1. 2 Municipal Management Districts (MMD) are special districts that are: Self governed, but must be approved by the host municipality; and have the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Ordinance Public Hearing: Orange County Board of County Commissioners February 21, 2012.
Advertisements

Oversight of Metropolitan Districts Department of Local Affairs
Local Government Basics Understanding California’s System of Local Government.
Alternatives to Financing Lake Development Infrastructure in Mississippi Public Improvement Districts and Tax Increment Financing February 4, 2009 Lucien.
Legislative Committee on Education Capital Funding Needs July 15, 2014.
Administrative Foreclosure A RECOMMENDED MECHANISM TO ADDRESS BLIGHTED AND ABANDONED PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH 1.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
ACMA Conference February 8, 2007 Evaluating Investments in Infrastructure Panel Overview of Public Infrastructure Financing in the City of Phoenix.
Taking the Mystery out of Economic Development Tools Chris Eng, Chisago County HRA-EDA.
GFOAz May 11, 2007 The ABC’s of Municipal Financing.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 11, 2012 CELEBRATION POINTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS.
Public Hearing FY 2011 Budget 1. City Council Goals FY 2011 Flood Recovery and Protection –Identify Funding and Sources for Flood –Restore Affordable.
2013 BUDGET General Fund Revenues$84,870,998 Expenditures Divisional 69,635,424 Non-Divisional 5,695,509 Transfers 9,540,065 84,870,998 $ Nil * Capital$14,788,522.
WASHINGTON JOBS INVESTMENT COALITION SUPPORTING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AUTHORITY December, 2010.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
Chapter 7: Local Government in Georgia STUDY PRESENTATION
Who Should Pay for Costly Water and Sewer Infrastructure? The Legal Considerations TRWA / TWCA Water Law Seminar January 24 – 25, 2013 Austin, Texas Leonard.
WHAT THE HAPPENED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN CALIFORNIA!? Steve Andrews Senior Policy Advisor Mayor’s Office of Economic Development City of Los.
Roles of Local/State/Federal Legislative- Executive Bodies Bill Ebel, City Manager City of Overland Park, KS.
Municipal Tax Increment Financing
2004 Budget Presentation City Commission Budget Study Session July 2, 2003.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
PUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATION (S) by John Lisenko Definition: A public works organization is any organized system set up for the purpose of managing the physical.
Beech Grove, Indiana TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Heather R. James, Ice Miller LLP April 18, 2013.
Tax Increment Thomas Chapman Raymond James John Repsholdt Ehlers Steven Langert Consolidated High School District 230.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance September 25, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
Public Sector Incentives The Missing Piece of the Retail Development Puzzle? Jim M. Page, CCE, IOM President and CEO Chamber of Commerce of West Alabama.
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Financing Plan Highlights Citizens’ Charter Review Task Force March 29,2007 Pavement Management Report Financing Plan Presenter:
Municipal Tax Increment Financing Daniel Stevenson, Office of the Commissioner, DECD Phone:
Old Corvallis Road Urban Renewal Program An Overview May 4 th, 2009.
3TB Project Review Tax Increment Financing (“TIF”) Overview January 25, 2013.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
First Budget Hearing (Final Hearing For Non-Ad Valorem Assessments) Board of County Commissioners September 06, 2007.
County and City Government in Georgia
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance August 20, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
2014 City Budget and Outside Agency Requests Fourth City Budget Work Session.
Board of County Commissioners March 24, 2015 Neighborhood Improvement Districts Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division.
2013 Business Planning Process. Business Planning Process Guidelines Budget Preparation Preparation of Business Plans Management Review Presentations.
County and City Government in Georgia
2014 PROPERTY TAX LEVY RICHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEVY INFORMATION.
2008 PROPERTY TAX LEVY RICHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEVY INFORMATION.
1 Homestead Exemption Presented to the City Council by Horatio Porter, Budget Officer January 21, 2010.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
2012 PROPERTY TAX LEVY RICHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEVY INFORMATION.
PUBLIC WORKS FY 2012 Proposed Budget May 24, 2012.
Lake Ashton and Lake Ashton II Community Development Districts CDD ORIENTATION CLASS February 28, 2011.
Tax Increment Financing How TIRZ Funding works:
 Overview of Project  Economic Development Tools  Municipal Management Districts  Tax Increment Reinvestment Zones  Session Review, Q&A.
REVENUE OVERVIEW FY2016 PROPOSED BUDGET July 28,
2015 Charter Change Sec General Obligation Bonds City Council Meeting April 6, 2015 Image courtesy of: Erik Sletten.
BUDGET PROCESS & REVENUE & EXPENSE INFORMATION For FISCAL YEAR 2011.
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013 Case No SV Silver Leaf Metropolitan District Service Plan Case Manager: Russell.
PROPOSED CITY OF STOCKTON WATERFORD ESTATES EAST PHASE II ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING Stockton City Council January 6, 2004.
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013 Case No SV Foothills Metropolitan District Service Plan Case Manager: Russell D.
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013
Chapter 16: State and Local Government Section 3: Local Government & Citizen Participation (pgs )
Community Improvement Districts County Counselors Association of Kansas Annual Meeting November 15, 2010 Janet S. Garms
Branches/Leaders/Responsibilities
Tax Abatement Bonds Presentation City of Marshall, Minnesota
PROPOSED MARCH LANE / HOLMAN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Section 1: County Government
Presented by: Deborah Early Icenogle Seaver Pogue, P.C.
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
Neighborhood Revitalization Plans Neighborhoods and Downtown
Work Session Follow UP Aug. 23, 2018.
Neighborhood Revitalization Plans Neighborhoods and Downtown
Local Government Chapter 24
City of Thief River Falls
Presentation to the Special Administrative Board
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

1

2

Municipal Management Districts (MMD) are special districts that are: Self governed, but must be approved by the host municipality; and have the ability to construct public infrastructure and provide services within District approved service plan. Created either: Pursuant to Ch.375, Local Government Code, through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TECQ,) or by local law enacted by the State Legislature. 3

MMDs may issue Tax Exempt Bonds BUT bond debt is not city debt and does not impact city bonding capacity. – May levy taxes, assessments and impact fees in accordance with service plan. Assessments only by petition of affected property owners and property taxes require approval by majority of eligible voters in district. – Bond issuances must be approved by City Council. Often combined with TIFs to provide funding necessary to finance infrastructure improvements and supplement city’s capital investments There is significant use of this tool in other areas of the State – Operated in Houston since mid-1990s. – Several other Texas cities have established MMDs 4

Promote, develop, encourage and maintain employment, commerce, transportation, housing, tourism, recreation, arts, economic development, safety and public welfare within a defined area. Provide and enhance supplemental services to the area. Create an independent financing mechanism to finance these services. Focused primarily on commercial development or business activity. 5

MMDs can be created in two ways: – Through formal application to Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TECQ) in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 375, Local Government Code involves nine months process serves primarily commercial development requires a petition signed by owners of a majority of the assessed real property in proposed district – Through a special local bill in the State Legislature must be supported by local municipality and House/Senate authors and sponsors (four months) 6

Are Self-governed and a political sub-division of the State, but City has ability to require checks and balances in formatting State legislation. Provides complimentary and supplemental services, but does not replace services provided by municipality May levy taxes, assessments or impact fees in accordance with its approved service plan. Assessments must be requested by petition of affected property owners. Real Property Taxes must be approved by a majority of eligible voters in District. 7

Generally track Chapter 375 of Local Government Code. – Initial board appointed by creating legislation/application. – New appointment/reappointments recommended by governing board and approved by City Council. – Four year staggered terms – Board eligibility: At least 18 years old Resident or owner of property in the District Owner of stock of a corporate owner of property in District Owner of a beneficial interest in Trust that owns property in District An agent, employee or tenant of a person that owns property in the District 8

Economic Development Business Recruitment Promotion of Health and Sanitation Public Safety, Traffic Control and Recreation Landscaping, Lighting and Signs Streets, Walkways and Drainage Solid Waste, Water, Sewer and Power Facilities Parks, Historic Areas, Works of Art Parking Facilities and Transit Stations 9

May issue bonds allowed by statute and its local governing municipality Bond debt is not City debt and does not impact City bonding capacity Bond debt supported by Real Property Taxes, Assessments or Impact Fees (Assessments must be requested by petition of affected property owners.) Real Property taxes must be approved by a majority of eligible voters in District Under Chapter 375, District may not finance services and improvement projects unless petitioner requesting those services and improvement projects submitted by either owners of 50 percent or more of assessed value in district or owners of 50 percent or more of surface area of district, excluding publicly owned lands and lands exempt from assessment. 10

MMD exists until dissolved by: – Petition by property owners (75%), or – Vote of board Additionally the MMD may be dissolved by – Resolution of City Council 11

UseLandImprovementTotalTaxable Single Family $ 13,976,565 $ 64,048,154 $ 78,024,719 $ 61,395,359 Multi Family2,059,8599,523,90811,583,76711,141,349 Office1,132,0544,727,5865,859,6404,955,184 Commercial2,622,3816,089,6858,712,066 Total $ 19,790,859 $ 84,389,333 $ 104,180,192 $ 86,203,958 12

 865 residential parcels of property are in the boundaries of the potential Municipal Management District for a total appraised value of $89,608,486  Based on total appraised value in 2012, the average value per residential parcel is $103,593  40 Commercial parcels of property are within the boundaries of the potential Municipal; Management District for a total appraised value of $14,571,706  Based on the total appraised value in 2012, the average value of commercial parcels is $2,604,048 13

 On the average residential parcel, every $.01 of tax assessed would create a tax liability to the owner of $10.53  On the average commercial property, every $.01 of tax assessed would create a liability to the owner of $  Each $.07 of tax assessed on the entire residential district would pay for approximately $1.0 million in capital project cost 14

 Full Reconstruction Roadway Reconstruction$9,000,000 Storm Water Costs$4,600,000 Water Costs$1,150,000 Wastewater Costs$ 900,000  Total $15,740,000  $ tax rate required = $1,141per year (residential)  $ tax rate required = $28, per year (commercial) 15

 Partial Reconstruction Roadway Reconstruction$6,300,000 Storm Water Costs$4,600,000 Water Costs$1,150,000 Wastewater Costs$990,000  Total$13,040,000  Mill off asphalt and partial repair of roadway base  $.9128 tax rate required = $ per year (residential)  $.9128 tax rate required = $23, per year (commercial) 16

 Proposed role of the City of Corpus Christi is: Facilitator Technical Advisor Evaluator 17

 Tax Increment Refinancing Zone Tax Increment Financing, or TIF, is a public financing method that is used for subsidizing redevelopment, infrastructure, and other community-improvement projects in many countries, including the United States. Similar or related value capture strategies are used around the world.redevelopment United Statesvalue capture If the cost of basic services increases, with TIF in place, the result is a revenue shortfall that has to be paid from sources other than tax revenues of the TIF district. TIF is a method to use future gains in taxes to subsidize current improvements, which are projected to create the conditions for said gains. The completion of a public project often results in an increase in the value of surrounding real estate, which generates additional tax revenue. Sales-tax revenue may also increase, and jobs may be added, although these factors and their multipliers usually do not influence the structure of TIF.real estate 18

 Tax Abatement The Property Redevelopment and Tax Abatement Act, Chapter 312 of the Texas Tax Code, authorizes counties, cities and school districts to provide property tax abatement for limited periods of time as an inducement for the development or redevelopment of a property. 19

 Clear identification of district boundaries  Project consideration/selection  More substantial modeling of cost to home owners  Identification of home owner interest  Briefing to City Council  Consideration of Preliminary Board Composition  Consideration of a Municipal Management District Service Plan  Seek approval through petition to Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (Majority of the assessed value of real property in the district, or 50 persons who own real property in the proposed district) 20

Questions? 21