Type Ia Supernovae Progenitors. Type Ia Supernovae Historical defining characteristics: Generally, lack of lines of hydrogen Contain a strong Si II absorption.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ringberg, July 8, 2005 COSMIC RATE OF SNIa Laura Greggio INAF, Padova Astronomical Observatory.
Advertisements

Stellar Death Astronomy 315 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 14 “I am glad we do not have to try to kill the stars. … Imagine if a man each day should have.
Lecture 20 White dwarfs.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Clicker Questions Chapter 12 Stellar Evolution.
How are the lives of stars with close companions different?
Nova & SuperNova Heart of the Valley Astronomers, Corvallis, OR 2007.
Photometry of Type Ia Supernovae: Search for the Second Parameter Date: May 15, 2009 Author: Kevin Perot Advisor: Dr. Baron.
Chapter 18 Lecture The Cosmic Perspective Seventh Edition © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. The Bizarre Stellar Graveyard.
The Deaths of Stars The Southern Crab Nebula (He2-104), a planetary nebula (left), and the Crab Nebula (M1; right), a supernova remnant.
Mass transfer in a binary system
Binary Stellar Evolution How Stars are Arranged When stars form, common for two or more to end up in orbit Multiples more common than singles Binaries.
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
Supernova. Explosions Stars may explode cataclysmically. –Large energy release (10 3 – 10 6 L  ) –Short time period (few days) These explosions used.
1. accretion disk - flat disk of matter spiraling down onto the surface of a star. Often from a companion star.
The Lives of Stars Chapter 12. Life on Main-Sequence Zero-Age Main Sequence (ZAMS) –main sequence location where stars are born Bottom/left edge of main.
Stellar Explosions. Introduction Life after Death for White Dwarfs The End of a High-Mass Star Supernovae Supernova 1987A The Crab Nebula in Motion The.
Chapter 19.
Astronomy Picture of the Day. Recall: Luminosity - Intrinsic property of a star. Apparent Brightness – the brightness we perceive a star to be from Earth.
NASA's Chandra Sees Brightest Supernova Ever N. Smith et al. 2007, astro-ph/ v2.
Chapter 12: Stellar Evolution Stars more massive than the Sun The evolution of all stars is basically the same in the beginning. Hydrogen burning leads.
(Informal) workshop - Ferrara April 2004 SNe. Astrophysical (natural) Explosive Devices Thermonuclear SNe Gravitational collapse C-deflagration He-detonation.
Supernova Type 1 Supernova Produced in a binary system containing a white dwarf. The mechanism is the same (?) as what produces the nova event.
Type Ia Supernovae: standard candles? Roger Chevalier.
Chapter 21 Stellar Explosions. 21.1Life after Death for White Dwarfs 21.2The End of a High-Mass Star 21.3Supernovae Supernova 1987A The Crab Nebula in.
Black holes: do they exist?
Overview of Astronomy AST 200. Astronomy Nature designs the Experiment Nature designs the Experiment Tools Tools 1) Imaging 2) Spectroscopy 3) Computational.
Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts. Summary of Post-Main-Sequence Evolution of Stars M > 8 M sun M < 4 M sun Subsequent ignition of nuclear reactions involving.
Star Formation. Introduction Star-Forming Regions The Formation of Stars Like the Sun Stars of Other Masses Observations of Brown Dwarfs Observations.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Life Cycle of the Stars.
Chapter 19 Star Formation
Chapter 21 Stellar Explosions Life after Death for White Dwarfs A nova is a star that flares up very suddenly and then returns slowly to its former.
1 The structure and evolution of stars Lecture14: Type Ia Supernovae The Extravagant Universe By R. Kirshner.
Dec. 6, Review: >8Msun stars become Type II SNe As nuclear burning proceeds to, finally, burning Silicon (Si) into iron (Fe), catastrophe looms.
SNLS-03D3bb Andy Howell University of Toronto and the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS)
Review for Quiz 2. Outline of Part 2 Properties of Stars  Distances, luminosities, spectral types, temperatures, sizes  Binary stars, methods of estimating.
Precise Cosmology from SNe Ia Wang Xiao-feng Physics Department and Tsinghua Center for Astrophysics, Tsinghua University 2005, 9, 22, Sino-French Dark.
Different Kinds of “Novae” I. Super Novae Type Ia: No hydrogen, CO WD deflagration --> detonation Type Ia: No hydrogen, CO WD deflagration --> detonation.
SN Ia rates and progenitors Mark Sullivan University of Southampton.
A Star Becomes a Star 1)Stellar lifetime 2)Red Giant 3)White Dwarf 4)Supernova 5)More massive stars October 28, 2002.
Clicker Question: In which phase of a star’s life is it converting He to Carbon? A: main sequence B: giant branch C: horizontal branch D: white dwarf.
SN Ia Margutti Raffaella, Observational methods.
Ay 123 Lecture 11 - Supernovae & Neutron Stars Timescales for HS Burning faster and faster..
Stellar Evolution. Solar Composition Most stars in space have this composition: 74% hydrogen, 26% helium Fusion is the energy maker of the sun.
9. Evolution of Massive Stars: Supernovae. Evolution up to supernovae: the nuclear burning sequence; the iron catastrophe. Supernovae: photodisintigration;
Two types of supernovae
Termination of Stars. Some Quantum Concepts Pauli Exclusion Principle: Effectively limits the amount of certain kinds of stuff that can be crammed into.
The Death of High Mass Stars: 8 Solar Masses and up.
Progenitor stars of supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada.
Chapter 11 The Interstellar Medium
Death of sun-like Massive star death Elemental my dear Watson Novas Neutron Stars Black holes $ 200 $ 200$200 $ 200 $ 200 $400 $ 400$400 $ 400$400.
Study of the type IIP supernova 2008gz Roy et al. 2011, MNRAS accepted.
Chapter 15.2 The classification of Supernovae. Types of Supernova.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 2: Type Ia supernovae and Λ Distances at z ~1 Type Ia supernovae SNe Ia and cosmology Results from the Supernova Cosmology Project,
The Deaths of Stars Please press “1” to test your transmitter.
CIfAR Stanford 2008 SN Ia Rates: Theory, Progenitors, and Implications.
Supernova Type 1 Supernova Produced in a binary system containing a white dwarf. The mechanism is the same (?) as what produces the nova event.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. The Bizarre Stellar Graveyard.
Star Formation. Chapter 19 Not on this Exam – On the Next Exam!
Gamma-Ray Bursts Please press “1” to test your transmitter.
Nuclei in the Cosmos XI Heidelberg, July 22, 2010 Friedrich Röpke DFG Emmy Noether Junior Research Group Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Garching,
Type 1a Supernovae Astrophysics Lesson 17.
Supernova.
Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts
The lifecycles of stars
Composition of Stars Classify stars by their color, size, and brightness. Other properties of stars are chemical composition and mass. Color and Temperature.
Chapter 11 The Interstellar Medium
White Dwarf Stars Low mass stars are unable to reach high enough temperatures to ignite elements heavier than carbon in their core become white dwarfs.
The structure and evolution of stars
The lifecycles of stars
Supernova.
Presentation transcript:

Type Ia Supernovae Progenitors

Type Ia Supernovae Historical defining characteristics: Generally, lack of lines of hydrogen Contain a strong Si II absorption feature (6355Å shifted to ~6100Å)

Observational Characteristics Homogeneity: nearly 60% homogeneous in terms of spectra, light curves, peak absolute magnitudes M B ~ log(H o /74) Inhomogeneity: differences in spectra, light curves, do exist. In terms of explosion strength, order: Very weak, e.g. SN 1991bg, SN 1992k Weak, e.g. SN 1986G Normal, ~60% Very bright, e.g. SN 1991T, ~20%

Energy:½(~10 4 km/s) 2 ~ E CO->Fe Degeneracy:Explosive event Spectrum:Generally no hydrogen Delay:Explosions can occur with long delay after cessation of star formation. Basic model:Thermonuclear disruption of mass-accreting white dwarf. Note:Flame physics is still an unsolved problem, deflagration to detonation? The following simple facts

Why is identifying the progenitors so important? The fact that we still don’t know the progenitors of some of the most dramatic explosions – a major embarrassment. For dark energy properties we need to understand the evolution of the luminosity with cosmic time. Feedback – radiative, kinetic, nucleosynthetic input into galaxy evolution.

Form at M wd ≲ 0.45M ☉ Can explode at ∼ 0.7M ☉ central He ignition But composition of ejected matter: He + 56 Ni + decay products Inconsistent with observations Form from M ∼ M ☉ But not numerous enough and expected to collapse to NS rather than explode Composition of accreting WD O-Ne-MgC-OHe Yes No

At what mass does the WD explode? Chandrasekhar mass carbon igniters Carbon ignites at center: Sub-Chandra mass helium igniters 1.At ~10 51 ergs Ni decay powers lightcurve 3.X; (V j ) consistent with spectra 4.M Ch explains homogeneity 1.Difficult to reach M Ch 2.For M WD ≳ 1.2M ☉ collapse to NS rather than explosion may ensue Indirect double detonation or “edge lit” detonation One detonation propagates outward (through He), inward pressure wave compresses the C-O, ignites off center, followed by outward detonation. +−

At what mass does the WD explode? Composition of high velocity ejecta In sub-Chandra mass WDs Intermediate mass elements sandwiched by Ni and He/Ni rich High velocity Ni, He! No high velocity C!

For progenitors we have two possible scenarios Double degenerate Merger of two CO WDs brought together by gravitational radiation Single degenerate A CO WD accretes material from a main sequence or red giant companion Binary WD systemsSystems such as: Recurrent novae Supersoft x-ray sources Symbiotic systems

Evolutionary Scenarios

Double degenerate scenario Strengths 1.Population synthesis predicts the right statistics. 2.Double degenerate systems detected observationally. 3.Mergers with some significant consequences appear inevitable. 4.In ellipticals, consistent with observed x-ray flux (~30x smaller than predicted for SDS). Weaknesses 1.Off-center carbon ignition may lead to O- Ne-Mg WD and accretion induced collapse rather than SN Ia.

Double degenerate scenario 1.The merger of two 0.9 M ☉ WDs produced a subluminous SN Ia (SN 1991bg-like).

Double degenerate scenario 2.Simulation of 0.6 M ☉ M ☉ suggested that SNe Ia could be obtained if

Single degenerate scenario Strengths 1.If accreted matter can be retained, natural path to increasing mass. 2.Candidate progenitors exist. Weaknesses 1.It is not absolutely clear that a hydrogen-accreting WD can indeed reach M Ch. 2.Limits on the presence of H exclude symbiotics with the highest mass loss rates. 3.In ellipticals, the observed x-ray flux ~30x smaller than predicted.

A few recent observational findings 1.Two populations: “Prompt” – SN Ia rate ~ star formation rate “Delayed” – SN Ia rate ~ stellar mass ⇓ a.Rate higher in late type galaxies. b.For higher z prompt dominate sample. c.Prompt are brighter.

Recent observational findings 2.A decrease with redshift in the strength of intermediate mass element features (consistent with higher brightness, which implies larger mass of 56 Ni).

Recent observational findings 3.The luminosity-weighted age of the host galaxy is correlated with the 56 Ni yield ⇒ more massive progenitors give rise to more luminous explosions.

Recent observational findings 4.Super-Chandrasekhar mass progenitors? E.g. SNLS-03D3bb SN 2009dc.

Serendipity and SNe Ia A short (10 sec) acquisition image by STIS on board HST of the nucleus of the radio-loud galaxy 3C 78 revealed a point source superposed very near the jet – a SN Ia.

Possibility to Increase SNe Ia Rate? The shocks produced by jets can either: a.Heat mass-donor star in binaries containing white dwarfs, thereby increasing the mass transfer rate. or b.Compress clumps in the interstellar medium thereby increasing the mass accretion rate onto low-velocity white dwarfs. Prediction: The rate of classical novae should increase too, because novae are obtained when white dwarfs accrete at rates

Serendipity and Classical Novae An HST program intended to measure the proper motion of the optical jet in M87 discovered 11 transient sources in the vicinity of the jet. HST WFPC2

Conclusions 1.Single degenerate scenario could, in principle, explain everything: prompt are caused by accretion from young main sequence stars (~8M ☉ ), and delayed are caused by accretion from red giant companions (~1M ☉ ). However, models involve maybe too many “moving parts.”

Conclusions 2.Double degenerates could perhaps produce SNe Ia, especially in ellipticals, but many uncertainties remain. 3.Is there something to be learned from gamma-ray bursts? In particular, if indeed both double degenerates and single degenerates contribute to SNe Ia, then it would be hard to believe that mergers and accretion from a red giant, in ellipticals, would appear precisely the same in all two- parameter diagrams (e.g., the separation between long and short GRBs in duration-hardness diagrams). Consequently, there should be some phase space in which the two progenitor families should separate.