Module 8 The Optional Protocol.  Understand the main features of the communications and inquires procedures in the Optional Protocol  Identify the main.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Necessitiy and Importance of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities Presentation at the International Conference.
Advertisements

UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Individual Complaints Procedure Ben Schokman Director — International Human Rights Advocacy Human.
PHILLIP FRENCH DIRECTOR AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR DISABILITY LAW 2012 Asserting human rights under the Optional Protocol.
VAW Research Briefing Yale Law School, Lowenstein Clinic - Katherine Culver, Jessica So, Tiffany Tam.
Bringing International Law Home: A Guide for Australian NGOs on the UN Human Rights System Teena Balgi Kingsford Legal Centre Ben Schokman Human Rights.
Module 7.1 State Reporting to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
© 2006 Prohibition of Torture Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Austria.
Regional conference on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, February, Belgrad,Serbia Albania’s Challenges.
Module 3 Ratification.  Understand the steps involved in ratifying the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol.
Human Rights Advocacy “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”
CRC OPTIONAL PROTOCOL 3. What does the new Optional Protocol provide? Provides for a communications or ‘complaints procedure’ that allows individuals,
The UN human rights system and indigenous peoples
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Legal dilemmas in anti- discrimination law Faculty of Law Professor Niklas Bruun Helsinki and Stockholm Gothenburg
Planning and submitting a shadow report Charlotte Gage Women’s Resource Centre.
Civil Society and UN Human Rights Mechanisms OHCHR-OSCE Workshop on NGO reporting and monitoring – July Pristina.
UNCRPD Catherine Casserley Cloisters
NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 4 INVESTIGATION.
INTERACTION WITH THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM
Module 6 National implementation and monitoring frameworks.
Judith A. Oder Interights. Normative Framework OAU Refugee Convention 1969 African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights 1981 African Children’s Charter.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
The African Children’s Charter Prof Julia Sloth-Nielsen.
The UPR within the context of the UN Human Rights System.
5 September 2007Maria Lundberg, NCHR1 JUR 5710 Institutions and Procedures UN Treaty bodies.
Your name The ILO, International Labour Standards and Supervisory Mechanisms Presented by Cerilyn A. Pastolero Project Coordinator, ILO Manila Presented.
COMPLYING WITH THE UN CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES.
IRTP Part D PDP WG Items for Review. Items for Review Policy Development Process WG Charter GNSO WG Guidelines.
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights The individual complaints procedure under the treaty bodies.
C OMPLAINTS TRAINING WORKSHOP Geneva, Switzerland 6 – 9 May 2008 Choice of Forum Alexander H. E. Morawa, S.J.D. Professor of Law.
Basic concepts in Human Rights
INTRODUCTION TO THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR STANDARDS (ILS) SYSTEM Trade Union Training on Occupational Safety, health and the Environment, with Special Attention.
Trade Union Training on Economic and Financial Analyses of Enterprises INTERNATIONAL LABOUR STANDARDS: PROCEDURES AND SUPERVISION Turin, 9 August 2005.
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO.
Equinet Legal Seminar 1 July 2010 New Equinet report: Influencing the Interpretation of the Law – Powers and Practices of Equality Bodies Nanna Margrethe.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
ILO Supervisory Mechanisms
Uniting Nations by Learning Together UPR as a process of accountability Regional Governance Week Social Accountability in a Changing Region Cairo,
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) v. Ireland Complaint No. 110/2014 Mark Jordan University of Southampton 1.
1 English Legal System Civil court reforms. 2 Civil courts Civil reform Thermawear V Linton (1995) CA as per Lord Justice Henry, “…the adversarial system.
European Committe for Social Rights. The Council of Europe was established in 1949 by 10 Countries. It has now 47 member States. The European Convention.
ILS/FPR PROGRAMME, ITC ILO TURIN THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR STANDARDS (ILS) SYSTEM A GENERAL INTRODUCTION FOR TRADE UNIONS.
Implementation and monitoring of the Convention.  Implementation States parties to the Convention must : – Repeal laws conflicting with the Convention.
© International Training Centre of the ILO Training Centre of the ILO 1 International Labour Standards (ILS) and their.
The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (MNE Declaration) Multinational enterprises and social policy.
Human rights also to electrosensible disabled persons Giorgio Cinciripini,
© International Training Centre of the ILO International Labour Standards and the ILO Supervisory System: tools to defend workers’ rights Geneva,
International Human Rights Mechanisms: An NGO Perspective Ben Schokman June
Turin International Labour Standards System Monique Cloutier.
THE COLLECTIVE COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE UNDER THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER AMSTERDAM, 10 NOVEMBER 2014.
The third Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure (OP3 CRC) Anita Goh Advocacy Officer
Susie Talbot, INTERIGHTS.  The ICESCR and OP-ICESCR background  Opportunities under the OP-ICESCR  Taking a strategic case from the national level.
process and procedures for assessments
VAW Research Briefing Yale Law School, Lowenstein Clinic - Katherine Culver, Jessica So, Tiffany Tam.
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Enforced disappearances and the UN Human rights mechanisms
Results and recommendations of the CRPD Committee’s examination of the UK 9 November 2017 Rachel Fox – Senior Associate, Treaty Monitoring 01.
Functions of the Treaty Bodies
State Reporting to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Module 7.1.
ILO Supervisory system and the fight against forced labour
Ratification Module 3.
The Optional Protocol Module 8.
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
National implementation and monitoring frameworks
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure (New York, 19 December 2011) The Hague, 4 June 2012 Legal.
ILO Convention No. 189 Ratification process
International Training Centre of the ILO
International Training Centre of the ILO
Presentation transcript:

Module 8 The Optional Protocol

 Understand the main features of the communications and inquires procedures in the Optional Protocol  Identify the main roles of States, OPDs, and United Nations country teams in promoting its ratification and ensuring appropriate follow-up  What is the communications procedure?  The process from submitting a communication to its resolution  Admissibility criteria  Checklist for submitting a communication  Interim measures  Views and follow-up  What is the inquiry procedure  Benefits of the Optional Protocol  Roles of States, civil society organizations and the United Nations ObjectivesModule flow

The communications procedure Some facts about the communications procedure A quasi-judicial procedure A written procedure Most communications do not satisfy the preliminary criteria for registration by the Committee (pre-admissibility stage) The Committee provides its views and recommendations Views are authoritative statements about the Convention’s provisions Remedies rely on the political will of the State party What the communications procedure is not The Committee is not a court There is no oral hearing There are no lawyers The result is not legally enforceable

From complaint to resolution

CHECKLIST FOR SUBMISSION Submission in writing (or legible alternative format) Identification of the author and victim (name, contact details, etc.) Identification of the State party concerned Clarification of the subject matter of the communication Clarification of the nature of the alleged violation Identification of steps taken to exhaust domestic remedies Clarification of other international procedures examining the complaint Identification of specific requests or remedies sought Date, place and signature List of documents attached (previous decisions, summaries of documents such as national laws in a working language of the Committee)

ADMISSIBILITY CRITERIA Is the communication from or on behalf of individuals or groups of individuals ? Yes Does this individual or group claims to be a victim of a violation of the Convention Yes Is the claimant subject to the State’s jurisdiction?Yes Has the State ratified the Optional Protocol?Yes Is the alleged victim anonymous?No Is the communication an abuse of the Optional Protocol?No Has the communication come before another international procedure of investigation or settlement? No Are domestic remedies exhausted?Yes Is the complaint manifestly unfounded or unsubstantiated?No Did the alleged conduct occur after the Optional Protocol’s entry into force for the State? Yes

Interim measures At any time after the receipt of a communication and before a determination of the merits has been reached, the Committee may transmit to the State Party concerned for its urgent consideration a request that the State Party take such interim measures as may be necessary to avoid possible irreparable damage to the victim or victims of the alleged violation. Optional Protocol, art. 4 (1) At any time after the receipt of a communication and before a determination of the merits has been reached, the Committee may transmit to the State Party concerned for its urgent consideration a request that the State Party take such interim measures as may be necessary to avoid possible irreparable damage to the victim or victims of the alleged violation. Optional Protocol, art. 4 (1)

Views and follow-up Views published State had 6 months to report Committee may seek further information State to report in next periodic report Committee working group or special rapporteur on follow-up

The inquiry procedure Receipt of reliable information of grave or systematic violations Invitation to the State to cooperate Designation of one or more Committee members to conduct the inquiry Country visit if State agrees Findings, comments and recommendations transmitted to State Observations from the State to be transmitted within 6 months Invitation to the State to report in its periodic report

Benefits of the Optional Protocol Can strengthen national protection mechanisms such as courts Can validate laws and policies Can validate or query national court decisions Helps the Government bring about domestic change Provides an opportunity to States to benefit from the advice of international experts Clarifies how to implement the Convention by reference to specific situations Helps to incorporate the Convention into domestic law Provides a mechanism for strategic litigation by civil society organizations to support key changes Can provide protection to victims Relatively easy for victims to use

Roles for stakeholders to support the Optional Protocol StatesCivil societyUnited Nations country teams Ratify the Optional ProtocolPromote ratification Strengthen implementationAssist authors with complaints Collect and disseminate jurisprudence Strengthen domestic remedies Draft communications on behalf of victims Raise awareness and train stakeholders such as judges and CSOs Provide timely information to the Committee Provide reliable information for inquiries Follow up on recommendations Monitor complianceAssist with follow-up Disseminate the Committee’s views Report on follow-up

Sources  Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  Committee’s Rules of Procedure (CRPD/C/4/2)  Fact sheet on the procedure for submitting communications to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities under the Optional Protocol to the Convention (CRPD/C/5/2/Rev.1)  Revised guidelines for submission of communications to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities under the Optional Protocol to the Convention (CRPD/C/5/3/Rev.1)  (accessed 10 August 2012)  Elements for an optional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (E/CN.4/2006/WG.23/2)