Missouri Reading Initiative Evaluation Plan: 2006-2009 Goals, Activities, and Responsibilities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Reading First Evaluation in Georgia: A Multidimensional Approach Ken Proctor Reading First Director Georgia Department of Education Michael C. McKenna.
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Dr.Mohamed E. Osman & Prof.Thuwayba A. Al Barwani With Dr.Abdo M. Al Mekhlafi Dr. Khalid Al Saadi Ms.Laila Alhashar Ms.Fathiya Al Maawali Ms.Zuhor Al lawati.
CONDUCTING PROGRAM EVALUATIONS FOR FEDERAL PROGRAMS Brooke Blair, ALSDE Mark Ward, ALSDE Erin McCann, SEDL Mary Lou Meadows, SEDL.
1 Role of the Case Manager Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District 2009.
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
Principals’ Council Meetings May  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify.
Progress Monitoring Plan Information and Procedures August Part 2.
Missouri Reading Initiative Evaluation Plan: Goals, Activities, and Responsibilities.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Assisting Students with Disabilities
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Maryland Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation (ECMHC) Evaluation
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Evaluation Tools & Approaches for Engaging Stakeholders: The AREA Approach Presentation at the Canadian Evaluation Society Dr. Mariam Manley, Principal.
Chapter 8 Assessing Active Science Learning
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
Jackson Elementary School Title I Information
Progress Monitoring for All Student Adapted from the Kentucky Systems of Interventions Guidance Document.
Progress Monitoring Plan Information and Procedures August Part 2.
Intervention Team / Tier III Overview Harding University High School
Evaluation Results Missouri Reading Initiative.
Equitable Services, Part 2 Planning for Equitable Services Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Title I Schoolwide Mid- Year Review Melissa Moe and Kris Rangel January 24, 2013.
September 22, 2015 Shawanna Arnold Assistant Principal Annual Title I Meeting Gullatt Elementary School Review of Title I Plan.
CaMSP Cohort 8 Orientation Cohort 8 State and Local Evaluation Overview, Reporting Requirements, and Attendance Database February 23, 2011 California Department.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
What is Response to Intervention (RTI)? Response to Intervention is the practice of providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student.
1 Coordinated Program Review: School Staff Overview Sutton Public Schools Frequently Asked Questions: Faculty Information
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Evaluation Results Missouri Reading Initiative.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Building Collaborative Teams Susan Rasicot. Examine: The Statistics  Number of students on grade level  Number of students by grade below grade level.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Using DIBELS to Improve Reading Outcomes in Grades 3-5.
DESE District Review Center for District and School Accountability Site Visit: April 11-14, 2011.
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
Brentwood Elementary Title One Annual Parent Meeting September 20, :00 PM.
Incorporating Program Assessment into Your Annual Program Review June 29, 2006.
Knowledge-Building and Instructional Practice in Georgia Reading First.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Annual Title I Meeting Gullatt Elementary School
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Missouri Reading Initiative Evaluation Plan: Goals, Activities, and Responsibilities

Overview Goals Goals Who Who What What When When Roles and Responsibilities Roles and Responsibilities

Goals I. Measure Outcomes II. Monitor Program Implementation (Process) III. Provide Useful Information for Program Development : Schools and MRI

Who? MRI Staff MRI Staff University Interns University Interns School Personnel School Personnel 5,000-7,000 Respondents: new schools new schools 4,500-7,500 students 4,500-7,500 students Teachers Teachers

What? Logic and Instruments Basic Program Logic: Step 1 ( Strategic Input): MRI provides instruction in Comprehensive Literacy... Step 2 (Strategic Objective): Classroom teachers change to (reinforce) Comprehensive Literacy practice resulting in... Step 3 (Long-Term Outcome): Improved levels of student achievement in communication arts.

Data Collection “Instruments” “Teacher Beliefs and Practices Survey”: Measures teacher beliefs and attitudes about learning styles, and how frequently they utilize certain practices in their classrooms. (Pre and Post)

Parent Involvement in Literacy Survey Parent Involvement in Literacy Survey Given in Fall and Spring to assess how schools approach parent involvement Measures changes in programs after MRI presents its parent involvement component Data Collection “Instruments”

Annual MRI Questionnaire: Set of questions with scaled responses given at year-end to teachers, administrators and other participants that focuses on implementation process. Teacher/Administrator Interviews: Semi-structured interviews that ask about the strengths and weaknesses of various program elements. (Exit)

Data Collection “Instruments” Standardized Test Scores: Standardized Test Scores: MAP and school-based scores used to document student achievement. Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA) scores: Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA) scores: An assessment tool that measures individual student reading development; a component of MRI instruction. Create Baselines and collect as implemented Create Baselines and collect as implemented

Data Collection “Instruments” Special Education and Title I data: Annual referrals to special education and Title I programs: 1.# Site team referrals 2.# Diagnostic evaluation referrals 3.#IEP placements 4.Create baselines and update annually

Data Collection “Instruments” Student data--- student age, gender, social and economic data (free/reduced lunch status, family type), ethnicity/race. Student data--- student age, gender, social and economic data (free/reduced lunch status, family type), ethnicity/race. Teacher data --- years teaching, length of service at school. Teacher data --- years teaching, length of service at school. School data --- size, percentage on free/reduced lunch, rural/urban. School data --- size, percentage on free/reduced lunch, rural/urban. Document review --- collection, review, and analysis of documents relating to program design, budgets, implementation, school involvement, etc. Document review --- collection, review, and analysis of documents relating to program design, budgets, implementation, school involvement, etc.

Timeline: Orientation: April-May 2006 Present evaluation plan and finalize evaluation roles and responsibilities Present evaluation plan and finalize evaluation roles and responsibilities Provide each school with a thorough orientation to the MRI program activities. Provide each school with a thorough orientation to the MRI program activities.

Timeline: Year I: ( ) September-December 2006 Conduct Pre-Teachers Beliefs & Practices Survey Conduct Pre-Teachers Beliefs & Practices Survey Collect student demographic data Collect student demographic data Collect baseline student achievement scores Collect baseline student achievement scores Collect baseline DRA scores Collect baseline DRA scores Collect baseline special ed./Title I data Collect baseline special ed./Title I data Collect school information Collect school information

Timeline: Year I: ( ) January-May 2007 Update Student Achievement Scores Update Student Achievement Scores April-May 2007 Implement end-of-year questionnaire to teachers and administrators Implement end-of-year questionnaire to teachers and administrators Update student demographic info. Update student demographic info. June-August 2007 Prepare site reports/1st year report Prepare site reports/1st year report

Timeline: Year II: ( ) September 2007-May 2008 Update standardized test scores as they occur Update standardized test scores as they occur Update DRA scores as they occur Update DRA scores as they occur Update special education/Title I data Update special education/Title I data May 2008 Conduct end-of-year questionnaire (May) Conduct end-of-year questionnaire (May) Update student demographic info. Update student demographic info. June-August 2008 Prepare site reports/2nd year report Prepare site reports/2nd year report

Timeline: Year III: ( ) September 2008-May 2009 Update standardized test scores Update standardized test scores Update DRA scores Update DRA scores Update special education/Title I data Update special education/Title I data March-May 2009 Conduct post-Teacher beliefs and Practices Survey Conduct post-Teacher beliefs and Practices Survey Conduct exit interviews Conduct exit interviews Collect final student achievement data Collect final student achievement data Update student demographic info. Update student demographic info.

Timeline: Year III: ( ) June-August 2009 Prepare final site reports Prepare final site reports Fall 2009 Final Report Final Report

Roles and Responsibilities Schools Schools Collect and transmit data; Collect and transmit data; Test Scores Special Education Interviews Surveys Surveys Provide General information Provide General informationSchoolStudent Teacher Service MRI MRI Support data collection Support data collectionStaff Set up systems Design Forms Internet –Data Entry –Analysis –Reports