, R. Bruce, B. Goddard, C. Wiesner, A. Lechner, M. Frankl
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
Alignment and beam-based correction
Dependability Requirements of the LBDS and their Design Implications
The LHC Beam Dumping System
Beam Dynamics in Curved ILC Main Linac (following earth curvature)
IR Detector - Test cryostat : Machining
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance? -2
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
Proposal for a Transparent Off-Axis Injection Scheme for BESSY II
Beam Injection and Extraction Scheme
Magnetic gap calculation
Fast Kicker R&D at ATF T.Naito(KEK) TILC09 18/April/ /11/27.
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
MERIT Beam Collimator Design
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Proposal for quadrupole families
15/12/2009 Vacuum interlock in sector 78 understood  out-gassing of a Penning gauge ignited as a result of ionization or dust arcing In conclusion: NO.
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
ILC Beam Switchyard: Issues and Plans
Presentation transcript:

page 1 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Apertures LSS6 l Position MKQA l Vacuum chamber between Q4 and TCDS

page 2 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Position of MKQA magnet l Position as presented in special meeting on 24 April is not valid »Additional kick to extracted beam by Q4 was not taken into account l Possible positions are given assuming: »MKD vacuum chamber D = 57 mm, alignment  0.5 mm »Closed orbit 4 mm »Includes beta beating, tune adjustment, residual dispersion etc. »Stored beam n1 = 7; na = 1.22; nr = 1.4 »Extracted beam n1 = 6.5 (no halo) »Extracted beam MKD kick = 110 % * mrad

page 3 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Apertures MKQA Just o.k. about 13.5 m right of exit Q4

page 4 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 At 7 m from Q4, stored beam is too large

page 5 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 At 15 m from Q4 to extracted beam hits the vacuum chamber

page 6 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Apertures MKQA stored extracted MKD entrance n1 = 6.7 MKD exit: n1 = 6.9 For chamber of D = 57 mm, on axis two options: Right of Q4 between 12.7 m and 14.0 m relative to exit of Q4 Left of Q4, more than 46 m relative to exit of Q4 (right) Displacing the chamber off-axis makes things worse Exit right Q4L

page 7 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Or more than 46 m left of Q4

page 8 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 One possibility Disadvantages: Radioactive environment just after the TCS Very tight apertures At distance of 13.5 m: beta-x = 187 m ; beta-y = 557 m With D = 58 mm and 1 mm off- set can swap MKQA and TCS

page 9 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Disadvantages: * Place available in UA / cable length * Different beta-functions than originally foreseen at –47 m: beta-x = 512 m, beta-y = 162 m * Integration to be checked Other option of MKQA position > 46 m Much better from radiation point of view; can also be better for aperture! But …

page 10 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Or put MKQA on the other beam, in front of Q5 Instead of position > 46 m Q4 L, can put > 382 m to the right, is about 3 m right of Q5 At 382 m from Q4, beta-x = m, beta-y = m Is as putting it at the same position, but on the other beam !

page 11 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Check: Two beams give very similar results

page 12 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Vacuum chamber between Q4 and TCDS l Aperture calculations made assuming:: »Closed orbit 4 mm, alignment  0.5 mm »Additional  5 mm for vacuum chamber alignment (if possible) »Includes beta beating, tune adjustment, residual dispersion etc. »Stored beam n1 = 7; na = 1.22; nr = 1.4 »Extracted beam n1 = 6.5 (no halo) »Extracted beam MKD kick = 110 % * mrad

page 13 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Proposed solution First bit l First 70 m: »Chamber with diameter of 100 mm »Assumption as given above:  9.5 mm total for alignment »5 mm off-set of centre of chamber »CHECH IF MKB SUPPORT PASSES Extracted beam o.k. up to 73.3 m Stored beam n1 >> 7

page 14 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Picture at 70 m from Q4

page 15 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Between 70 m and 124 m from exit Q4 l Same chamber D = 100 mm, but 25 mm off-set l Still 9.5 mm total in alignment tolerance Extracted o.k. up to m Stored o.k. from 67 m onwards

page 16 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Between 124 m and entrance TCDS at m l Same chamber but alignment tolerance tighter:  4  0.5  2 mm. Needs additional support. o.k. up to 133 m

page 17 Jan Uythoven AB/BT, LBDS meeting 18 May 2004 Entrance TCDS At = m Closed orbit:  4 mm Alignment:  0.5 mm 110 % MKD kick exterior 100 % MKD kick interior Chamber just in front of TCDS