Foldable Notes Graphic Organizer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Essay Prompt: Analyze how tariffs led to the nullification crisis and the development of the states’ rights theory/debate. How was this disagreement settled?
Advertisements

Copy the following on the top 15 lines of NB p. 45.
Andrew Jackson Part II 7th President of US
Nullification Crisis:
Andrew Jackson - A New Crisis
A dinner party argument over states-rights.
ALIEN AND SEDITION: AWFUL AND SORRY Chapter 8. The Laws are Passed The Federalist Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts  1798  Adams signed them.
Nullification Crisis Jackson versus Calhoun.
Ch 12.3 – Jackson and the Nullification Crisis! How did a dispute over tariffs in the 1830s indirectly lead to the US Civil War in 1860s?
Jackson’s Administration

Chapter 13 Section 2.  Unlike earlier Presidents, Jackson rarely met with his cabinet. He was more likely to seek advice from his trusted friends, who.
Preview List one reason for Jackson’s Indian Removal Act
The Nullification Crisis tariffs states’ rightsA crisis about tariffs and states’ rights State’s rights obey federalState’s rights – a theory that a state.
Arguments of Civil War. What was the Missouri Compromise of 1820?
The Nullification Crisis Southern Response When Tariffs Get Too High.
NULLIFICATION CRISIS States Rights Vs. Federal Goverment.
ROAD TO CIVIL WAR MISSOURI COMPROMISE WHAT WAS THE CONCERN ABOUT ADMITTING MISSOURI AS A STATE? THE BALANCE BETWEEN SLAVE AND FREE STATES IN THE SENATE.
US LEADING TO CIVIL WAR By: Chase kerns and Michael peck.
Ch Conflicts Over States’ Rights. Who was John C. Calhoun? One American’s Story What caused Calhoun to change his beliefs? What will you learn about.
The Nullification Crisis
Sectionalism and States’ Rights
Unit 3B: The Nullification Crisis Unit 3B: Jacksonian Democracy US History I - Mr. Sularz Summit High School.
Age of Jackson The Events. The Nullification Crisis Tariff of 1828 (“Tariff of Abominations”). John C. Calhoun of S. Carolina (V.P.) Nullification = States.
STATE RIGHTS VS FEDERAL AUTHORITY Nullification Crisis.
Age of Jackson Chapter 10. Election of 1824 John Quincy Adams vs. Andrew Jackson.
Sectionalism I. Industry North : Industrial economy Railroads Clippers increased foreign trade Machines helped produce more goods wave Favors protective.
The Congress Chapter 5 Section 3. Nullification Nullification- The belief that states had the right to nullify (disregard) laws passed by the national.
Have you ever had to draw a boundary line to keep someone out of your stuff or to keep someone away? Why did this happen? What was the opposing side’s.
The Jackson Era Jackson’s Administration
 Country in 3 sections  Country pulled into 3 sections Northeast, South, & West Northeast, South, & West  Regions argued over 3 economic issues land.
States Rights Debate 1798-AlienAlien and Sedition Acts 1799-VirginiaVirginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1827-TariffTariff of Abominations 1828 TheThe Nullification.
Federalist In Charge CHAPTER 9 p John Adams became President / Thomas Jefferson became Vice President Because they were from different parties.
Nullification Background Information write on back of Nullification graphic organizer Protective tariffs, tax on imported goods, had long been a topic.
The Tariff Debate (pages ) Explain in your own words what a tariff is. _______________________________________ Why did many northerners support.
Growing Sectionalism How did social and economic disparity contribute to the rise of sectionalism?
Chapter 10 A Changing Nation States’ Rights and the Economy.
SC’s Secession from the Union Standard Indicator
Andrew Jackson and The Nullification Issue The Nullification Issue The Webster and Hayes Debate The Force Bill.
 Your Persuasive Essay History content in your ELA Class.
Nullification Crisis Vice President John C. Calhoun
Conflicts Over States Rights
THE MISSOURI COMPROMISE AND NULLIFICATION CRISIS.
Tariffs, 2 nd Bank and Secession  EQ: How did Jackson’s actions in reference to the idea of secession delay a civil war?
Unit 4: A Nation Divided Lesson 2: Tensions over Slavery and popular sovereignty.
HW: CHAPTER 7 SECTION 2 - VOCAB AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS DUE MONDAY 9/20.
Sectionalism I.
The Nullification Crisis
Conflicts over States’ Rights
Lesson 2: Tensions over Slavery and popular sovereignty
Growing Sectionalism How did social and economic disparity contribute to the rise of sectionalism?
Andrew Jackson:
Nullification Crisis: Civil war averted
Federal vs. State Government ( )
Jackson as President As suffrage continued by 1840 more than 80% of white males voted for president.
Jackson’s Administration
Nullification Crisis Sectionalism: Constitutional?
Jackson-the Nullification Crisis
Andrew Jackson and The Nullification Issue
Conflict over States’ Rights
The nullification crisis
Texas Secession Essential Question: Why did Texas secede?
Jackson’s Administration
Question #1 Which precedent was established by the Supreme Court ruling in Marbury v. Madison? The federal government has the power to regulate trade.
Thinking Questions: The Missouri Controversy
6.2 Political Conflict & Economic Crisis
12.2 Nullification Controversy
States’ Rights & Nullification
Andrew Jackson Crisis in Office.
Chapter 7 section 5 Review
Presentation transcript:

Foldable Notes Graphic Organizer End Goal: A graphic organizer with 6 labeled sections for notes. 1. Fold a piece of paper lengthwise with a quarter inch flap left at the bottom. 2. Fold the paper into thirds. Remember when folding into thirds, the portion that you fold over is approximately the same size as the remaining side.

Foldable Notes Graphic Organizer From this to this. 3. Fold paper one last time. This time in half. 4. Unfold. You should have six sections. Label the bottom flap “Nullification - the idea that a state has the right to invalidate a federal law.” Nullification - the idea that a state has the right to invalidate a federal law

Foldable Notes Graphic Organizer 5. Label each flap from left to right: 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts 1799 Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions 1812 Hartford Convention 1827 Tariff of Abominations 1828 The Nullification Crisis My Conclusion – Where you decide if a state should be allowed to use nullification and two reasons why or why not

The Nullification Notes: A States’ Rights Debate 1798- Alien 1812- and Key Concept- FEDERALISM-American government structure is organized so powers are divided between Federal and State governments. The Nullification Notes: A States’ Rights Debate 1798- Alien and Sedition Acts 1799- Virginia Kentucky Resolutions 1812- Hartford Convention

Alien and Sedition Acts The Alien Act-Could Expel foreigners for looking suspicious. Sedition Act- Forbade people from publishing or voicing criticism against the government. Back to Home/ Front Page

Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions Kentucky and Virginia passed legislation (laws) at the state level which nullified (cancelled) the Alien and Sedition acts on the basis that they were unconstitutional. Back to Home/ Front Page

Hartford Convention War of 1812 Many New Englanders from the Federalist party opposed the war. They met to discuss the idea of nullifying the war act and/or seceding from the United States to form their own country. They dropped this idea after the U.S. victory at the Battle of New Orleans. Back to Home/ Front Page

Tariff of Abominations Tariff- Tax on imported goods. A high tariff was passed to protect northern manufacturers- Why? So they sell more. The South calls it an “abomination” because they buy foreign goods. The tax made the goods more expensive. Back to Home/ Front Page

The Nullification Crisis South Carolina nullifies the Federal law. S.C. says that the Kentucky and Virginia resolutions set precedent that states could nullify federal laws. Back to Home/ Front Page

Jackson Responds Jackson was enraged! He declared that S. Carolina would enforce the law. He passed the Force Bill- Approved by congress saying that he could use the army to enforce laws if necessary. Back to Home/ Front Page

Can a State Nullify a Law? It is a question of the supremacy of the national government versus state sovereignty (states’ rights). Back to Home/ Front Page

No Senator Daniel Webster argued that only the Supreme Court could decide whether a law was constitutional. He said the federal government was sovereign, that the Union was perpetual, and that any attempt to dismember it was nothing less than treason. Back to Home/ Front Page

Yes States formed the Union by an agreement (or "compact") among the States, and that as creators of the federal government, the States have the final authority to determine the limits of the power of that government. States, not the federal courts are the ultimate interpreters of the extent of the federal government's power. Thus states may reject, or nullify, federal laws that the States believe are beyond the federal government's constitutional powers.

What about Secession? If the states have the right to nullify federal laws that they believe are beyond the federal government's constitutional powers, do they have the right to secede from the Union? Back