©2006 Armstrong International, Inc. Case Study Major Refinery Steam Trap Failure Rates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
en l ’an ans d ’expérience sur la vapeur
Advertisements

1 Impact of Decisions Made to Systems Engineering: Cost vs. Reliability System David A. Ekker Stella B. Bondi and Resit Unal November 4-5, 2008 HRA INCOSE.
Barracuda Link Balancer Link Reliability and Bandwidth Optimization.
Roll-out Carts Proactive Replacement Programs. Outline – Proactive Replacement Program Background What (is proactive replacement)? Why (proactive replacement)?
HumidiClean. New After 400 Hours After 800 Hours Ionic Bed.
ENERGY SAVING Product Offering COMPRESSOR MARKETING OPPORTUNITIES.
Process & Benefits of Monitoring Based Commissioning David Jump, Ph.D., P.E. Principal Quantum Energy Services & Technologies, Inc.
STEAM TRAPS.
8-1 Prepare Recommendations Contact Suppliers  Purchasing Decisions For Office Equipment Evaluate Warranty Options  Evaluate Office Needs.
Comparison of Solar Power Generation:
PETRO CHEMICAL ENERGY. The Company  Petro Chemical Energy o We are the global leader in energy loss surveys having over 25 years experience making your.
Water Hammer.
Steam Traps 101 A Practical Guide to Implementing Effective Steam Trap Maintenance Programs to Reduce Energy Consumption & Greenhouse Gas Emissions David.
©2005 Armstrong International, Inc. Open and Closed Systems.
MAINTENANCE OF COMPLEX EQUIPMENT: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES Professor Pra Murthy The University of Queensland Brisbane, Australia.
Intelligent Radio Frequency (RF) Monitoring © 2009 Armstrong International, Inc.
© 2002 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 9-1 principles of MARKETING Chapter 9 New Product Development and Life Cycle Strategies.
Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group Annual Meeting January 20-23, 2014 Feedwater Pump Thrust Bearing Failure Presented By: Kurt J. Weis Rotating.
PRESENTED BY Toshiba International: Mike Tharp Hupp Electric Motors: Dave Patterson.
PREPARED BY: VAUGHANS CONSULTING GROUP INC. JULY 30,2013 Dynamic Motors Is this business venture economically viable?
Ivo Pinkiewicz, IENOT, POLAND DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER POPULATION and EFFICIENCY LEVELS IN POLAND.
How to Get a Newer, Better Fleet Gary Hatfield Mercury Associates.
Heat Exchanger Stall.
What makes the TG101 better!
1 Life Cycle Investing……. Hickman et. al, JPM Winter 01 Financial Planners recommend as investor approach retirement, portfolios should shift toward safer.
Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. Coatings Group Review of Maintenance Prioritization Schemes from Three Transportation Authorities Christopher L. Farschon, P.E.,
DQ03DR090 High Pressure Coolant Pump Failure
©2006 Armstrong International, Inc. SteamEye ®
1 Availability Modeling of Cooling Water Pumps to Assess if a Replacement Option is Economically Feasible. Dr. Salman Mishari.
Welcome to our World of Energy Storage Device Test Systems.
Economic Evaluation of PV systems in Jordan
Smartcool Systems Inc. Providing effective and reliable energy efficiency solutions for HVAC-R customers around the globe.
Energy and Water Savings Presented by Bill Power Power Services, Inc San Mateo County Ag Workshop December 5, 2014.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona District or Distributed Integrated EnergyDistrict Heating and Cooling Robert McMillin Siemens Industry, Inc.
©2008 Armstrong International, Inc. Steam Basics.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Energy Awareness Does NOT Save Energy Don Rainey Energy Management TAG 328 Nov. 4, 2011.
 Exergames: The New Face of Exercise? By Sarah Takagaki June 4, 2015.
Best Practices Software: Decision Tools for Industry Michaela Martin ORNL.
2009 IPC Energy Benchmarking Survey Initial Results Survey of 2008 operations.
Safety Driven Performance Conference 2013 Integrating ModuSpec and WEST Engineering Services to advance excellence in drilling safety, integrity and performance.
Use of API 6A vs ISO in marking 6A equipment
Chapter 1 Why We Have to do Maintenance. Why Maintenance Provides assurance Flight Safety Reliability Airworthiness.
Introduction to pc-GAR and pc-GAR MT G. Michael Curley Manager of GADS Services October 29, 2010.
Energy Efficiency... Process vs. Program Tom Henry – Armstrong International, Inc. Henry Molise – Pfizer (retired)
Saad Haj Bakry, PhD, CEng, FIEE 1 Network Management Support Saad Haj Bakry, PhD, CEng, FIEE P RESENTATIONS IN N ETWORK M ANAGEMENT.
Smart Inventory System. Step 1: Manage inventory Step 2: Record New Purchase Step 3: Generate New Purchase Plan (smartly)
Maintainance and Reliability Pertemuan 26 Mata kuliah: J Manajemen Operasional Tahun: 2010.
Inverted Bucket Steam Traps A Solution to Plugging Problems.
Populations and Samples. Warm Up
Process Steam Coil Air Heating. 2 Process Steam Coil Air Heating A Total System Solution Breakthrough Single Supplier Single Service Single Resource TOTAL.
MNM Fatal Falling Material Falling Material June 12, 2006 (Virginia) June 12, 2006 (Virginia) Crushed Stone Operation Crushed Stone Operation Machine/Plant.
Improving Preventive Maintenance of Packaging Process Equipment in a Pharmaceutical Industry Final Presentation By: Anabel Rodriguez.
P-25 Digital Communication System History: October 2007 explored changing from analog to P-25 digital system. At that time the P-25 standards had not been.
Compressed Air System Optimization Rebate
1 EIT 2.2 Is your company missing out on the cost-savings opportunities offered by data center consolidations? Andy Abbas Co-Founder and Vice President.
Portfolio-Based Roof Management How to Get More Service Life and Energy from your Roof Portfolio.
Introducing Adaptive 3D Control for Sigma Air Manager™
ENERGY CONSERVATION IN MOTOR SYSTEMS. Introduction 2.
Sigma Air Manager Basic
Kraft Summer Intern 2015 Jacob Herbstritt.
Steam Trap Health Monitoring Service Performance & Reliability Monitoring.
The Jorlon TM Diaphragm.
Software Metrics and Reliability
UPS Connectivity Options: PPDM ( )
Reliability and Maintainability
ENERGY SAVING Product Offering
Counts High Counts Low Counts
Use of API 6A vs ISO in marking 6A equipment
Information regarding Flushmate® Pressure assist vessels
The Jorlon TM Diaphragm.
Presentation transcript:

©2006 Armstrong International, Inc. Case Study Major Refinery Steam Trap Failure Rates

“Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong “Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong 2 Survey Cycle Time vs Failure Rate 10,000 traps, Major Refinery Steam Trap Survey Cycle Time versus Failure Rate Major Refinery (11 Cycles) 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Months Steam Trap Failure Rate

“Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong “Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong 3 Survey Cycle Time vs Failure Rate 80,000 traps World-Wide Steam Trap Failure Rate vs. Survey Cycle Time Major Refinery World-Wide Steam Trap Surveys 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Survey-to-Survey Cycle Time Trap Failure Rate

“Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong “Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong 4 How Often Should I Survey Steam Traps? Note traps fail randomly over time. (A 10% failure rate for a population of 10,000 traps means that 1,000 traps will fail each year; after 10 years, they have all failed. Accelerating the surveys does not reduce failures; it only finds them faster! Finding failed traps faster & getting them repaired saves money in steam losses & improves equipment reliability. At this refinery, a 4-mos. cycle time is optimum. Each facility must determine the cost of more frequent surveys versus the additional steam savings realized.

“Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong “Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong 5 Failure Rates Drip Traps vs. Tracer Traps 150 psig Drip Trap Failure Rate vs. Survey Cycle Time 1,992 traps 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Months Failure Rate 150 psig Tracer Trap Failure Rate vs. Survey Cycle Time 4,256 traps 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% Months Failure Rate Drip Traps Tracer Traps Application Effects Trap Life

“Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong “Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong 6 High Pressure vs Low Pressure Drip Trap Failure Rates 40 psig Drip Trap Failure Rate vs. Survey Cycle Time 777 Traps 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Months Failure Rate 600 psig Drip Trap Failure Rate vs. Survey Cycle Time 467 traps 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% Months Failure Rate 40 psig Drip Traps 600 psig Drip Traps Operating Pressure Effects Trap Life

“Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong “Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong 7 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% % Failure Rate Series1 10%0%2% 0%9%6%3%11%0% 40 psi Drip Traps 40 psi Process s Traps 40 psi Tracer Traps 65 psi Drip Traps 65 psi Process s Traps 65 psi Tracer Traps 150 psi Drip Traps 150 psi Process s Traps 150 psi Tracer Traps 600 psi Drip traps 600 psi Process s traps Drip traps now fail at 10% frequency, but Tracer traps fail at only 2-3% frequency. At these rates, drip traps could last as long as ten years & tracer traps as long as years! 2006 Steam Trap Failure Rate

“Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong “Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong 8 Options for Optimizing Surveys Survey all traps every 4 mos. Survey only Drip Traps every 4 mos. Survey all Tracer Traps every 12 mos. Use Steam Eye to go to real-time surveys!

“Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong “Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong 9 Manufacture Failure Rates Major Refinery Notes: 1. Total trap population is 50,000 traps. 2. Velan has less than 50 traps in this population. 3. Traps with no failure rates have less than 30 traps each in service. 4. Ogontz has less than 45 traps in population.

“Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong “Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong 10 Picking a Brand of Trap Comparisons depend on age of traps, service, pressure, etc. It’s difficult to compare database data and come up with meaningful conclusions as to whether one brand is better than another. If one brand is older than another, it may fail more often. Side-by-side comparisons are best. Also, mean time between failures for each brand and model number at various pressures and services would be the best data.

“Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong “Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong 11 Refinery’s Trap Recommendations Use an Armstrong Universal Connector IS2 when replacing traps. (This speeds up future replacements.) For all new 40, 65, and 150 psi mud legs or tracer traps use: Armstrong 2010 or 2011 Inverted Bucket trap (first preference because they do not plug easily with fines). For new 600+ psi steam traps choose: Armstrong 2022 (first preference) For process traps, consult the Energy Planner.

“Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong “Expect many enjoyable experiences!” David M. Armstrong 12 Steam Trap Programs Save Money by Saving Steam

©2006 Armstrong International, Inc. For More Information Contact Armstrong International, Inc.