Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 6: Juvenile Offenders in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R ACIAL D ISPARITIES IN THE C RIMINAL J USTICE S YSTEM.
Advertisements

Pretrial Procedures Transfer hearings Detention Intake Diversion
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
Statutory Rape from the Perspective of Law Enforcement Howard N. Snyder Conference on Sexual Exploitation of Teens Washington. DC, March 23, 2005 © National.
Measuring Delinquency
Research and Evaluation Center Juvenile Incarceration Trends Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. John Jay College of Criminal Justice City University of New York Webinar.
Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice in Wisconsin Pamela Oliver.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 5: Law Enforcement and Juvenile.
A Presentation by the Technical Assistance Resource Center (TARC) at New Mexico State University. Updated June 2009.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 3: Juvenile Offenders Copyright.
2014 Minneapolis Crime Totals Statistics verified and completed on 1/12/2015 CRIME yr % Chg Homicide % Rape % Robbery %
Crime Chapter 8 Section 2. Crime Prohibited by law Punishable by the government.
Research and Evaluation Center National Trends in Youth Crime Jeffrey A. Butts, Director Research and Evaluation Center John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
Presented by: Duren Banks Chief, Prosecution and Adjudication Statistics Unit Bureau of Justice Statistics Washington, DC August 4, 2009 The Work.
Chapter 2 Crime and Criminals Irwin/McGraw-Hill
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 1: Juvenile Population Characteristics.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 7: Juvenile Offenders in.
1 Book Cover Here Chapter 18 ROBBERY Criminal Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing the Past, 7 th Edition Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights.
Juvenile Delinquency November 14, Daily Agenda  Review Section 2 Assessment  Section 16-3 Juvenile Delinquency  Chapter Review on page 380. 
Chapter 2 – The Nature and Extent of Crime
1 Book Cover Here Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 5 Juveniles and Community Corrections Corrections in the Community, 5e.
Juvenile Law Security Services.
Cuyahoga County Strengthening Communities – Youth (SCY) Project: Findings & Implications for Juvenile Justice David L. Hussey, Ph.D. Associate Professor.
Crime Chapter 8 Section 2. Crime Prohibited by law Punishable by the government.
NYS Office of Children & Family Services Race and Ethnicity: Path Through the Juvenile Justice System Deputy Commissioner Joyce Burrell March 2008.
Unequal Justice Race, Class and the Criminal Justice System Tim Ready Director Walker Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnic Relations Western Michigan.
Criminal Justice Today CHAPTER Criminal Justice Today, 13th Edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, © 2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Slide 1 Promoting and Supporting Status Offense System Reform Presentation to National Conference of State Legislators June 23, 2014 Allie Meyer Vera Institute.
Juvenile Justice System. The Juvenile Justice System, 6 th ed. Dean J. Champion Presented by: D. Romeo 2 The Juvenile Justice System CRCT pp 193 The Juvenile.
Juvenile Justice How and why juvenile justice differs from adult justice.
Data Analysis and Forecasting Project – Interim Report Delivered to the DJJ January 2008 Jennifer Lewis Priestley, Ph.D. Shan Muthersbaugh, MS Candidate.
LA County Cases: An Overview of Characteristics & Disposition Outcomes Denise C. Herz, Ph.D. California State University—Los Angeles School of Criminal.
Purpose and Scope of Juvenile Court Act
Department of Criminal Justice California State University - Bakersfield CRJU 330 Race, Ethnicity and Criminal Justice Dr. Abu-Lughod, Reem Ali Minority.
Juvenile Crime and Punishment. Causes of Youth Violence Complex interplay of factors Correlations, not predictions Accumulation of risk Number of resources.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 4: Juvenile Justice System.
Chapter 15 The Juvenile System. CHILD SAVERS Child Savers: Wealthy, civic minded citizens who were concerned with the welfare of disadvantaged children.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 2: Juvenile Victims Copyright.
Raise the Age Lessons from the first 2 years. Background: CT added 16-year-olds to the juvenile system January 1, 2010.
Ofc. B.P. Corrado Colorado Springs Police Department Created
Copyright © 2012 Carolina Academic Press Chapter 1: Crime in California Georgia Spiropoulos.
Facts to Consider: Presentation to the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Howard N. Snyder National Center for Juvenile.
Girls Study Group Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting June 6, 2008 Washington, D.C. Margaret A. Zahn,
Juvenile Corrections Population Forecasting Advisory Committee September 1, 2010 DAS Exec. Building 155 Cottage, BAM Conference Torri Lynn (Chair)Linn.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System Part 14 Juvenile Justice.
Disproportionate Minority Confinement
Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Muskie School of Public Service 2008 Maine Crime and Justice Data Book March, 2009.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
Chapter 5 Police and the Juvenile Offender. Juvenile Justice: Theory, Systems, and Organization Houston/Barton Prentice Hall © 2005 Pearson Education,
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
URBAN INSTITUTE WASHINGTON, DC YOUTH VIOLENCE Perception vs. Reality Prepared by Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. THE URBAN INSTITUTE Program on Law & Behavior.
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
2015 CICERO POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL INSERVICE TRAINING
AJS101 (40384) Monday, October 3, 2016 Time Keeper.
Prisoners: Characteristics of U.S. Inmate Populations
Juvenile Crime: Explanations and Differences From Adults
The Scope of the Problem
Understanding the Criminal Justice System
CASE OF THE DAY “Confinement for 2 Athletes in Sex Abuse of Teammates”
Maryland Juvenile Services Long Term Trends FY 2007 – FY December 2016
Metro Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Baltimore City Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
CASE OF THE DAY “Confinement for 2 Athletes in Sex Abuse of Teammates”
Disproportionate Minority Confinement
Female Delinquency Similarities and differences between male and female delinquency: girls offenses less serious crimes committed by boys more varied half.
handling juvenile records
Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
Presentation transcript:

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 6: Juvenile Offenders in Court Copyright 2006 National Center for Juvenile Justice 3700 S. Water Street, Suite 200 Pittsburgh, PA Suggested Citation: Snyder, Howard N., and Sickmund, Melissa Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. More information is available online. The full report, report chapters, and data files for the graphs can be downloaded from Additional statistics are available from OJJDP's Statistical Briefing Book, located at:

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile courts handled four times as many delinquency cases in 2002 as in 1960

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Delinquency cases, by offense category

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Robbery cases peaked in 1995, near 40,000, then fell to levels of the late 1980s

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Aggravated assault cases peaked in 1995, at 84,400, then fell off sharply

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Simple assault cases climbed steadily through 1997, then leveled off at around 270,000 in 2001 and 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Burglary caseloads were relatively flat until 1997—since then, they have dropped to their lowest level since at least 1985

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Larceny-theft cases peaked in 1995 at nearly 426,000 and have also dropped to their lowest level since at least 1985

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Within the public order category, weapons offense cases peaked in 1994 at 51,100 and have dropped steadily since then

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile court caseload trends are different for males and females

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile court caseload trend differences for males and females vary by offense category

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report The female share of delinquency cases increased steadily from 1991 through 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report The delinquency case rate rose from 1985 to 2002 for all races, but the rate for blacks remained well above the rates for other groups

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Compared with 1985, 2002 person offense rates were higher for all racial groups

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Property case rates dropped for all races between 1985 and 2002—down 28% for whites, 17% for blacks, and 27% for youth of other races

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Case rates for drug offenses more than doubled from 1985 to 2002 for both white (118%) and black (128%) youth

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Compared with 1985, 2002 public order offense rates were higher for all racial groups—up 66% for whites, 125% for blacks, and 52% for youth of other races

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Delinquency case rates generally increase with age

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Between 1985 and 2002, trends in case rates were generally similar across age groups

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report The number of cases involving detention was higher in 2002 than in 1985 for all but property cases

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Despite the growth in the volume of delinquency cases involving detention, the proportion of cases detained was about the same in 2002 as in 1985

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Males accounted for most delinquency cases involving detention

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Males were consistently more likely than females to be detained

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report White youth accounted for the largest number of delinquency cases involving detention

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Although they accounted for the largest number, white youth were the least likely to be detained

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Each year from 1985 through 2002, delinquency cases involving youth age 16 or older were more likely to be detained than were cases involving youth age 15 or younger

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report The number of petitioned delinquency cases increased 96% between 1985 and the peak in 1997, then declined 8% by 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Between 1985 and 2002, the petitioned caseload increased for each of the four general offense categories

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report The number of cases in which the youth was adjudicated delinquent rose steadily from 1985 to 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Except for property cases, the offense-specific trends followed the same pattern as delinquency cases in general

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Trends in the number of adjudicated property offense cases ordered to residential placement or probation were different from trends for other offenses

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Between 1985 and 2002, the number of cases in which the youth was adjudicated delinquent and ordered to formal probation increased for all offense categories

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report In 2002, the most severe sanction ordered in 85,000 adjudicated delinquency cases (14%) was something other than residential placement or probation

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Adjudicated cases receiving sanctions other than residential placement or probation accounted for 53 out of 1,000 delinquency cases processed during the year

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Person offense case processing, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Person offense case processing for males, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Person offense case processing for females, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Person offense case processing whites, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Person offense case processing for blacks, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Person offense case processing for other races, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Property offense case processing, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Property offense case processing for males, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Property offense case processing for females, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Property offense case processing for whites, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Property offense case processing for blacks, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Property offense case processing for other races, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Drug offense case processing, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Drug offense case processing for males, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Drug offense case processing for females, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Drug offense case processing for whites, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Drug offense case processing for blacks, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Drug offense case processing for other races, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Public order offense case processing, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Public order offense case processing for males, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Public order offense case processing for females, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Public order offense case processing for whites, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Public order offense case processing for blacks, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Public order offense case processing for other races, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report The profile of waived cases has changed

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile courts waived 46% fewer delinquency cases to criminal court in 2002 than in 1994

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report For most of the period from 1993 through 2002, person offenses outnumbered property offenses among waived cases

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Between 1985 and 2002, person offense cases were the most likely type of case to be waived to criminal court; except 1989–1991, when drug offense cases were most likely

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Both whites and blacks experienced sharp increases between 1985 and 1994—and substantial drops between 1994 and 2002—in the number of person offense cases waived

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report For most of the period from 1985 to 2002, the likelihood of waiver was greater for black youth than for white youth regardless of offense category

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report The degree of racial disparity in the juvenile justice system declined between 1992 and 2002, especially at two decision points: arrest and waiver to criminal court

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report The volume of petitioned truancy, runaway, and ungovernability cases peaks at age 15

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Runaway case processing, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Truancy case processing, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Ungovernability case processing, 2002

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Liquor law violation case processing, 2002