B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Post-2011 Review Workgroup 5: Reporting and Verification of Savings April 1, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Proposed Transportation Funding Policy Changes Fairfax County Department of Transportation March.
Advertisements

© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
AASHTO 2005 Slide #1 New Uniform Act Rules: What’s Changed in Appraisal Practice? AASHTO/FHWA 2005 Right-of-Way and Utilities Subcommittee Conference Austin,
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N EE Post-2011 Review Regional Meeting March 20, 2014 Emerald People’s Utility Disrict Eugene,
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Feedback on road budgets RPF November Contents  Background  Process  Information requested  Information obtained  Issues  Current data  Road.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Energy Efficiency at BPA Northwest Clean & Affordable Energy Conference Josh Warner May 31, 2013.
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
Drug Medi-Cal (DMC) Organized Delivery System Wavier November 3,
Office of the Auditor General of Canada The State of Program Evaluation in the Canadian Federal Government Glenn Wheeler Director, Results Measurement.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Solving the Mystery of Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs Office Technology and Economic Development November 4, 2009.
Understanding Financial Management
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
EsMD Structured Content Use Case 2 WG Meeting Wednesday, April 25 th, 2012.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Presentation to the Oversight Board Santa Clara County Auditor-Controller 1.
MDCH/DELEG Michigan Nursing Corps Request for Proposals Webinar March 15, 2011 Collaboration of Michigan Department of Community Health and Michigan.
Atlanta Board of Education AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” February 14, 2011.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Role of the Regional Technical Forum in PNW Energy Efficiency Programs May 14, 2008.
Transfer Service Meeting, October 19, 2005 Bonneville Power Administration Long-Term Transfer Service (GTA and OATT) Customer Kick-Off Meeting Garry Thompson.
Civil society participation in the Universal Periodic Review.
School Finances for Finance Subcommittees School Councils.
Air Quality Benefits from Energy Conservation Measures Anna Garcia April 2004.
Outlook on effective management of EU structural funds from to Vilnius.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona GSA’s Actions under the PPCC GSA’s Pipeline Session 1, Track 5Meeting the PPCC Sharon Conger Public Building.
1 Northwest Energy Efficiency Taskforce Workgroup # 1 Measuring What Matters Looking ahead, what data must we have to succeed?
CANAR Consortia of Administrators for Native American Rehabilitation FISCAL MANAGEMENT FOR PROJECT SUCCESS CANAR 2012.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Energy Efficiency Post-2011 Phase 2 Update January 12, 2011 Northwest Power and Conservation.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Improvements to Child Care Business Practices CMSM/DSSAB Training - EFIS February 28, 2011.
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Energy Optimization Plans 2011 Biennial Review Pre-Filing Update Rob Ozar, Manager Energy Optimization Section March.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Portfolio Committee on Appropriations Quarter 1 Expenditure and Performance 24 August 2012 The Presidency Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation.
University of Minnesota Internal\External Sales “The Internal Sales Review Process” An Overview of What Happens During the Review.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Small City and County Grant Kick-Off Meeting California.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Presented by: Todd Amundson, BPA Jane Peters, research into action Ryan Fedie, BPA Update.
Sixth Power Plan A Public Utility Point of View Bill Gaines, Director, Tacoma Public Utilities Craig Smith, Assistant General Manager, Snohomish PUD Northwest.
Barriers to Implementing Energy Efficiency at Small and Rural Utilities Jennifer Anziano and Ryan Firestone August 19, 2015.
How The Regional Technical Forum Supports PNW Energy Efficiency Programs January 5, 2010.
Slide 1 Overview of Conservation in the Pacific Northwest Energy Efficiency Options in the Northwest Post-2011Meeting March 4, 2008.
Focus 2028 – Energy Efficiency February 29, 2016.
Kansas City Power & Light and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations – Suggestions for Chapter 22 Revisions Missouri Public Service Commission Meeting Aug 31,
1 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2014 PREMIER, INC. NYHQ DSRIP Committee Kick-Off Meeting March 2015.
1 NORTHWEST ENERGY EFFICIENCY ALLIANCE 2015 Operations Plan Efficient Homes (NWESH)/Next Step Home.
Focus 2028 – Energy Efficiency Listening Sessions March 2016.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Bonneville Power Administration Energy Efficiency Emerging Technologies (E3T) Program Introduction.
Stage 3. Consultation and Review Standard Setting Training Course 2016.
COMET Working Group Progress Report 11/13/03
Program Compliance Review Committee
Efficient Homes (NWESH)/Next Step Home
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING.
THREE-YEAR LOCAL STRATEGIC PLANNING
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
1915(i)& (k) Implementation Update
How to Complete a Matching Grant Report
TIBC Budget Formulation Improvement Project
1915(c) WAIVER REDESIGN 2019 Brain Injury Summit
Ministry of National Economy of The Republic of Kazakhstan
Welcome.
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) Certification Process
Budgeting Conversation
Presentation transcript:

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Post-2011 Review Workgroup 5: Reporting and Verification of Savings April 1, 2014

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Agenda  Introductions  Rules of Engagement  Overview of Progress to Date  Action Items  Issues 12 and 13 - Workgroup Draft Recommendations and BPA Refinements  Issue 10 - Discussion  Links to other Workgroups  Next steps 2

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Rules of Engagement  *6 to mute – please do not put us on “Hold”  Want to encourage a conversation  Process not longer than it needs to be  Try not to get bogged down on ancillary issues 3

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Rules of Engagement  Goal: consensus-based recommendations that address the issues outlined in the scoping document  Consensus: an acceptable resolution, one that can be supported even if not the "favorite" of each individual 4

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Overview of Progress to Date  Held kickoff meeting March 4th  Discussed issues 10, 12, and 13  Grouped Issues 12 and 13, which both relate to timing of reporting, and addressed them first  Developed draft recommendations for Issues 12 and 13 for reporting and forecasting of savings and expenditures 5

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Action Items  BPA was asked to review the draft workgroup recommendations for Issues 12 and 13 and refine them before the April 1 meeting (completed)  BPA was asked to do some analysis of the end- of-rate-period ‘hockey stick’ (partially completed)  Utilities were asked to provide their perspective on the hockey stick as well  Other? 6

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Review of Issues 12 and 13  12: Timing of Utility Reporting to BPA (BPA generated)  13: Reporting and Consistency of Utility Self-Funded Savings (BPA generated) 7

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Review of Issues 12 and 13  Summary: BPA would like to receive regular reporting of BPA- funded and self-funded savings to allow tracking of progress toward its targets. BPA would like to continue to receive regular forecasts of savings to also help with this tracking. In addition, BPA would like to receive periodic forecasts of expenditures to satisfy BPA Finance needs and ensure EEI funds are fully utilized. 8

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Review of Issues 12 and 13  Options: Status quo – utilities have flexibility to report when they want More regular reporting of savings; regular forecasting of savings, expenditures 9

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Draft Recommendations from Workgroup on Issues 12 and 13  Focused on three areas: Reporting savings Forecasting savings Forecasting expenditures 10

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Reporting Savings – Workgroup Recommendations  What’s included: Actual EEI-funded (invoiced) savings and self-funded savings  Frequency: Best practice is monthly reporting, minimum is every six months  Utilities affected: All  How implemented: Via IS 2.0/NED  Reporting interval a requirement?: Unclear 11

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Reporting Savings – Workgroup Recommendations  Rationale: Some earlier requirements on timing of reporting are no longer in place (e.g., every 6 months for rate credit) Some utilities report on regular monthly basis; other utilities want to report less often BPA wants to establish minimum reporting frequency for all utilities to provide better visibility to actual savings and progress toward our targets 12

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Reporting Savings – BPA Refinements  What’s included: Actual EEI-funded (invoiced) savings and self-funded savings  Frequency: Best practice is monthly reporting, minimum is every six months quarter  Utilities affected: All  How implemented: Via IS 2.0/NED  Reporting interval a requirement? Unclear No, it’s a request -- except for EEI reporting at end of rate period, which is required.  If self-management of savings is adopted, how would utilities view a quarterly reporting requirement? 13

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Forecasting Savings – Workgroup Recommendations  What’s included: EEI-funded and self-funded savings  Frequency: Quarterly projections (or most quarters) for fiscal year  Utilities affected: 20-largest utilities currently but could be expanded  How implemented: Through EERs currently  Forecasting a requirement?: Unclear 14

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Forecasting Savings – Workgroup Recommendations  Rationale: Current participation by 20-largest utilities in providing voluntary projections is somewhat inconsistent BPA would like more consistent and complete forecasting 15

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Forecasting Savings – BPA Refinements  What’s included: EEI-funded and self-funded savings  Frequency: Quarterly projections (or most quarters) for fiscal year for rate period  Utilities affected: 20-largest utilities currently but could be expanded  How implemented: Through EERs currently, but may build this functionality into NED  Forecasting a requirement?: Unclear No, it’s a request 16

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Forecasting Expenditures – Workgroup Recommendations  What’s included: EEI expenditures  Frequency: 2nd quarter of each fiscal year covering the final 2 quarters of the fiscal year  Utilities affected: TBD  How implemented: Through EERs initially  Forecasting a requirement?: Unclear 17

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Forecasting Expenditures – Workgroup Recommendations  Rationale: Forecast in first year of rate period will provide data needed by BPA Finance to provide Congressional budget submission. In return, BPA Finance will continue to offer utilities within-rate-period spending flexibility Forecast in second year of rate period will help EE identify EEI funds that may not get spent. 18

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Forecasting Expenditures – BPA Refinements No formal requirement or request at this time, but this is still a need and may be revisited if other forecasting tools are inadequate. EERs will continue to request EEI forecasts periodically to help with budget planning.  What’s included: EEI expenditures  Frequency: 2nd quarter of each fiscal year covering the last 2 quarters of the fiscal year Periodic  Utilities affected: TBD All  How implemented: Through EERs initially  Forecasting a requirement?: Unclear No 19

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Review of Issue 10  10 (expanded): BPA Requirements for Implementing, Reporting, and Verifying Utility Self-funded Savings (utility generated)  Summary: BPA has the same requirements in the Implementation Manual for implementing, reporting, and verifying self-funded savings as for BPA-funded savings. Can these requirements for self-funded savings be streamlined? 20

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Review of Issue 10  Options: Status quo Reduced requirements for self-funded savings 21

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Sub-Issues  Requirements for implementing and reporting self-funded savings  Requirements for verifying self-funded savings  Reporting of non-reportable measures and projects  Terminology for describing self-funded savings 22

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Requirements for Implementing and Reporting Self-Funded Savings  Utility Perspective: Having the same requirements for implementing and reporting utility self-funded savings as for EEI-funded savings may be burdensome All parties want to ensure that public power’s share of the Council’s target is met 23

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Requirements for Implementing and Reporting Self-Funded Savings  BPA Perspective: Energy savings must meet requirements under Regional Dialogue contracts, IM Consistency in IM requirements between EEI-funded and self-funded savings ensures reliability and facilitates implementation QSSI process has focused on reducing requirements for custom projects, including ones self-funded 24

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Requirements for Implementing and Reporting Self-Funded Savings  Discussion: Does the workgroup support following IM requirements when implementing self-funded measures/projects and reporting savings? 25

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Requirements for Verifying Self-Funded Savings  Utility perspective  Having the same requirements for verification/ oversight of self-funded savings may be burdensome  BPA's role in verifying self-funded energy efficiency is somewhat flexible since BPA does not have the same fiduciary interest in assuring proper expenditure as it does with federal funds  All parties want to ensure the quality of the savings 26

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Requirements for Verifying Self-Funded Savings  BPA perspective  Energy savings must be verifiable and meet requirements under Regional Dialogue contracts and IM  Self-funded savings should be subject to the same oversight as EEI-funded savings to ensure the reliability of savings 27

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Requirements for Verifying Self-Funded Savings  Discussion: What is the group’s recommendation regarding BPA’s role in verifying self-funded savings? 28

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Reporting of Non-Reportable Measures and Projects  In the kickoff meeting several types of ‘non-reportables’ were mentioned: Utility self-funded measures that are not cost-effective using BPA’s calculations but otherwise meet BPA requirements RTF-approved measures that BPA hasn’t yet adopted Other measures BPA hasn’t approved New construction projects where incremental costs are not easily calculated 29

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Reporting of Non-Reportable Measures and Projects  Both BPA and utilities expressed interest in reducing non-reportable savings  Discussion: Are there any other types of non-reportables that utilities have concerns about? What are specific examples of the types of non-reportables that were mentioned? Can non-reportable savings be made reportable? What are the constraints? 30

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Terminology for Describing Self- Funded Savings  BPA adopted the terminology “self-funded savings” to refer to savings that met all of BPA’s program requirements  Some utilities have suggested changing the terminology to “utility-funded savings”  Discussion: How do utilities feel about this suggestion? 31

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Links to Other Workgroups  Workgroup 1, Model for Achieving Programmatic Savings: Under self-management of incentives, would need mechanism to ensure regular reporting of savings Can we clarify the terms “self-funded vs. self- managed?  Workgroup 2, Implementation Manual How can we accelerate BPA adoption of new measures including non-reportables? 32

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Next Steps  Additional background or analytical work needed?  Other recommendations? 33

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Next Steps  Meeting on April 22, 10:00-12:00 Will two hours be enough? Any other meetings needed?  Prepare meeting notes  Materials posted on BPA’s Post-2011 websitePost-2011 website  Other? 34

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Questions? Mark Ralston Mary Smith

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Extra slides 36

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Self-Funded Savings Requirements in Regional Dialogue Contracts Section : [Utility] shall verify and report all cost- effective (as defined by section 3(4) of the Northwest Power Act) non-BPA-funded conservation measures and projects savings achieved by [utility] through the Regional Technical Forum's Planning, Tracking and Reporting System or its successor tool. Verification protocols of conservation measures and projects, reporting timelines and documentation requirements shall comply with BPA's Energy Efficiency Implementation Manual or its successor.section 3(4) of the Northwest Power Act 37