Dave Monroe & Christy Powers.  Aristotle: Intellectual vs. Moral Virtues  Intellectual Character vs. Moral Character  Dispositional Properties.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Philosophy 148 Chapter 5.
Advertisements

Argument, Persuasion, Persuasive Techniques, and Rhetorical Fallacies
Persuasive Appeals and Antigone
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 More Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking
Logical Fallacies Persuasion Pitfalls. Logical Fallacies What is a logical fallacy? A mistake in reasoning that seriously affects the ability to argue.
The Myth of Moral Relativism
Valuable Intellectual Traits
Moral Relativism, Cultural Differences and Bioethics Prof. Eric Barnes.
The Elements of Persuasion “... Verbal communication that attempts to bring about a voluntary change in judgment so that readers or listeners will accept.
Aristotle 384 BC – 322 BC. Aristotle e.com/watch?v=tbg HbzrL3d0.
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophical Terms Logic Things you ought to know.
By Ryan Davis and Nick Houska. Fallacies  Fallacies- are defects in an argument that cause an argument to be invalid, unsound or weak  Example: Hasty.
Persuasion Change someone’s:  mind (the way they think)  behavior (the way they act)
EGOISM AND CRITIQUE 8.5 Forensic Philosophy December 16, 2013.
The Virtue Theory of Ethics By Tony, Andy, and Kerry.
66 As soon as it was day, the elders of the people, both chief priests and scribes, came together and led Him into their council, saying, 67 “If You are.
Reminder: there are many ways in which reasoning can go wrong; that is, there are many kinds of mistakes in argument. It is customary to reserve the term.
Propositions A proposition is the declarative statement that an advocate intends to support in the argument. Some propositions are stated formally, some.
Visual Argumentation.
W HAT IS M EDIA ’ S R OLE ? To inform To entertain To persuade.
The Argument from Religious Experience Does a claimed experience of something divine prove God’s existence?
NEATLY write down the vocabulary word and the definition. There will be a quiz later, so THINK while you write. Include examples when you think they are.
Ad Hominem Abusive and Circumstantial Fallacies Week3.
Who Defined the Study of Philosophy and Logic? ________,___________,__________ These three philosophers form the basis of what is known as__________________.
The Nature of Morality General Overview “We are discussing no small matter, but how we ought to live” (Plato in the Republic ca. 390B.C.)
ANTONAIA SUDDUTH JAMES MARSHALL SECTION 3 COGNITIVE & BEHAVIOR THEORIES.
The Spiritual Virtues of Apologetics Kurt Jaros. The Spiritual Virtues of Apologetics 1.Faithfulness.
Mike McGuire MV Community College COM 101 A Closer Look at Logos Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies ENGL102 Ordover Fall 2008.
Samantha Down.  Also known as the “black and white fallacy” or “false dilemma”  An either/or fallacy is when a speaker makes a claim that presents an.
An Introduction to Critical Thinking
Debate 101 Brand. Class Rules We are respectful We are considerate We listen the first time We will be present We are responsible What are some of the.
ARGUMENTS. WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT? An argument consist of two or more premises and one conclusion. A premise is a statement that supports the conclusion.
Morality and Self- Interest Vice and Virtue in Everyday Life Chapter 3.
Presuppositionalism Truth Talks Apologetics Series: Week 6.
Academic Vocabulary Unit 7 Cite: To give evidence for or justification of an argument or statement.
Critical Thinking Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Reasoning & Problem Solving Lecture 5b More Fallacies By David Kelsey.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.1 Chapters1 & 2.
Lecture Notes © 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education© 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education 1 Critical Thinking Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Notes for the Exam.  is just a fancy way of saying that you're stating your main point.  A claim tells what you think is true about a topic based on.
Write down 3 sentences 2 sentences should be truths about yourself. 1 sentence should be a lie about yourself. For example: I was raised in Houston. I.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Common Logical Fallacies FLAWED ARGUMENTS SUBTLE ERRORS IN JUDGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION.
1 Lesson 7: Arguments SOCI Thinking Critically about Social Issues Spring 2012.
Talking points 1. Would Neil still have committed suicide if Mr. Keating had never come into his life? Who is most to blame for Neil’s death? Mr. Keating?
Logical Fallacies. Slippery Slope The argument that some event must inevitably follow from another without any rational claim. If we allow A to happen.
Religious language: cognitive or non-cognitive?
Rhetoric The Art of Persuasion Impress your significant other!
A Lesson on Rhetorical Appeals: Ethos, Pathos, Logos
Critical Thinking Elijah Levy
Matt Slick debating techniques: part 2
Common Logical Fallacies
Introduction to Logic Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Fallacies and Persuaders
Chapter 7.24: Persuasive Speaking
Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies
Recap Key-Terms Cognitivism Non-Cognitivism Realism Anti-Realism
Thinking In College In this lesson, we’ll explore what it means to be a college-level thinker, and how to develop strong thinking skills. Any questions.
Persuasive techniques
Emperor Chin’s Tomb. Do you think we should?.
Thinking In College In this lesson, we’ll explore what it means to be a college-level thinker, and how to develop strong thinking skills. Any questions.
Visual Argumentation.
An Introduction to Persuasion and Argument
Logical Fallacies.
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Argument and persuasion
Argument and persuasion
Living in the Media Age (Fallacies)
ARGUMENT AND PERSUASION
Presentation transcript:

Dave Monroe & Christy Powers

 Aristotle: Intellectual vs. Moral Virtues  Intellectual Character vs. Moral Character  Dispositional Properties

 Intellectually Virtuous = Critical Thinker  Intellectually Vicious = Uncritical Thinker  Uncritical Thinker = “Lazy Minded”

 Curiosity  Int. Honesty  Int. Boldness  Int. Integrity  Int. Empathy  Fair-mindedness  Int. Satisfaction  Int. Dishonesty  Int. Cowardice  Int. Unprincipled  Int. Apathy  Int. Unfair.

 Attempts to persuade or mislead emotionally or psychologically rather than rationally.  Tools of the lazy mind: rhetorical tricks.  Non-rational behavior producing intellectual vice.

 The fallacy of using the fact that many people believe a claim as evidence of the claim’s truth.  Ex: “Of course Iraq has weapons of mass destruction! Everyone knows that!”  Vice: Intellectual Satisfaction.

 Rejecting an argument or claim by criticizing the person making the argument rather than by confronting the argument itself.  “President Bush argued that we should go to war in Iraq. Why should I believe him? He skipped out on his own military service!”  Vices: intellectually unfair and intellectual cowardice.

 The fallacy of twisting, distorting, weakening, or oversimplifying another’s position so it is more easily refuted.  Ex: “Fred is in favor of legislation against assault weapons. Such unpatriotic thinking flies in the face of American culture and is an affront to the principles of our founding fathers. Many Americans died for the right to own assault weapons—how dare Fred and others like him disrespect that?”  Vices: intellectually unfair, intellectually dishonest, and intellectually cowardly.

 Dismissing another’s argument out of hand because the claims presented are inconsistent with one’s own (or one’s groups’) beliefs.  Ex: “What do you mean Veganism is morally better than eating meat? Not as far as I’m concerned! My daddy raised me to love cheeseburgers!”  Vice: Intellectual Apathy

 Arguing that some claim is true on the basis that it hasn’t been shown false, or arguing that a claim is false on the basis that it hasn’t been show true—or, arguing to a definite conclusion on the basis of lacking evidence.  “You can’t prove to me that God exists, therefore he doesn’t!”  Vice: Intellectually Unprincipled (usually used opportunistically—e.g., Ben Stein’s arguments against evolutionary theory) & Intellectually dishonest.

 Using Fallacies makes us worse thinkers!  But so what? What’s wrong with being lazy- minded?  A. Imprisoned  B. Encourages self-deception  C. Susceptible to manipulation  D. Inhibits authenticity (agency & engagement)