Share Thoughts on Breast Cancer Study Overview and Statement of Work GPC Global Webinar, December 18, 2014 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMRSC Division of Hematology/Oncology
Advertisements

CROMS NIDCR Clinical Monitoring
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Purpose: To: 1) examine participation of target groups (older women, inner city and rural women; African-American women); and 2) assess impact of the “high.
1 What’s New in the Therapy Prior Authorization Review Process? December 2011 Therapy Clinical Webinars.
How to Write a Research Proposal Detroit Medical Center Nursing Research Council.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
EDRN’s Validation Study Information Management System Developed for EDRN by the DMCC Cancer Biomarkers Group Division of Cancer Prevention Jet Propulsion.
7.Implications for Analysis: Parent/Youth Survey Data.
Multisite Human Subjects Research CUNY HRPP Coordinator Training October 19, 2012.
David Cloutier Director, Research Center Management and Development Budgeting for Industry Sponsored Clinical Trials.
Designing the Questionnaire
How to Prepare for a FTCA Site Visit Office Hours
The Complete Design Data Collection Methods Part Three.
SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Competitive Grant Program Special Diabetes Program for Indians Competitive Grant Program SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM.
National Cancer Institute (NCI) Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) Research Studies UCSF HRPP Submission Process Overview Tuesday, December.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
Competitive Grant Program: Year 2 Meeting 3. SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Competitive Grant Program: Year 2 Meeting 3 Jeanne M. Amos HH Data Coordinator.
Spring 2015 Florida Alternate Assessment Spring 2015 Florida Alternate Assessment Test Coordinator Responsibilities Lake County Schools 1.
Trial Procedures and Forms
Long-term Archive Service Requirements draft-ietf-ltans-reqs-00.txt.
Ilana F. Gareen, Ph.D. Brown University Center for Statistical Sciences
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Cover Letters for Survey Research Studies
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
SYNOPSIS OF THE PROTOCOL Title: Pregnancy Associated Breast Cancer (PABC); Prospective Data Registry in Saudi Arabia Sponsor: Oncology Department, King.
SWIS Digital Inspections Project (SWIS DIP) Chris Allen, Information Management Branch California Integrated Waste Management Board November 5, 2008 The.
The Auditing Process: Lessons Learned Florida’s Medicaid EHR Incentive Program July 23, 2015.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Guidelines for NHANES Research Proposal Submission by Natalie Dupree Margaret McDowell.
Role of the Oncology Research Team Carmen B. Jacobs, BS, RN,OCN, CCRP U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas U.S.A.
3rd NRC Meeting, 9-12 June 2008, Windsor ICCS 2009 Main Survey Field Operations.
New York State Health Homes Implementation and Billing Update Statewide Webinar Presented by: New York State Department of Health January 12,
Monitoring IRB Monitoring of Clinical Trials. Types of Monitoring Internally Internally Externally Externally.
 The IRB application  The Review Process  Summary of Protocol  Appendixes  Informed Consent  Recruiting materials  Research Instruments  Other.
Module 3: Informed Consent. This training session contains information regarding: Documenting consent Documenting consent Conducting informed consent.
H I P A A T R A I N I N G Self Directed Module 7 Research Disclosures For Data Custodians START Click to begin…
BNR – Stroke: data entry and data management CAREC/PAHO Curacoa,15-16 November 2010 Gina Pitts, BNR-CVD Registrar Chronic Disease Research Centre, Jemmotts.
HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION PROGRAM Office Location: 1350 N. Vine Ave. (one block west of Cherry Ave. & three blocks north of Speedway) PO Box Phone:
Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
Students Course and Teacher Evaluation Please refer to notes at the bottom of this slide.
Data Management Seminar, 9-12th July 2007, Hamburg 11 ICCS 2009 – Field Trial Survey Operations Overview.
THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF ADVISORY COMMITTEES Development of Work-Based Learning Programs Unit 6-- Developing and Maintaining Community and Business Partnerships.
Is IRB Review or an OHSRP Determination Required?.
Return to Work 101 Injury Reporting May 14th, 2009 Presented by: Cathy Stein-Romo Chief Executive Office Risk Management/WC Unit (213)
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
dataset.csv bc_terms_results.RData - bcterm$term204[ ] bc-variable.csv (Scraped i2b2 query) bc_qa2.Rmd bc_qa_txform.R bcread_api_key.R bc_fetch.Rmd (Extracts.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Uses of the NIH Collaboratory Distributed Research Network Jeffrey Brown, PhD for the DRN Team Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical.
CHILDREN OF PRISONERS PARTNERSHIP What is the Children of Prisoners (CP) Partnership? The CP Partnership is a funding project between PFI and selected.
1 MARCH 2012 Regulatory Documents & the CTSU.
Opening An ETCTN Study at Your Site August Scope of this Presentation  This presentation applies to all sites which will be participating on.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Benchmarks of Quality KENTUCKY CENTER FOR INSTRUCTIONAL.
KING COUNTY ASTMA PROGRAM Screening Questionnaires Checklists.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
A FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRESCRIPTION PROGRAM
WHI Cancer Survivor Cohort (CSC)
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
Multisite Human Subjects Research
New NIH Human Subjects & Clinical Trials Information
It All Starts with the Student Study Team
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S STUDY FILE
Russell Center Small Research Grants Program
TRTO (Translational Research Trials Office)
SYNOPSIS OF THE PROTOCOL
Jason Springer MD MS Mei Liu PhD
Presentation transcript:

Share Thoughts on Breast Cancer Study Overview and Statement of Work GPC Global Webinar, December 18,

Review the Share Thoughts on Breast Cancer Study statement of work  Aims, Design, Survey domains, Protocol Outline  SOPs Review pressure points in the timeline  IRB reliance request by Dec 23 (key personnel for all sites required), approval by Jan 23  IRB application by Jan 27, approval by Mar 16  First survey mailing April 28 Near-term deadlines  Name Study Team Point of Contact (POC) (Dec 19)  Complete the Site Preparation Questionnaire #1 (Dec 22) Outline

Specific aims encompass cohort characterization (n~4,500) and survey (completed n=1,000 or ~115 per Center) – Aim 1 – Select a cohort – Aim 2 – Demonstrate ability for semi-centralized questionnaire – Aim 3 – Generate pilot data (PROs, out-of-system care, correspondence of i2b2-derived measures w/ self-report) – Aim 4 – Determine prevalence of characteristics and validate algorithms in underlying cohort – Aim 5 – Demonstrate linkage of survey and i2b2- derived data for consenting patients Breast Cancer Cohort Study

The role of patient preferences and shared decision-making in management decisions associated with high inter-institutional variability What do patients know about their breast reconstruction options? Which patients receive autologous fat grafting? Prevalence and correlates of long-term effects – upper limb morbidity, neuropathy, heart failure, fatigue Outcomes of bilateral mastectomy Prevalence and correlates of gene testing Share Thoughts on Breast Cancer Sample Paper Topics

Cross-sectional survey months after diagnosis – Patient-reported outcomes FACT-B, Quick DASH, neuropathy, heart failure, shoulder diagnoses, fear of recurrence – BMI change – Treatments and interventions received including genetic testing, survivorship care plan elements and breast reconstruction – Factors considered when making surgery, chemo decisions – Shared decision-making x treatment type – Preferred decision-making role – Patient experiences of care (Care coordination and physician communication) – Recalled decisional uncertainty and decision support, perceived decision effectiveness – Interest in research participation Share Thoughts on Breast Cancer Survey Domains

Selection Criteria Inclusion criteria for the UNDERLYING de-identified study population: – Any sex – Diagnosed with primary breast cancer – Age 18+ at the time of dx – diagnosed during 7/1/ /30/2013 (i.e months prior to survey) (if there are insufficient patients diagnosed in this period, we may extend the window) Also, as the timeline for survey implementation slips we will shift the diagnosis window accordingly Exclude from the SURVEY sample if: – Sex not equal to female – Less than 18 years of age – Prior cancer diagnosis – Breast cancer was not microscopically confirmed – Only tumor morphology was lobular carcinoma in situ – Stage IV breast cancer – Known to be deceased – Non-English speaking (for now)

1.CC creates Survey Sample Finder File (see Work Plan 1). Site Honest Brokers append a study ID number (a range of ID numbers will be specified by the CC) and the MRN to the finder file and retain this file for later data requests for consented patients. 2.Site Honest Broker retrieves name and mailing address and supplies a file to site study team containing name, address, and encrypted MRN ID for mail merge. 3.Sites verify list by working with local tumor registrar 4.Each site will maintain a tracking database (likely via REDCap) that will include name, address, and study ID number. 5.Sites will send out a packet of information to potential subjects inviting them to enroll in the study. The packet will include, (a) a signed cover letter from the participating site on site appropriate letterhead, (b) the study questionnaire which will include an information sheet containing elements of consent on the inside front cover; (c) a consent document for obtaining medical record data at the end of the study booklet; (d) a $10 gift card; e) a copy of the consent document for their records; and f) a business reply envelope in which to return the study booklet. 6.Return of a questionnaire will indicate a willingness to participate in that portion of the study. 7.Return of the consent documents will be required for potential subject to be included in the i2b2 medical information part of the study. 8.Return of blank questionnaire will indicate a potential subject has declined to participate. 9.If a subject does not respond at all to the first mailing, one repeat mailing of the invitation packet will occur. Proposed Enrollment and Consent Process

1.Prospective subjects will be asked to complete a mailed questionnaire. The questionnaire should take about 30 minutes to complete. 2.They will also be asked to sign and return the consent document. 3.Both items will be included in one study booklet. The study booklet may be returned in a pre-paid envelope provided. The reply envelope will be addressed to the UI Coordinating Center. 4.The UI Coordinating Center project manager will optically scan the paper questionnaires and may telephone a participant if markings are not legible or ambiguous. The project manager will detach the consent forms and contact information from the study booklet and store them separately from the paper questionnaire pages. 5.The tracking database will be regularly updated with status of the questionnaire and consent. 6.A file containing study ID numbers for consenting individuals will be supplied to the participating sites. 7.Participating sites will generate i2b2 study variables for all consented subjects and submit to the study team via the GPC Honest Broker. 8.Coordinating Center will supply survey data for consented subjects back to the sites. 9.There is no long-term follow-up planned at this time. Other Study Procedures

SOP for Data Request, Transfer and Storage – 4 work plans: – WP1: create the survey sample finder file This work plan is necessary to validate the cohort eligibility criteria are comparably defined and applied. – WP2: Data support for mailings This work plan specifies how sites generate mailing list and conduct initial and non-respondent mailings and how response is tracked – WP3: Store survey dataset This work plan stores the survey data in the study database and uploads survey data for consented subjects back to the sites. – WP4: Request and obtain data for consented subjects This work plan is needed to complete the aims for the study and describes how the research team can access the complete study database for analysis. List of SOPs drafted

GPC Breast Cancer Survey Site preparation Questionnaires – These are necessary to insure that sites understand all tasks that will be required and have identified staff for each task GPC Breast Cancer Survey Mailing Protocol – This specifies many of the detailed procedures sites and the CC will follow. List of SOPs drafted (continued)

December 18 – GPC Site PIs Review scope of work December 19 – GPC Site PIs name the Study Team Point of Contact (POC) for your site – – Per IRB Reliance Agreement: “Site study teams will be asked to provide a point person for each site involved in the study to serve as the primary point person for the IRB review process for that site.” – Could be your site’s GPC Breast Group representative or a staff person in charge of the site’s survey implementation December 22 – Complete the Site Preparation Questionnaire #1 Near-term Deadlines