Highway Noise Issues Public is Demanding Quieter Pavements! Governor’s Derby Breakfast, Louisville, KY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basics of Acoustics Mn/DOT MPCA FHWA Presenters:
Advertisements

SAT Seminar Feedback Road Noise Study
Next Generation Concrete Surface Industry Innovations in Quiet Pavement Technology.
Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Holistic approach for rolling noise mitigation GRB 56 th Sep 3 – 5,
Hearing Conservation and Noise Control Bureau of Workers’ Comp PA Training for Health & Safety (PATHS) 1PPT CFR
 Noise basics  What are quieter pavements?  State experience –Arizona pavements in Phoenix –Washington State experience  Interstate 5  SR 520  Bottom.
Design and Construction Guidelines for Thermally Insulated Concrete Pavements Lev Khazanovich, UM John Harvey, UCD Joe Mahoney, UW September 12, 2007.
1 Preserving Municipality Roadways Federal = 3% State = 20% Local = 77% 94% of paved roads have an Asphalt surface FHWA Source: Stephen R. Mueller,
Highway Engineering Pavement Types
HMA Design (Surface) The surface course is the layer in contact with traffic loads and normally contains the highest quality materials. It provides characteristics.
Quiet Pavement ASPHALT: THE QUIET PAVEMENT
Basic Acoustics Inverse square law Reinforcement/cancellation
Greening the Blacktop Going Green with Sustainable Asphalt RAP, Recycling, Energy and the Carbon Footprint.
Perpetual Pavements Concept and History Iowa Open House
Asphalt Rubber Asphalt Concrete Friction Course Overlay as a Pavement Preservation Strategy K. Kaloush, K. Biligiri, M. Rodezno, M. Belshe Arizona State.
Noise classification for tendering quiet asphalt wearing courses Hans Bendtsen, Danish Road Directorate International Partnership MeetingWashington January.
Pavement Surface Characteristics 9 th Annual Concrete Conference The Crowne Plaza Timonium, Maryland March 24 th, 2009 Leif Wathne Larry Scofield.
Paul M. Kohler Noise Abatement Program Manager INTERSTATE 95 EXPRESS LANES FUNDAMENTALS OF TRAFFIC NOISE.
The History of Pavement Noise and New Directions in Arizona.
PHY 102: Waves & Quanta Topic 3 Energy in wave motion
Bituminous Street Recertification Initiatives. Initiative Items n Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) n Longitudinal Joint Spec and other methods for longitudinal.
SOUND ENERGY, INTENSITY AND POWER The acoustic power of a sound source is the amount of sound energy produced by a source per second. Acoustic power.
Quiet Pavement ASPHALT: THE STRONG, QUIET TYPE
ASPHALT RUBBER 2000 Summary of the Conference About 220 Registrations About 185 Attendees 33 Countries 40 Papers Site Visit to Crumb Rubber Factory and.
Portorož, Slovenia TIRE / PAVEMENT NOISE CHARACTERISTICS OF WEARING COURSE ASPHALT MIXTURES Douglas D. Carlson Rubber Pavements AssociationRubber Pavements.
Application of Low Noise Road surfaces in the Netherlands: Excellent results but not enough to meet the legal targets Prepared by the Netherlands.
Jim Sherwood, U. S. Federal Highway Administration, Turner Fairbank Highway Research Center, Infrastructure Research and Development Roya Amjadi, U. S.
Surface Rehabilitation Treatments
Pengukuran Noise Ahmad Suudi, S.T., M.T.. 2 Noise Measurement Significant variability in noises from transportation sources L p : noise level at a particular.
Introduction to Noise Control
TRB AFK10 Committee on General Issues in Asphalt Technology Update on NCAT Test Track and Other Research Results April 24-26, 2006.
The Effects of Pavement Properties on Road Tire Noise Wing-tat HUNG, Wing-gun WONG Chung-fai NG, Chi-ho YIM The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Planning for the 2012 Research Cycle National Center for Asphalt Technology.
CE 453 Lecture 7 Noise Analysis See: and
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
Saving Your Asphalt! 36 th Annual Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference & Equipment Show February 18-20, 2009.
Implementing Noise Compatible Land Use  Federal Highway Administration  Lesson 1 Roadway Noise and FHWA Guidelines.
Update on Results of Long- term Traffic Noise Measurements for Pavement Overlay Projects James A. Reyff Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc Summer Meeting.
West Northern Lights Boulevard – Sound Barrier Improvements August 16, 2006 Meeting Purpose: A Forum to Share and Gather Information The Municipality of.
Acoustics/Psychoacoustics Huber Ch. 2 Sound and Hearing.
Research Findings from the NCAT Test Track APAI Winter Conference Indianapolis, December 14, 2010.
AFK10 April 21, Structural Study at the NCAT Test Track R. Buzz Powell Dr. David Timm.
A Very Difficult TNM Quiz Grant Anderson Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc. Get correct TNM results Speed up your input and barrier design Avoid TNM confusions.
Dependency of Coefficient of Rolling Resistance on Pavement Surface Characteristics Richard Sohaney, The Transtec Group Bernard Izevbekhai, MnDOT 19 September.
Sound in everyday life Pitch: related to frequency. Audible range: about 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz; Ultrasound: above 20,000 Hz; Infrasound: below 20 Hz Loudness:
Environmental Impacts Socio-Economic Environment Land Use Transportation System Design & Construction of Facilities Operations & Maintenance Activities.
Sound
$18 Million Benefits of Using Ground Tire Rubber In Asphalt: Eleven Years of Success George Way, P.E. Arizona DOT.
Noise in Road Construction. What this presentation covers Hearing loss rates and claims facts Noise levels of construction equipment Control methods to.
Influence of road surface on tyre rolling sound emission Report from the NordTyre project, part 2: Passenger car tyres. Truls Berge, SINTEF ICT, Norway.
 All sound is produced by  material sends through a thru  Frequency of = frequency of  Pitch =  High pitch = high  Low = low vibration frequency.
Ultra Thin Bonded Wearing Coarse Sponsored by: Minnesota LTAP Center Presented by: Michael Marti, P.E. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Dan Wegman, P.E. SemMaterials.
Office of Highway Safety Sight Distance and Roadway Condition Dan Walsh, P.E.
Sound and Hearing. Basic Facts Longitudinal wave Audible range (human): 20Hz – 20,000Hz.
Chip Seal Design Chapter 2. North America (ranked by prevalence) Empirical / Past Experience No Design Method Own Method McLeod (1960’s) - Asphalt Institute.
POLK RAIL QUIET ZONE ANALYSIS Conditions Assessment CSX “S” Line March 24, 2016.
Sound Intensity Level – Learning Outcomes
Toolbox presentation: How can we stop noise damaging hearing.
Jerry L. Larson IRMCA Indiana LTAP Basics of a Good Road
Santiago Hills II East Orange General Plan Noise Assessment Matthew B. Jones, P.E. Mestre Greve Associates.
Introduction to Noise Control Environmental Science Ithan B. Zimmer, Ph.D., P.E.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Questions
Abstract A highway traffic noise prediction model has been developed for environmental assessment in South Korea. The model is based on an outdoor sound.
Sound Intensity Level – Learning Outcomes
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
WAVES.
I-94 Maple Grove to Rogers Community Noise Engagement Meeting #1
ASPHALT: THE QUIET PAVEMENT
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Presentation transcript:

Highway Noise Issues

Public is Demanding Quieter Pavements! Governor’s Derby Breakfast, Louisville, KY

Quantifying Noise Quantifying Noise Measuring Pavement Noise Measuring Pavement Noise Mitigation Methods Mitigation Methods Comparison of Pvmt. Surfaces Comparison of Pvmt. Surfaces Arizona’s Quiet Pavements Arizona’s Quiet Pavements Presentation Outline

How Do We Quantify Noise?

The Decibel Scale Hearing Threshold Discomfort Conversation Pain Threshold How Do We Quantify Noise?

The Decibel Scale Conversation Train Chain Saw Increasing the Decibel Level by 10 Doubles the Sound Intensity

75 Decibels The individual is exposed to a combined total 78 Decibels

The Decibel Scale A reduction of 3 dB(A) is like doubling the distance from the noise. 67 dB(A) 50 ft

The Decibel Scale A reduction of 3 dB(A) is like doubling the distance from the noise. 67 dB(A) 100 ft - 3 dB(A) = 64 dB(A)

A 3dB(A) reduction corresponds to: doubling the distance reducing traffic volume by 50% reducing traffic speed by 25%

FHWA - Noise Abatement Criteria 67 dB(A) “this is not an absolute value or design standard, only a level where noise mitigation must be considered” For new construction or reconstruction (ISO )

Side-Line Measurements Statistical By- pass Method (ISO )

Close-proximity (CPX) Method

NCAT Close Proximity Noise Trailer

Comparison of CPX versus Side-Line Measurements Indianapolis - September 2003 Offset: 23 dB(A)

What Can Be Done to Mitigate Pavement Noise? –Distance –Obstructions Noise Walls Earth Berms Trees/ Shrubs –Control at the Source with Pavement Surface

Controlled Through Distance

Wall 10’ above LOS Controlled Through Obstructions Average 1 dBA for each 2 ft of Wall Above Line of Sight

Noise Walls Effective only for those in line-of-sight. Does not reduce noise at source.

Sound or Noise Walls

Walls –top 10 States in 1998 spent over $1.3M per mile –do nothing to eliminate the noise at the source Earth Berms –require a lot of land if very high Vegetation –takes a long time to develop –200’ thick would only achieve a 10 dB reduction Noise Barrier Effectiveness Must Justify Expense

Controlling At the Source

“Pavement / tire noise has been studied for well over 30 years and several large databases have been compiled in the last decade. NCHRP Synthesis 268 is a summary of the research findings of this extensively studied topic.”

Conclusions: “In general, when dense-graded asphalt and PCC pavements are compared, the dense-graded is quieter by 2 to 3 dB(A)” A 3dB(A) reduction corresponds to: - doubling the distance - reducing traffic volume by 50% - reducing traffic speed by 25%

Conclusions: “Open-graded asphalt shows the greatest potential for noise reduction for passby noise. Reduction when compared to dense- graded asphalt ranged from 1 to 9 dB(A).” A 9dB(A) reduction corresponds to: - a reduction in traffic noise by almost 50%!

I-64 Noise Study in Louisville By Local Engineering FirmBy Local Engineering Firm Readings taken before and after B/S OverlayReadings taken before and after B/S Overlay A 4-6 decibel reduction between old PCC and new asphaltA 4-6 decibel reduction between old PCC and new asphalt

OGFCs Reduce Noise, Eliminate Hydroplaning, Increase Wet Friction, and Minimize Spray

I-74 in Ohio Driving on Dense HMA onto OGFC then back onto Dense HMA

Texas Highway Driving on Dense Graded Mix then onto OGFC

Is It Cost Effective? A decrease of 2 dB means a reduction of five feet in wall height or for a mile of pavement a reduction of $528,000 (Average of $20/sf)

OGFC is the quietest surface type. (Wayson, NCHRP Synthesis 268) SMA has also proven to be a quiet surface. (Wisconsin DOT, 1993) Dense graded HMA surfaces are quieter than PCC pavements. (Hibbs and Larson, Report FHWA-SA , May 1996) Summary: Effect of Pavement Surface

Arizona DOT Uses ARFC to Provide Quiet Pavements ADOT is Spending $34M to Overlay PCCP in the Phoenix MetropolitanADOT is Spending $34M to Overlay PCCP in the Phoenix Metropolitan The ARFC is Minus 9.5mm & 9-9.5% BinderThe ARFC is Minus 9.5mm & 9-9.5% Binder 12.5 mm Thick When Used on Flexible Pavement12.5 mm Thick When Used on Flexible Pavement 25 mm Thick When Used on PCCP25 mm Thick When Used on PCCP ADOT Uses Pavement Type (ARFC) as a Noise Mitigation Strategy (4 dBA)ADOT Uses Pavement Type (ARFC) as a Noise Mitigation Strategy (4 dBA)

Recorded Noise Levels from CPX

–Highway noise very important to public –Small changes in dB(A) level very noticeable reduction of 3dB(A) like doubling distance or halving trafficreduction of 3dB(A) like doubling distance or halving traffic –Sound barriers expensive and not very effective –Controlling Noise at the Source is Best Option Dense HMA 2-4dB(A) quieter than PCCDense HMA 2-4dB(A) quieter than PCC OGFCs 1-9dB(A) quieter than Dense HMAOGFCs 1-9dB(A) quieter than Dense HMA Summary