History and Development of Pre- loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI) Heiden Bliss Ryan Richmond Scott McCutcheon History and Development of Pre-loaded Single.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Project Principal Investigator: Stephen J. Rocklage Co-authors: Billy D. Arnsberg and Dale S. Kellar Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries.

Advertisements

Smolt Monitoring Program 1982-Present BPA project#

COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.

A Study to Evaluate Delayed (Extra) Mortality Associated with Passage of Yearling Chinook Salmon Smolts through Snake River Dams Project No

Comparative Survival Study Smolt Monitoring Program 2010 PIT Tag Mark Groups.

Survival Estimates for the Passage of Juvenile Salmonids Through Dams and Reservoirs of the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers (Project ) CBFWA March.

Management Implications of ISAB Tagging Report # Council Meeting June 9, 2009 Whitefish, Montana.

Fall Chinook Acclimation Project (FCAP) Overview Under ESA NMFS lists Snake River fall chinook as threatened in 1992 Co-managers agreed to release 450,000.

Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.

Columbia Basin Pit Tag Information System BPA Project Number July

Strategic Hatchery Management Roadmap to Success Don Campton U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, OR.

Conserving Americas Fisheries U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Columbia River Fisheries Program Office Future of Our Salmon A Vision of Restoration in the.

Rebecca A. Buchanan Columbia Basin Research School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle, WA INVESTIGATING MIGRATORY PROCESSES.

Examining the Effects of Juvenile Migration Timing on Adult Age of Columbia River Salmon Benjamin P. Sandford Fish Ecology Division Fish Ecology Division.

Methods to Mitigate Tagging Effects (Actual & Perceived) Scott McCutcheon Ryan Richmond Methods to Mitigate Tagging Effects.

PTAGIS Program Review and Roadmap Focused on Portland Team for the 2014 PIT Tag Steering Committee Annual Meeting.

Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.

A Review of the 2014 Mark Procedures Manual Tiffani Marsh 1, Charles Morrill 2, Pat Keniry 3, Stephen Pastor 4, Jeff Fryer 5, Scott Putnam 6, Brandon Chockley.

Evaluation of a Prototype Spillway Transceiver Gordon Axel, Dr. Sandy Downing, Bruce Jonasson, and Gabriel Brooks Northwest Fisheries Science Center Fish.

Evaluation of prototype fish passage structures in the Lower Granite Dam juvenile fish bypass system – juvenile Pacific lamprey results Rod.

Comparing Preloaded PIT Tag Single Use Injectors to Multiple Use PIT Injectors Scott McCutcheon Ryan Richmond Heiden Bliss Comparing Preloaded Single Use.

Craig D. Rabe 1 Doug Nelson 1 Kenneth F. Tiffan 2 Russell W. Perry 2 William P. Connor 3 Frank L. Mullins Survival, Growth, and Tag Retention in.

Assessing the use of PIT Tags as a Tool to Monitor Adult Chinook Salmon Returns to Idaho John Cassinelli Regional Fisheries Biologist Idaho Department.

Emerging PIT-tag Technologies Presenter: Sandra Downing Ideas and information supplied by numerous people For NPCC Fish Tagging Forum – March 22, 2012.

Tagging  Fish are captured via angling & implanted with a VEMCO acoustic transmitter (V13, V9, or V7) – (Figure 4).  Specific age classes are targeted.

Strategies to Maximize the Efficiency of Using Parentage-based Tagging as a Tool to Meet Management and Research Objectives By Carl Stiefel Idaho Department.

Development of the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan: A Brief History Scott Marshall LSRCP Program Administrator U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.

Tucannon Endemic Steelhead – An Integrated Program picture.

Fecundity Management Strategies. Why Talk About This? As managers, we utilize various methods in managing broodstock collection – we never want to be.

New PIT tags - Collision analysis - Approval Process Joseph Zydlewski, Todd Gilmore USFSW – CRFPO, Vancouver, WA Sean Casey Digital Angel/ Destron Fearing.

COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON AND STEELHEAD RETURNS FPAC and TMT – March 2013 Presented by: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.

Combining PIT Tags with Scale Reading to Better Understand the Life History of Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Douglas Marsh and William Muir - NOAA Fisheries.

Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N McNary Dworshak Anderson Ranch Palisades Ice Harbor Grand Coulee Revelstroke Lower Monumental.

Pacific Fishery Management Council Jurisdiction –3 miles to 200 miles –4 states (includes Idaho) Members -- appointed –State governments –Federal Agencies.

By Richard Hinrichsen, Shawn Narum, Matt Campbell, Mike Ackerman, Craig Steele, Maureen Hess, Bill Young, Barbara Shields, Brian Maschhoff Funded by: Bonneville.

Lower Snake River Fish & Wildlife Compensation Plan Scott Marshall LSRCP Program Manager US Fish & Wildlife Service.

May 10, 2012 Presented by Micki Varney Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Smolt Monitoring Program: Overview and Data Collection (SMP Traps) Brandon R. Chockley SMP Pre-Season Meeting Feb. 11,

Estimating the Age and Origin of Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon at Lower Granite Dam Christian Smith USFWS Abernathy Lab, Longview, WA Jody White Quantitative.

RMIS Overview & Infomap Service PSMFC Regional Mark Processing Center (RMPC) Overview of RMPC & CWT Database Since 1977 the RMPC has provided essential.

Management Strategies for Columbia River Recreational and Commercial Fisheries and Beyond Oregon and Washington Staff Options for Initial Analysis.

Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.

Smolt Monitoring Program: Overview and Data Collection Brandon R. Chockley SMP Pre-Season Meeting February 20,

Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.

Differential Estimates of “Survival” for PIT Tagged Fish – Evidence and Causes Jason Vogel Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.

IMPACTS OF DAM AND RESERVOIR PASSAGE ON OUTMIGRATING JUVENILE HATCHERY CHINOOK SALMON: RESULTS FROM A PAIRED RELEASE STUDY IN THE UPPER WILLAMETTE RIVER.

Effectiveness of alternative broodstock, rearing and release practices at Winthrop NFH William Gale and Matt Cooper -USFWS, Mid-Columbia River Fishery.

Steelhead Genetic Diversity at Multiple Spatial Scales in the Snake River Basin, Idaho Authors: Jennifer L. Nielsen 1, Alan Byrne 2, Sara L. Graziano 1.

Downstream Survival of Juvenile Stream Type Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Through the Snake/Columbia River Hydropower System and Adult Return Rates AFEP.

Findings of Congress The Endangered Species Act is the last resort for species at risk of extinction. Under the ESA, the National Marine Fisheries Service.

Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.

LSRCP Hatchery Steelhead Salmon River Brian Leth and Carl Stiefel LSRCP Steelhead Program Review July 20-21, 2012 Clarkston,WA.

Performance of a New Steelhead Line Derived from Hatchery Parents Collected in Autumn in the Grande Ronde River Lance Clarke, Michael Flesher, Shelby Warren,

Historical Review Fish Migration Data. Two Management Approaches Spill for Fish Passage Planning dates Percent passage dates.

Estimated survival of juvenile salmonids through the lower Columbia River and estuary, and estimated mortality from avian predation John Ferguson NOAA.

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Slide 1 FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL SYMPOSIUM (West) – 6/3/09 Implementing Energy Efficiency in Remote.

Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data

Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team

Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting

MPG Spring-Summer Chinook

Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary

The Data Wars Of the Columbia Basin.

2017 Dworshak Dam Effects on Clearwater In-river Fish

Steelhead stock status in Idaho 2008 update

Steelhead status in Idaho 2010 update

Steelhead status in Idaho 2010 update

Adult PIT-tag Interrogation System Wells Hydroelectric Project (System Design, Installation and Evaluation) Shane Bickford* Public Utility District.

Goals and Objectives Conservation: 1) increase population viability (abundance, diversity and spatial distribution) by moving to a locally adapted fall.

Eagle Fish Genetics Lab (IDFG): Craig Steele Mike Ackerman

Presentation transcript:

History and Development of Pre- loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI) Heiden Bliss Ryan Richmond Scott McCutcheon History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)

Acknowledgements Contributed data: Dave Marvin & Jennifer Neighbors, PSMFC Contributed testing and feedback support for the development of the SUI : Scott Dunmire, USACE Doug Marsh, NOAA Dr. William “Billy” Connor, USFWS Bill Arnsberg & Jason Vogel, NPT History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)

Introduction History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI) Interest in an SUI system Why develop an SUI system R & D 2008-YTD Use in 2009 & 2010

The Beginning History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI) Began PIT tagging in the Columbia Basin 25 years ago Over 26 million fish tagged – Until 2009 virtually all fish were tagged with Multi-Use Injectors (MUI)

Interest in an SUI History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI) Beginning in 2002, members of the PIT tag steering committee requested the development of a pre-loaded Single Use Injection (SUI) system. – Primary reason at that time was: Lack of available personnel in remote locations – A prototype SUI system was delivered by Destron Fearing to NMFS in 2004 for testing. Changes were requested, but no further R & D occurred. – Interest for use on Biomark tagging projects

Interest in an SUI History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI) Beginning in 2002, members of the PIT tag steering committee requested the development of a pre-loaded Single Use Injection (SUI) system. – Primary reason at that time was: Lack of available personnel in remote locations – A prototype SUI system was delivered by Destron Fearing to NMFS in 2004 for testing. Changes were requested, but no further R & D occurred. – Biomark saw a need internally

Why Develop an SUI System? In 2008 Biomark began development of an SUI: 1.More efficient tagging system for Basin Users Personnel issues 2.Provide a better product for PIT Tag Users Lower mortality and shedding rates 3.Reduce project overhead By increasing the efficiency of Biomark tagging projects, we could lower our cost 4.Make the SUI available to all PIT Tag Users Both large and small scale projects 5.Eliminate human health issues No handling of needles History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)

2008 R & D – Began looking at developing an Auto-tagger – Simpler pre-loaded SUI system more efficient and feasible History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)

2008 R & D History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI) Needle Assembly Development – Smaller 13 gauge needle – Individual push rods No disease transmission – No loss of tags from needles

2008 R & D (cont.) – New implanter developed MK25 History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)

2008 R & D (cont.) – Initial Tray system developed Bulky, held 200 SUIs History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)

2009 Field Testing – The principle investigators of the Snake River Fall Chinook program and the COE agreed to a field test of the SUI – Lyons Ferry Hatchery successfully tagging approximately 57,000 yearling fall Chinook salmon. History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)

2009 Field Testing – The principle investigators of the Snake River Fall Chinook program, and the COE agreed to a field test of the SUI – Successfully tagged 57,000 yearling Chinook at Lyons Ferry Hatchery Tagging techniques were established and standardized History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)

Approval For Use The principle investigators and COE approved the use of the SUI system for the remainder of Biomark’s 2009 marking year. – Biomark tagged approximately 656,000 fish using the first generation SUI system. – SUI injectors accounted for 30% of the total fish PIT tagged and released into the Columbia Basin in History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)

2009 SUI Usage (R & D Year) (COE funded projects with tagging conducted by Biomark) Comparing Preloaded Single Use Injectors to Multiple Use Injectors YearlingSub-yearling LocationSockeyeChinook Total 2009 Lyons Ferry Hatchery 57,000 67,000 Oxbow Hatchery 11,000 Sawtooth Hatchery 51,000 Lyons Ferry Hatchery 59,000 Umatilla/Irrigon Hat. 83,000 Dworshak NFH 328, Sub-Total 62,000 57, , ,000

2009 R & D (cont.) History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI) Unique R & D opportunity – Modifications between tagging projects Comments from experienced from Biomark staff – Feedback from Beta Testers USFWS NOAA

2009 R & D (cont.) – MK25 Modified Internal parts – Needle Assembly Modified – Tray Modified Smaller, lightweight, 100 SUIs History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)

2009 R & D (cont.) – Patent Pending No external funding used – Going Green History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)

2009 R & D Needle production and tag loading was shifted from overseas to Boise, Idaho – Better Quality Assurance over production Assures a better quality product for SUI users – Created multiple US manufacturing jobs History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)

2010 SUI Use Biomark tagged 729,000 with SUIs – The 2010 total use of SUIs in the Columbia Basin was over one million 43% of the total fish tagged and released in the Columbia Basin History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)

2010 Total SUI (Columbia Basin) Comparing Preloaded Single Use Injectors to Multiple Use Injectors Number Tagging GroupSpeciesTagged BiomarkSteelhead7,500 BiomarkSockeye64,000 BiomarkYearling Chinook57,000 BiomarkSub-yearling Chinook508,000 BiomarkYearling Chinook81,000 BiomarkCoho11,500 Biomark Sub-totalVarious729,000 BPA/Various AgenciesVarious321,500 Total 1,050,500

The Future 2011 – 1,300,000 50% of the total tags that will be used in the Columbia Basin – Biomark – BPA/Various Agencies Continued R & D – Feedback  Total use of P-SUI in the Columbia Basin was approximately 1.3 million  50% of the total fish tagged and released in the Columbia Basin Comparing Preloaded Single Use Injectors to Multiple Use Injectors

Questions? History and Development of Pre-loaded Single Use Injectors (SUI)