Leadership Training Module 2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Performance Assessment
Guiding Principle Five Mentoring needs to be tailored to the needs of the individual teacher and, at the same time, verifying their skills as teachers.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Performance Management
RTTT Teacher Evaluator Training
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 2: Recording Evidence NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 4/14/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Teacher Observation Training
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
Introduction Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson
Teacher Observation Training
NYSED August 4-5, 2011 Teaching & Learning Solutions teachinglearningsolutions.com Albert (Duffy) Miller Ed.D Bernadette (Bernie) Cleland, Ed.D Teacher.
November 17, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4 Developed.
December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
OCM BOCES Day 1 & 2 Lead Evaluator Training 1. 2 Day One Agenda.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING October 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
Effective Evaluation Feedback: Getting People to Commit to Changing Practice.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Lead Evaluator Training
Learning Centered Conferencing Using the Marzano Framework Beth McGibbon and Brent Perdue Part 1: The Preconference.
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
What Is Evidence? PRESENTED BY SCHAUNA FINDLAY, PH.D.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
SCDN Principal Evaluation Evaluation Through the Lens of the ISLLC Standards May 30, 2013 Michael Keany Evaluation Through the Lens of the ISLLC Standards.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
November 29, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 3 Developed by Teaching.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Evidence in Evaluations. What is Evidence? ITED Document – Evidence refers to data, information, artifacts and performances that educators and evaluators.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
A brief introduction to
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Common Core State Standards & North Carolina Essential Standards Support for School Executives 1.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 2 Developed by Teaching.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION PRIORITIES PREPARED & PRESENTED S. SUPERVISOR HELENA MOHAMMAD Ministry of Education ELT General Supervision
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
TCRP TEACHER TRAINING TCRP Overview. Agenda Objective By the end of the session all teachers will be able to: TCRP Pverview Agenda and Objectives 2 1.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Formative Assessment and Feedback to Improve Writing CONVENING III, SECTION I.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Linking ISLLC and your Principal Rubrics to a Case.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
The Framework for Teaching
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Providing feedback to learners
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Leadership Training Module 2 Jane Suddaby Liane Benedict Mary Ann Preston

quote

http://www.ideachampions.com/weblogs/work-for-change.gif

Agenda Hanging in there? Debrief… Best Practices & Evidence-Based Evaluation Value-Added Growth Model

Remember the 3rd grade teacher?

Inter-rater Reliability?

What is the purpose of teacher evaluation?

Teacher Evaluation What’s wrong with the current process? Why hasn’t it traditionally resulted in professional growth?

What does the data show? 2011 3-8 ELA Results/Proficiency Grade 3 27.1- 67.9% Grade 4 33.3 – 70.6 Grade 5 38.2 – 66.2 Grade 6 46.6 – 74.5 Grade 7 32 – 53.3 Grade 8 33 – 52.5

The Widget Effect

Three Gates for Effective Evaluation Fairness Validity Reliability

Why do these “gates” matter? Why is it important to understand the 3 “gates” and best practices in educator evaluation? How will you present this information to teachers who may have very different experience with evaluation?

Observation vs. Evaluation

Best Practices in Evaluation Basis for evaluation Quality of work – FfT based criteria Student progress State Assessment Benchmark assessments Common assessments Teacher-made assessments Plan for gathering data Processes and procedures for gathering information about quality of work Procedures for gathering information about student progress End result Student learning Teacher rating Direction for professional growth Determination of employment Compensation Career ladder

Best Practices in Evaluation Basis for observation– Knowledge of the criteria Observers must understand the Criteria Observers must have a focus on constructing meaning through cognitive engagement Observers must be able to identify appropriate data (evidence) to paint an accurate picture of educators’ work Plan for gathering data – Fidelity to process and procedures Observer must understand the process including it’s intent or purpose. Observer must follow process with fidelity, engaging the educator in discussion along the way Observer must maintain consistency and fairness from educator to educator End result – Quality of the product Observer must align evidence to appropriate component Observer must level evidence accurately Observer must have sufficient evidence to support rating Observer must have skill in engaging educator in conversation around level and direction for future

Research Says… Six Best Practices Annual Processes Clear, rigorous expectations Multiple measures Multiple ratings Regular feedback Significance http://www.tntp.org/index.php/publications/issue-analysis/teacher-evaluation-2.0/

Evidence Evidence is a factual reporting of events. It may include teacher and student actions and/or behaviors. It may also include artifacts prepared by the teacher, students, or others. It is not clouded with personal opinion or biases. It is selected using data-gathering by the observer and / or the teacher.

Types of Observation Evidence Verbatim scripting of teacher or student comments: “Bring your white boards, markers and erasers to the carpet and sit on your square.” Non-evaluative statements of observed teacher or student behavior: Teacher presented the content from the front of room. Numeric information about time, student participation, resource use, etc.: [9:14 – 9:29] Warm-up. 8 of 22 Ss finished at 9:20, sat still until 9:29 An observed aspect of the environment: Desks were arranged in groups of four with room to walk between each group.

Evidence or Opinion? Read each statement. Evidence or opinion? Discuss your answer with your elbow partner. If opinion, reword the statement so that it is an evidence statement. Be prepared to discuss some of the statements, or statements about which you have questions.

Evidence Review Actions, by teacher or students Statements or questions, by teacher or students Observable features of the classroom

Evidence Review Have I recorded only facts? Is my evidence relevant to the criteria being examined? Whenever possible, have I quantified words such as few, some, and most? Have I used quotation marks when quoting a teacher or student? Does my selection or documentation of evidence indicate any personal or professional preferences?  Have I included any opinion (in the guise of fact)?

BIAS Definition: Attaching positive or negative meaning to elements in our environment based on personal or societal influences that shape our thinking A biased judgment is based on outside influences of effectiveness. Example: “Mrs. T does so much for the school, she is an excellent teacher.” The actual classroom evidence may not support the rating of the teacher as “excellent”.

Bias in an Educational Setting Imagine that you are the parent of a school age child. You are walking down the hall of your child’s school while classes are in session. The doors to several rooms are open and you have the opportunity to look in on teachers. What would cause you to think favorably about what you saw and what would cause you to think negatively?

Other Threats to Observer Accuracy Assessor bias Leniency Central Tendency “Halo” or “Horns” Effect

Reflecting on Bias Reflect on teachers you have evaluated in the past… What biases may have influenced your judgment? Have personal biases impacted a higher or lower rating of a teacher?

The Evidence Cycle COLLECT DATA (Evidence) Interpret: Clarify SORT TO ALIGN WITH YOUR FRAMEWORK Interpret: Clarify Conclusions NO! Impact on learning… Support needed…

Time to Practice 9th Grade Social Studies Evidence Collection Share with your partner: What is your initial reaction? What did you notice? How does this compare to lessons you typically see?

Time to Practice Evidence check Label your evidence with the appropriate teaching standard and element (from 3.1-3.6).

Some Thoughts About Feedback Growth producing feedback is better than praise. Specific feedback is better than global feedback. Feedback is the bridge between performance and the desired goal. Reflection is not about what went well. It is about what you noticed about the lesson. Some feedback is hard to give. Let the evidence do the talking!

Types of Feedback Directive-From evaluator to teacher When behavior is immoral, illegal, dangerous, clueless Collaborative-Back and forth Both evaluator and teacher have ideas to contribute Non-directive-From teacher to evaluator The teacher deserves to take the lead

Table Talk Based on the evidence that you previously collected, craft three questions that you would consider using in a post-observation conference. Frame your questions to ensure that they are designed to promote a climate of professional inquiry. Share your questions with a partner. Consider the following: How might this question make the teacher feel?? How might the teacher respond to the question?

A Culture of Professional Inquiry Professional learning never ends. It is every teacher’s responsibility to engage in professional development. Teaching is so complex that it is never done perfectly. Every educator can always become more skilled. Making a commitment to do so is part of the essential work of teaching. Charlotte Danielson The Handbook for Enhancing Professional Practice

A Culture of Professional Inquiry Should: Infuse a school’s practices related to professional development; Be reflected in the school’s practices surrounding mentoring and teacher evaluation; and Regard mentoring and evaluation as ongoing learning. Charlotte Danielson The Handbook for Enhancing Professional Practice

Teacher Evaluation “Teacher evaluation can be an opportunity for genuine professional learning. When organized around clearly established and accepted standards of practice, teacher evaluation offers an opportunity for educators to reflect seriously on their practice, and promote learning.” Charlotte Danielson The Handbook for Enhancing Professional Practice

Table Talk Discuss the content of the previous 4 slides with your colleagues. What cultural and structural conditions must be in place to create and sustain a climate of professional inquiry? In what ways does the type of questions observers ask of teachers promote – or inhibit – such a climate? How does your existing culture foster a culture of inquiry? What changes, if any, need to be made in your existing culture to create a culture of professional inquiry?