Logic modeling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Advertisements

Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
How to Evaluate Your Health Literacy Project Jill Lucht, MS Project Director, Center for Health Policy
Definition: A program logic model is a systematic, visual way to present a program It is a picture of why and how you believe a program will work.
1 Theory of Change Chesapeake Bay Funders Network Program Evaluation Training Workshop OMG Center for Collaborative Learning January 9-10, 2008.
Karen L. Mapp, Ed.D. Deputy Superintendent, Boston Public Schools
Dennis McBride, Ph.D. The Washington Institute (253) Goal Driven Logic Models.
Logic modeling. “Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?” “That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.” said the Cat.
FCS Program Focus Area – Healthy Eating/Active Lifestyles Dr. Virginie Zoumenou UMES/ Maryland Cooperative Extension 11/01/07.
IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 1: Introduction to Idea Mapping Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
Logic Models. A logic model is your program ROAD MAP. Where are you trying to go? How are you trying to get there? What will tell you that you’ve arrived?
ACE Personal Trainer Manual 5th Edition
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium How to Develop a Program Logic Model.
IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 2: Refining Idea Maps Diabetes Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips, Ph.D. Lisa Wyatt Knowlton,
Reality Check For Extension Programs Deborah J. Young Associate Director University of Arizona Cooperative Extension.
Teaching Adults to Teach Children about Food Safety Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENT TRAINING Logic Models OBJECTIVES FOR TODAY: n Recognize and understand components of a logic model n Learn how to create a logic.
HEALTHY HABITS FOR TEENS NURS 440 / GROUP 2 DENISE COONEY, KEVIN DOAN SCOTT KOWALEWSKY, & BRANDON ZOLYNSKY.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Logic Models Ron Hale Office of Health Promotion & Community Health Improvement April 7, 2008 Las Vegas, NM.
IFAS Extension Goal 3, Logic Model and Communications Plan Life Skills Developed in Youth Through Subject Matter Experiences Situation Statement Florida.
Models for Program Planning in Health Promotion
Edward M. Haugh Jr. ESC Consultant. III. Recommendations for Applying Outcomes Planning to ESC  I. Introduction to Outcomes Planning II. A Sample ESC.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Preparing for the Main Event Using Logic Models as a Tool for Collaboratives Brenda M. Joly Leslie M. Beitsch August 6, 2008.
Affirmations Break the Silence HBHE 651 Program Planning Winter, 2011.
Model mod·el noun \mä-d ə l\ 1:Structural design. 2:A usually miniature representation of something; a pattern of something to be made. 3:An example for.
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Juggling the Program Management Ball 1. One day thou art an extension educator… The next day thou art a county director or district extension director…how.
LCES Advisory Leadership System… The role of advisory leadership councils in Extension’s programming process.
Futuring the Key to NC Success Pat Sobrero NC Urban Extension Summit May 11, 2005.
Prepared by the North Dakota State Data Center July HNDECA and ECCS Evaluation Dr. Richard Rathge Professor and Director North Dakota State Data.
1 © 2010 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. 11 Logic Models A ROADMAP TO SUCCESS.
PHSB 612: Interventions Diane M. Dowdy, Ph.D. Spring 2008.
Nancy L. Weaver, PhD, MPH Department of Community Health School of Public Health Saint Louis University 16 July 2010 LOGIC MODEL FUNDAMENTALS.
“Achieving wellness now and through a lifetime requires knowledge, self awareness, motivation, and effort.” Paul Insel and Walton Roth Created by Sandra.
Evaluation Tools and Models Northern Plains CCC Program Comprehensive Cancer Control 2008 Annual Grantee Meetings May 14th, 2008 Atlanta, GA.
Putting Logic Models to Use Jere Thomas, LCSW, CPSII.
Mapping the logic behind your programming Primary Prevention Institute
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Logic Models: Laying the Groundwork for a Comprehensive Evaluation Office of Special Education Programs Courtney Brown, Ph.D. Center for Evaluation & Education.
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Using Logic Models to Create Effective Programs
Building an Organizational Evaluation Infrastructure / Culture to Improve the Management and Outcomes of Health Programs Judith Hager, MA, MPH Molly Bradshaw,
Outcome-based Planning and Evaluation Gloria Latimer, Ed.S, Director of Community Programs Jason Vahling, M.P.H., Community Program Specialist.
Basic Program Logic RESOURCES/INPUTS The ingredients you need to implement your program! YOUR PROGRAM What you do to achieve your departmental goals! RESULTS/IMPACT.
Getting to Outcomes: How to do strategic planning with your CRP Theresa Costello National Resource Center for Child Protective Services May 25, 2007.
HEALTHY HABITS FOR TEENS NURS 440 / GROUP 2 DENISE COONEY, KEVIN DOAN SCOTT KOWALEWSKY, & BRANDON ZOLYNSKY.
Logic modeling. “Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?” “That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.” said the Cat.
LOGIC MODEL: A Program Performance Framework Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK.
Logic Models Performance Framework for Evaluating Programs in Extension.
ADRCs Do What? Using Logic Models to Document and Improve ADRC Outcomes Glenn M. Landers.
Allison Nichols, Ed.D. Extension Specialist in Evaluation.
Designing Effective Evaluation Strategies for Outreach Programs
Grant Champions Workshop Logic Model Development
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
Figure 1. Basic Logic Model Structure
Short term Medium term Long term
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Logic modeling.
Logic modeling.
Project Title: (PEARS Action Plan-Step 1)
Resources Activity Measures Outcomes
Logic modeling.
Using Logic Models in Project Proposals
BOOTCAMP SOCIAL INNOVATION ACCELERATOR TO CREATE LASTING CHANGE
Logic modeling.
Presentation transcript:

Logic modeling

“Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?” “That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.” said the Cat. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll

Models “… draw upon a number of theories to help understand a specific problem in a particular setting or context.” (Glanz, Rimer, & Lewis, pp. 27)

Planning Models Like a road map Present all possible routes you might take to develop, implement, and evaluate a program.

Planning Models PRECEDE/PROCEED MATCH CDCynergy

PRECEDE/PROCEED Model

MATCH (Multilevel Approach To Community Health) Developed in late 1980s Used by U.S. Government Applied when behavioral & environmental risk & protective factors for disease / injury are known & general priorities determined Includes ecological planning – levels of influence

MATCH Figure 4.16: MATCH: Multilevel Approach To Community Health (Pearson Ed, 2012)

CDCynergy Developed by the Office of Communication at the CDC in 1997 First issued in 1998 Developed initially for public health professionals at CDC with responsibilities for health communication Developed for health communication but can be used with all health promotion planning Available on CD-ROM; many versions (Pearson Ed, 2012)

CDCynergy P 6: Implement Plan P 5: Plan Evaluation P 4: Develop Intervention P 3: Plan Intervention (Is communication dominant or supportive?) P 2: Analyze Problem (causes, goals, intervention strategies P 1: Describe Problem (identify & define) (Pearson Ed, 2012)

Generalized Model for Program Planning (GMPP) Figure 4.18: Generalized Model for Program Planning (Pearson Ed, 2012)

Logic Models Provide a picture of how your program works Gives logical chain of connections showing what your program will accomplish A series of “if-then” relationships

Logic Model Components Situation Influential factors Assumptions Resources/Inputs Outputs: Activities + Participation Outcomes/Impact

http://www. humanserviceresearch http://www.humanserviceresearch.com/youthlifeskillsevaluation/logic_model.gif

Situation What is the present problem?

Influential Factors What factors may impact the program? Within the person Environment

Assumptions Client is honest in providing information Client will make a good faith effort to change practices or habits

Resources / Inputs What is invested to the program: Staff expertise, time, money/funding, materials, equipment, partners

Outputs (activities + participation) Activities: what is done (events or actions) Workshops, meetings, counseling, training, assessments, curriculum development

Outputs (activities + participation) Who the program reaches: Participants, customers, citizens

Outcomes / Impact Program objectives Short-term (learning) Medium-term (actions) Long-term (conditions)

Short-term outcomes Learning (KAB) Awareness Knowledge Attitudes Skills Opinions Motivations

Medium-term outcomes Actions Behavior Practice Decisions Policies Social actions

Long-term outcome Conditions Social Economic Civic Environmental

Health Belief Model Perceived Threat: Skin cancer Sunscreen too expensive, forget to buy it, inconvenient to use it Polk county residents, all SESs, educational levels, and ages Perceived Threat: Skin cancer “It’s Oregon, the sun is rarely out” Already tan, rarely sunburn, sunscreen smells weird, feels oily Likelihood to taking action – without intervention: low Self-efficacy Cues to action:

Logic Model Inputs Outputs Activities Participation Outcomes – Impact Short Med Long Situation: High incident of new skin cancers in Polk county, OR What we invest: Time Money Staff Volunteers Office Computers / other technology Community partnerships What we do: Hand out sunscreen samples Posters about skin cancer risk Health fair Brochures about sunscreen/skin cancer Talk in school health classes about sunscreen/skin cancer Who we reach: School kids / parents Attendees of health fair General population Increase knowledge about skin cancer / sunscreen Awareness of risk of skin cancer Skill about applying sunscreen People will start using sunscreen Population will avoid sun during peak time Rates of skin cancer will decrease in the community Mortality rates from skin cancer will decrease Assumptions: Clients will give good faith effort to change, be honest External (influencing) factors: time, weather, $$, tanning culture

Logic Model Inputs Outputs Activities Participation Outcomes – Impact Short Med Long Situation: High rates of Type 2 Diabetes among children in community; goal to decrease rates of DM in K-12 What we invest: Time Money Staff Volunteers Office Computers / other technology Community partnerships What we do: Nutrition workshops (label reading, how to shop on a budget, cooking demonstrations) Develop handouts, curriculum, resources Train, counsel, facilitate Who we reach: Children in the community (K-12), parents, family members, teachers, support staff Community members Label reading knowledge Awareness of healthier choices Cooking skills Knowledge of different exercises Awareness of health benefits of exercise Students K-12 will actively engage in exercise Healthier foods will be prepared at home Healthier foods will be available in schools Type 2 DM will decrease in community Increase local farmer’s markets, food sustainability Assumptions: Clients will be honest, and make a good faith effort to change External (influencing) factors: culture, weather, time, money

Logic Model Inputs Outputs Activities Participation Outcomes – Impact Short Med Long Situation: What we invest: What we do: Who we reach: Assumptions: External (influencing) factors: