P. Miocchi 1,2, R. Capuzzo-Dolcetta 2, P. Di Matteo 2,3 1 INAF - Osserv. Astron. di Teramo (Teramo, Italy) 2 Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Rome “La Sapienza”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
David Cole, University of Leicester Walter Dehnen; Mark Wilkinson – University of Leicester; Justin Read – ETH Zurich 29 June 2012.
Advertisements

The Thick Disks of Spiral Galaxies as Relics from Gas-Rich, Turbulent, Clumpy Disks at High Redshifts Frédéric Bournaud, Bruce G. Elmegreen, and Marie.
Galaxy Formation and Evolution, Mo, van den Bosch & White, 2010 Galactic Dynamics, Binney & Tremaine 2008.
Long Term Future of Halos, Definition of Galaxy Mass, Orbital Instabilities, and Stochastic Hill’s Equations Fred Adams, Univ. Michigan fq(x) Foundational.
Formation of intergroup and intragroup objects Kenji Bekki (UNSW) Origin of isolated massive clouds, intergalactic HII regions, intragroup GCs etc….
Does the Fornax dwarf spheroidal have a central cusp or core? Collaborators: Justin Read, Ben Moore, Joachim Stadel, Marcel Zemp and George Lake Tobias.
GALAXIES IN DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS: VOIDS TO CLUSTERS:  Simulations will require to model full physics:  Cooling, heating, star formation feedbacks…
Formation of Globular Clusters in  CDM Cosmology Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan)
On the size evolution of early type galaxies and their dark matter haloes Gian Luigi Granato INAF – Trieste Cinthia Ragone-Figueroa Mario Abadi IATE-Cordoba.
Galaxy Formation and Evolution Open Problems Alessandro Spagna Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino Torino, 18 Febbraio 2002.
Spitzer Reveals Activities of Supermassive Black Holes in Elliptical Galaxies Qiusheng Gu Nanjing University in collaboration with J.-S. Huang (CfA), G.
Session: MGAT9 – Self-Gravitating Systems SPHERICALLY SYMMETRIC RELATIVISTIC STELLAR CLUSTERS WITH ANISOTROPIC MOMENTUM DISTRIBUTION Marco MERAFINA Department.
ANGULAR MOMENTUM AND THE STRUCTURE OF DM HALOS Chiara Tonini Special guest: Andrea Lapi Director: Paolo Salucci C.T., A. Lapi & P. Salucci (astro-ph/ ,
Clusters & Super Clusters Large Scale Structure Chapter 22.
Nuclei of Early-type Dwarf Galaxies: Are They Progenitors of Ultracompact Dwarf Galaxies? Paudel, S., Lisker, T., Janz, J. 2010, ApJ, 724, L64 Park, Hong.
Tidal Disruption of Globular Clusters in Dwarf Galaxies J. Peñarrubia Santiago 2011 in collaboration with: M.Walker; G. Gilmore & S. Koposov.
Vicky Kalogera Jeremy Sepinsky with Krzysztof Belczynski X-Ray Binaries and and Super-Star Clusters Super-Star Clusters.
Massive Star Clusters in Non- Interacting Galaxies Dynamical Mass Estimates and the (I)MF Søren S. Larsen ESO / ST-ECF, Garching Tom Richtler, Concepcion.
Galactic Evolution PHYS390 Astrophysics Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 21.
RECOILING BLACK HOLES IN GALACTIC CENTERS Michael Boylan-Kolchin, Chung-Pei Ma, and Eliot Quataert (UC Berkeley) astro-ph/
The Milky Way Galaxy James Binney Oxford University.
Numerical Modeling of Hierarchical Galaxy Formation Cole, S. et al. 2000, MNRAS 319, Adam Trotter December 4, 2007 Astronomy 704, UNC-Chapel Hill,
Cosmological N-body simulations of structure formation Jürg Diemand, Ben Moore and Joachim Stadel, University of Zurich.
Dynamical Evolution and the Mass Function of Globular Cluster Systems Dynamical Evolution and the Mass Function of Globular Cluster Systems Steve Zepf.
PRESIDENCY UNIVERSITY
X-ray Binaries in Nearby Galaxies Vicky Kalogera Northwestern University Super Star Clusters Starburst galaxies Ultra-Luminous X-Ray Sources Elliptical.
Goal: To know the different types of galaxies and to understand their differences and similarities. Objectives: 1) To learn about Spirals 2) To learn about.
Felipe Garrido Goicovic Supervisor: Jorge Cuadra PhD thesis project January 2014.
J. Cuadra – Accretion of Stellar Winds in the Galactic Centre – IAU General Assembly – Prague – p. 1 Accretion of Stellar Winds in the Galactic Centre.
Dynamical state and star formation properties of the merging galaxy cluster Abell 3921 C. Ferrari 1,2, C. Benoist 1, S. Maurogordato 1, A. Cappi 3, E.
Black holes: do they exist?
(MNRAS 327, 610, 2001 & 347, 1234, 2004) David Churches, Mike Edmunds, Alistair Nelson - Physics & Astronomy, Cardiff University - Physics & Astronomy,
Galactic Metamorphoses: Role of Structure Christopher J. Conselice.
Quasars, black holes and galaxy evolution Clive Tadhunter University of Sheffield 3C273.
Gary Mamon, 2 July 2005, PNe as astronomical tools, Gdansk Do planetary nebulae indicate a lack of dark matter in elliptical galaxies? with Avishai DEKEL.
Dynamical formation of LMXBs in the inner bulge of M31 by Rasmus Voss with Marat Gilfanov X-rays from nearby galaxies ESAC September 2007.
Population of dynamically formed triples in dense stellar systems Natalia Ivanova Fred Rasio, Vicky Kalogera, John Fregeau, Laura Blecha, Ryan O'Leary.
Top Five Lessons Learned from the Colliding Antennae Galaxies Brad Whitmore December 1, 2011 Hubble Science Briefing Space Telescope Science Institute.
A Supergroup in 6dFGS Sarah Brough, Swinburne University Virginia Kilborn, Duncan Forbes, Swinburne University Warrick Couch, UNSW Heath Jones, Mount Stromlo.
Galaxy Groups Duncan A. Forbes Centre for Astrophysics & Supercomputing, Swinburne University.
Dynamical Evolution of Globular Cluster Systems: The Milky Way & M87 Sungsoo S. Kim 1 Jihye Shin 1 Koji Takahashi 2 1 Kyung Hee Univ. (Korea) 2 Saitama.
New and Odds on Globular Cluster Stellar Populations: an Observational Point of View (The Snapshot Database) G.Piotto, I. King, S. Djorgovski and G. Bono,
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 2-1: Active galaxies and super massive black holes in the local universe Seminar: Gultekin et al. 2009, ApJ, 698,
Paolo Miocchi in collaboration with R. Capuzzo-Dolcetta, P. Di Matteo, A. Vicari Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Rome “La Sapienza” (Rome, Italy) Work supported.
Galactic structure and star counts Du cuihua BATC meeting, NAOC.
野口正史 (東北大学).  Numerical simulation Disk galaxy evolution driven by massive clumps  Analytical model building Hubble sequence.
A bestiary of QSO/host interactions Y. Letawe 1, P. Magain 1, G. Letawe 1, F. Courbin 2, D. Hutsemékers 1 1 Institut d’Astrophysique.
Galactic Archaeology wishy-washy Nobuo Arimoto NAOJ.
Susanne Pfalzner Christoph Olczak David Madlener Thomas Kaczmarek Jochen Tackenberg Manuel Steinhausen Uni Köln I.Physikalisches Institut.
Assembly of Massive Elliptical Galaxies
17 - Galaxy Evolution (and interactions).
Intermediate-mass Black Holes in Star Clusters Holger Baumgardt Astrophysical Computing Laboratory, RIKEN, Tokyo new address:
Capture of Stars by Supermassive Black Holes J.A. de Freitas Pacheco T. Regimbau C. Filloux Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur.
Modes of Star Formation along the Hubble Sequence … and beyond Richard de Grijs University of Sheffield, UK Terschelling, 7 July 2005.
Nearby mergers: ellipticals in formation? Thorsten Naab University Observatory, Munich October 4th, 2006 From the Local Universe to the Red Sequence Space.
1 VLT kinematics for Omega Centauri : Further support for a central BH E. Noyola et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, L Jun 30 (Thu) Sang Chul KIM ( 김상철 )
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
24 Apr 2003Astrogravs '031 Astrophysics of Captures Steinn Sigurdsson Dept Astro & Astrop, & CGWP Penn State.
Evolution of massive binary black holes Qingjuan Yu Princeton University July 21, 2002.
The prolate shape of the Galactic halo Amina Helmi Kapteyn Astronomical Institute.
The formation of ultra-compact dwarf galaxies and nucleated dwarf galaxies Collaborators: Ben Moore, Stelios Kazantzidis, Tobias Kaufmann, Andrea V. Macciò.
Ultracompact dwarf galaxies - a mixed bag of objects
The Origin and Structure of Elliptical Galaxies
Fueling QSOs: The Relevance of Mergers
The formation and dynamical state of the brightest cluster galaxies
Luciano del Valle & Andrés Escala Universidad de Chile
Evolution of massive binary black holes (BBHs)
Black Hole Binaries Dynamically Formed in Globular Clusters
Henry Ferguson STScI August 28, 2008
Modeling the Extended Structure of Dwarf Spheroidals (Carina, Leo I)
Presentation transcript:

P. Miocchi 1,2, R. Capuzzo-Dolcetta 2, P. Di Matteo 2,3 1 INAF - Osserv. Astron. di Teramo (Teramo, Italy) 2 Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Rome “La Sapienza” (Rome, Italy) 3 LERMA - Observ. de Paris (Paris, France) Work supported by the INAF-CINECA agreement ( key- project grants inarm033, inakp002) and by MIUR (PRIN2001). Globular Clusters close interactions in galactic central regions

Main motivations: the study of a possible Accretion Mechanism for galactic nuclei - the study of a possible Accretion Mechanism for galactic nuclei the problem of the Super Star Clusters formation - the problem of the Super Star Clusters formation the study of the GCs mass loss and the tidal-tails  orbit path connection - the study of the GCs mass loss and the tidal-tails  orbit path connection See Di Matteo’s poster Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006)

Murali & Weinberg, 1997, MNRAS, 288, 767. Tremaine et al, 1975, ApJ, 196, 407. Accretion of the galactic nucleus Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006)  Sufficiently massive (>10 6 M  ) GCs could have spiralled into the galactic nucleus in less than 1 Gyr GCs could have accreted nuclear regions because of:  Tidal destruction  Dynamical friction  in triaxial galaxies the dynamical friction braking time t df ~ one-order of magnitude shorter than in axisymmetric or spherical potential  t df  1  M; Capuzzo-Dolcetta 1993, ApJ, 415, 616

Accretion of the galactic nucleus 1.To what extent can GCs survive the strong tidal bulge interaction? 2.Do they eventually merge?  What features will the merged system have? Still few numerical studies on the merging process, e.g.: Fellhauer & Kroupa, 2002, MNRAS, 330, 642 Bekki et al., 2004, ApJ, 610, L13 Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006) Miocchi et al., Accepted on ApJ (astro-ph/ )

Tidal interactions in the central regions  Sufficiently compact clusters (c  1.2) survive the tidal interaction with the galactic potential at least for t  30 Myr. (~ 40 galactic core crossing time)  The passage through the galactic core gives rise to a tidal-shock stronger than that due to high velocity GC-GC collisions.  Tidal interactions produce further orbital decaying Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006)

Formation of Super Star Clusters (SSC) Compact stellar systems with mass intermediate between GCs and dwarf galaxies have been observed (HST, VLT):  Nuclear Star Clusters in the centre of late-type spirals (Matthews et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 208; Böker et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 105)  Ultracompact Dwarf Galaxies (Drinkwater et al., 2000, Pub.Astron. Soc. Austr., 17, 227; Phillips et al., 2001, ApJ, 560, 201; Bekki et al., 2003, MNRAS, 344, 399) M ~ 10 6 – 10 8 M , R < 100 pc  Formation mechanisms still unclear Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006)

The numerical model  N-body (ATD) accurate simulations (individual time-steps) with 10 6 ‘particles’ for more than 100,000 time-steps.  Galactic triaxial model (Schwarzschild-like with axial ratio 2:1.25:1 and a core mass ~ 7  10 9 M  ).  Dynamical friction included. Miocchi & Capuzzo Dolcetta, 2002, A&A, 382, clusters with: King initial profile (c ~ 0.8 – 1.2) M ~ 4.5  10 7 M  core radius ~ 10 – 20 pc ; limiting radius ~ 130 – 150 pc central vel. dispersion ~ 30 – 40 km/s Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006)

Super Star Cluster formation Time flows top-bottom and left-right from t = 0 to t = 15 Myr. One snapshot every 1 Myr Merging among 4 clusters. length unit = 200 pc 4 clusters initially at rest with: King initial profile (c ~ 0.8 – 1.2) M ~ 4.5  10 7 M  r c ~ 10 – 20 pc ; r t ~ 130 – 150 pc  0 ~ 30 – 40 km/s 400 pc t = 0 t = 15 Myr Galactic triaxial model (axial ratio 2:1.25:1, core mass ~ 7  10 9 M  ) with dynamical friction included.

Super Star Cluster formation continuation from t = 16 to t = 31 Myr Dynamical equilibrium attained! 16 Myr 31 Myr Merging among 4 clusters.

Merging duration Centre-of-density decaying for the 4 clusters Lagrangian radii (10, 30, 50, 90%) of the whole system Merging completed 400 pc time unit = 0.8 Myr ; length unit = 200 pc Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006)

Merging duration Centre-of-density decaying for the 4 clusters Merging completed The same without dynamical friction (simulation with N = 10 4 ) ~ 8 pc Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006)

Super Star Cluster formation The animations simulate 15 Myr. x y y z Last configuration (t = 31 Myr) 400 pc Merging among 4 clusters. x y y z Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006)

Super Star Cluster density profile  The final configuration of the SSC is axisymmetric (1.4:1.4:1, e = 0.3)  The formed SSC has a density profile comparable to the “sum” of the profiles of the 4 progenitor clusters  t rel >> Hubble time rhrh Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006) SSC superimposed GCs 3000 M  / pc 3

Super Star Cluster morphology The form of the SSC inner region (< r h ) is ~ axisymmetric around z-axis Surface isodensity contours at t = 41 Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006)

central vel. dispersion (km/sec) Super Star Cluster scaling relation The formed SSC has M = 1.9  10 8 M   0 = 150 km/s r h = 40 pc Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006) From Kissler-Patig, Jordán, Bastian, 2005, astro-ph/

Super Star Cluster scaling relation The formed SSC has M = 1.9  10 8 M   0 = 150 km/s r h = 40 pc Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006) From Kissler-Patig, Jordán, Bastian, 2005, astro-ph/

Conclusions  The 4 clusters merge in  18 galactic core crossing times (  14 Myr) starting from  100 pc from the galactic centre.  The resulting system attains a configuration of dynamical equilibrium.  The final spatial density is comparable with the sum of the initial cluster density profiles.  The SSC is located much closer to the GCs M-  sequence than to the elliptical galactic scaling relation.  The merging takes place also without dynamical friction, though with a  doubled time-scale Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006)

Future Prospects  A statistically significant set of orbits and clusters has to be considered.  Inclusion of further galactic components.  Self-consistent particle representation of the bulge desirable! Globular Clusters interaction in galactic central regions (Concepción, 2006)