Best Practice Precepts [... next] Arguments Arguments Possibility of the Impossible Possibility of the Impossible Belief, Truth, and Reality Belief, Truth,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Asking the Right Questions: Chapter 1
Advertisements

Introduction to Science as an Inquiry-Based Process The development and implementation of the research project leading to the creation of the science fair.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Value conflicts and assumptions - 1 While an author usually offers explicit reasons why he comes to a certain conclusion, he also makes (implicit) assumptions.
Mr Jernigan.  In your T3, write definitions for each of the following terms: ◦ Argument ◦ Persuasion ◦ Central Claim/Thesis ◦ Claim ◦ Evidence ◦ Warrant.
A thinking map We have looked at a large number of pieces of reasoning types, and now we need a thinking map of how to best analyse, understand, and evaluate.
Chapter 10.  Real life problems are usually different than just estimation of population statistics.  We try on the basis of experimental evidence Whether.
Faith & Reason Sheila E. McGinn, Ph.D. Professor of Religious Studies John Carroll University.
Chapter 1 What is Science
HOW CAN WE TELL SCIENCE FROM NON-SCIENCE? Identify The Characteristics Of Science Make a list for yourself.
Critical Thinking Rubrics David Hunter, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Chair Philosophy and Humanities Buffalo State College, SUNY November 4, 2005.
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Chapter 1 The problem of knowledge.
THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE. Assumptions  Nature is real, understandable, knowable through observation  Nature is orderly and uniform  Measurements yield.
Scientific Thinking - 1 A. It is not what the man of science believes that distinguishes him, but how and why he believes it. B. A hypothesis is scientific.
Argumentation - 1 We often encounter situations in which someone is trying to persuade us of a point of view by presenting reasons for it. We often encounter.
Introduction, Acquiring Knowledge, and the Scientific Method
Acquiring Knowledge in Science. Some Questions  What is science and how does it work?  Create a list of words to describe science  Which ways of knowing.
Knowledge & Faith Dr. Carl J. Wenning Department of Physics Illinois State University.
CHAPTER FIVE: THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings ELEVENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
Causality, Reasoning in Research, and Why Science is Hard
Sociological Research
The Philosophy of Science Claude Oscar Monet: London: Houses of Parliament at Sunset, 1903.
Writing the Persuasive Essay. Following the Prompt To begin a persuasive essay, you must first have an opinion you want others to share. The writer’s.
Methods of Science Section 1.1. Methods of Science 3 areas of science: Life, Earth, Physical –What is involved in each? Scientific Explanations- not always.
Debate: Reasoning. Claims & Evidence Review Claims are statements that serve to support your conclusion. Evidence is information discovered through.
1 Science as a Process Chapter 1 Section 2. 2 Objectives  Explain how science is different from other forms of human endeavor.  Identify the steps that.
Making a Claim Grounds for Claim Evaluation Beyond Brainstorm.
WHY ARE YOU HERE? Yes ….. You! IB SEHS STUDENTS?.
“Facts are not science – as the dictionary is not literature” –Martin H. Fischer If science is not facts, what is it?
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
The Scientific Method.
Chapter 1 Psychological Science The Need for Psychological Science.
Plan for Today: Thinking about Theory 1.What is theory? 2.Is theory possible in IR? 3.Why is it important? 4.How can we distinguish among theories?
Introduction to Earth Science Section 2 Section 2: Science as a Process Preview Key Ideas Behavior of Natural Systems Scientific Methods Scientific Measurements.
Chapter 27: Hypotheses, Explanations, and Inference to the Best Explanation.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Physical Science 1011 Dr. Goodroad. PHYSICAL SCIENCE 1011 READ ASSIGNMENT READ ASSIGNMENT ATTEMPT PROBLEMS ATTEMPT PROBLEMS ATTEND CLASS (TAKE NOTES)
The Scientific Method. Objectives Explain how science is different from other forms of human endeavor. Identify the steps that make up scientific methods.
What kinds of things are we certain about?. Mathematical and logical truths.
EA 1.2: ArgumentATIVE SYNTHESIS ESSAY on culture EA 1.2: ArgumentATIVE SYNTHESIS ESSAY on culture To synthesize means to weave together different materials.
Eliminative materialism
The Nature of Knowledge. Thick Concept When a short definition is not enough, it is called a thick concept word. It can only be understood through experience.
Methods of Scientific Inquiry Ch 1.3 Course Overview.
Argument Essay Argumentative assignments may require you to read research where interviews, surveys, observations, or experiments are used to support a.
What Is Science?. 1. Science is limited to studying only the natural world. 2. The natural world are those phenomena that can be investigated, discovered,
Warm-Up  12/9/15: SWBAT define science.  Using the picture for inspiration, describe Science.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE The nature of knowledge. Knowledge  What is it?  A “Thick Concept”?  How is it different from belief?
Understanding Science 5. The Burden of Proof © Colin Frayn,
Designing an Experiment &The Characteristics of Scientific Knowledge.
© 2001 Laura Snodgrass, Ph.D.1 Experimental Psychology Introduction.
Two central questions What does it mean to talk of, or believe in, God? –Is talk about God talk about something that exists independently of us? Or a way.
CHAPTER NINE Becoming an Effective Reader PowerPoint by Mary Dubbé Thomas Nelson Community College PART ONE Fact and Opinion 9 9 Copyright © 2012 Pearson.
Moshe Banai, PhD Editor – International Studies of Management and Organization
METHODS IN ANTHROPOLOGY SCIENCE AND INTERPRETATION.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Nature of Science Vocabulary Words.
A Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools
Reading and Writing Arguments
Sociological Research
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
How do we know things? The Scientific Method
Nonfiction vocabulary
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Nature of Science Dr. Charles Ophardt EDU 370.
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Definitions: Evidence-Based Claims- 1.) the ability to take detailed
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Fact and Opinion: Is There Really a Difference
Reasons for Belief and Doubt
Presentation transcript:

Best Practice Precepts [... next] Arguments Arguments Possibility of the Impossible Possibility of the Impossible Belief, Truth, and Reality Belief, Truth, and Reality Knowledge, Belief, and Evidence Knowledge, Belief, and Evidence Scientific Thinking Scientific Thinking Bias Bias

Arguments - 1 A. Itemize opinions from all relevant sides of an issue and collect logical arguments supporting each. B. Break the arguments into their constituent statements and draw out various additional implications from these statements. C. Examine these statements and implications for internal contradictions.

Arguments - 2 D. Locate opposing claims between the various arguments and assign relative weightings to opposing claims: –Increase the weighting when the claims have strong support, especially distinct chains of reasoning or different news sources, decrease the weighting when the claims have contradictions. –...

Arguments - 3 –Adjust weighting depending on relevance of information to central issue. –Require sufficient support to justify any incredible claims. –Otherwise, ignore these claims when forming a judgment. E. Assess the weights of the various claims.

Arguments - 4 F. Once we have identified an argument, we identify keywords or phrases within its reasoning, that might have alternative well-defined meanings. G. We determine whether or not the author explicitly uses one of those definitions. If not, and one of them changes our acceptance of the conclusion, then an ambiguity has been identified. H. This is an important step in accepting or not some conclusion.

Possibility of the Impossible - 1 A. Just because something is logically possible doesn’t mean that it’s real. B. Just because a claim hasn’t been conclusively refuted doesn’t mean that it’s true. C. Just because a claim hasn’t been conclusively proven doesn’t mean that it’s false.

Possibility of the Impossible - 2 D. Just because something seems physically impossible doesn’t mean that it is. E. Just because something is physically possible doesn’t mean that it’s real. F. One can’t believe impossible things. G. We have to live today by what truth we can get today, and be ready tomorrow to call it falsehood.

Belief, Truth, and Reality - 1 A. Just because you believe that something is true doesn’t mean that it is. B. Just because a group of people believe that something is true doesn’t mean that it is. C. There is such a thing as objective truth.

Belief, Truth, and Reality - 2 D. Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. E. Truth is something we can attempt to doubt, and then perhaps, after much exertion, discover that part of the doubt is unjustified.

Knowledge, Belief, and Evidence - 1 A. We are justified in believing a proposition when we have no good reason to doubt it. B. There is good reason to doubt a proposition if it conflicts with other propositions we have good reason to believe. C. The more background information a proposition conflicts with, the more reason there is to doubt it.

Knowledge, Belief, and Evidence - 2 D. When there is good reason to doubt a proposition, we should proportion our belief to the evidence. E. There is good reason to doubt a proposition if it conflicts with expert opinion. F. Just because someone is an expert in one field doesn’t mean that he is an expert in another.

Knowledge, Belief, and Evidence - 3 G. If we have no reason to doubt what’s disclosed to us through perception, introspection, memory, or reason, then we’re justified in believing it. H. To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.

Scientific Thinking - 1 A. It is not what the man of science believes that distinguishes him, but how and why he believes it. B. A hypothesis is scientific only if it is testable, that is, only if it predicts something other than what it was introduced to explain. A hypothesis should state the test conditions that could render it false – falsifiability.

Scientific Thinking - 2 C. Other things being equal, the best hypothesis is the one that is the most fruitful, that is, makes the most novel predictions. D. Other things being equal, the best hypothesis is the one that has the greatest scope, that is, that explains and predicts the most diverse phenomena.

Scientific Thinking - 3 E. Other things being equal, the best hypothesis is the simplest one, that is, the one that makes the fewest assumptions. F. Other things being equal, the best hypothesis is the most conservative, that is, the one that fits best with established beliefs.

Scientific Thinking - 4 G. We should accept an extraordinary hypothesis only if no ordinary one will do. H. When two or more hypotheses compete, we should make a new observation, the result of which shall eliminate some of them.