Results of Deceleration Studies Giulio Stancari E-835 Meeting 23 October 1999.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electron Cooling in the Accumulator McGinnis Electron Cooling in the Accumulator Dave McGinnis.
Advertisements

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CD2 LATTICE IMPROVEMENTS Accelerator Systems Advisory Committee April 23-24, 2007 Stephen Kramer for the NSLS-II Design Team.
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Run 2 PMG 2/16/06 - McGinnis Run II PMG Stacking Rapid Response Team Report Dave McGinnis February 16, 2006.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Resonance crossing and error tolerances Shinji Machida KEK FFAG05 at Fermilab, April 3-7, 2005.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
F UEC - 6 Oct 06 Recent FNAL Collider Operations Ron Moore Fermilab – Tevatron Dept.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Antiproton Source Capabilities and Issues Keith Gollwitzer & Valeri Lebedev Accelerator Division Fermilab 1.
Theoretical studies of IBS in the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, Y.Papaphilippou MSWG – LIU meeting, 1/10/2013.
SNuMI (>1MW) SNuMI 1 Motivations for SNuMI The neutrino experimental program for the next decade –NOνA (long baseline νμ→νe search) –MINERνA (Main Injector.
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, January 20-31, 2014 Lecture 20 - Cooling 2 Anti-protons are created by hitting a target with an energetic proton.
Recycler Status and Plans Shekhar Mishra MID/Beams Division Fermilab AAC Review 2/4/03 Introduction to the Recycler Ring Recycler Improvements and status.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
F Antiproton Source Apertures Steve Werkema DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 22, 2006.
Overview Run-6 - RHIC Vadim Ptitsyn C-AD, BNL. V.Ptitsyn RHIC Spin Workshop 2006 RHIC Run-6 Timeline  1 Feb – Start of the Run-6. Start of the cooldown.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
1 Muon Acceleration and FFAG II Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC NuFact06 Summer School August 20-21, 2006.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
May 17, 2005Wednesday Experiment Meeting BNL, Upton Acceleration beyond 100 GeV  Goal To evaluate the spin dynamics beyond 100 GeV  What’s the impact.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 28 Jul 03 Week in Review: 07/21/03 –07/28/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Progress in Quad Ring Coolers Ring Cooler Workshop UCLA March 7-8, 2002.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
All Experimenters' Mtg - Aug. 04, 2003 Week in Review: 07/28/03 –08/03/03 Doug Moehs – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Alexander Molodozhentsev KEK for MR-commissioning group September 20, 2005 for RCS-MR commissioning group September 27, 2005 Sextupole effect for MR -
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Accelerator Issues Fermilab Antiproton Experiment Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department Accelerator Division Fermilab.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
AP2 Line & Debuncher Studies Status Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source January 9, 2006 Many people involved with providing the hardware and software that.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
Fermilab Run 2 Accelerator Status and Upgrades
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
09-21 Study of bunch length limits Goals: To identify and observe effects which put limits on the minimum bunch length in RHIC. Try to distiguish the limitation.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
Status of the AP2 Optics Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department November 19, 2004.
Status of the Accelerator Complex Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Accelerator Division Fermilab 2009 Fermilab Users’ Meeting.
F Record luminosities at the Tevatron & Future potentiality Steve Werkema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, Illinois USA Asian Particle Accelerator.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Overview of Ramp Development Giulio Stancari E-835 Collaboration Meeting Torino, May
F HCP 2007 Performance and Future of the Tevatron Ron Moore Fermilab - Tevatron Dept. Tevatron overview and performance Antiproton source + Recycler overview.
Nufact02, London, July 1-6, 2002K.Hanke Muon Phase Rotation and Cooling: Simulation Work at CERN new 88 MHz front-end update on cooling experiment simulations.
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Slip stacking in Recycler Ioanis Kourbanis 9/14/11.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
Antiproton Acceptance Steve Werkema DOE Review February 24, 2004.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
Toward an Improved Model of the Fermilab Booster Synchrotron A. Drozhdin, J.-F. Ostiguy and W. Chou Beam Physics Department Introduction The Booster is.
Simulation of Luminosity Variation
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev AAC Workshop 2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Multiturn extraction for PS2
ELENA Extra Low ENergy Antiproton Ring
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Energy Calibration of the SPS with Proton and Lead Ion Beams
Simulation of Multiturn Injection into SIS-18
JLEIC Ion Integration Goals
JLEIC Weekly R&D Meeting
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Plans for future electron cooling needs PS BD/AC
Presentation transcript:

Results of Deceleration Studies Giulio Stancari E-835 Meeting 23 October 1999

E-835 Collaboration Meeting G. Stancari 2 Goals (a) make E-835 possible: quad magnets replaced, buses rearranged, shunts added, 8-GeV lattice modified, …  1996/97 deceleration ramps are no longer usable. (b) make whole E-835 data taking above transition: transition crossing can be very inefficient; current transition energy at 8 GeV corresponds to  s = 3.66 GeV, just below the . The plan: modify the Accumulator lattice as the beam is decelerated from 8 GeV to the E-835 data-taking energy region, so that the transition energy is shifted from just below the  to well below the  0. Keep lattice constant in E-835 region.

23 October 1999E-835 Collaboration Meeting G. Stancari 3 Charmonium spectrum and the transition energy of the Accumulator

23 October 1999E-835 Collaboration Meeting G. Stancari 4 Scheme for ramping  t slip factor  = 1/  t 2 - 1/  2 the magnet strengths determine  t

23 October 1999E-835 Collaboration Meeting G. Stancari 5 Deceleration Studies The ramp-development team (K. Gollwitzer, E. Harms, W. Marsh, D. McGinnis, G. Stancari and S. Werkema) did deceleration studies for about 8 weeks, from Aug 25 to Oct 17. Measured lattice at 8 GeV. Established maximum-aperture orbit: A x =10  and A y = 11  mm-mrad. Performed rounds of tune, orbit and frequency corrections. Minimized coupling between transverse planes. Corrected chromaticity. Checked size of RF bucket.

23 October 1999E-835 Collaboration Meeting G. Stancari 6 Tune-tracker pictures

23 October 1999E-835 Collaboration Meeting G. Stancari 7 Orbit and dp/p (revolution frequency) corrections

23 October 1999E-835 Collaboration Meeting G. Stancari 8 The emittance of the proton beams we received was much bigger than what we expect to have with stacked and cooled antiprotons. It was also variable. Emittance considerations Beam emittance  is the phase-space volume occupied by a specified fraction (ie, 95%) of particles. In the transverse degrees of freedom,   1/p. Along a ramp, the transverse emittances are expected to grow by a factor 2. In order to obtain reliable and reproducible measurements of ramp transmission efficiency, it was necessary to scrape the beam to simulate the effect of stochastic cooling.

23 October 1999E-835 Collaboration Meeting G. Stancari 9 Results (I)  a good transmission efficiency from the top to the bottom of the ramp has been achieved efficiency is 94% with beam scraped to 2  mm-mrad in both transverse planes and to  p /p  10 8 GeV 00 beam current vs momentum

23 October 1999E-835 Collaboration Meeting G. Stancari 10 Results (II)  the  t ramping scheme (aka “snowplowing  t ”) worked well. The measurements of  and  t along the ramp (Sep 13) are close to their target values.