Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) For additional information see www.mstservices.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Creating vital partnerships between: Children Home School Community.
Advertisements

Implementation of MST in Norway Iceland June 2008 Bernadette Christensen Clinical Director of the Youth Department Anne Cathrine Strütt MST Consultant.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
MHSA Full Service Partnership (FSP) For YOUTH (Ages 0-15) and TAY (Transition-Age Youth) (Ages 16-25) Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning.
Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
Critical Issues for Successful Implementation.  Samanthya Amann, Iowa  Nicole Byers, Delaware  Kate Hanley, Consultant with the NRCYD.
Research Insights from the Family Home Program: An Adaptation of the Teaching-Family Model at Boys Town Daniel L. Daly and Ronald W. Thompson EUSARF 2014/
Center for Innovative the Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research and Education 1.
Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence University of Colorado Boulder
Closed institutions and their alternatives: What works? Presentation Eusarf Conference 22th September, 2005,Paris.
HUD-VASH Case Management System Paul Smits, MSW Associate Chief Consultant, Roger Casey, PhD Director, Grant and Per Diem Program.
Multi Systemic Therapy
Multisystemic Therapy (MST)
Site Dev Highlighted article or topic – Transport Findings Update and Summary _____________________________________ Website: Pre Sonja Schoenwald, Ph.D.
Our Mission Community Outreach for Youth & Family Services, Inc. is dedicated to improving the quality of life for both the youth and adult population.
Wraparound – A Team Based Approach. What is Wraparound? Evidence-based model for youth involved in multiple systems Facilitation of child and family teams.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Preventing and Reducing Adolescent Violence
Children’s Mental Health System Change Initiative COSA Conference March 10, 2006 Bill Bouska Matthew Pearl Office of Mental Health & Addiction Services.
An Overview of the Mental Health Remedial Plan California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Juvenile Justice REDEFINING MENTAL HEALTH.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
Module 7 Promoting Family Engagement and Meaningful Involvement.
Enhancing Health Coverage for Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth OJJDP Coordinating Council November 13, 2013 Diane Justice, Senior Program Director National.
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
April 3-4, 2003 Garden Grove Proven Programs for Community Supervision Settings 1 Proven Program for Community Supervision Settings Todd Sosna, Ph.D.
Critical Resources to Support School and Community Partnerships: The School Counselor’s Role Sabri Dogan, Doctoral Student, OSU David Julian, Ph.D., OSU.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
Effective Collaboration For Serious Violent Offender Reentry David Osher, Ph.D. Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice Technical Assistance Partnership.
Research and Health Utilization Around Conduct Problems Scott T. Ronis, Ph.D. Department of Psychology University of New Brunswick ________________________________________.
ENCIRCLE: A COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIP FOR OUR YOUTH Led by Center for Learning & Development thanks to a grant from the Office of the Governor Criminal.
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota’s Crossover Youth Implementation of the CYPM April 18, 2012.
Treatment 101 Substance Abuse Basics West Coast Consulting Wanda King
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Mayor’s Office of Homeland Security and Public Safety Gang Reduction Program Los Angeles.
North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training Module One: Understanding TASC.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.
Chapter 10 Counseling At Risk Children and Adolescents.
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ADDING THE RECLAIMING FUTURES APPROACH TO JUVENILE TREATMENT DRUG COURTS: RECLAIMING FUTURES/JUVENILE DRUG COURT EVALUATION Josephine.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Review of Judicial Branch Activities in “Raise the Age” Presented by the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division June 28, 2012.
1 Sandy Keenan TA Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health(SOC) National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention(SSHS/PL)
1 Helping Foster Parents & Child Care Workers Prevent and Reduce Adolescent Violence.
1 Implementing and Sustaining MDFT in Practice Cynthia Rowe, PhD., Howard A. Liddle, Ed.D., Gayle A. Dakof, Ph.D., Craig Henderson, Ph.D., Alina Gonzalez,
MST OUTCOMES 8 Randomized Trials Published (more than 850 families participating) u3 with violent and chronic juvenile offenders u1 with substance abusing.
Report-back Seminar “ Early Intervention ” in Family and Preschool Children Services Outcome Framework and Critical Success Factors / Principles.
Perm June 2011 Wim van Geffen director MST-Nederland Breaking the cycle of criminal behaviour by the focus on family and not on youth.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Risk and protective factors Research-based predictors of problem behaviors and positive youth outcomes— risk and protective factors.
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Chapter 13 Intervention:Children and Adolescents INTRODUCTION TO CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY 2E HUNSLEY & LEE PREPARED BY DR. CATHY CHOVAZ, KING’S COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
AUTISM: Methodologies and Recent research Ilene S. Schwartz University of Washington
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators To learn how to explain the Communities That Care process and the research.
Unit 6. Effective Communication and Collaboration This unit focuses on efforts to reduce juvenile delinquency through a collaborative process of community-based,
Testimony to the Senate Task Force on Youth Violence Multisystemic Therapy: A scientifically-supported intervention to reduce youth violence Paul Block,
A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF CARE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Ken Berrick, Founder and Chief Executive Officer Seneca Center for Children and Families
County Leadership Family Member Orientation. 2 System of Care is, first and foremost, a set of values and principles that provides an organizing framework.
Functional Family Therapy Goal Oriented Solutions for families in Bedford-Somerset.
Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Justice
State of the Science in Functional Family Therapy
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Using Observation to Enhance Supervision CIMH Symposium Supervisor Track Oakland, California April 27, 2012.
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
Wraparound Oregon Designing a coordinated service system for children, youth and their families.
Comprehensive Youth Services
Presentation transcript:

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Multisystemic Therapy (MST) For additional information see

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Primary Goals of MST n Reduce youth criminal activity n Reduce other types of antisocial behavior such as drug abuse and sexual offending n Achieve these outcomes at cost savings by decreasing rates of incarceration and out- of-home placements

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 MST Research and Dissemination n Family Services Research Center (FSRC) ä Research Center at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Dr. Scott Henggeler, Director n MST Services ä MUSC affiliated organization offering assistance in MST program development and training through licensing agreements with the MUSC and the FSRC n MST Institute ä Independent non-profit organization providing quality control expertise, data, and tools to all interested parties

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 MST “Champions” & Advocates n OJJDP - Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention n Washington State Institute of Public Policy ä MST: most cost effective approach to reducing crime n “Blueprints for Violence Prevention” ä MST selected as one of the 10 “Blueprint” programs by Delbert Elliott, Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, University of Colorado

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 MST Research and Development n Theoretical underpinnings n Research findings on delinquent behavior n MST research findings

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 MST Theoretical Assumptions n Children and adolescents are embedded in multiple systems that have direct and indirect influences on their behavior. n Influences are reciprocal and bi-directional Based on Bronfenbrenner, Haley, and Minuchin

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Ecological Models Child Neighborhood FamilyPeers School

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Ecological Models Child Family Peers School Neighborhood Treatment Providers

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Causal Models of Delinquency & Drug Use Condensed Longitudinal Model Family School Delinquent Peers Delinquent Behavior Prior Delinquent Behavior Low Parental Monitoring Low Affection High Conflict Low School Involvement Poor Academic Performance Elliott, Huizinga & Ageton (1985)

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Needs of Violent & Chronic Juvenile Offenders and Their Multiproblem Families n Improve parental discipline practices n Increase family affection n Decrease association with deviant peers n Increase association with prosocial peers n Improve school/vocational performance n Engage in positive recreational activities n Improve family-community relations n Empower family to solve future difficulties

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 The Missouri Delinquency Project Charles M. Borduin, (PI), University of Missouri Barton J. Mann, University of Illinois - Chicago Lynn T. Cone, University of Missouri Scott W. Henggeler, Medical University of South Carolina Bethany R. Fucci, University of Missouri David M. Blaske, University of Missouri Robert A. Williams, University of Missouri

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Participants: 200 Offenders and Their Families n Averaged 4.2 previous arrests n 64% had been incarcerated previously for at least 4 weeks n Average age = 14.8 years n 67% male, 33% female n 30% African-American, 70% Caucasian n 47% lived with only one parental figure

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Service/Treatment Options n Multisystemic Therapy ä 77 completers ä 15 dropouts n Individual Therapy ä 63 completers ä 21 dropouts n Usual probation services for refusers ä 24 refusers

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Service Delivery vs. Treatment Service Delivery Models n Family Preservation n Inpatient n Outpatient n Residential Treatment n Foster Care Treatment Models n Multisystemic Therapy n Cognitive Therapy n Family Therapy n Psychodynamic Therapy n Behavior Therapy

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Delivery of Multisystemic Therapy

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 MST Case Example n 15 year old minority youth n Referral to MST for truancy, aggressive behavior at home and school, multiple shopliftings, and drug abuse n Lives with mother, stepfather, and three younger siblings

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 MST Treatment Principles n Nine principles of MST intervention design and implementation n Treatment fidelity and adherence is measured with relation to these nine principles

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Principles of MST 1.Finding the Fit The primary purpose of assessment is to understand the “fit” between the identified problems and their broader systemic context. 2.Positive & Strength Focused Therapeutic contacts should emphasize the positive and should use systemic strengths as levers for change.

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Principles of MST 3.Increasing Responsibility Interventions should be designed to promote responsibility and decrease irresponsible behavior among family members. 4.Present-focused, Action-oriented & Well-defined Interventions should be present-focused and action-oriented, targeting specific and well-defined problems.

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Principles of MST 5.Targeting Sequences Interventions should target sequences of behavior within and between multiple systems that maintain identified problems. 6.Developmentally Appropriate Interventions should be developmentally appropriate and fit the developmental needs of the youth.

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Principles of MST 7.Continuous Effort Interventions should be designed to require daily or weekly effort by family members. 8.Evaluation and Accountability Interventions efficacy is evaluated continuously from multiple perspectives, with providers assuming accountability for overcoming barriers to successful outcomes.

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Principles of MST 9.Generalization Interventions should be designed to promote treatment generalization and long-term maintenance of therapeutic change by empowering care givers to address family members’ needs across multiple systemic contexts.

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Instrumental Outcomes at Post-treatment n Increasing family cohesion and adaptability n Increasing family supportiveness n Decreasing family hostility n Decreasing parental symptomatology n Decreasing behavior problems in youth Multisystemic Therapy was significantly more effective at:

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Ultimate Outcomes at Four-Year Follow-Up n Preventing violent offending n Preventing other criminal offending n Preventing drug-related offending n Decreasing seriousness of committed crimes Multisystemic Therapy was significantly more effective at:

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Missouri Delinquency Project

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 The Role of Treatment Fidelity Standard Training for MST clinical staff ä 5-Day on-site orientation to MST ä Weekly MST consultations: viewed as the core of the training program -- true on-the-job training ä Quarterly on-site booster training

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 The Role of Treatment Fidelity n Examined the effects of MST in the absence of ongoing weekly MST consultation. n Adherence measure: 26 item questionnaire completed by the youth’s caregiver/parent. n Results: adherence to the MST treatment model varied greatly without weekly MST consultation. n Client outcomes: where treatment adherence was high, outcomes were substantially better.

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 The Role of Treatment Fidelity MST treatment adherence predicted: n decreased criminal activity n decreased incarceration n decreased adolescent emotional distress n increased parental emotional distress

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 The Role of Treatment Fidelity Implications of research: n High adherence is essential for obtaining outcomes with difficult clinical populations n Traditional training and supervisory protocols are not sufficient for obtaining high adherence n To obtain the strongest possible outcomes, MST programs should “institutionalize” adherence monitoring and on-going training for staff

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Bridging the Gap: University to Community n University-based research projects often show promising results which can not be replicated by community-based programs n MST has successfully made this transition ä Positive university-based research ä Positive community-based research ä Focusing on the implementation of effective community-based MST programs

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Community-based Dissemination Efforts n Program Replications ä California ä Connecticut ä Colorado ä Delaware* ä Florida ä Ireland (No.) ä Kansas ä Louisiana ä Manchester (UK) ä Maryland ä Michigan* ä Minnesota ä Missouri ä New York* ä Nebraska ä North Carolina ä Ohio* * Clinical Trials ä Oregon ä Pennsylvania* ä South Carolina* ä Tennessee* ä Texas* ä Washington ä Washington D.C. ä Ontario, Canada* ä Norway*

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Critical Elements of Implementation n Continuous Focus on Outcomes n Fidelity to the Treatment Model n Accessibility of Treatment F What influences these critical elements? ä Interagency collaboration ä Organizational support of the program ä Operational practices and policies

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Influences of Other System Stakeholders n Funding structure in place n Ability of MST therapist to take the “lead” in clinical decision making n Key stakeholders usually include: ä Juvenile Justice, Family Court, Mental Health, Social Welfare, School systems, parent groups n Clearly defined target population, program goals, and referral process

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Influences within the Provider Organization n Clear understanding of MST at all levels n Commitment to implement MST fully n Target MST compatible populations n Willingness to modify policies and dedicate resources to achieve outcomes ä Commitment to training and supervision ä Policies (e.g. flex-time, transportation) ä Resources (e.g. pay, cellular phones)

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Influences within the Clinical Context/Team n Clinical supervisor: committed, credible authority n Distinct and dedicated MST staff n Low caseloads (4-6 families per clinician) n Weekly group supervision per MST protocol n Weekly MST consultation for clinical team n Adequate on-call coverage system n MST training for all staff who can influence treatment n Outcome-based discharge criteria n Therapists: strengths and barriers

Multisystemic Therapy 04/00 Why is MST Successful? n Treatment targets known causes of delinquency: family relations, peer relations, school performance, community factors n Treatment is family driven and occurs in the youths’ natural environment n Providers are accountable for outcomes n Therapists are well trained and supported n Significant energies are devoted to developing positive interagency relations