RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS: A COBEC WORKSHOP JANUARY 29, 2014 GUY FROST VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY RDA Toolkit, Basic Cataloging.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future of Cataloging RDA and other innovations Pt. 2.
Advertisements

RDA Test Train the Trainer Module 2: Structure [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Serials/Integrating Resources Charlene Chou March 18 th,
Christee Pascale, Associate Head, Metadata & Catloging Jacquie Samples, Continuing & Electronic Resources Librarian North Carolina State University Libraries.
MARC 21, FRBR, RDA Review terminology (especially for non-native English speakers) Conceptual models Elements Attributes Future: Probably not a bib record,
MARC 101 for Non-Catalogers Colorado Horizon Users Group Meeting Philip S. Miller Library Castle Rock, CO May 29, 2007.
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Kathryn Lybarger January 17, 2013 Third Thursday.
Identifying Manifestations and Items 1 James/Kuhagen for VLA -- Feb. 5, 2013 “Heads up:” Several of the instructions being discussed today were revised.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
RDA MAJOR DIFFERENCES FROM AACR2 March, 21, 2015 Hotel Pullman Surabaya.
Using the RDA Toolkit KATHRYN LYBARGER UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY RDA CAMP 2013 PRELIMINARY SESSION.
Titles Title Statement and Variant Titles. Title Statement – MARC tag 245 Identifies the resource, including the title proper, other titles, numbering,
Module 17 Describing Serials and Integrating Resources RDA Training University of Nevada, Reno February 2013.
LC reference staff briefing Nov. 30, 2010 Judy Kuhagen Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Joy Anhalt Richard Stewart Reaching Forward May 6, 2011.
5: Describing Carriers and Content 1.Content type 2.Media type 3.Carrier type 4.Extent 5.Describing content 6.Other content attributes 5-1.
Books and Ebooks in RDA Kathryn Lybarger RDA Camp 2013.
RDA, FRBR & MARC RDA Cataloguing Seminars September 2012.
RDA for Print Materials 5 June 2013 Vicki Sipe. Resource Description and Access Timeline Tested and analyzed during Implemented March 31, 2013.
Module C: Identifying expressions User task: identify.
RDA - MARC Name: Huldah Raubenheimer Job Title: Cataloguer: University of the Free State Tel:
7: Basics of RDA Relationships for Serials Relationships in RDA Relationship designators Creators and other corporate bodies related to works Corporate.
Cataloging Electronic Resources using RDA. Direct Access Resources CD-ROMs.
Continuing Resources: Serials RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS: A COBEC WORKSHOP FEBRUARY 3, 2014 GUY FROST VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Descriptive Cataloging with RDA
Booth 917 ALA Booth 917 RDA Conversion Service. Booth 917 ALA Booth 917 What is Resource Description and Access? RDA is the standard for cataloging that.
Module 5 Key differences from AACR2 Recording Data Adapted from: Teaching RDA: Train-the-trainer course RDA: Resource description and access presented.
Based on an earlier presentation made at the BCLA Annual Conference in 2010 Prepared for Pan-Canadian RDA Training by: Linda Woodcock, Technical Services.
Structure AACR2 Part I - Description Part II - Headings, Uniform titles, References RDA Attributes (of entities) Relationships (between entities)
RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS: A COBEC WORKSHOP PRECONFERENCE JANUARY 30, 2014 GUY FROST VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY Monographs Part.
RDA Copy Cataloging Training East Carolina University August 29, 2013.
CONSER RDA Bridge Training [date] Presenters : [names] 1.
RDA Toolkit With thanks to Lori Robare (University of Oregon) and Robert Maxwell (Brigham Young University) for most of these slides.
Module 8 Series in AACR2 and RDA: What’s the same? What’s different?
Module 8: Changes to RDA LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, in general and for serials.
From AACR2 to RDA: An Evolution Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
RDA Toolkit is an integrated, browser-based, online product that allow user to interact with a collection of cataloging-related documents and resources.
Cataloguing integrating resources with RDA OLA Preconference workshop, January 29, 2014 Emma Cross Cataloguing Librarian, Carleton University Library.
Carrier Description & Illustrative Content Part 2 Descriptive Cataloging with RDA Illustrative Content (continued)
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
Recording Identifiers for Manifestations Descriptive Cataloging with RDA core element.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA and Special Libraries Chris Todd, Janess Stewart & Jenny McDonald.
RDA, the Next Phase Joy Anhalt Marjorie Bloss Richard Stewart.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
Based on an earlier presentation made at the BCLA Annual Conference in 2010 Prepared for Pan-Canadian RDA Training by: Linda Woodcock, Technical Services.
Carrier Description & Illustrative Content Part 2 Descriptive Cataloging with RDA Illustrative Content (continued)
Description of Bibliographic Items. Review Encoding = Markup. The library cataloging “markup” language is MARC. Unlike HTML, MARC tags have meaning (i.e.,
AACR2 versus RDA Presentation given at the CLA Pre-Conference Session From Rules to Entities: Cataloguing with RDA May 29, 2009 by Tom Delsey.
AACR 2 –Rules for Descriptive Cataloguing
Module 4 Key differences from AACR2 Structure This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License
RDA Training University of Nevada, Las Vegas May2013 Module 3 RDA Basics Using the RDA Toolkit.
Jeanne Piascik Principal Cataloger University of Central Florida Technical Services Member Group FLA 2014 Annual Conference.
Strengthening Hybrid RDA/AACR2 Bibliographic Records La Donna Riddle Weber – November 2015.
Book Cataloging with RDA. RDA Instructions & Guidelines General things: – Core elements (required) – Alternative guidelines and instructions – Optional.
6/10/2016 Cataloging ETDs in RDA USETDA Conference September 24-26, 2014 Sevim McCutcheon Catalog Librarian; Associate Professor Kent State University,
Key differences from AACR2 Structure 1. Learning Outcomes Understand similarities between RDA and AACR2 Understand the structural differences between.
Queensland University of Technology FIT School of Information Systems MM 1 CRICOS No J Bibliographic description Objectives –Comments.
Why RDA? What’s the point? OCLC Cookbook finder: html
RDA for Law Catalogers Serials and Integrating Resources Melissa Beck UCLA Law Library.
RDA Resource Description and Access : a brief overview of the new bibliographic cataloging standard Billy Chi-hing Kwan Assistant Library Director Philadelphia.
THERE WENT THE NEIGHBORHOOD
Recording Identifiers for Manifestations
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Presentation transcript:

RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS: A COBEC WORKSHOP JANUARY 29, 2014 GUY FROST VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY RDA Toolkit, Basic Cataloging Monographs

New Definitions and Terminology Authorized Access Point (AAP) – replaces main entry, added entry Instructions – replaces rules WEMI (Work Expression Manifestation Item) – entity relationship model in which RDA is based and Toolkit is organized Transcribe and Record – terms used to indicate when to “take what you see” or record following the guidelines Examples generally lack ISBD punctuation (RDA 0.10)  e.g., ed. -- the period is part of the abbreviation, not ending punctuation, in MARC, ed..

Attributes and Relationships Section 0: Introduces RDA  Provides generic/basic list of Core Sections 1-4 Covers the Attributes outlined in FRBR and FRAD Sections 5-10 Covers the Relationships outlined in FRBR and FRAD Appendices A-L Provide additional guidelines  Abbreviations, Capitalization, Relator terms, etc.

Major Change from AACR2R and RDA  RDA embraces the “principle of representation” (take what you see)  Instructions are for recording data for all formats and not partitioned out into separate chapters like AACR2  Can’t always think in terms of maps, scores, CDs, etc. Must think in WEMI terms to use RDA to its fullest  Recording of Relationships between resources exploited

Levels of Description RDA provides for three levels of Description  Comprehensive  Describes the resource as a whole (e.g., a single volume, a multivolume resource, score with parts, a CD, a DVD, a serial … essentially everything that is typically cataloged)  Analytical  Describing a single part of a resources (e.g., a filmstrip in a kit cataloged separately)  Hierarchical  Combination of the two (cataloging a chapter within a book as well as the book, cataloging a multivolume set as well as each volume separately) (N.B.: LC does not follow this practice)

RDA Section 1: Recording Attributes of Manifestations & Items Made up to 4 chapters  Provides the foundation for achieving FISO as part of FRBR  Chapter 1 General Guidelines  RDA Core, Language and Script, Transcription, Inaccuracies, etc.  Chapter 2 Identifying Manifestations and Items  Descriptive information (title, edition, publisher, series, etc.)  Chapter 3 Describing Carriers  Extent (e.g., pages), font size, etc.  Chapter 4. Acquisitions and Access  Restrictions on a resource, Terms of availability, etc.

Transcription v. Recording In almost all instances, Section 2 Descriptive data is transcribed. However, RDA does allow for some exceptions. In these cases, the initial instructions state to record the information. Ex.: New York : Frederick A. Stokes Company : MCMXXVII RDA 1.8 Numbers Expressed as Numerals or as Words provides general guidelines, or where in the instructions to go to deal with various data attributes

Roman Numerals, cont. New York : Frederick A. Stokes Company : MCMXXVII Form of Numerals Record in the form preferred by the agency 264;_1; $a …, $c [1927] Alternative [1] Record as found (LC’s practice) 264;_1; $a …, $c MCMXXVII Alternative [2] Record as found and as agency prefers 264;_1; $a …, $c MCMXXVII [1927]

020;__; $a 2.15 (R) 245;__; $a 2.3 (T) / $c 2.4 (T) 250;__; $a 2.5 (T)/ $b (T) 264;_1; $a (T) : $b (T), $c (R) 264;_2; $a : $b 2.9.4, $c (if no 264;_1) 264;_3; $a : $b , $c (if no 264;_1 or 264;_2) 264;_4; $c 2.11 (if no 264;_1; $c) (R) 300;__; $a 3.4 (R) 336;__; $a 6.9 (P) 337;__; $a (P) 338;__; $a 3.3 (P) 490;__; $a 2.12 (T) ; $v (R) $a (T) ; $v (R) In short …

ISBD (aka, the punctuation) 245;__; $a : $b / $c. 246;__; $a : $b 250;__; $a / $b. 264;_0-3; $a : $b, $c. 264;_4; $a 300;__; $a : $b ; $c. 490;__; $a ; $v 500;__; $a. 504;__; $a. 505;__; $ title / author -- title / author --. 6xx;__; $a. 7xx;__; $a. 856;__; $a

245 - Titles Source of Information expanded in RDA to include the entire resource  Removes the need to put information in square brackets when found anywhere on the resource  RDA details the Preferred Order of Sources on the resource Exercise: Find the exercise titled: RDA TOOLKIT: PREFERRED SOURCE OF INFORMATION. Using RDA Toolkit, Navigate through the Browse Tree to answer the questions on the exercise

250 – Edition Statement Preferred source: Same source as title proper Transcribe edition statement as found 250;__; $a Second edition. 250;__; $a 4th ed.. 250;__; $a First American Edition.

264 v. 260 Field 260 Publication Statement is being phased out and replaced with field allows for the recording of: Production – 264;_0; $a Publication – 264;_1; $a Distribution – 264;_2; $a Manufacture – 264;_3; $a Copyright – 264;_4; $c (only)

264 – Publication/Copyright Preferred Source:  Publisher name ($b) = same as title proper  Place of Publication ($a) = Same as Publisher’s Name  Date of Publication ($c) = Same as title Proper  Copyright date ($c) = Anywhere 264;_1; $a New York : $b Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc., $c 2011.

264 More on Publication/Copyright Date Many resources only provide Copyright date Instructions says “Copyright date is a core element if neither the date of publication nor the date of distribution is identified.” - Here, the 264 $c would have [date of publication not identified] (or distribution). But if you can infer the date from the copyright: DtSt: s Dates: ;_1; $a … : $b …, $c [2008] Copyright date is NOT required if you infer a date from the copyright date, or somewhere else in the resource (e.g., preface, colophon, etc.). See LC-PCC PS for clarification

300 Physical Description Most abbreviations changed to spelled out terms p. becomes pagesill. or illus. becomes illustrations col. Becomes colorl. becomes leaves Exceptions:  cm, mm (no periods), but in. [4] p. of plates becomes 4 unnumbered pages of plates

490 – Series Statement The Series Statement is a transcribed field The Series numbering is recorded for the same reason mentioned with date of publication Ex. 490;1_; $a Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society ; $v volume 225, number 1056 (first of 4 numbers) (September 2013)

504 – Bibliographical References and Index Labeled “Supplementary Content” in RDA (7.16) and a Core element for LC  Used when a resource has a bibliography, discography, or filmography that is substantial or deemed important to cataloger and user (identify and select) 504;__; $a Includes bibliographic references. 504;__; $a Includes bibliographic references and index. 504;__; $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 34-48) and index. but, 500;__; $a Includes index. (when resource lacks bibliographical references)

Other Notes There are a myriad of notes (general and specific) that could be included in the 5XX fields.  Key considerations  will it help in the identification and selection of the resource?  Is there local information that would be beneficial to users (e.g., signed by author, missing pages, book has won an award, intended audience, language of resource, etc.)  Many have their own 5xx field 586;__; $a Pulitzer Prize, 1996.

336,337,338 (Content, Media, Carrier) The new fields that replaces $h [GMD] of the 245 field. RDA only requires 336 and 338, but the 337 is core for LC LC only records $a and omits the $b code form A simple Book 336;__; $a text $2 rdacontent (RDA 6.9) 337;__; $a unmediated $2 rdamedia (RDA 3.2) 338;__; $a volume $2 rdacarrier (RDA 3.3)

336,337,338 (Content, Media, Carrier), Cont. All Fields are repeatable For example: Book that is chiefly illustrations 336;__; $a still image $2 rdacontent 336;__; $a text $2 rdacontent 337;__; $a unmediated $2 rdamedia 338;__; $a volume $2 rdacarrier Another example: Book with accompanying CD 336;__; $a text $2 rdacontent $3 text 336;__; $a text $2 rdacontent $3 CD-ROM 337;__; $a unmediated $2 rdamedia $3 text 337;__; $a computer $2 rdamedia $3 CD-ROM 338;__; $a volume $2 rdacarrier $3 text 338;__; $a computer disc $2 rdacarrier $3 CD-ROM

The RDA Suite There are three areas that need to be recorded to make an RDA record Desc.: i 040;__; $a … $b eng $e rda $c … 336;__; $a … $2 rdacontent 337;__; $a … $2 rdamedia 338;__; $a … $2 rdacarrier

Other Significant Changes Errors in title, etc. are recorded as is, [sic] no longer used  Add the correct form in a 246 for titles, add a 500 note  Add a 500 note in all other instances Jr., Sr., etc. now considered part of the persons name and Authorized Access Points (AAP) will include them now Fictitious characters now authors (100 field) Dept. no longer abbreviated; now spelled out in all AAP (1XX, 6XX, 7XX, and 8XX fields); for descriptive fields (e.g., 264) use what is on the item being cataloged Square brackets required only if information comes from outside the source  When square brackets are used, each subfield is bracketed separately 264;_1; $a [New York] : $b [Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.], $c [2011]

020 – Coming 2014 Changes Subfield added to separate descriptive information from actual ISBN number Current practice: 020;__; $a (hbk) Practice sometime in 2014: 020;__; $a $q hbk 020;__; $a $q hardback

250 – Coming 2014 Changes Field becomes repeatable after OCLC upgrade 250;__; $a Revised, corrected, and expanded edition containing all the published poetry. 250:__; $a Centennial edition. Resources has both of these edition statements Materials Specified subfield added ($3) 250;__; $3 CD-ROM: $a First edition. Not implemented in OCLC yet; expected 2nd qtr of 2014

Duplicate Coding In the MARC record there are two types of data: coded (machine actionable) and plain text (keyword searchable).  Many fields in the description will also have a coded counterpart in the Fixed Field (008) or other fields (e.g., 3XX) Examples: 264;_1; $a … $c [2008] = DtSt: s Dates: ;__; $a Bibliographic references = Cont.: b and index = Indx: 1 300;__; $a … $b illustrations, maps, photographs, etc. = Ills: abo_, etc.

Duplicate Coding Cont. With the coming of RDA, some of the machine actionable data is not in coded form but semantic in nature Example: 300;__; $a … $b digital, stereo 344;__; $a digital $g stereo $2 rda The 344 is intended to be machine actionable, the 300 eye readable to a patron In short, don’t be afraid to record something twice even though it may look and seem, redundant, they have different functions

In Class Exercises A reforming people Breed your own Vegetable varieties Residential landscape architecture After the dream