Teacher Working Conditions are Student Learning Conditions Eric Hirsch New Teacher Center at the University of California at Santa Cruz ECS Annual Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

The Role of the Principal Going Forward. What Leon School District is Required to Do Florida Department of Educations Supports that might impact you What.
What is Pay & Performance?
Ib Ia Teachers lead in their classroom. Take responsibility for all students’ learning Communicate vision to students Use data to organize, plan, and set.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
The Principal and Assistant Principal Evaluation Process: Integrating the Teacher Working Conditions Survey.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT March 19, 2015.
Session 2.3: Skills for Supportive Supervision
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14.
Becoming a High Impact Board Susan Salter Director of Board Development Alabama Association of School Boards.
Margaretville Central Superintendent’s Goals.
School Improvement Plan Results & Next Steps December, 2009 Central Elementary School Home of the Eagles.
TELL Colorado Post-Survey Webinar Andrew Sioberg New Teacher Center.
Angelina SaloomAmy Bobak Angelina SaloomAmy Bobak Kimberly Carthy-Pierre Tina Pavy.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Ways to Utilize the 2012 FCPS Working Conditions Survey April 11, 12, 13 Laurie Fracolli, Sid Haro, and Andrew Sioberg.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
Richfield Elementary School Improvement Plan Amber Lawrence, Chairperson Brian K. Barrett, Principal.
Cross State Analyses of Results TELL Survey. New Teacher Center (NTC) worked collaboratively with 11 state coalitions—including governors,
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Roles and Responsibilities of School Principals
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
Superintendent Goals Update. District Level Leadership Research McRel Internationally recognized private, non-profit organization in Denver,
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Collaborative Closing the Gap Action Plans: School Counselors, School Social Workers and School Psychologists Working to Close the Gaps.
Technology Leadership
Educator Preparation, Retention, and Effectiveness Ed Fuller University Council for Educational Administration and The University of Texas at Austin February.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
January 31, 2014 Data Use Information and Guide. Copyright © 2014 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Oregon” ? TELL Oregon is an anonymous.
TELL ACPS Preliminary Findings Teaching, Empowering, Leading & Learning TELL ACPS Preliminary Findings Teaching, Empowering, Leading & Learning Alexandria.
 Center for Innovative Leadership Development  Leadership Group of the Carolinas  Leadership Conferences  Expanding Graduate Programs  Doctoral Cohorts.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
The Common Core State Standards Initiative Alisa Chapman, University of North Carolina October 24, 2013.
Running Creek Elementary School School Improvement Plan Damon L. Rhodes, Principal Mandy Dry, SIT Chair.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
What It Takes to Leave No Child Behind: The Role of School Boards in Closing the Achievement Gap Pedro A. Noguera, Ph.D. Stienhardt School of Education.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
RESEARCH BINGO!. Compared to teachers in a flexible block schedule, teachers in a traditional, fixed-period schedule are more likely to implement a variety.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Governor Easley’s Teacher Working Conditions Initiative Presentation by Eric Hirsch, Director of Special Projects, New Teacher Center UNC-Wilmington -
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Amy Bobak Angelina Saloom Kimberly Carthy-Pierre Tina Pavy.
TELL Kentucky 2015 Preliminary Results June 3, 2015 Ann Maddock New Teacher Center Teaching, Empowering, Leading and Learning.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Framework for Effective Technology Use Presented By Carolyn Walsh and David Schaeffler.
Cross State Analyses of Results TELL Survey. New Teacher Center (NTC) worked collaboratively with 11 state coalitions—including governors,
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Kentucky Board of Education Final Results-2015 Teaching, Empowering, Leading and Learning (TELL) Survey June 8, 2016 Ann Maddock Senior Policy Advisor.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Alexandria City Public Schools Preliminary Results of the 2016 Teaching, Empowering, Leading, and Learning (TELL) Survey. Dawn Shephard Associate Director, Teaching,
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
TELL Survey Background
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Working Conditions are Student Learning Conditions Eric Hirsch New Teacher Center at the University of California at Santa Cruz ECS Annual Meeting July 12, 2007

Source: Richard M. Ingersoll, Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (Fall 2001): Reasons for Teacher Dissatisfaction

Full population survey of every educator in order to gather school data as each is unique in their issues as well as in investments and commitment toward improvement Online survey with individual access codes to ensure valid process with backing of broad coalition About 30 core questions asked identically across all states to allow for cross-state analyses Data put up on the web and public to educators, the community and policymakers (varies by location) Gathering Customized Data to Understand Schools

Kansas – 53% response rate statewide with over 21,000 educators and data available for about 1,000 schools Mississippi – 67% response rate statewide with data from more than 25,000 educators Nevada – 49% response rate for Clark County (over 8,000 educators) done annually as part of CCSD/CCEA interest-based agreement. Similar response rate in 2007 Ohio – pilot in 2005 and voluntary survey in 2006 and Data from 2007 for over 15,000 (44% response rate) educators in 310 schools across 65 districts Arizona – 70% response rate in 7,500 educator phase-in 2006 and 53% response rate with more than 32,000 educators statewide in 2007 North Carolina – 66% response rate statewide with over 75,000 educators and data for 1,985 of 2,200 schools. Survey conducted in 2002 (38% response rate) and 2004 (38% response rate) More than 250,000 respondents to the survey in the past 3 years Surveys in 2006 and 2007

Teacher Working Conditions are Student Learning Conditions

Teachers on Which Working Condition is Most Necessary to Improve Student Learning

“If I am allowed to utilize my teaching expertise—to draw from what I know will engage and stimulate my students—then students will achieve at levels no one could dream of. If I am hampered…then I can’t do what I do best.” - Teacher, Published in Threshold Magazine article on teacher working conditions

Domain/Question (percent that agree or strongly agree) Lowest Quartile 2 nd Quartile 3 rd Quartile Highest Quartile Difference Between Highest and Lowest The school environment is safe 73.5%83.6%88.5%91.9%18.4% There is an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect 54.6%62.0%66.0%71.8%17.2% School leadership shields teachers from interruptions 52.8%57.6%63.3%68.2%15.5% Teachers have sufficient access to appropriate instructional materials 65.4%72.1%75.0%79.8%14.5% The School Improvement Team is effective 51.3%56.6%60.3%65.1%13.8% TWC Questions in NC – Elementary by Performance Percentage agreement that working condition is in place based on quartiles of elementary schools on the North Carolina ABC Performance Composite.

Teacher Working Conditions are Student Learning Conditions Six CTQ studies from five states demonstrate clear and significant connections between teaching conditions and student achievement and academic growth –In most cases, up to 20 – 25 percent of the variance in school achievement can be attributed to teaching conditions (particularly empowerment and leadership questions) at all levels –Empowerment mattered in Clark; leadership and facilities and resources in NC, particularly for student growth. Time highly correlated in Arizona at 4 th and 12 th grade levels.

Teacher Working Conditions Survey Question Connection to Achievement NCAZKS Faculty is committed to helping every student learn MAE, H Sufficient access to appropriate instructional materials MAH Class sizes are reasonable EG, HA8 th 10 th There is an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect MG5 th School leadership shields educators from interruptions MG8 th 10 th The school is safe or clean and well maintained MGM School leadership clearly communicates expectations to parents and students HA5 th 10 th Effective process for making collaborative decisions MAE Teachers role in devising instructional techniques HA E=Elementary, M=Middle, H=High, G=Growth Indicator, A=Overall Achievement Indicator Note: Table only includes questions that were statistically significant in more than one location. See individual reports for full explanation of models and impact of questions on achievement measures.

In Kansas, for every 10 percent of elementary teachers who agree that the faculty is committed to helping every student learn, a 2.7 percent increase in students passing the state math assessment can be estimated (1.4 percent at the high school level). A 1.1 estimated increase in the middle school performance composite was found in North Carolina In North Carolina elementary schools where 60 percent or more of the staff agree that class sizes are reasonable, they are 1.3 times more likely to meet or exceed growth expectations. Middle schools where 80 percent or more of the faculty agree there is an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect were 2.2 times more likely to meet or exceed growth expectations For every 10 percent of Kansas middle school students who agree that their school is safe, a 2.3 percent increase in students passing the math assessment can be estimated Examples of the Impact of TWC on Student Learning

Teacher Working Conditions Affect Teacher Retention

Teachers on Which Working Condition is Most Important to Future Employment Plans

“ Without a doubt, the principal is the number one factor in determining the desirability of being a part of a particular school community. Being respected and valued personally and professionally is something I have to have in order to stay in a school.” - Teacher, published in Threshold Magazine article on teacher working conditions

Teacher Working Conditions Survey Question Percent of Teachers Who Agree StayersMoversLeavers Opportunities are available for members of the community to contribute actively to this school’s success. 71%26%48% There is an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect within the school. 66%22%44% The school improvement team provides effective leadership at this school. 70%31%49% The school leadership support teachers’ efforts to maintain discipline in the classroom. 70%31%48% In this school we take steps to solve problems. 67%28%47% The school leadership shields teachers from disruptions, allowing teachers to focus on educating students. 62%25%41% Source: Hirsch, E. et al. Teacher Working Conditions Are Student Learning Conditions: A Report on the 2006 North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey. Feb. 2007: CTQ.

Working Conditions by Performance Composite Quartile Domain Question (percent that agree or strongly agree) Lowest Expected ModerateHighest Expected Difference Between Highest and Lowest There is an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect 72.7%67.3%49.9%22.8% Teachers are trusted to make sound professional decisions about instruction 72.4%64.5%50.2%22.2% Teachers are centrally involved in decision making about educational issues 58.5%49.2%38.1%20.4% Teachers feel comfortable raising issues and concerns that are important to them 66.6%61.8%46.6%20.0% Teachers are respected as educational experts 62.3%55.6%42.5%19.8% TWC Kansas – Elementary School Agreement by Expected Turnover Source: Hirsch, E. et al. Creating Conditions for Student and Teacher Success: A Report on the 2006 Kansas Teacher Working Conditions Survey. May 2007: CTQ

Teaching Conditions Affect Turnover More than 40 percent of teacher future employment plans could be explained by working conditions in Clark County In Arizona, correlations with future employment intentions statistically significant for all conditions (except PD) and highest for leadership (.633). Correlations significant for all working conditions in Kansas Analysis of actual turnover in North Carolina – can explain about 40 percent of turnover. Up to 8 percent for elementary, 12 percent for high schools, but 34 percent for middle schools with working conditions

Teacher Working Conditions Survey Question Connection to Turnover NCClarkAZKS Teacher performance evaluation process is consistentEE,S Role in selection of instructional materialsE The non-instructional time received is sufficientM, H E Leadership addresses concerns about new teacher support M School leadership is effectiveH M There is an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect*** E,S *** Teachers are recognized as educational experts EE, M The school environment is safe S E,SE Centrally involved in decision making S Efforts made to minimize routine paperwork and duties E,SM, H Effective process for making group decisions and solving problems and/or take steps to solve problems E,SE I need to work a second job during the school yearE

Teaching Conditions Affect Turnover In Las Vegas, the presence of an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect was the most powerful predictor of any variable on whether a teacher would continue working in their current position. For every 10 percent of teachers agreeing that trust is present, a 3.1 percent increase in the percentage of teachers wanting to stay could be expected If 40 percent or LESS of the faculty in a school believed that they are respected as educational experts, the school is 2.7 times more likely to have a high expected turnover rate in Kansas elementary schools

Teachers and Administrators View Working Conditions Differently

Agreement on Select Working Conditions Questions Teachers Agreeing Principals Agreeing The non-instructional time provided for teachers in my school is sufficient 45%76% Teachers and staff work in a school environment that is safe 65%79% Teachers are centrally involved in decision-making about educational issues 51%96% There is an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect within the school 62%95% The faculty has an effective process for making group decisions and solving problems 56%95% Professional development provides teachers with the knowledge and skills most needed to teach effectively 63%91% Overall this school is a good place to work and learn 77%92% Source: Hirsch, E. et al. Teacher Working Conditions Are Student Learning Conditions: A Report on the 2006 North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey. Feb. 2007: CTQ.

School leadership makes a sustained effort to address teacher concerns about: Teachers Agreeing Principals Agreeing The use of time in my school 60%98% Facilities and resources 68%99% Empowering teachers 58%98% Leadership issues 57%97% Professional development 69%98% New Teacher Support 62%97% Source: Hirsch, E. et al. Teacher Working Conditions Are Student Learning Conditions: A Report on the 2006 North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey. Feb. 2007: CTQ.

Other Notable Findings in State Reports

Other Findings from State Reports In North Carolina, schools that used working conditions results as a tool for school improvement showed improvements in critical areas. For example, low TWC data use schools dropped from 63 percent to 42 percent agreement that there is an atmosphere of trust versus high use schools improved 2.2 percent (from 76 to 79 percent) between 2004 and 2006 Little variation in how individual educators viewed working conditions was found. But big differences existed across states in whether or not there was a teacher working conditions gap present in schools serving high poverty and high minority student populations

State and District Policies to Improve Teaching and Learning Conditions

Established TWC Survey as permanent part of budget TWC every 2 years as part of the budget Associated research and findings at both the statewide and school levels Established NC TWC Advisory Board to oversee implementation and dissemination of survey and the findings to school level as well as policy development Provides funding ($100K annually) to NCNetwork for SIT plans incorporating TWC data Evaluation of school principals SBE required to revise evaluation instrument for principal evaluation to include accountability of teacher retention, teacher support, and school climate State TWC Policies Passed in North Carolina

Revision of MSA standards (Masters in School Administration) SBE required to revise MSA program standards to focus on providing positive school climate, teacher support, and teacher retention Requires all new principals To complete the Principals Executive Program (PEP) - focusing on TWC; provides $125K Creating 100 school-based family support teams - including school nurse and social worker at 100 schools in need State TWC Policies Passed in North Carolina

Planning time for teachers- HB 1151 passed- requiring all SIT to document a plan to provide planning time for every teacher (goal of 5 hours per week), and a duty-free lunch Expansion of Learn and Earn and New Schools Project (Gov.'s 21st Century High Schools) - at the core of the design of these new high schools is the foundation of planning time for teachers to be able to do their work Unprecedented funding to support disadvantaged students and districts: $112 Million in new dollars This includes the Low Wealth fund, DSSF monies to all 115 districts, and return of the discretionary reduction- new focus on teacher recruitment, retention, and support State TWC Policies Passed in North Carolina

Leandro districts: provides continuation 2M$ of custom professional development to DSSF schools/ districts based on TWC survey and ABC scores Customized analysis for original DSSF districts high schools in Turnaround High Schools All high schools under 70% proficiency for last two years Best Practices highlighted and shared through the Real D.E.A.L. Award winning schools State TWC Policies Passed in North Carolina

Allow for flexibility and foster innovation in scheduling and planning time Encourage principal to principal discussions that allow for open dialogue and sharing of ideas and experiences Provide guidance on expectations for use of planning time without becoming overly prescriptive Building in rewards for non- instructional time Prioritize planning in the allocation of resources

Administrators and faculty share a vision for the school Schools have an effective group decision-making and problem-solving process School leadership consistently supports teachers

For More Information Eric Hirsch New Teacher Center at the University of California at Santa Cruz (temporary) (cell) – for reports – for online toolkit