Investigating the decision making process in patients with non-curative cancer who have been invited to join a clinical research trial Student: Mary Murphy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emotional Resistance Building: A grounded theory of how family members of loved ones undergoing chemotherapy deal with fear of emotional collapse Dr Bridie.
Advertisements

THE DEEDS PROJECT Professionals perceptions of patient involvement Rosemary Chesson The Robert Gordon University.
Ask Me Anything American Nurses Training Association.
Antonia Lannie, PhD student,
Ground Rules for Meetings
S3 Useful Expressions.
Involving acute hospital inpatients in the evaluation of an occupational therapy service Cathy Robertson Senior occupational therapist Wirral Hospital.
Team Meeting Communication Skills
Session 5-8. Objectives for the session To revisit general themes and considerations when delivering the intervention. To consider sessions 5-8 and familiarise.
Perceptions of Risks and Harms. Affect participation in C90s? Judged “Cos when we come yeah you know about, what you are like, piece of paper we write.
LEARNING WITH IMAGINATION Enquiry, Communities, and Power in the Mantle of the Expert System.
What children think about having a thyroid disorder: a small scale study By Shannon Davidson Age 10.
Dr Viv Burr and Prof Nigel King Centre for Applied Psychological Research University of Huddersfield, UK.
Learning from families and practitioners to optimise recruitment to children’s clinical trials RECRUIT study findings Investigating team: Val Shilling,
Patient experience of RADAR (Rapid Alcohol Detoxification: Acute hospital Referral) Gordon Hay Centre for Public Health, Faculty of Education, Health and.
Telehealthcare: Integrating service development and evaluation Tracy Finch, Carl May, Frances Mair, Maggie Mort, Linda Gask Universities of Newcastle,
© Manchester self-harm project, University of Manchester. All rights reserved. Not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the permission of the copyright.
Women’s Reproductive Decision-Making Process and Providers’ Participation Donna B. Barnes, PhD California State University, Hayward
©2003 Community Faculty Development Center Teaching Culture and Community in Primary Care: Teaching Culturally Appropriate Communication Skills.
How You Can Be an Advocate for Clinical Trials in Your Community.
The hills across the valley of the Ebro were long and white. On this side there was no shade and no trees and the station was between two lines of rails.
An island of possibility: The construction of culture in a Francophone school Carla DiGiorgio, PhD Faculty of Education, UPEI.
Mixed-level English classrooms What my paper is about: Basically my paper is about confirming with my research that the use of technology in the classroom.
Missed Opportunities: The Health Adviser as a link between Genitourinary Medicine and Primary Care in the management of Chlamydia Bruce Armstrong, Sue.
Presenter: Kim Klein Klein and Roth Consulting Klein and Roth Consulting helps organizations build strong fundraising programs that are mission-driven.
Term 2 – Contemporary Relationships with Outdoor Environments.
LILAC 2008 Perceptions of information: The Net Generation Marian Smith and Dr. Mark Hepworth.
WHAT IS RESEARCH? Catey Bunce Principal Statistician NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute.
Talking Mats™ and Families living with Dementia Dr Joan Murphy Stirling, Scotland © Talking Mats Limited 2014.
Presentation for the disability Adviser Assessor Post Idiot.- We can find nothing wrong with you, so just get up and get on with your life. Me.- If I could.
Nurses’ Illness Narratives: Influences on Family-Centered Care Lindsey Lawson & Barbara Couden-Hernandez.
When Someone is Talking. Sometimes in school I have something important to tell an adult. Oh I really need to tell her something…but she is talking…
Case Study: Medical Research Jillian Cudmore Mallory Anne Andrea Currie Amy DeBaie.
Young Offender Perspectives: What’s on their minds about a Successful Re-Entry.
Title: Patient Centred Care for Vulnerable Older People in the Community Nurse Consultants Meeting July 07 Presenter: Clare Abley, Nurse Consultant Vulnerable.
Self- Management and With – SMVOICED Team.
Teachers’ preliminary views on involvement in the project e-CPDelt: model 2020 Dr. Radha Nambiar Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hazita Azman Assoc. Prof. Dr. Thang Siew.
Believed Cues to Deception: A Qualitative Investigation 1 Rachel Taylor 2 – University of Glamorgan Crystal Rolfe – University Hospital Wales, Cardiff.
Student Nurses Learn Spiritual care in hospice and palliative care settings Lesline Lewinson
Princess Royal Trust for Carers National Conference at Birmingham 25 th November 2010 Alan Worthington Carer, NMHDP Acute Programme. ‘Do your local MH.
Exploring the expectations and experiences of ‘widening participation’ students admitted to health professional programmes Presenter: Alison Draper Lecturer.
Which outcomes of self-management matter to patients, family/carers, health professionals and commissioners? Dr Sara Demain, Associate Professor.
Weighing in to the literacy debate: the role of ICTs for weight management NHS Research Ethics Committee: 07/Q1907/54 Audrey Marshall.
Slide 1 Improving your Persuasion and Influencing Skills for better negotiated outcomes Presented by Katrena Friel March 2009.
Investigating service user ethical priorities in psychological research Rachael Carrick.
The EPEC-O Curriculum is produced by the EPEC TM Project with major funding provided by NCI, with supplemental funding provided by the Lance Armstrong.
Background Outcomes / Results Qualitative methodology was used to collect data about parent and professional views of the current services.
CENTRE FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING & LEARNING ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING CETL Associates Project Angelina Wilson and Nicola Reimann CENTRE FOR EXCELLENCE IN.
A qualitative descriptive study describing relapsed multiple myeloma patients’ experience of their care and the views of health care professionals in their.
Involving Service User Stories in the development of Mental Health services: capturing, enabling & supporting service users' expertise and experiences.
Living and dying well with different illnesses; experiences of patients and carers “Whatever the setting, care will be provided to the highest standards.
Families and Disability. At the beginning… Watch the following video and think about the following questions: What do you think the needs of these parents.
The Background “the unobservable cognitive dimension of teaching…what teachers know, believe and think” (Borg, 2003, p. 81)
Time to Make Health Services Safe from Stigma: Voices of Canadian Aboriginal People Living with HIV/AIDS and Health Care Providers R. Jackson, Lynne MacLean,
Medical Assistants being Compared to a Nurse My Point of View: Good or Bad Shannon Hicks English 2010.
课标人教实验版 高二 Module 6 Unit 3. Listening on workbook.
Conclusions  Carers of people with dementia report a higher need for information and holistic, structured support from health and social care services.
Using qualitative methodology to explore palliative lung cancer patients’ experiences of participating in a clinical trial Stephanie Sivell, Simon Noble,
REFLECT: Recovery Following Intensive Care Treatment
Dr Caroline Shulman & Niamh Brophy
Damned if you do and Damned if you don’t
Mamarojo2 Ethical, legal and social issues in genomics
Missed Opportunities for Advance/Anticipatory Care Planning
HIS RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM
Family centred Early Intervention programmes in Jordan: a grounded theory study into family and occupational therapists’ collaboration Nisrin Alqatarneh.
‘See Me’: Exploring unmet need among young adults in Bristol
Background Results Aim Method Conclusions
Ye Zhang| November 2018 Supervisory team: Prof. Rebecca Guy
Insights from Children about Abuse and Neglect
Practitioner Research Older People (P.R.O.P)
Presentation transcript:

Investigating the decision making process in patients with non-curative cancer who have been invited to join a clinical research trial Student: Mary Murphy Supervision team:Prof Donna Fitzsimons Prof Eilis McCaughan Dr Richard Wilson This is an R & D HSC funded fellowship

Background  Most patients with incurable cancer are not offered participation in clinical trials (Kaasa & De Conno, 2001, Krouse, 2007)  Research participation associated with improved outcomes (Joffe et al, 2004, Agrawal & Emanual, 2003)  Improved understanding of consent decision making essential to inform practice (Audrey et al, 2008)

Study Aim To understand the decision making processes of patients with incurable cancer, within the context of clinical research trials.

Setting and Data Collection  BHSCT Cancer Centre  Range from Phase I to Phase III  In-depth interviews -16 patients and 18 members of the research team

Methodology  Grounded Theory approach  In depth interviews with patients and Research Team (RT)  Data interlinked  Constraints of classic GT not doing data justice

Nothing to Lose Trial information- balanced or skewed? Increased personalised care Privileged opportunity Selective hearing Clinging to a straw Trusting the research team Helping others Patients Research Staff Findings

Nothing to lose ‘I just don’t think…. It’s a no brainer, really. If a consultant says to you, “Listen this is what we’ve got, an opportunity here to improve your situation. It hasn’t been done before. Would you be interested in doing it?” And you have nothing else. There is no other hope in the room, this is the only thing on the table, what are you going to do?’ (P01)

Trial information balanced or skewed ? ‘Mostly we are offering them a carrot that maybe this is the next magical drug for their disease….. I’d say, “I haven’t got another treatment that offers you any benefit and therefore we are hoping that this might be a drug that is the magical drug but it is a very long shot.” ’ (RT14)

Increased personalised care ‘She [clinical research nurse] says, “You will still be looked after the same way. You will still be getting the same appointments to come up. You will be coming up more often.” Which is what I want. I want to get a bit more attention. “You’ll be treated like a VIP” she says. I went, “That’s fine.” ’ (P06)

Privileged opportunity  Patients reported feeling lucky to be given the opportunity  Research team were unsurprised by this ‘Well I think if you are offered something that you have no access to ordinarily, I think that probably would make you feel special.’ (RT08)

Selective hearing  Trial acceptors showed a disregard for side- effects of trial drug  Some thought that trial participation might result in a cure  Research staff were aware of this stating that ‘they hear what they want to hear’ (RT08)

Clinging to a straw ‘I just want to live. I’ll take anything.’ (P02)  Patients were hopeful for life extension  For some a trial was the only treatment option ‘And so I sort of thought in one way it did give a sense of hope, that at least there are trials, but on the other hand you sort of think, he’s referring you to that, because he’s got nothing else.’ (P01)

Trusting the research team Many believed that their oncologist was offering them a trial because they believed it to be their best option ‘I didn’t think to bother to question it because I just took the view that they’re not going to give me something that’s absolutely stupid. I trust them and I’m not going to question this’. (P02)

Helping others  Research staff asserted that patients sometimes joined trials primarily to help others  No patients reported altruism as a primary reason for saying ‘yes’ ‘I’m not trying to pretend that it’s all for someone else. I’m hoping that this treatment will be of benefit to me.’ (P04)

- Balanced information -Selective hearing -Helping others -Positive information -Altruism secondary -Increased Care -Privileged -Trusting relationship -Clinging to a straw ConsensusResearch teamPatients Nothing to lose

Conclusions  Trial participation makes patients feel special and endorses hopes for personal benefit  Participants agreed that trial benefit extended well beyond the drug available  Patients were aware of reality but held unrealistic hopes for personal benefit

Conclusions  Nothing to lose is a central theme for most participants  Consensus that trial participation offers last and best option  Groups differ on whether information is balanced or skewed  Patients have unconditional trust in their oncologists – impacting on “informed” consent process

Implications for Practice  The context is more important than the trial for patients’ decision making  The RT need to be mindful of patients’ trust  Trial participation may offer an alternative way for patients and HCPs to address End of Life issues