International Compaction & Compaction Testing Update www.ticservicegroup.com.au Feb 2010 Opportunity - Increase the life of infrastructure (some experts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ride Specification – IRI Update Prepared by Joe Thomas, P.E. 11/1/06 MAAPT 53 rd Annual Asphalt Conference December 6, 2006.
Advertisements

Retroreflectivity: Raising the Nighttime Brightness of Traffic Signs and Markings Office of Technology Applications Peter Hatzi.
Note: Lists provided by the Conference Board of Canada
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
Design and Construction Guidelines for Thermally Insulated Concrete Pavements Lev Khazanovich, UM John Harvey, UCD Joe Mahoney, UW September 12, 2007.
Asphalt Issues AASHTO SCOC Virginia Beach, Va. By Victor (Lee) Gallivan FHWA August 2, 2011.
European Asphalt Pavement Warranties Scan September 14-28, 2002.
Intelligent Compaction for Hot Mix Asphalt Mike Arasteh, RC Baltimore.
Mark Lindemann NDOR Geotechnical Engineer.  Background on previous field testing  Research – Non-nuclear field testing  Cost Savings of Going Non-Nuclear.
Business Critical Rules March 2015
Stephen A. Wandner Senior Economist U.S. Department of Labor Michael Wiseman Research Professor George Washington University.
American Trucking Associations National Association of Steel Pipe Distributors March 2007 Ray Kuntz Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Watkins and.
Tranlation: EASL’s Average Daily Traffic Time or Traffic Pavement Condition Index Pavement Performance Pavement Condition High Performance Intersections.
How to Document A Business Management System
MEPDG Overview & National Perspective CRSI Expert Task Group Meeting July 29, 2008 Gary Crawford Federal Highway Administration Office of Pavement Technology.
A Urban Highway Infrastructure: Design For Long, Long Life Michael I. Darter, Ph.D, PE Principle Engineer, ARA, Inc. Director, Pavement Research Institute,
Safe roads, Reliable journeys, Informed travellers New Technologies for Highway Structures “Vision” Awtar Jandu Structures Design and Management.
TURNER-FAIRBANK HIGHWAY RESEARCH CENTER NDE Research Ongoing Projects and Response Based Load Rating The Office of Research, Development, and Technology.
The Coalition for Transportation Productivity Making Roads Safer, Protecting the Environment and Strengthening the Economy Through Vehicle Weight Limit.
Intelligent Compaction Research & Development and QA Activities Richard B. Duval, P.E. Construction Research Engineer Infrastructure Research & Development.
CEVP ® Cost Estimate Validation Process TEA Conference 2004 Jay Drye, P.E. Assistant State Design Engineer Monica Bielenberg, P.E. CREM Program Manager.
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS Lecture 4. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Four basic types of condition.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
Asphalt Quality Assurance Program
Construction Methods Lecture 9 Compacting Lecture 9.
PERFORMANCE-BASED PROCEDURES FOR IN-PLACE SOIL TESTING 2013 LTAP-TTAP National Conference Boise, Idaho July 24, 2013.
Irene Rico Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century ~ MAP-21.
Office of Highway Safety Bridge Load Rating Dan Walsh.
Determining Innovative Contracting Methods to Reduce User Costs Stuart Thompson Utah Technology Transfer Center.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
Truths and Myths about Traffic Data Truths and Myths about Traffic Data ITSA Presentation June 2007 AirSage Proprietary & Confidential.
Economic Analysis: Applications to Work Zones March 25, 2004.
1 Joint ASIA / BIA / TRIBAL Data Management Committee A Proposed Centralized Data Management Function Sponsored by the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs.
NCHRP Synthesis 458: Roadway Safety Data Interoperability Between Local and State Agencies Presented to ATSIP TRF 2014 Presented by Nancy Lefler Vanasse.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
Beyond the Crossroads National Conference on Transportation Infrastructure and Regulatory Policy May 27, Denver, CO Future Infrastructure Needs,
FHWA Highways For LIFE Technology Partnerships Program Intelligent Asphalt Compaction Analyzer October 01, 2007 – September 30, 2009 Haskell Lemon Construction.
International Collaboration between Road Agencies Gregers Hildebrand, Danish Road Directorate.
PennDOT’s Study of NCHRP Research Results Implementation TRB State Representatives & AASHTO National RAC Meetings July 27, Michael Bonini Transportation.
Planning for Road Safety George Mavroyeni – Executive Director, Major Projects (former Executive Director, Road Safety and Network Access) May 2011.
ABC POLICY DEVELOPMENT IOWA DOT Norman McDonald, PE Iowa Department of Transportation Office of Bridges and Structures MID-CONTINENT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
AAPA 2012 Study Tour to Europe – Closing & recommendations v2 Closing & recommendations.
1 THE VALUE OF THE VALUE FOR MONEY AUDIT FACILITIES MANAGEMENT.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
AASHTO Research Advisory Committee ~ July 28, 2010 TERRA Transportation Engineering and Road Research Alliance Presented by: André Clover, P. E. Bureau.
1 Hot-Mix Asphalt and Flexible Pavement Design: the MEPDG Kevin D. Hall, Ph.D., P.E. Professor and Head, Dept. of Civil Engineering University of Arkansas.
Energy Efficiency in Public Buildings in Brazil – Guidelines for Implementation Anand Subbiah, Nexant Inc. April 30, 2002, Kubitschek Plaza Hotel, Brasilia,
A Strategic Plan for Pavement Engineering NCHRP 20-7(223) AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements Dan Dawood, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
Midwest Geotechnical Conference Indianapolis, Indiana September 22, 2015 Bob Arndorfer.
Swedish Risk Management System Internal management and control Aiming to Transport Administration with reasonable certainty to.
Data Analytics – A Cost Effective Approach to Reducing Operating Costs Automatically “find what matters” in the data from building equipment systems and.
CMRA WEBINAR ON NEW SPECIFICATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION JUNE 15 TH, 2010 Recycled Asphalt Shingles in HMA Implementation: A Perspective from Wisconsin.
How safe are our highway structures? Optimised assessment of bridges Aleš Žnidarič Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
Your Septic System Designing and its Maintenance.
Transportation Asset Management PM Peer Exchange Performance Reporting and Target Setting (Section 2): VDOT’s Experience Connie Sorrell Chief of System.
GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT HIGHWAYS RESEARCH STATION Training program for newly recruited Assistant Engineers.
European Asphalt Pavement Warranties Scan
Office of Materials and Road Research
Industrial Assessment Center Database
(Additional materials)
Highways for LIFE – Technology Partnerships Program
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Long-Term Pavement Performance Program
Quality Assurance for Emulsified Asphalt Surface Treatments
Over 1 million potholes filled in 2018 at a cost approaching £100m.
Prime Factors for Successful Preservation Treatments
Presentation transcript:

International Compaction & Compaction Testing Update Feb 2010 Opportunity - Increase the life of infrastructure (some experts say double) - Cut construction costs

2 Overview Issues with Compaction Testing The Numbers – Why is Compaction Important Compaction problem being Solved Measuring Compaction: Fundamental Changes What’s Happening in the USA & Europe Intelligent Compaction – What is It? Benefits Starting Point Case study Writing Modulus into the Specifications Questions

Issues with Compaction Testing Current practices not delivering the best quality outcome for Victoria’s road network –Quality e.g. results can be ‘massaged’ –Quantity e.g. testing capability not available when required –Knowledge & technical skills 3

4 The Numbers – USA Why is Compaction Important “I’ve studied where we spend money in the U.S. to fix our infrastructure, and a lot of the cost can be tied directly to the performance of compacted materials underneath our civil infrastructure,” –Prof David White, Iowa State University, Ames and Director of the school’s Earthworks Engineering Research Center “At the very least, improper compaction costs taxpayers $1 billion a year in wasted diesel fuel, construction labor, equipment maintenance, rework, rehabilitation, litigation and other inefficiencies” White adds. White estimates that the stiffness of soil, sand and aggregate—the building blocks of road embankments, building pads and bridge abutments—cost the public up to $100 billion a year if not built up properly. “There is something like $50 billion a year for vehicle maintenance because of poor road conditions,” he says. “Those poor road conditions are tied to what they are sitting on.”

5 Compaction problem being Solved An Intelligent Compaction (IC) roller can test the entire range of the project, and its sensors can penetrate deeper into the fill. Handheld testing devices, e.g. nuclear-density gauge, can only measure a limited amount of space at a time—covering only a small percentage of the project’s footprint. Compaction Uniformity to specification

6 Measuring Compaction: Fundamental Changes From Density to Stiffness Stiffness is the basis for calculating an even more fundamental material property, "modulus," which experts agree is the most accurate and independent means for judging deformation and, thus, a material's level of compaction. * Stiffness is loosely defined as a measure of a material's ability to resist deformation under load Density Stiffness*

7 Speaking of Intelligent Compaction (IC) “We are trying to measure and predict how [roads] will behave when a truck runs over the material. The [IC] roller is really a better simulation of how well that material will behave over the long term, over the itty- bitty, nuclear-density gauge.” –John Siekmeier, a senior research engineer for the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation.

8 Old Method New Method After Compaction is Complete Provides little or no “on the fly” feedback Compaction Control Density Verified using a compaction control device (inc DCP, GeoGauge and Light Weight Deflectometer eg Zorn ZFG2000) In-situ test methods Measurement Unit & When Nuclear Gauge Stiffness Ongoing measurement & feedback to operator Intelligent Compaction Compaction Method

Intelligent Compaction – What is It? 9

10 Intelligent Compaction – What is It? A stiffness measuring and recording system A GPS-based documentation system that is capable of producing colour- coded mapping of pertinent information during the compaction process An onboard measuring device that allows roller operators to see whether they are overcompacting (and destroying the material), undercompacting or right on target. As operators make multiple passes with the roller, a computer screen shows which areas need attention. An automatic feedback system that is capable of varying compactive effort based on measured stiffness Puts roller operators directly in charge of ground control, enabling them to inspect their own work before turning it over to the owner for verification and payment Calibrated and verified using a compaction control device measuring elastic modulus e.g. Zorn ZFG 2000 “Intelligent compaction” (IC) is the ability of a soil or asphalt roller to measure the stiffness or solidity of the underlying material and instruct the operator what to do next

11 LWD ZFG 2000 Measuring Modulus Export 2003 – 2008 –China 250 –USA 55 (mostly purchased for DOT research) –Australia 8 –Europe 680 Germany 920 Additional 1200 units from competitors Not a flash in the pan e.g.

12 IC Benefits - Minnesota DOT study Increase the Life of Infrastructure (some experts say double) –European experience, says the Minnesota DOT's research, "clearly demonstrates that greater compaction uniformity increases the useable life of pavement systems, and similar benefits occur with embankment compaction and buried-structure backfill." –Reduction in highway repair costs Increased Compaction Uniformity –Produce more uniform compaction, provided soils are within the moisture-content range necessary to achieve the target compaction –Identification of non-compactable areas –Eliminate over-compaction and under-compaction, applying additional effort only if necessary –Improved density of pavement materials –Improved depth of compaction

13 IC Benefits - Minnesota DOT study Cut Construction Costs –Maximum productivity of the compaction process –Minimising over compaction reduces costs - wasted diesel fuel, construction labor, equipment maintenance, rework etc –Reduce manual spot checks required for confirmation, since the IC roller automatically checks virtually every spot on the jobsite for compaction results (Example: 75% reduction in QA testing (Sweden) - Briaud and Seo, Texas A&M, 2004) Better Documentation & Pavement Management –Complete documentation for every lift with measurement and recording of materials stiffness values –Full documentation of compaction results may be the basis on which states potentially may award bonuses or assess penalties for compaction-work quality Construction Verification of Design Values –“Comprehensive data on the mechanistic properties of all materials compacted, permitting links between design, construction and performance. For example, the data record produced by the compactor, which covers all areas and all lifts, will be essential to the pavement- management process. Long-term performance may be correlated with the properties produced during construction.“

14 What’s Happening in the USA Objective - save billions of dollars a year in potholed roads, cracked bridges, broken dams and blown-out tires –Increase the life of infrastructure (some experts say double) –Cut construction costs The construction industry is investing millions of dollars a year to validate IC and stiffness / modulus testing as generally accepted practice. –Example - TPF-5(128), a three-year, $750,000 pooled fund between Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, North Dakota, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin. –Visit Improved Roads –Higher density and better uniformity –Pavement service life increased –Reduced pavement distress. Reduction of Congestion –Maintenance and repair activities delayed / eliminated. –Less traffic disruption due to construction activity. Increased Safety –Pavements are smoother and safer –Less construction activity eliminates dangerous road hazards USA started from same base as Australia (Density testing using Nuclear Gauge) FHWA Strategic Plan Rationale

15 Starting Point in 2004 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) –“Europeans have over 10 years experience with Intelligent Compaction for soils and asphalt. Once our Scan Team saw it, we knew we wanted it in the US. It was a matter of making our case to DOTs and industry…” –160-page study — "Intelligent Compaction: Strategic Plan" — which details the technology and its potential benefits, identifies research needs and presents a national implementation plan.

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23 Writing Modulus into the Specifications (USA) Government agencies including Federal Highway Administration are working to write specifications so they can let contracts enabling IC. Minnesota is the only state to do so, though its specification is still under regular revision and is careful not to mandate IC due to the high up-front cost to contractors. Nationwide, “all the cards are in place” to implement IC, “I’m really impressed by this.” –Mike Adams, a geotechnical engineer in Federal Highway Administration’s McLean, Va., research office At least a dozen states are testing IC as research spans the U.S. Current/Future Standards (2005) EU Performance Related Specifications Mn/DOT DCP Specifications Aggregate and Granular ASTM DCP Test Method ASTM GeoGauge Test Method ASTM LWD Test Method (draft) FHWA GeoGauge Pooled Fund FHWA CRREL Subgrade Performance Pooled Fund NCHRP NDT QC/QA for Flexible Pavements Proposed DCP/LWD Specification Pooled Fund Proposed Intelligent Compaction Pooled Fund AASHTO M-E Pavement Design A change in specifications from density-based to stiffness-based is happening

24 Measuring Compaction: Fundamental Changes from Density to Stiffness * Stiffness is loosely defined as a measure of a material's ability to resist deformation under load Density Stiffness*

25 Thank You Can you afford to delay action further? –Longer lasting roads built at lower cost What role will stiffness / modulus acceptance criteria and quality control / quality assurance (QA / QC) procedures have within VicRoads (and other state authorities) in the future? How will it be evaluated and rolled out?