The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners City of North Bend Pavement Management Plan & Street Utility Fee Analysis February 11, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capital Improvement Plan Financial Options September 12, 2013 Presented by: City Administration Finance Department.
Advertisements

Street Conditions Part 1 – State of the Streets Part 2 – Repairs and Maintenance Costs Part 3 – Options for Funding.
Chelan County Stemilt Loop Full Depth Reclamation, Phase II: Stemilt Loop Road is a Rural Minor Collector located in the Wenatchee Heights. The road serves.
City of Bloomfield Hills Asset Management Plan. Outline Overview plan Challenges and community input Recommendations for others.
Comparative Analysis of Emulsion and Hot Asphalt Cement Chip Seal Performance Douglas D. Gransberg, P.E., C.C.E. University of Oklahoma.
1 Preserving Municipality Roadways Federal = 3% State = 20% Local = 77% 94% of paved roads have an Asphalt surface FHWA Source: Stephen R. Mueller,
22 nd Conference Roads and Works Asphalt Trial – Outcomes so far Rod Ellis Board Member IPWEA SA.
City of Willows Pavement Management Program Road Maintenance Needs March 25, 2014.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS County of Los Angeles Public works 2015 Sustainable Pavement Round Table February 10, 2015.
ALLEGAN COUNTY PRIMARY ROAD MILLAGE AREA 2 JANUARY 21, 2014.
City of Auburn Hills Road Asset Management Program February 21, 2014 SEMCOG University.
Transportation System Needs House Transportation Committee Phil Williams, City of Bremerton Ashley Probart, AWC January 25, 2005.
2014 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 18, 2013.
Highway 46 in BeresfordHighway 19 North of Humboldt Highway 73 South of Lemmon Interstate 90 East of Wyoming Line.
Future of Ringgold County Sealcoat Road System Open Forum Meetings 2011 Credit for assistance in this presentation to Brad Skinner, Page County Engineer,
Pavement Design Terms and Concepts
Introduction to GIS In Pavement Management Introduction to GIS In Pavement Management Alex Rocco and Barry Waite City of Carson Geographic Services Division.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
City of Somersworth Presentation to City Council on Pavement Management Presented by: Joe Ducharme, Jr., P.E. Contract City Engineer & Britt E. Audett,
MODULE 2 By Vit Troyan. TRANSPORTATION: Right-of-Way Traffic Operations Street Maintenance One-Call Centers.
County of Orange Pavement Management System and Sustainable Treatment Program Clark Shen, Manager OC Construction Materials Lab Krishna Nadaraja, Senior.
Pavement Evaluation Survey Results and Understanding Condition Values PCI February 19, 2014.
Herriman City Engineering Department.  Herriman City has experienced tremendous growth over the last several years  Many new subdivisions and associated.
PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS: TRANSPORTATION Steve Hansen, PE Director of Public Works – Liberty, MO APWA PW Institute April 8, 2014.
Local Programs Update July 24, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
Pavement Preservation in South Carolina J. C. “Clem” Watson, P.E. Chief Engineer for Operations South Carolina Department of Transportation.
Pavement Maintenance II Part 1a: SurfaceTreatments Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
1 Town of Tillsonburg Lifecycle/Capital/Debt Strategy.
2004 Budget Presentation City Commission Budget Study Session July 2, 2003.
Pavement Preservation Protecting the Investment and the Environment R. Gary Hicks CP2 Center, Chico, CA Prepared for CEAC 2014 Conference March 26-28,
Street Maintenance. The Town of Bayfield maintains centerline miles of road.
Washington State Transportation Commission March 20, 2007 Jeff Monsen, PE Intergovernmental Policy Manager.
Concrete Pavements The Right Tool for The Right Job.
Micro-surfacing SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SemMaterials
Paving for Progress Aaron D. Granquist, Project Manager, HR Green, Inc. Doug Wilson, Capital Improvement Project Manager, Cedar Rapids Handouts and presentations.
Department of Transportation Report on Condition of County Maintained Road System Agenda Item 53 Board of Supervisor’s Meeting April 26, 2005.
Douglas County Road Maintenance Funding June 27, 2011.
Street Maintenance Program Update City Council Work Session February 5, 2013 Department of Public Works & Transportation.
John Angiulli Interim Director PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Citizen Academy October 9 & 16, 2012.
City of Springfield Office of Public Works Street & Sewer Infrastructure Analysis 1 Mayor J. Michael Houston Mark Mahoney, Director.
WEDGEWOOD COVE HOA STREET PAVING/RESURFACING PROJECT.
Multi-Layer Systems By Vadim Kravtsov Intermountain Slurry Seal, Inc 1.
March 21, BUDGET PRESENTATION- ROADS CAPITAL PROJECTS WATER WASTEWATER.
Public Works. Strategic Plan Presentation Department Organization Strategic Goals relating to Public Works Department Issues.
PRESENTED AND PREPARED BY CITY OF MISSOULA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
ORDINANCE # Authorizing $372,760 for traffic signal interconnect at 47 th Street and Emanuel Cleaver II Boulevard Start of project End of project.
PUBLIC WORKS FY 2012 Proposed Budget May 24, 2012.
City of Longview Pavement Preservation Program City Council Workshop February 2, 2012 Jeff Cameron, Public Works Director Josh Johnson, Street/Stormwater.
1 Transportation Impact Fees and Street Maintenance Fees Presented to the City Council by the Planning and Development Department January 21, 2010.
2013 Roads and Sidewalk Capital Programs Roads and Parks Maintenance Department Development & Infrastructure Division December 2, 2013.
Pavement Maintenance and Microsurfacing Board of Aldermen Discussion Session January 26, 2010.
Evergreen Highway Corridor Update Planning Commission Workshop March 22, 2016 Jennifer Campos, Senior Planner.
STRONG NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVE Public Works Department January 30, 2007 Agenda item 8.01.
CITY OF BELLEVILLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Town Road Survey - What You Should Know 1_24_17
Transportation Development District Presentation
Pavement Preservation Techniques Used in Virginia
Roadway Pavement Management Plan
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Minnesota’s Municipal Transportation System
General Road Construction Information
City of Madras System Development Charges
Infrastructure Investment Needs
Street Improvement Plan
Pavement condition index calculation
Common Sense Steps Towards Strong Financial Planning
Participatory Road Program neighborhood meeting Donahoo 174th Street
Town Council Strategic Planning Session
Walker Street Reconstruction Project 25% Design Public Hearing
Presentation transcript:

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners City of North Bend Pavement Management Plan & Street Utility Fee Analysis February 11, 2014

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Pavement Management Plan Objectives Review and Reassess Street Surface Conditions Previously Rated as “Good” or “Below” for Asphalt Streets and added Assessments for Concrete Streets Total Length of 29 Miles Update Cost Estimates for Repair; 166 Asphalt Street Segments, 45 Concrete Street Segments, and Added 4.05 Miles of Gravel Streets Develop 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Provide Report & Electronic Data (Cost Spreadsheet) to Supplement City’s current Pavement Management Plan.

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Roadway Assessment

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Repair Methods Crack Sealing – Tar or Epoxy Based, Normally associated with other repair methods, may be used on Asphalt & Concrete Streets in “Very Good” & “Excellent” Condition. Life Expectancy is up to 3 Years. Slurry Seal – Fine Aggregate, Asphalt Emulsion, Water, Mineral Filler. Used to prevent Raveling, Seal Minor Cracks and improve Surface Friction. Life Expectancy is 3 to 5 years. Chip Seal – Asphalt Base with Aggregate cover. Used to Water Proof Surface, Minor Crack Sealing and Surface Friction. Life Expectancy is 3 to 6 Years.

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Repair Methods (Continued) Overlay – Heated Mixture Mineral Aggregate and Asphalt Cement, Enhance Smoothness, Profile Roadway, Increase Surface Friction. Life Expectancy is 10 to 12 Years. Reconstruction – Removal of Pavement Surface and Subgrade. New Gravel Base and Asphalt Cement. Provides New Street Condition. Life Expectancy is 20 to 25 Years. Note: Life Expectancy may Vary due to Traffic Volumes, Type of Vehicles, and Existing Pavement Conditions

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Typical Pavement Repair Locations Crack Seal – Streets rated “Very Good” to “Excellent” (Not Reviewed). Used with all other Repair Methods except Reconstruction Slurry Seal – Low Volume Residential Streets with Minimal Cracking or Higher Volume Streets with no Cracks Chip Seal – Low and Medium Volume Streets with Increased Cracking. Higher Volume Roads with Less Cracking Overlays – Medium to High Volume Roads with Medium to Severe Cracking. Reconstruction – Failed Pavement for all Street Classifications

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Sample Street Repair - Crack Seal/Overlay Sheridan Street (Ohio to Maryland)

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Sample Street Repair - Slurry Seal 13 th Street (Marion to Everett)

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Sample Street Repair - Chip Seal State Street (Chester to Brussels)

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Sample Street Repair - Overlay Marion Street (13 th to 14 th )

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Sample Street Repair - Reconstruction Connecticut Street (Grant to Hayes)

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Street Condition Map

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Capital Improvement Costs Cost Include Construction Costs Contingency (10%) Engineering (18%) Legal/Admin (1.5%). Other Required Utility work not Included.

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Capital Improvement Costs (Continued) Asphalt Streets - $10,900,700 Concrete Streets - $2,891,700 Gravel Streets - $2,707,600 Total Costs - $ 16,500,00

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan Priority for Street Repairs should be Based on Volume and Condition 2015 through $3,300,00/Year

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Questions / Comments

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Street Utility Fee Analysis

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Purpose & Terms Eligible Maintenance Expenses (EME), defined as the following activities within the City’s easements and right- of-ways: patching, crack sealing, seal coating, overlaying, curb repair/replacement, and related activities in order that local streets and facilities be properly maintained Maintenance funded under this program shall exclude storm drainage improvements and maintenance: street lighting power costs, and landscape enhancements Determination of Transportation Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs) via Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Projected North Bend Transportation EDUs Class ofCurrent % of Transportation GeneratorEDUs 2017 Residential % Commercial % Institutional % Total Non-Residential % Total EDUs %

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Projected Project Costs & Payment Requirements Annual Payments Required for 20 and 30 year Funding Principal Period Yrs. Interest %Annual Payment $16,500, $1,160,958 $16,500, $897,127

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Funding Options Urban Renewal Funds (URF) State Turnback Program (STP) Street Utility Fee (SUF) Note: Gas Tax not considered for this Analysis

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Annual Revenue Required From SUF Program Revenue Required from Street Utility Fee Program Costs20 YR Value30 YR Value Annual Local Street Maintenance Cost$928,766$717,702 Annual Collector Street Maintenance Cost$150,925$116,627 Annual Arterial Road Maintenance Cost$81,267$62,799 Total Projected Annual Costs$1,160,958$897,127 Revenue Source STEP Revenue Sharing$100,000 Urban Renewal$230,000 Total Projected Revenues$330,000 Gap Which May be Collected by SUF$830,958$567,127

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Alternative Fee Methods Uniform Assessment Residential/Non-Residential Ratio Funding of Local/Collector/Arterial Streets Assessment Flat Fee Assessment

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners SUF Funding Alternatives – 20 Year Funding RevenueNumber of Mon Rates per EDU for Alt No.MethodRequiredRes. EDUsNon Res EDUsRes.Non-Res. 1Uniform Assessment$830,9583,95813,346$4.00 2Residential/Non-Res Assessment Local Streets$664,7663,958 $14.00$0.00 For Res. 50% Collector Streets$54,0123,958 $1.14$0.00 For Non-Res. 50% Coll. Streets$54,012 13,346$0.00$0.34 Arterial Streets$58,167 13,346$0.00$0.36 Totals$830,958 $15.13$0.70 3Flat Fee Assessment$830,9583,958314$16.21

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners SUF Funding Alternatives – 30 Year Funding RevenueNumber of Mon Rates per EDU for Alt No.MethodRequiredRes. EDUsNon Res EDUsRes.Non-Res. 1Uniform Assessment$567,1273,95813,346$2.73 2Residential/Non-Res Assessment Local Streets$453,7023,958 $9.55$0.00 For Res. 50% Collector Streets$36,8633,958 $0.78$0.00 For Non-Res. 50% Coll. Streets$36,863 13,346$0.00$0.23 Arterial Streets$39,699 13,346$0.00$0.25 Totals$567,127 $10.33$0.48 3Flat Fee Assessment$567,1273,958314$11.06

The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners Questions/Comments