1 Porous Pavement and Model Municipal Operations Center Demonstration Project Phase II Photo Document Project County of San Diego DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making Greenways Greener: Developing a Sustainable Trail in Ramsey County Ramsey County 2007 Lower Afton Road Trail Project By Commissioner Victoria Reinhardt.
Advertisements

Jonathan Stanton Public Health Engineer. Oil and grease Heavy Metals- lead, zinc, and mercury Nutrients- phosphorous and nitrogen Chemicals Mud and Sediment.
Urban Low Impact Development English + Associates Owner Architect Construction EcoServices Storm-water Tank Contractor General Contractor T&T Construction.
Permeable Paving. Low Impact Development (LID)  Low impact development (LID) is an approach to managing stormwater runoff to protect water quality.
Katie Rousseau Clean Water Program American Rivers.
Permeable Pavements Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission May 31, 2011.
CITY OF HOUSTON FLOODING & DRAINAGE COMMITTEE PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING May 18, 2010.
1 What is Green Infrastructure and How Does It Reduce Wet Weather Issues? Making natural systems work for us: using soil and vegetation - rather than concrete.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of the Hempfield Township’s New Storm Water Management Program.
SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN. SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN Ken Stratton.
Post Construction Runoff Control & BMPs J. C. Hayes, Ph.D., P.E. & D. Hitchcock, Ph.D. South Carolina Stormwater Forum May 8, 2007 Columbia, SC.
Carnell. IEMA, Ireland Regional Event Are SUDS the Answer for Drainage? Dublin, 12th Dec 2007 “Filter Drains as a SuDS System” presented by Andrew Todd,
Innovative Use of Porous Pavement for Treatment of Roadway Runoff Everett Gupton, PE Ron Horres, PE ASCE-EWRG & APWA Sustainable Stormwater Symposium September.
First installation of the BullDog™ PVC pipe-to-pipe restraint system occurred on August, Eliminated need for concrete thrust blocking Case History:
Spokane River Forum Conference March 26,  About 1/3 of City  130 outfalls.
Recycling Tear Off Shingles in Bituminous Pavement Ramsey County 2007 Lower Afton Road Trail Project By Jerry Auge, Jr. – Project Manager
Session 6A: Permeable Pavement. From the Rooftop to the Bay, March 9 -11, 2010 Photos: Chesapeake Bay Program Permeable Pavements Permeable Interlocking.
Keith Dorn Jesse Mefford Hunter Shealy ceramics.org.
LID Site Design and Drainage Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011.
INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR LID FACILITY DESIGN Prepared.
Stormwater Management University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Sharon Myers, L.G. Environment, Health, and Safety (919)
Monitoring and Analytical Issues For BMP Performance Evaluation Hong Lin, Ph.D. Gary Lippner, P.E. CDS Technologies May 9, 2006 NWQMC San Jose, CA.
{Your District Name Here} District Small MS4/Municipal Storm Water Update {Date Here}
Low Impact Development Best Management Practices
Coastal Smart Growth s/index.htmhttp:// s/index.htm
Stormwater Master Plan University of North Carolina Peter A. Reinhardt Sharon Myers, L.G. Department of Environment, Health and Safety.
Stormwater Management 101: Implementation Options through Partnerships
UVM-AWRA CHARRETTE: designing an alternative stormwater treatment technique W h a t I s a C h a r r e t t e? A Charrette is a cross-disciplinary workshop.
Sustainable Development: Practical Solutions to Real World Problems Fishkill, NY November 7, 2012 Low Impact Development and Rainwater Harvesting Solutions.
Horsley Witten Group, Inc. Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual Public Workshop Design Elements for BMPs January 19, 2011.
Equus Beds ASR Program – Wichita’s Future Water Supply September 6, 2012.
Design of Infiltration Practices
SAINTPAUL SUSTAINABLE BUILDING POLICY Saint Paul Sustainable Building Policy Training Module 7 Stormwater Management.
RAIN GARDEN DESIGN CONTEST 2013 MARCH 11 TH – 27 TH.
Leila Talebi (3/28/2012).  The existing land use of Cincinnati Zoo consists of various types including parking lot, open space areas, and steep wooded.
Introduction to Storm Water Phase II Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.
Tyler C. Ladd and Dr. Robert Traver, Villanova University Evaluation of a Porous Concrete BMP: The Hydrologic Perspective Funding and Acknowledgments:
Andy Erickson, St. Anthony Falls Lab Watershed Summit March 12, 2011 Identify and Prioritize Treatment Solutions.
Filtration Observations in the Carver County WMO West Metro Water Alliance May 25, 2011 (Thanks to Kristen Larson, Carver County)
Construction & Post-Construction Stormwater Ordinance City of Wenatchee, Public Works Department Jessica Shaw, Environmental Manager.
Created by The North Carolina School of Science and Math.The North Carolina School of Science and Math Copyright North Carolina Department of Public.
Workshop on the draft General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water from Small MS4s Fresno August 6, 2002 Redding August 8, 2002 San Luis Obispo August.
State of Connecticut Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Plan CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bureau of Policy and Planning Cynthia.
Module 8: Post-Construction Phase Post-Construction Phase BMP Monitoring BMP Maintenance Temporary BMP Removal After Stabilization BMP Reporting and Record.
BENJAMIN CHILTON STEVEN ANDREW MARTIN ROSE SCHNEIDER ECJ PARKING LOT REDESIGN UT AUSTIN: GROUP 5.
SUDS Research Dr Martin Mansell School of Engineering and Science University of Paisley.
Lessons Learned from Past MS4 Audits 1/3/20161 Lessons Learned from Past MS4 Audits.
San Rafael, California November 12, 2015
Kitsap County Department of Public Works CRAB – November 04, 2015 Bioretention Stormwater BMP Benson Burleson Design Engineer
Evaluation Measures for Municipal Storm Water Management Programs Daniel Rourke Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District October 15, 2003 Counting Raindrops.
BEST PRACTISE Use of permeable paving As part of a new Railway Station in Bromsgrove a new car park was being installed. This permeable solution had to.
By: Dario and Donovan. Low impact development or LID is an approach to land development or redevelopment, that works with nature to manage storm water.
Program Overview Town of Wrightsville Beach Public Works Department Stormwater Services.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCE DEPT. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (DERM) “THE PERMITTING PROCESS TO DISPOSE OF STORMWATER.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
Low Impact Development Practices. What is Low Impact Development (LID)? LID is an approach to land development (or re- development) that works with nature.
Comprehensive Thinking and Planning
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
Article VIII: Post Construction Best Management Practices Presented by Jennifer Boyer DuPage County DEC.
Former Naval Fuel Depot Point Molate December 8, 2014 Summary of IR Site 3 Remediation and Abatement Work to Date Point Molate Naval Fuel Depot Richmond,
Construction of On-Site Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Facilities Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit
Hydrosphere Notes Part 9-Land Use.
Source: US EPA National Stormwater Calculator Release
Case Study: Evaluating Retrofit Urban Best Management Practice Performance and Lessons Learned Nick Muenks, Marc Leisenring, Mark Willobee – Geosyntec.
4th Annual Construction Law Summit
MIDS calculator Quantifies reductions in runoff volume for a given BMP or group of BMPs Quantifies reductions in phosphorus (P) and TSS runoff for a given.
Kickoff example Create a new file
Intro MIDS Calculator Use
MS4 = Municipal Separated Storm Sewer System
Presentation transcript:

1 Porous Pavement and Model Municipal Operations Center Demonstration Project Phase II Photo Document Project County of San Diego DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES August 1,

2 Order of Review Overview of Phase I Results Treatment Train Site Preparation Construction Post Construction Porous Pavement Site Preparation Construction Post Construction Rain Event Results to Date 2

3 Overview of Phase I 3

4 N 11 M12A Porous Concrete 14,936 s.f. Porous Asphalt 40,126 s.f. Pavers 7,896 s.f. Reference Area. 7 Porous Pavement Center COC 62,958 s.f. 4

5 Cost Summary – Porous Pavement 7

6 PHASE I PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT SQUARE FOOT COSTS Demolition & Excavation Installation of Sub Base Pavemen t Costs Square Foot Costs* Annual Est. Square Foot Maintenance Costs Comments Porous Asphalt $ 2.75 $ 1.88 $ 1.87 $ 6.50 $ " excavation/backfill. 3" porous asphalt. Standard Asphalt $ 2.13 $ 1.04 $ 1.32 $ 4.49 $ "- Excavation/Backfill. 6"-Asphalt. Porous Concrete $ 3.19 $ 1.88 $ 6.34 $ $ "- Excavation/Backfill. 5-1/2" pervious concrete. Standard Concrete $ 1.51 $ - $ 3.42 $ 4.93 $ 0.01 No new base material. 6"- Reinforced Concrete Porous Pavers $ 2.75 $ 1.88 $ 9.63 $ TBD 18"- Excavation/Backfill. 3"-Paver. *Square foot cost are based on actual cost received by the County of San Diego. 8

7 Phase I Treatment Train Schematic 5

8 Targeted Pollutants of Concern Suspended Solids Oil/Grease Metals (Copper, Zinc, Chromium, Cadmium) Organics Nitrogen Note: These are consistent between Phase I and Phase II. 6

9 Phase II 9

10 Current and Proposed Porous Pavement and Treatment Train Locations 10

11 Phase II Expansion Three additional media filtration units Three additional porous paving test plots (54,000 sf) One additional porous concrete test plot Two additional porous asphalt test plots Geogrid stabilization under 1/2 of each new porous asphalt test plot 26,000 sf of roof runoff diverted to porous asphalt test beds Enhanced monitoring to evaluate current/expanded BMP effectiveness 11

12 Phase II Treatment Train Schematic 12

13

14 TREATMENT TRAIN Site Preparation 14

15 TREATMENT TRAIN Site Preparation and Excavation 15

16 TREATMENT TRAIN Excavation Around Phase 1 Treatment Train 16

17 TREATMENT TRAIN CONSTRUCTION 17

18 TREATMENT TRAIN Installation of MFS and Storm Filter Chambers 20

19 TREATMENT TRAIN Installation of MFS and Storm Filter Chambers 21

20 TREATMENT TRAIN Installation of Diversion Pipe and Monitoring Boxes 26

21 TREATMENT TRAIN Backfilling Treatment Train 28

22 TREATMENT TRAIN Maintenance 30

23 TREATMENT TRAIN CONSTRUCTION 29

24 TREATMENT TRAIN MSF Unit Replacement Filter 31

25 TREATMENT TRAIN Filter Replacement of Phase 1 MSF Unit 32

26 CDS PRE-TREATMENT CLEAN-OUT After Three Rain Events 33

27 POROUS PAVEMENT Site Preparation 34

28 POROUS PAVEMENT Excavation Engraving 35

29 POROUS PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION 37

30 POROUS PAVEMENT Installation of Subsurface Overflow Drainage and Monitoring System 38

31 POROUS PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION 39

32 POROUS ASPHALT PROFILE 41

33 POROUS PAVEMENT Installation of Geotech Style Fabric and Aggregate 44

34 POROUS PAVEMENT Installation of Geogrip Re-enforcement 45

35 POROUS PAVEMENT Porous Asphalt Overlain Aggregate Bed 52

36 POROUS PAVEMENT Installation of Porous Asphalt 50

37 POROUS ASPHALT PROFILE 46

38 POROUS PAVEMENT Installation of Porous Concrete 47

39 POROUS PAVEMENT Porous Concert Curing Process 48

40 POROUS PAVEMENT POST CONSTRUCTION 54

41 POROUS PAVEMENT Asphalt concrete Interface 55

42 POROUS PAVEMENT POST-CONSTRUCTION 56

43 POROUS PAVEMENT Porous Concrete Infiltration 57

44 POROUS PAVEMENT Porous Asphalt Infiltration 58

45 POROUS PAVEMENT Rain Event November 30,

46 POROUS PAVEMENT RAIN EVENT (11/30/2007) 60

47 POROUS PAVEMENT RAIN EVENT (11/30/2007) 61

48 POROUS PAVEMENT RAIN EVENT (11/30/2007) 62

49 POROUS PAVEMENT RAIN EVENT (11/30/2007) 63

50 Results to Date 64

51 Porous Paving Treatments Rainfall and Runoff measured during 11 events during the wet season. Events ranged from 0.23 inches to 1.07 inches during Phase I monitoring. All Three Porous Paving Treatments eliminated 100 percent of the runoff and associated contaminants. 65

52 Infiltration Works! 66

53 67

54 68

55 MFS Performance (Phase I) Perlite used as Media Initial data based upon only 3 events Effective at further removal of sediment Coarse sediments (>63 µ) to <1.8 mg/L. Fine sediments (<63 µ) to <14 mg/L Effective at further removal of contaminants strongly associated with particulate contaminants e.g. Total Lead concentrations reduced percent 69

56 70