How to Map Tests to LOINC Presented by Riki Merrick, MPH Contractor to APHL May 28, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Testing Relational Database
Advertisements

Configuration management
An Introduction to the Reportable Condition Mapping Tables Jeremiah Sable Consultant, The St. John Group Contractor to APHL.
S&I Framework Testing HL7 V2 Lab Results Interface and RI Pilot Robert Snelick National Institute of Standards and Technology June 23 rd, 2011 Contact:
An Introduction to the Reportable Condition Mapping Tables Jeremiah Sable Consultant, The St. John Group Contractor to APHL.
Lab and Messaging CoP 10/25/2012. Agenda Agenda review Introduction to the Specimen Cross-Mapping Table (Specimen CMT) – Background – Expected uses –
Solano County Health and Social Services PH Lab HIE project Linking 4 County PH Labs and linking reports to hospitals Stephan Betz, Ph.D. Assistant Director.
Result Status Relationships
5/10/2015DRAFT1 Public Health & Clinical LOINC - Feb 17 th 2012 CDC Vocabulary Team Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services (OSELS)
Best Practices for Interoperable Data Exchange Using LOINC Ming-Chin (Mark) Lin, MD Stanley M. Huff, MD.
Update on Vocabularies and Value Sets for Meaningful Use Betsy Humphreys, MLS, FACMI Deputy Director National Library of Medicine National Institutes of.
A proposal for interoperable health information exchange with two Esperantos: ICF and LOINC® originally presented at: Daniel J. Vreeman, PT, DPT, MSc Assistant.
LRI Validation Suite Meeting November 1st, Agenda Review of LIS Test Plan Template CLIA Testing EHR testing (Juror Document)—Inspection Testing.
Microbiology ICE Requesting: Index of Topics
ALOINC Order Code Project: Public Health Test Orders Ruby M. Phelps September 24, 2014 Laboratory Practice Standards Branch Division of Laboratory Programs,
Anatomy of a Lab Test EHR Laboratory Package for Small Sites without a Laboratory Professional Resource Patient Management System.
3/18/19990© 1999, Health Level Seven, Inc. Introduction: Vocabulary domains Marital Status –single (never married) –married –divorced –separated “Vocabulary”
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Lab Data Modeling Options Lab LOINC Meeting June, 2015 Indianapolis, Indiana.
Development Principles PHIN advances the use of standard vocabularies by working with Standards Development Organizations to ensure that public health.
1 Betsy L. Humphreys, MLS Betsy L. Humphreys, MLS National Library of Medicine National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health National Institutes.
Public Health Reporting Initiative October 3, 2012.
Betsy L. Humphreys, MLS National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Standards (including Vocabulary):
1 Health Level Seven (HL7) Report Out Population Science and Structured Documents Workgroup (SDWG) Riki Ohira September 22, 2011.
Region I Laboratory Update CDC National Infertility Prevention Project Boston, Massachusetts November 15, 2010 Richard Steece, Ph.D., D(ABMM) Laboratory.
Public Health Vocabulary Services (a) Gautam Kesarinath – CDC NCPHI Associate Director of Technology, (b) Nikolay Lipskiy – CDC SDO & Interoperability.
Betsy L. Humphreys Betsy L. Humphreys ~ National Library of Medicine National Institutes of.
PHDSC session Readiness of public health information systems to support Meaningful Use of EHRs through health information exchanges.
Public Health Case Reporting - CSTE TIG Lab Vocabulary Review May 1 st Week – Bacterial Diseases CRSWg, LMCoP, VMCoP May 6 th, /8/20151.
Overview HQMF Characteristics HQMF Structure and sections – About the ‘measure’ (MeasureAttributes) – Data Definitions – Logic Traditional usage in ‘quality’
Configuration Management (CM)
LRI Validation Suite Meeting September 06, Agenda Test data update – Selection of core message set Update Review validation discussion page – Mapping.
Survey of Medical Informatics CS 493 – Fall 2004 September 27, 2004.
Indian Health Service Laboratory Modernization LOINC/UCUM Proposed Strategy Clarence Smiley David Gifford.
Page 0 10/19/2015 Welcome to the VMCoP Meeting July 21st, 2009.
Public Health Case Reporting - CSTE TIG Lab Vocabulary Review May 4th Week – Viral, Parasitic and Non-Infectious Diseases CRSWg, LMCoP, VMCoP May 27 th,
Database Management Systems (DBMS)
Lab and Messaging CoP 11/29/2012. Agenda Agenda review Introduction to the Specimen Cross-Mapping Table (Specimen CMT) – Background – Expected uses –
12/24/2015DRAFT1 Public Health & Lab LOINC - June 8 th 2012 CDC Vocabulary Team Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services (OSELS)
Laboratory Pilots/Deployment June 26, Participants Coordination of Effort Validation Suite Vocabulary Group Implementation Guide Analysis LRI/LOI/eDOS.
From the initial page of the Cochrane Library, we have clicked on the Cochrane Reviews: By Topic hyperlink. This has displayed the Topics for Cochrane.
1 Message Mapping Guide Update for the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System NMI eSHARE Webinar Ruth Jajosky, DMD, MPH January 21, 2016 Center.
National Center for Public Health Informatics CSTE & CDC Joint ELR Task Force Standards Workgroup Meeting - NCMT Discussion Jan 7 th 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /0408r0 Submission May 2005 John Klein, SymbolSlide 1 TPC Comments Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It.
SNOMED CT Vendor Introduction 27 th October :30 (CET) Implementation Special Interest Group Tom Seabury IHTSDO.
Public Health Case Reporting - CSTE TIG Lab Vocabulary Review May 2nd Week – Bacterial Diseases CRSWg, LMCoP, VMCoP May 13 th, /11/20161.
CDA Overview HL7 CDA IHE Meeting, February 5, 2002 Slides from Liora Alschuler, alschuler.spinosa Co-chair HL7.
Session 6: Data Flow, Data Management, and Data Quality.
If property-type = susceptibility, then inheres-in = organism (also if method = MLC, then inheres-in = organism)
Implementation of National Standards (LOINC, SNOMED) for Electronic Reporting of Laboratory Results: BioSense Experience Nikolay Lipskiy 1, DrPH, MS, MBA;
1 Special eSHARE Webinar: Overview of ELR vocabulary associated with Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses New Conference Number: Participant.
Electronic CAP Cancer Checklists and Cancer Registries – A Pilot Project 2009 NAACCR Conference Ken Gerlach, MPH, CTR Castine Verrill, MS, CTR CDC-National.
C-CDA Scorecard Rubrics Review of CDA R2.0 Smart C-CDA Scorecard Rules C. Beebe.
Labs Early Adoption Program Template Insert the Name of Your Implementation / Organization Here MM/DD/YYYY.
LOINC-SNOMED CT Cooperation Project LOINC terms with component such as “xxx.identified”: Classification and answer list.
Public Health Laboratory Interoperability Project (PHLIP) The Vocabulary Harmonization Process APHL Association of Public Health Laboratories Ulrike Merrick,
From Source Code to Packages and even whole distributions By Cool Person From openSUSE.
6/9/2016. Summary of new content in 2.55 ~1700 new terms Lab: 800 Clinical: 750 Survey: 150.
Public Health - Clinical LOINC Meeting Sundak Ganesan, M.D. Health Scientist, Surveillance Operations Team National Notifiable Disease Surveillance (NNDSS)
8/25/2016 Swapna Abhyankar, MD LOINC Content Developer.
Introduction to LOINC and RELMA Introduction to LOINC and RELMA James T. Case MS, DVM, PhD Professor, Clinical Diagnostic Informatics California Animal.
Cindy Vinion (Northrop Grumman Corporation)
LOINC – SNOMED CT Cooperation on Content
Draft Observables Ontology model for laboratory and related domains
6th Annual PHIN Conference August 25-28, 2008
CDISC Use of LOINC Codes
Clinical Assessment Instruments and the LOINC/SNOMED CT Relationship
1 Chapter.
SDMX Information Model: An Introduction
LIVD on FHIR Draft Discussion.
Presentation transcript:

How to Map Tests to LOINC Presented by Riki Merrick, MPH Contractor to APHL May 28, 2014

Contractor to Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) Lead Terminologist for the APHL Informatics Program Author of ELR Release 2 Member of HL7 PHER Workgroup and Orders and Observation Workgroup IHE Lab Committee Planning Chair Author of NIST 2014 Test Tools for Certification Background: licensed physician in Germany About Me…

Examples of “Tests” and “Orders” in context of ELR

In the HL7 message Structure, Tests and Results are analogous to Question and Answer pairs This field (OBR.4) is for order This field (OBX.3) is for observable test. This field (OBX.5) is for the result.

Example Pilot message for Long Beach Public Health Lab(coded vocabulary in red) MSH|^~\&|ApolloLIMS^ApolloOID^ISO|Long Beach Public Health Laboratory^05D ^CLIA|CalREDIE^ ^ISO|CDPH^ ^ISO| ||ORU^R01^ORU_R01|53|T|2.5.1|||NE|NE|||||USELR1.0^^ ^ISO| SFT|Common Cents Systems^L^^^^ApolloLIMS&ApolloOID&ISO^XX^^^| |ApolloLIMS|binary ID unknown|| PID|1||318521^^^Long Beach Public Health Laboratory^ &ISO^AN||TEST^APOLLO^^^^^|| |M|| ^White^CDCREC^W^WHITE^L|2456 DAISY AVENUE^^LONG BEACH^CA^90806^^|||||||||||2186-5^Not Hispanic or Latino^CDCREC^N^Non-Hispanic^L^2.5.1||||||||||||| ORC|RE|^Long Beach PHL Test Account^^ISO|Z000672^Long Beach Public Health Laboratory^ ^ISO|||||| |RAW||^Test^Maurice^^^Dr.^MD^^NPI& &ISO^L^^^NPI^^^^^^^^MD||^WPN^PH^^^615^ |||||||Long Beach PHL Test Account^^^^^^^^^|2525 Grand Avenue^^Long Beach^CA^90815|^WPN^PH^^^615^ |4701 Trousdale Lane^^Nashville^TN^37167^^^^||||||| OBR|1|35^^^ISO|Z000672^Long Beach Public Health Laboratory^ ^ISO| ^Chlamydia trachomatis rRNA [Presence] in Unspecified specimen by Probe and target amplification method^LN^1020^CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS rRNA^L||| |||||||||^Test^Maurice^^^Dr.^MD^^NPI& &ISO^L^^^NPI^^^^^^^^MD|^WPN^P H^^^615^ ||||| |||C|||||||||| OBX|1|CWE| ^Chlamydia trachomatis rRNA [Presence] in Unspecified specimen by Probe and target amplification method^LN^1020^CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS rRNA^L|1| ^Positive^SCT^POS^POSITIVE^L|^^^^^L|||||C|||||^^^^^^^^&&ISO||| SPM|1|^Z000672&ApolloLIMS&ApolloOID&ISO|| ^First void urine specimen^SCT^UV^Urine, voided^L^^^Urine, voided|||^^^UV^STERILE CONTAINER^L^^^STERILE CONTAINER||||||||||||||||||

Generic vs Specific tests Sometimes the Question is very specific and the answer is generic… Example Question: Hepatitis B virus core Ab [Presence] in Serum Answer: Reactive or vice versa … Example Question: Bacteria identified in Stool by Culture Answer: Salmonella enterica ss enterica

Resources: Vocabulary PHINVADS/RCMT: LOINC o Online Search: o Download “Relma”:

LOINC & SNOMED So how do you do it?

What is LOINC ? Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes (LOINC): o Standard names & codes set that identifies laboratory and clinical observations o Established in 1994 by Clement McDonald at the Regenstrief Institute o More information is available at:

What is LOINC used for? Logical Observation Identifier Names LOINC is the Question: What test would you like us to perform? What test was performed? Ask at order Entry Question In HL7 speak: OBR-4 and OBX-3

Anatomy of a LOINC code Shortname: Salmonella Stl Cult Long Common Name:Salmonella sp identified in Stool by Organism specific culture LOINC parts: 1.COMPONENT:Salmonella Sp Identified 2.SCALE:Nom 3.PROPERTY: Prid 4.TIMING: Pt 5.SAMPLE: Stl 6.METHOD:Organism Specific Culture

COMPONENT What am I looking for? o Bacteria, Virus, Fungus o Genus specific, i.e. Influenza Virus o Species specific, i.e. Salmonella enteriditis o Part of the organism like AG, or RNA / DNA o Ab against an organism (species or genus level) IgG, IgM, Total

Property What exactly is being measured? Knowing the results (including units) is paramount here! o QN scale – Mass, concentration, catalytic activity, ratio, count, volume, length, Titer, rate o ORD scale – is often assigned an arbitrary property (most often, Threshold, ACNC) o NOM scale – for micro is PRID = Presence or Identity otherwise can be finding, appearance etc

Scale What format are my results in? Knowing the results is paramount here! o Quantitative QN – numeric values (mass, distance, concentration, volume, titers, ranges) o Ordinal ORD – list of terms with some order, but without scale (pos/neg, 1+,2+,3+) o Nominal NOM – list of names without order (organism names, categories) Narrative – descriptive text o Narrative NAR – descriptions (pathology result) o MULTI – textglob with different result types together as one observation

Timing What timeframe will my information cover? o PT – Point in time – most common in micro o Measured over a time period where different abbreviations are used depending on the time elapsed – most common would be 24 hours or 12 hours – this affects the property designation of a rate

System What type of specimen was examined? o This refers to the actual tested form of the specimen - If more than one specimen type is tested, use XXX – transmitted elsewhere in the message (Note XXX = “Unspecified Specimen” in the long common name description.) o If test is only performed on Isolates, then use ISLT o For serology, if it is always either serum or plasma use Ser or Ser/Plas

Method What method was used? o This is defined to a certain level, for example PCR is only expressed as target amplified probe (includes TMA, PCR, LCR, SDA) o More detail of the method can be sent in another part of the HL7 message o Can use “methodless” codes in LOINC too o Some Common ones include, EIA, PCR,IF,IB, Culture, Organism Specific Culture,

100 labs working separately could all correctly code their local tests using LOINC and SNOMED, and yet the process could generate 100 different electronic messages for the same tests.

Harmonization of Vocabulary and Messaging Guides. Implementation of Production Level Messages. Building Collaboration and Cross Project Fertilization. The Three Pieces To PHLIP

APHL approach to mapping Step 1 - Collect information about test o Local code and description o First and foremost: really helpful to know what the possible results will be. o Know as many of the following 6 properties of the test in order of importance ( can usually map with only the first two) 1. component - analyte/What is being observed? 2. Scale – Qualitative results is “Ord” – Numeric is “Qn” or “TItr” – Name of Organism is “Nom”

APHL approach to mapping LOINC properties( contin) 3. “Property” – think units for numeric results -For qualitative results is either “ACNC” or“Threshold” -For nominal results is usually “PRID” or “ID” 4. For Specimen can look for the XXX codes – Or common specimen types Ser, Stool 5. Method can look for the methodless codes – Some common ones include: » “EIA” » “IF” for DFA and IFA » “Probe.amp.tar” for NAATs » “Culture” 6. Time is essentially always “PT”

APHL approach to mapping - Simplifications “XXX” or “unspecified specimen” LOINCs Why? – Specimen is identified in another field in the HL7 message

Cultures are mapped to a generic culture LOINCs unless they are “Organism Specific” APHL approach to mapping - Simplifications Why? The result is specific

APHL approach to mapping - Simplifications “methodless” LOINCs Why? – When method is unknown from input

Test Metadata Collection Sheet

Influenza Encoding Guidelines

Process For Consistent Reporting Any PH Lab SME who develops new test Contact PHLIP Vocab Team Engage other programs: LIMSi, CSTE/ELR, etc Resolve language issues (e.g. CAP guidelines) Assign proper LOINC and SNOMED codes Include codes in package insert submission to FDA Quality control submits package insert to FDA Publish codes via APHL Sharepoint and PHINVADS

Resources for Finding the Right LOINC for ELR o Use Online LOINC for getting codes :

Resources for Finding the Right LOINC for ELR Can download Relma too to use locally:

Resources for Finding the Right LOINC for ELR Can download the LOINC Database and query directly from that too to use locally:

Reportable Condition Mapping Tables (RCMT) Resources for Finding the Right LOINC for ELR

Drafted Common Condition-based LOINC and SNOMED Encoding Guidance for Public Health and “coding tree diagrams ” for common reportable tests. Resources for Finding the Right LOINC for ELR

GC/CT Combination LOINC: ^Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae rRNA panel in Unspecified specimen by Probe and target amplification method Component: GC LIONC: ^Neisseria gonorrhoeae rRNA [Presence] in Unspecified specimen by Probe and target amplification method Positive SNOMED Code ^Positive(qualifier value) Negative SNOMED Code ^Negative(qualifier value) Other(Inconclusive, etc) Component: CT LOINC: ^Chlamydia trachomatis rRNA [Presence] in Unspecified specimen by Probe and target amplification method Positive SNOMED Code ^Positive(qualifier value) Negative SNOMED Code ^Negative(qualifier value) Other(Inconclusive, etc)

LOINC Copyright Notice "This product includes all or a portion of the LOINC® database, or is derived from the LOINC® database, subject to a license from Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Your use of the LOINC database and LOINC codes also is subject to this license, a copy of which is available at The current complete LOINC database and Users' Guide are available for download at The LOINC database and LOINC codes are copyright (c) , Regenstrief Institute, Inc. and the Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) Committee. All rights reserved. THE LOINC DATABASE IS PROVIDED "AS IS." ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES ARE DISCLAIMED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. LOINC® is a registered United States trademark of Regenstrief Institute, Inc. A small portion of the LOINC table may include content (e.g., survey instruments) that is subject to copyrights owned by third parties. Such content has been mapped to LOINC terms under applicable copyright and terms of use. Notice of such third party copyright and license terms would need to be included if such content is included."

Helpful links from loinc.org For newbies: More slide shows: Recommended readings: d-readings.html FAQs:

Questions? Contact me at: