Filing for a United States Patent “Helpful Hints” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
Advertisements

Patent Claim Basics Presented by The Patent Guild, Inc. Paul Royal, Jr. Registered Patent Agent.
Incorporation by Reference
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION OFFICE OF PATENT COUNSEL March 16, 2001.
Anatomy of a Patent Application Presented by: Jeong Oh Director, Office of Technology Transfer & Industrial Development Syracuse University April 30, 2009.
Intellectual Property (Patents) Overview P Intellectual Property (Patents) Overview Presented by Jim Parker S aliwanchik L loyd & E isenschenk 3107 S.W.
Proteomics Examination Yvonne (Bonnie) Eyler Technology Center 1600 Art Unit 1646 (703)
Utility and Written Description Steve Kunin Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy Esther Kepplinger Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations.
CSE Senior Design II The Patent Process Instructor: Mike O’Dell Based on a Presentation by Dale Hansen, Stanford University. Modified for this class by.
INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property
The United States Patent and Trademark Office Bob Olszewski, Director TC 2900 United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Patent Law A Career Choice For Engineers Azadeh Khadem Registered Patent Attorney November 25, 2008 Azadeh Khadem Registered Patent Attorney November 25,
The America Invents Act (AIA) - Rules and Implications of First to File, Prior Art, and Non-obviousness -
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
35 U.S.C. 112, Sixth Paragraph MPEP 2181 – 2186 Jean Witz Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600.
Appeal Practice Before Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Searching for Prior Art: Moving From the Search Room to the World Wide Web Larry Tarazano Primary Examiner Technology Center 1700 U.S. Patent and Trademark.
Restriction Practice for Genus Claims Species Claims Linking Claims and Markush Claims Julie Burke QAS/PM TC1600.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 25, 2008 Patent - Utility.
Necessity is the mother of invention. The father is unknown.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 27, 2008 Patent - Enablement.
Patent Overview by Jeff Woller. Why have Patents? Patents make some people rich – but, does that seem like something the government should protect? Do.
Filing a Patent Application: Procedures and Tips
Applications for Intellectual Property International IP Protection IP Enforcement Protecting Software JEFFREY L. SNOW, PARTNER NATIONAL SBIR/STTR CONFERENCE.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 14, 2007 Patent - Utility.
® ® From Invention to Start-Up Seminar Series University of Washington The Legal Side of Things Invention Protection Gary S. Kindness Christensen O’Connor.
Lauren MacLanahan Office of Technology Licensing GTRC.
The Patent Process and the America Invents Act
Intellectual Property (IP) GE 105 Introduction to Engineering Design.
STEPS TO SUCCESSFUL PRELIMINARY PATENT SEARCHING Karen M. Kitchens Patent and Trademark Resource Center Wyoming State.
1 Basic Facts about Patents Chem 3380 Fall Patent Documents  Legal Document A patent is a legal right granted by a government to an inventor.
© 2010 Hodgson Russ LLP IEEE Southern Area Entrepreneur’s Day Overview Of The Patent Process R. Kent Roberts Hodgson Russ LLP (716)
Amit Patel Project Officer (IPR/Patent). Contents Form 1 (Application for Patent) Form 2 (Provisional/Complete Specification) Form 3 (Statement and Undertaking)
Charles R. Eloshway Patent Attorney Office of International Relations U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Conference on Intellectual Property in the Global.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
Patent Protection Around the World & at the USPTO
Contents of US Patent Applications & Filing Requirements
Notice of Proposed Rule Making Affecting Claims That Recite Alternatives 1 Robert Clarke, Director Office of Patent Legal Administration (571)
1 John Calvert Supervisory Patent Examiner
Evansdale Library—West Virginia University U.S. Patent Searching --Plants August 24, 2005 Marian G. Armour-Gemmen Patent & Trademark Reference Librarian.
Intellectual Property GE 105 Introduction to Engineering Design.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
2/2/09 - L14 PatentsCopyright Joanne DeGroat, ECE, OSU1 Patents.
Preparing a Provisional Patent Application Hay Yeung Cheung, Ph.D. Myers Wolin, LLC March 16, 2013 Trenton Computer Festival 1.
Seminar Industrial Property Protection Prague, 4 June 2003 Patent Protection in Europe Heidrun Krestel Liaison Officer Member States Co-operation Programmes.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
Introduction to Patents by Patrick Ragains. A Patent is: §a property right granted by the U.S. Government to an inventor “to exclude others from making,
Josiah Hernandez Patentability Requirements. Useful Having utilitarian or commercial value Novel No one else has done it before If someone has done it.
PCT FILING - ADVANTAGES© Dr. S. Padmaja, Managing Partner, iProPAT June 21, 2012.
Prosecution Lunch Patents January Reminder: USPTO Fee Changes- Jan. 1, 2014 Issue Fee Decrease- delay paying if you can –Issue Fee: from $1,780.
1 Written Description Analysis and Capon v. Eshhar Jeffrey Siew Supervisory Patent Examiner AU 1645 USPTO (571)
Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C U.S. Patent Claims By James A. Larson.
1 INTELECTUAL PROPERTY PATENTS. 2 A patent for an invention grants property rights of that invention to the inventor. It is issued by the Patent and Trademark.
Patentability Considerations in the 3-D Structure Arts Patentability Considerations in the 3-D Structure Arts Michael P. Woodward Supervisory Patent Examiner.
Trilateral Project WM4 Report on comparative study on Examination Practice Relating to Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and Haplotypes. Linda S.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW FOR NON-IP PRACTITIONERS: ETHICS AND ISSUE SPOTTING FOR EFFECTIVE REPRESENTATION Philip Furgang Furgang & Adwar, L.L.P. New York,
1 FY08 Restriction Petition Update and Burden Julie Burke Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600.
Basse Asplund, M Sc, Ph D Patent Attorney and Partner Stockholm, Uppsala, Göteborg och Lund.
Patents 101 March 28, 2006 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
Patents, Trade Secrets and Unfair Competition
Searching for Prior Art: Moving From the Search Room
Patents 101 March 28, 2006 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
Patenting innovative products
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Ram R. Shukla, Ph.D. SPE AU 1632 & 1634 Technology Center
Nuts and Bolts of Patent Law
Global Innovation Management Workout on Writing a Patent
What are the types of intellectual property?
What You Didn’t Know That You Didn’t Know About Patents
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

Filing for a United States Patent “Helpful Hints” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

In order to receive a patent, an invention must meet the requirements set forth in the law. This includes the requirements of: –35 U.S.C. 101: Patentable Subject Matter –35 U.S.C. 102: Novelty –35 U.S.C. 103: Obviousness –35 U.S.C. 112: First Paragraph: Enablement –35 U.S.C. 112: Second Paragraph: Definiteness Requirements for Patentability

Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) –uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/mpep.htm (Laws and Rules) –uspto.gov/web/patents/legis.htm

The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 35 U.S.C. 112 Second Paragraph: Definiteness

Claims Analysis 1.A method of making an asphalt concrete composition, comprising the steps of: (a) heating a mineral aggregate to a temperature of 325°to 500°F, preferably between 350°to 450°F. (b) admixing said mineral aggregate with a rubber aggregate to form a mineral/rubber aggregate admixture. (c) admixing a fibrous material with said aggregate admixture to forma dry mix. (d) admixing said asphalt cement with said dry mix to form a hot, wet mix.

Claims Analysis 1.A method of making an asphalt concrete composition, comprising the steps of: (a) heating a mineral aggregate to a temperature of 325°to 500°F, preferably between 350°to 450°F. (b) admixing said mineral aggregate with a rubber aggregate to form a mineral/rubber aggregate admixture. (c) admixing a fibrous material with said aggregate admixture to forma dry mix. (d) admixing said asphalt cement with said dry mix to form a hot, wet mix.

Claims Analysis (a) Preferred ranges or materials in same claim are not longer considered to be indefinite. (d) No antecedent basis for “said asphalt cement”

Claims Analysis 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first time period is 15 seconds.

Claims Analysis 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first time period is 15 seconds. Problem: Lack of antecedent basis for “the first time period.”

Claims Analysis 3.The method according to claim 1, wherein said temperature is between 300°to 360°F.

Claims Analysis 3.The method according to claim 1, wherein said temperature is between 300°to 360°F. Problem: The lower end of the temperature range is outside of the range set forth in claim 1 (325°to 500°F).

Claims Analysis 4.The method of claim 3, wherein step (b) includes the step of sizing said rubber aggregate prior to admixing with said mineral aggregate into micron particulates.

Claims Analysis 5.An asphalt concrete composition, comprising in percent by weight, 1%-10% rubber aggregate; % fibrous material such as antistatic treated polyester fiber, 1%-8% asphalt cement; and the remainder mineral aggregate.

Claims Analysis 5.An asphalt concrete composition, comprising in percent by weight, 1%-10% rubber aggregate; % fibrous material such as antistatic treated polyester fiber, 1%-8% asphalt cement; and the remainder mineral aggregate. Problem: The “antistatic treated polyester fiber” is considered to be a preferred material. It is not indefinite.

Claims Analysis 6.The composition of claim 5, wherein the composition has 1% - 5% rubber aggregate, 0.05%-0.4% fibrous materials; and 4%-6% asphalt cement.

Claims Analysis 7.The composition of any of claims 5 or 6, wherein said rubber aggregate has a particle size of between microns. 8.The composition of any one of claims 5-7, wherein said polyester fibers are 0.25 inches to 0.5 inch in length and about inch in diameter

Claims Analysis 7.The composition of any of claims 5 or 6, wherein said rubber aggregate has a particle size of between microns. 8.The composition of any one of claims 5-7, wherein said polyester fibers are 0.25 inches to 0.5 inch in length and about inch in diameter?

Claims Analysis Problem: Claim 8 is missing a period. Claim 8 is also improper because it depends from another multiply dependent claim.

Claims Analysis 9.The asphalt concrete composition as substantially described herein.

Claims Analysis 9.The asphalt concrete composition as substantially described herein. Problem: The claim does not clearly define the invention.

The provisional application must be made in the name(s) of all of the inventor(s). It can be filed up to one year following the date of first sale, offer for sale, public use or publication of the invention. (These pre-filing disclosures, although protected in the United States, may preclude patenting in foreign countries.) Provisional Patent Applications

A filing date will be accorded to a provisional application only when it contains: –A written description of the invention, complying with all requirements of 35 U.S.C. §112 ¶ 1. –Any drawings necessary to understand the invention, complying with 35 U.S.C. §113. Provisional Patent Applications

To be complete, a provisional application must also include the filing fee as set forth in 37 C. F. R. 1.16(k) and a cover sheet identifying: –The application as a provisional application for patent. –The name(s) of all inventors. –Inventor residence(s). –Title of the invention. – continued – Provisional Patent Applications

To be complete, a provisional application must also include the filing fee as set forth in 37 C. F. R. 1.16(k) and a cover sheet identifying (cont.): –Name and registration number of attorney or agent and docket number (if applicable). –Correspondence address. –Any U.S. government agency that has a property interest in the application. Provisional Patent Applications

A nonprovisional utility patent application must be in the English language or be accompanied by a translation in the English language. Must be typewritten or produced by a mechanical (or computer) printer. The paper size must be either: –21.6 cm. by 27.9 cm. (81/2 by 11 inches); or –21.0 cm. by 29.7 cm. (DIN size A4). Nonprovisional Patent Applications

A complete nonprovisional utility patent application should contain the elements listed below, arranged in the order shown. –Utility Patent Application Transmittal Form or Transmittal Letter –Fee Transmittal Form and appropriate fees –Application Data Sheet (see 37 CFR§1.76) –Specification (with at least one claim) –Drawings (when necessary) –Executed Oath or Declaration –Nucleotide and/or Amino Acid Sequence Listing (when necessary) Nonprovisional Patent Applications

Patent Applications Additional Information regarding the filing of a patent application: –uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/utility/utility.htm#intro Where to down load forms –uspto.gov/web/forms/index.html#patent

Inventor Resources uspto.gov/web/offices/com/iip/index.htm

Patent Searching uspto.gov/patft/index.html Advanced Search: –A number of fields in patent database may be search, but documents before 1976 can only be searched by U.S. Classification and Patent Number. The “text database” does not go back that far.

Patent Searching East/West For the more advanced searcher: –More powerful search engines and more advanced search engines are available. –However, these are available at the USPTO (Public Search Room) or at certain Patent Depository Libraries.

Patent Searching East/West –More complete databases Derwent EPO JPO OCR USPat

Patent Searching East/West –More powerful search engine Faster Handles complex search terms better Proximity operators Better truncation

Search operators: –AND, OR, ANDNOT Searching particular fields: –e.g., Abst/ ccl/ Right truncation “$”: –Plant$ Searching phrases “….”: –AN/“General Motors” Searching combinations: –AN/“General Motors” and ABST/transmission$ Patent Searching USPTO.gov

Conference on Intellectual Property in the Global Marketplace THANK YOU Filing for a United States Patent: “Helpful Hints”