1 Maintenance Decision Support System Pooled Fund Study TPF-5(054) David Huft, South Dakota DOT AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways Palm Desert, CA October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Advertisements

SSI MDSS capabilities Today and Beyond Surface Systems, Inc. Jon Tarleton & Bob Dreisewerd.
MDSS In Iowa Forecast Contracts. Iowa’s Forecast MDSS This summer, Iowa DOT required MDSS capabilities for its 3-year winter forecast service MDSS capability.
Cambridge DPW: Technology & Snow Clearing Alice Yang, Nathalie Bloch, & Tyler Jaeckel.
1 Panel Discussion: State DOT experiences with MDSS demonstrations last winter Paul Pisano, Team Leader Road Weather Management Federal Highway Administration.
What do you want in MDSS Functionality? Ray Murphy, FHWA October 20, 2005 MDSS Stakeholders Meeting.
1 Implementation of the MDSS Pooled Fund Study David Huft, South Dakota DOT AASHTO Research Advisory Committee Kansas City, MO July 27, 2010 Connecting.
Surface Transportation Weather Research at The University of North Dakota.
Maintenance Decision Support System Pooled Fund Study TPF-5(054) David Huft, South Dakota DOT MDSS Stakeholders Meeting Boulder, CO October 20-21, 2005.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration The Maintenance Decision Support System (MDSS) - transforming the world of winter maintenance.
MDSS Stakeholder Meeting June, COMPUTING A BETTER WAY TO PLOW IN NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA Kwasi D. Amoah, Graduate Student, MSEM University of.
Development of Maintenance Decision Support System David Huft South Dakota Department of Transportation.
AASHTOWare Program Benefits Standing Committee on Highways October 18, 2013 Tom Cole, Idaho DOT AASHTO Special Committee on Joint Development.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
Integrating Surface Transportation Weather Information Systems - The DOT Role Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting Session 494: SAFETEA-LU.
Session 131 Hazard Mapping and Modeling Supporting Emergency Response Operations using GIS and Modeling.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
Maintenance Decisions Support System (MDSS) and GPS/AVL/Telematics Data Ben Hershey July 19 th, 2011 Meridian Environmental Technology Inc. Louisville,
Weather and Winter Mobility Program Overview U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Paul Pisano Weather & Winter Mobility Coordinator.
Winter Storm Response Presentation & Discussion. Winter Storm Response2 Storm Response – PW Mission “We strive for the safest roadways at a reasonable.
Moving Research into Practice.  Implementation is the routine use of a SHRP 2 product by users in their regular way of doing business.  Users can include.
AASHTO Subcommittee on Rail Transportation Sept. 18, 2012 Kevin Chesnik.
1 Consensus Definition of MDSS Paul Pisano, Team Leader Road Weather Management Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC MDSS Stakeholder Meeting.
Decision Support System Development: Engaging End Users Bill Mahoney National Center for Atmospheric Research Research Applications Laboratory (RAL)
The Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative: INVESTING IN PROGRAMS THAT WORK May 15, 2014 Sara Dube, Manager Ashleigh Holand, Manager-State Policy.
Benefit Cost Analysis for WRTM Mike Lawrence Jack Faucett Associates ITS PCB T3 Webinar July 8, 2014.
Clarus Initiative: Coordination with USDOT VII Initiative Paul Pisano, FHWA Road Weather Management Program James Pol, USDOT ITS Joint Program Office NCAR.
Request for Proposal (RFP) Creation for Road Weather Services that Include MDSS Capabilities Bill Mahoney & Kevin Petty National Center for Atmospheric.
1 Road Weather Management Performance Metrics Development: An Update Chris Cluett, Leon Osborne, Arthur Handman, Jeff Jenq ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting.
1 25 th International Conference on IIPS, AMS Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ An Update on FHWA Road Weather Management Initiatives Paul Pisano Federal Highway.
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth MDSS Implementation Team Maintenance Decision Support System (MDSS) Statewide Implementation:
AASHTO SUBCOMMITTEE ON SYSTEM OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT PHOENIX, AZ – APRIL 2013 SYSTEM OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT TONY KRATOFIL, P.E. MARK GEIB, P.E. STEVE.
Maintenance Decision Support System Intersection I-15 Intersection I-15 and I-70 in Utah and I-70 in Utah Point intervals Point intervals along corridor.
1 NTOC Talking Operations – Road Weather Management – September 30, 2008 Illinois DOT MDSS… a Smart Investment (Paul) Dean Kernan Illinois DOT Field Technician.
MDSS Lab Prototype: Program Update and Highlights Bill Mahoney National Center For Atmospheric Research (NCAR) MDSS Stakeholder Meeting Boulder, CO 20.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
S URVEY OF P ROFILER C ERTIFICATION M ETHODS David Huft Research Program Manager & ITS Coordinator South Dakota Department of Transportation September.
1 NTOC Talking Operations – Road Weather Management – September 30, 2008 MDSS Update Ray Murphy, ITS Specialist FHWA/Resource Center, Chicago, IL.
A SSET M ANAGEMENT Northeast Bridge Management Peer Exchange (BMPE) April 26, 2011 Manchester, NH Bridge Management Questionnaire Report Wade F. Casey,
Aurora and Clear Roads Update MDSS Stakeholder Meeting Falls Church, VA August 10, 2006.
Use of MDSS by the City and County of Denver March 14, 2007 Pat Kennedy, P.E. Denver Street Maintenance.
Managing a Research Program from Various Funding Sources Sandra Larson, P.E. Research and Technology (R & T) Bureau Director Iowa Department of Transportation.
AASHTO TIG Ananth Prasad Chief Engineer, Florida DOT.
NCAR MDSS Functional Prototype Display System Preview – April 2002 Bill Mahoney National Center for Atmospheric Research Images shown are valid as of 15.
Subcommittee on Maintenance Activity Report October 15, 2013 Carlos Braceras Chair, Subcommittee on Maintenance.
Weather-Responsive Regional Traveler Information System David Huft, SDDOT Research Program Manager Greg Ostermeier, Iteris, Inc. Talking Technology and.
Analysis of MDSS Benefits and Costs David Huft, South Dakota DOT MDSS Stakeholders Meeting #8 Falls Church, VA August 10, 2006 Connecting South Dakota.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Weather Information for Surface Transportation: AASHTO Activities June 13, 2006 WIST Workshop Presented by Leland D. Smithson AASHTO SICOP Coordinator.
Working Smart for the Customer’s Benefit Pam Hutton AASHTO SHRP2 Implementation Manager June 11, 2013.
Weather-Responsive Transportation Management Weather-Responsive Transportation Management ROEMER ALFELOR Federal Highway Administration NTOC Webcast March.
MATOC Trial Phase Dec 2008 to Jun 2009 Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Richard W. Steeg, PE Chair MATOC Steering Committee VDOT Regional.
Integrating State and Local Safety Data 1 Roadway Safety Data Program.
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
Assigning Winter Level of Service State Long Range Transportation Plan (SLRP) is the basis for assigning LOS Designates routes into International,
Roadway Data Extraction Technical Assistance Program (RDETAP) Robert Pollack October 25,
SHRP2 Capacity Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Capacity Focus Area February 4, 2013.
1 Maintenance Decision Support System Pooled Fund Study TPF-5(054) David Huft, South Dakota DOT AASHTO Research Advisory Committee Salt Lake City, Utah.
1 The Use of METRo (Model of the Environment and Temperature of the Roads) in Roadway Operation Decision Support Systems The Use of METRo (Model of the.
Melissa Lance Operations Systems Manager July 16, 2015 Connected Vehicle Update National and Virginia Perspective.
Clear Roads Test and Evaluation of Materials, Equipment and Methods for Winter Highway Maintenance.
City of Joliet Anti – Icing/De-Icing Program MIKE EULITZ – ROADWAYS ENGINEER.
1 NTOC Talking Operations – Road Weather Management – September 30, 2008 PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR ROAD WEATHER MANAGEMENT Roemer Alfelor FHWA Road Weather.
European Truck Platooning Conference Amsterdam, 07 April 2016 Liam Breslin Sustainable Surface Transport DG Research & Innovation European Commission Research.
Multi-state Applied Weather Concepts
Connecting South Dakota and the Nation
Steve Beningo Rural Intelligent Transportation Systems Specialist
Decision Support System Development: Engaging End Users Bill Mahoney National Center for Atmospheric Research Research Applications Laboratory (RAL)
Ashleigh Holand, Manager-State Policy
Regional Operations Forum Road Weather Management
Presentation transcript:

1 Maintenance Decision Support System Pooled Fund Study TPF-5(054) David Huft, South Dakota DOT AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways Palm Desert, CA October 24, 2009 Connecting South Dakota and the Nation

2 Motivation for MDSS nRising expectations of traveling public and commercial carriers nRising material & fuel costs nConstrained agency funding and staffing nReliable, timely, reports of conditions hard to get nSome weather conditions are difficult to forecast nPavement response to weather conditions and maintenance treatments is complex nNew deicing chemicals are available nRetiring maintenance staff replaced by less experienced workers

3 MDSS Operating Premise If you know… nroad characteristics ncurrent conditions npredicted weather nphysics & chemistry of snow, ice, chemicals navailable resources (material, equipment, schedule) MDSS can recommend… ntreatment type napplication rate noptimal timing …and predict nfuture road conditions with or without treatments

4 MDSS Mass & Energy Modeling

5 MDSS Road Condition Prediction Passing Driving

6 Pooled Fund MDSS: Essential Elements of MDSS nReport actual road conditions nReport maintenance treatments nAssess past & present weather conditions nAssess present roadway state nPredict storm-event weather nRecognize resource constraints nIdentify feasible maintenance treatments nTarget agency priorities nPredict road surface behavior nCommunicate recommendations to supervisors and workers

7 MDSS Graphical User Interface Map View

8 MDSS Graphical User Interface Route View Different maintenance plans produce different road conditions

9 Mobile Data Collector Touch Screen Computer

10 MDSS is New… but Not New Assess DOT Needs, Readiness Evaluate Functional Prototype Develop MDSS Software 6-State Limited Deployment Refine MDSS Software Validation Studies 8-State Field Trials Broad Deployment 2007 Expanded Deployment B/C Analysis State Field Trials 12-State Field Trials 14-State Field Trials Refinement, Management Tools

11 MDSS Routes # of Routes CA6 CO108 IN156 IA65 KS18 KY5 MN185 NE101 NH7 NY17 ND77 SD80 VA9 WY68 Contractor is Meridian Environmental Technology

12 MDSS Benefits: Projected nAchieve same level of service with less material & effort –23% material savings in New Hampshire study nAchieve better level of service with same material & effort –10-15% less “unacceptable” conditions in New Hampshire study n8:1 Benefit/Cost Ratio New Hampshire nSimilar studies performed in MN, CO

13 MDSS Benefits: Realized nMitchell Region (SD) event example: $60/mile versus $300/mile nIndiana first-year statewide deployment in winter of 2008/2009 –Substantial reduction in salt use ($12M) –Reductions in overtime ($1.3M) & fuel –Estimated savings of $11M overall after normalizing for winter conditions –~27% of normal winter maintenance budget

14 MDSS Benefits: Intangible nOne-stop convenience for complete winter weather information nBetter anticipation of storm events & road conditions nDirect information delivery to managers & operators nMore seamless winter maintenance nReduced environmental impact nUse of MDSS “storm playback” as a training & analysis tool

15 Pooled Fund Study: Current Technical Directions nFostering initial deployments nIntegration w/DOT Information Systems –equipment, scheduling, traveler information nEvaluation, validation, and refinement nImproving physical models nImproving remote assessments of weather conditions nDevelopment of more management- oriented tools and reports

16 Pooled Fund Study: Membership Benefits nOpportunity to “test drive” MDSS nConvenient funding mechanism nLearning environment –State ↔ State –State ↔ Developer nPeer exchange process to identify and address technology challenges through research and development activities nNationally prominent forum for advancing MDSS and related technologies

17 Pooled Fund Study: Member Responsibilities nContribute Financially nContribute Intellectually –Project Panel Meetings (3/year) –Conference Calls –Technical Product Reviews –Assess Technology Gaps & Needs nConduct Deployment Field Trials nIntellectual Property Stewardship New States Are Welcome

18 Questions? For additional information, please contact: David Huft SDDOT Research Program Manager