Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
College of Engineering and Computer Science Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Wright State University Regular Class Aircraft SAE Aero.
Advertisements

Michael DeRosa Master of Engineering Final Project Exploration of Airfoil Sections to Determine the Optimal Airfoil for Remote Controlled Pylon Racing.
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
Daniel Graves –Project Lead James Reepmeyer – Lead Engineer Brian Smaszcz– Airframe Design Alex Funiciello – Airfoil Design Michael Hardbarger – Control.
Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Proposal Presentation February 17 th, 2005 Matthew Chin Advisor: Prof. S. Thangam Aaron Dickerson Brett J. Ulrich Tzvee Wood.
What is engineering? Engineering - The branch of science and technology concerned with the design, building, and use of engines, machines, and structures.
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
Guidelines Presentation. Aircraft Aim & Judging The aircraft needs to transport the mirror segments of the ESO European Extremely Large Telescope, being.
SAE AERO DESIGN 2004 HEAVY-LIFT CARGO PLANE Stephen McNulty Richard-Marc Hernandez Jessica Pisano Yoosuk Kee Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam Control.
Florida International University Mechanics and Materials Engineering SAE Aero Design® Brazil Competition Senior Design Project Presentation Team 6: PanthAir.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Brian Martinez.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane William Gerboth, Jonathan Landis, Scott Munro, Harold Pahlck February 18, 2010.
SAE Aero Design Guidelines Rev A, 2013 Aero Design Oral Presentation Guidelines How to Deliver a Presentation The Judges will Notice.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
David Chandpen (Lead Engineer) Matthew Maberry Travis Cushman Benjamin Waller Zach Veilleux Joseph Travaglini.
JLFANG-LDS Light Dynamic Strikefighter Dr. James Lang, Project Advisor Aircraft Design by Team Bling-Bling Marcus Artates Connor McCarthy Ryan McDonnell.
1 Design Group 2 Kat Donovan - Team Leader Andrew DeBerry Mike Kinder John Mack Jeff Newcamp Andrew Prisbell Nick Schumacher Conceptual Design for AME.
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
D & C PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 November 4, 2003
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Stephen McNulty Richard-Marc Hernandez Jessica Pisano Yoosuk Kee Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Proposal Matthew Chin, Aaron Dickerson, Brett J. Ulrich, Tzvee Wood October 5 th, 2004 Group #1 – Project #3.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
The Barn Owls Chris “Mo” Baughman Kate Brennan Christine Izuo Dan Masse Joe “Sal” Salerno Paul Slaboch Michelle Smith.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Stephen McNulty Richard-Marc Hernandez Jessica Pisano Yoosuk Kee Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
March 3, Structures and Weights 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Structures 1 PDR Team “Canard” October 12th,
Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Group #1 Matthew Chin, Aaron Dickerson Brett J. Ulrich, Tzvee Wood Advisor: Professor Siva Thangam December 9 th, 2004.
SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Advisor: Siva Thangam Group Members: Will Gerboth Jon Landis Scott Munro Harold Pahlck.
BATTAGLIA MARIO FACCIO PEDRO SALAZAR ANDRES 2015 SAE Aero Design East Competition Faculty Advisor: Dr. Dulikravich.
Review Chapter 12. Fundamental Flight Maneuvers Straight and Level Turns Climbs Descents.
Team 5 Structures PDR Presented By: Ross May James Roesch Charles Stangle.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Stephen McNulty Richard-Marc Hernandez Jessica Pisano Yoosuk Kee Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane William Gerboth, Jonathan Landis, Scott Munro, Harold Pahlck October 8, 2009.
Justin DeStories Aircraft Design. Objective/Requirements  The UAV team at Arizona State University is designing, optimizing, and building an autonomous.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Aero Design Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo
Michael DeRosa Master of Engineering Final Project
[SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane] Joe Lojek : James Koryan : Justin Sommer : Ramy Ghaly [Ducks on a Plane] : Advisor Professor Thangam : Thursday, February.
SAE Aero Design West 2008 Information Session. What is the SAE competition? Who - Undergrad and Grad Students (SAE Members) Competition Components - Design.
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
Brian Martinez Chase Beatty Mohammed Ramadan Noe Caro.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Chase Beatty.
Craig Kohring, Pat Tice, Sean Dineen, Mark Gasser James Pallardy, Katie Schipf, AJ Dayvie.
2015 SAE Aero East Design Team 2015 SAE Aero Design East Team Mid-Term Status Report (3/5/2015)
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Richard-Marc Hernandez Yoosuk Kee Stephen McNulty Jessica Pisano Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44.
Miguel Jimenez Ricardo Lugo Carlos Rojas Advisor: Andres Tremante.
SAE AERO DESIGN® EAST COMPETITION A SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT PREPARED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICAL.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
Final Design Team 6 December 2 nd, UAV Team Specializations David Neira – Power & Propulsion Josiah Shearon – Materials Selection & Fabrication.
Subsystem Level Design Review.  Project Review  System Level Changes ◦ Tail Dragger ◦ Airfoil Change and Discussion  Subsystem Selection ◦ Fuselage.
2015 SAE Aero Design East Team
Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Joe Lojek Justin Sommer James Koryan Ramy Ghaly November 7, 2006 Ducks on a Plane.
Aerodynamic Design of a Light Aircraft
Beard & McLain, “Small Unmanned Aircraft,” Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 4: Slide 1 Chapter 4 Forces and Moments.
Yaqoub Almounes John Cowan Josh Gomez Michael Medulla Mohammad Qasem
2007 SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
SAE Aero 2017 Midterm Presentation Joe Zongolowicz, Nick Montana, Frank Dixon, Kevin Scheventer, Kathy Hansen, Marquis Ward, Gerald Short, Zhangsiwen Xiao,
SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Structures and Weights 1 QDR
ME 423 Design Progress Nugget Chart
Presentation transcript:

Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane William Gerboth, Jonathan Landis, Scott Munro, Harold Pahlck December 21, 2009

Presentation Outline Project Objectives Competition Update Phase I Summary Phase II Summary Design Approaches Technical Analysis Equipment Selection Prototype Fabrication Plan Updated Budget Nugget Charts

Project Objectives Design and build an airplane to successfully compete in the SAE Aero East competition Plane must successfully take off from a runway of 200 feet and land on a runway 400 feet Constraints of 55 pounds total weight, and the combined height, length, and width of 200 inches Plane must make one complete 360° circuit of the field per attempt

Competition Updates Aero Design East competition is full As of now Aero West is still open In order to compete Submission of design report with plans and payload prediction before January 21, 2010 Aircraft must be constructed and tested by February 22, 2010 Decision not to compete Time needed to complete report and construct airplane

Phase I Summary Design concepts were decided upon Airfoil Shape: Eppler 423 Wing Shape: Straight Landing Gear: Tricycle Tail shape: T-Tail

Phase II Summary Calculated drag, lift, takeoff distance, & landing distance Used equations from textbooks, White paper, online Drag Takeoff Landing

Design Approaches CL vs. Angle of Attack CL available from Eppler 423 Determined flap angle of 8 deg. to prevent stall CL,max = 1.4

Technical Analysis: Wing Loading Wing subject lift force Non uniform distributed load 22.5 lbs per wing Max Stress = 886 psi Yield Strength = 2000 psi Max Displacement = 1.57 in

Technical Analysis: Fuselage Loading Fuselage tested for relative strength Cantilever static analysis done Force of 1 lb used to test strength in x-y and x-z directions Max Stressx-y= 314 psi Max Stressx-z= 156 psi Max Displacementx-y = .084 in. Max Displacementx-z= .083 in.

Technical Analysis: Tail Analysis The tail was analyzed for withstanding a 3ft drop and drag forces Max Stress: 290 PSI Max Displacement: .046 in

Technical Analysis: Landing Gear Landing gear tested to withstand a 3ft drop Max Stress: 22,874 PSI Max Displacement: .023 in

Technical Analysis: Stability & Control Longitudinal Static Stability Criteria: Static Margin Must be Positive Static Margin = hn- h Neutral Point = hn = Tail Volume Ratio = Center of Gravity = h Solidworks Used to Calculate C.G

Equipment Selection Engine Fuel Tank Propeller Servos O.S. .61FX with E-4010 Muffler Fuel Tank Great Planes Fuel Tank 12 oz. Propeller APC 14x4W Propeller Servos 5G TowerPro SG50 Micro RC Servos

Prototype Fabrication Plan

Updated Budget Item Estimated Cost Available Final Cost SAE Membership $40 No SAE Registration $600 R/C Controller $200 Yes $0 Engine w/ muffler $180 Propeller $20 Tires/Axle $10 Batteries Servos $100 Push Rods Fuel Tank $5 Balsa/Glue/Monokote $150 $75 Travel $2,000 Misc. $139 Total $3,474   $2,859

Plan for Phase IV Do further analysis on final design Build and analyze a small scale airfoil for testing in the wind tunnel Begin construction Devise a testing plan

ME 423 Phase I Nugget Chart – Proposal & Conceptual Design Title: Heavy Cargo Lift Plane Team Members: William Gerboth, Scott Munro, Jonathan Landis, Harold Pahlck Advisor: Professor Siva Thangam Project #: 3 Date: 9/30/09 Project Objectives Design and build an airplane that conforms to the SAE competition rules and regulations. Plane must navigate a 360 degree after taking off from within a 200 foot runway, and then land successfully on a runway of 400 feet. Constraints of 55 total pounds and a height, width, and length of 200 inches must be followed. Conceptual Designs and Highlights Airfoil Profile Lift Force Take-off and Landing Ease of Construction Stall Angle Drag Durable Why This Project and State-of-the-art A high lift ability to plane weight ratio is ideal for cargo, military, and medical transportation because cost will be reduced without sacrificing performance. The technology can also be applied to unmanned aerial vehicles for military use. Drawing and Illustration of Promising Concepts Eppler 423 airfoil What Are the Key Areas/Aspects to Solve Lift force must be maximized from the wing design Limited to the FX OS 0.61 engine which produces approximately 1.9 hp. Design needs to maximize the weight that can be lifted while minimizing the weight of the plane.

ME 423 Phase II Nugget Chart – Design Selection and Technical Analysis Title: Heavy Cargo Lift Plane Team Members: William Gerboth, Scott Munro, Jonathan Landis, Harold Pahlck Advisor: Professor Siva Thangam Project #: 3 Date: 11/12/09 Project Objectives Design and build an airplane that conforms to the SAE competition rules and regulations. Plane must navigate a 360 degree after taking off from within a 200 foot runway, and then land successfully on a runway of 400 feet. Constraints of 55 total pounds and a height, width, and length of 200 inches must be followed. Results Obtained at This Point Types and Focuses of Technical Analysis Force analysis of structural members of wing, tail, and fuselage. Stress analysis of materials to use for structural members Deflection tests of landing gear Static analysis for wing and tail design Aerodynamic analysis to maximize lift and minimize drag Propeller design to maximize the power available in the engine Drawing and Illustration (about technical analysis performed) Design Specifications Wing span of 120 inches Overall length of 68 inches Height of 12 inches Thrust of 11.86 pounds Estimated payload of 23 pounds Plane weight of 12 pounds

ME 423 Phase III Nugget Chart – Analysis & Engineering Design Title: Heavy Cargo Lift Plane Team Members: William Gerboth, Scott Munro, Jonathan Landis, Harold Pahlck Advisor: Professor Siva Thangam Project #: 3 Date: 12/15/09 Project Objectives Design and build an airplane that conforms to the SAE competition rules and regulations. Plane must navigate a 360 degree after taking off from within a 200 foot runway, and then land successfully on a runway of 400 feet. Constraints of 55 total pounds and a height, width, and length of 200 inches must be followed. Results Obtained in the Semester Height of 12 inches, Length of 68 inches Wingspan of 120 inches, Chord length of 12 inches Eppler 423 airfoil for main wing NACA 0012 airfoil for tail wing Coefficient of lift max = 1.4 Propeller of 14” diameter x 4.5” pitch Takeoff distance = 190 at 46.5 ft/s and 25 pounds Technical Analysis (cont.) Stress analysis of materials Aerodynamic analysis to maximize lift and minimize drag Propeller design to maximize the power available in the engine Drawing and Illustration Engineering Design Solidworks and COSMOSworks analysis Confirmed analysis through Excel calculations Prototype Plan and Purchase Requisition Updated budget to exclude recycled materials Took inventory of existing materials Budget without travel is $859 Begin ordering and then construction