Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS Andrea Dell’Acqua - CERN PH/SFT on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First results from the ATLAS experiment at the LHC
Advertisements

Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS Pixels&SCT 1 The Atlas combined testbeam Thijs Cornelissen, NIKHEF Jamboree, Nijmegen, December 2004.
Simulation Project Major achievements (past 6 months 2007)
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
Ties Behnke, Vasiliy Morgunov 1SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Pflow in SNARK: the next steps Ties Behnke, SLAC and DESY; Vassilly Morgunov, DESY and.
ATLAS Analysis Model. Introduction On Feb 11, 2008 the Analysis Model Forum published a report (D. Costanzo, I. Hinchliffe, S. Menke, ATL- GEN-INT )
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
The LHC Machine and Experiments
05/11/2006Prof. dr hab. Elżbieta Richter-Wąs Physics Program of the experiments at L arge H adron C ollider Lecture 5.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
August 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Software Workshop Ann Arbor ATLAS Computing Planning ATLAS Software Workshop August 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
JCOP Workshop September 8th 1999 H.J.Burckhart 1 ATLAS DCS Organization of Detector and Controls Architecture Connection to DAQ Front-end System Practical.
Conditions DB in LHCb LCG Conditions DB Workshop 8-9 December 2003 P. Mato / CERN.
The ATLAS Tile Calorimeter: Commissioning and Preparation for Collisions Presented by Oleg Solovyanov On behalf of the Tile Calorimeter Collaboration of.
Jiawen Zhang, IHEP, 2008, April 10, frascati Status of BEPCII/BESIII and Physics preparation Jiawen Zhang 2008/4/7—10 , PHIPSI08, Frascati.
Alignment Strategy for ATLAS: Detector Description and Database Issues
LHC: ATLAS Experiment meeting “Conditions” data challenge Elizabeth Gallas - Oxford - August 29, 2009 XLDB3.
Requirements for a Next Generation Framework: ATLAS Experience S. Kama, J. Baines, T. Bold, P. Calafiura, W. Lampl, C. Leggett, D. Malon, G. Stewart, B.
Event Data Model in ATLAS Edward Moyse (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration CHEP 2004, Interlaken.
N ATIONAL E NERGY R ESEARCH S CIENTIFIC C OMPUTING C ENTER Charles Leggett The Athena Control Framework in Production, New Developments and Lessons Learned.
Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.
The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger
0 Status of Shower Parameterisation code in Athena Andrea Dell’Acqua CERN PH-SFT.
Event Data History David Adams BNL Atlas Software Week December 2001.
Early Commissioning of ATLAS First North American ATLAS Physics Workshop Tucson J. Pilcher University of Chicago.
5 May 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch Computing Planning for ATLAS ATLAS Software Week 5 May 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
19 November 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing ATLAS Computing - issues for 1999 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
Computing in High Energy Physics – Interlaken - September 2004 Ada Farilla Offline Software for the ATLAS Combined Test Beam Ada Farilla – I.N.F.N. Roma3.
24/06/03 ATLAS WeekAlexandre Solodkov1 Status of TileCal software.
M&O status and program for ATLAS LAr calorimeter R Stroynowski (on vacations)
ATLAS Data Challenges US ATLAS Physics & Computing ANL October 30th 2001 Gilbert Poulard CERN EP-ATC.
Zprávy z ATLAS SW Week March 2004 Seminář ATLAS SW CZ Duben 2004 Jiří Chudoba FzÚ AV CR.
8 June 2006V. Niess- CALOR Chicago1 The Simulation of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimetry V. Niess CPPM - IN2P3/CNRS - U. Méditerranée – France On.
Vertex finding and B-Tagging for the ATLAS Inner Detector A.H. Wildauer Universität Innsbruck CERN ATLAS Computing Group on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Cosmic Rays for ATLAS Commissioning Commissioning Meeting ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens May 2003 Halo+Cosmics group: M.Boonekamp, F.Gianotti, R.McPherson,
GDB Meeting - 10 June 2003 ATLAS Offline Software David R. Quarrie Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
TRT Offline Software DOE Visit, August 21 st 2008 Outline: oTRT Commissioning oTRT Offline Software Activities oTRT Alignment oTRT Efficiency and Noise.
8/18/2004E. Monnier - CPPM - ICHEP04 - Beijing1 Atlas liquid argon calorimeter status E. Monnier on behalf of the Atlas liquid argon calorimeter group.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
Integration of the ATLAS Tag Database with Data Management and Analysis Components Caitriana Nicholson University of Glasgow 3 rd September 2007 CHEP,
Detector Description in LHCb Detector Description Workshop 13 June 2002 S. Ponce, P. Mato / CERN.
Status of Beam Halo/Gas Simulation A.Stradling(Wisconsin) P. Steinberg(BNL) G. Usai (Chicago) Standard Model Group 6 December 2006 A.Stradling(Wisconsin)
Computing R&D and Milestones LHCb Plenary June 18th, 1998 These slides are on WWW at:
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Ties Behnke: Event Reconstruction 1Arlington LC workshop, Jan 9-11, 2003 Event Reconstruction Event Reconstruction in the BRAHMS simulation framework:
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Summary of User Requirements for Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Offline Week Alignment and Calibration Workshop February.
The MEG Offline Project General Architecture Offline Organization Responsibilities Milestones PSI 2/7/2004Corrado Gatto INFN.
August 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Software Workshop Ann Arbor ACOS Report ATLAS Software Workshop December 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
Detector SimOOlation activities in ATLAS A.Dell’Acqua CERN-EP/ATC May 19th, 1999.
L. Perini DATAGRID WP8 Use-cases 19 Dec ATLAS short term grid use-cases The “production” activities foreseen till mid-2001 and the tools to be used.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Introduction to FCC Software FCC Istanbul 11 March, 2016 Alice Robson (CERN/UNIGE) on behalf of / with thanks to the FCC software group.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
CMS Status & Commissioning Menu: 1 Recent Progress Commissioning Prior to and After First Beam Commissioning with first LHC Events Outlook Wolfgang Funk.
1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.
ATLAS Distributed Computing Tutorial Tags: What, Why, When, Where and How? Mike Kenyon University of Glasgow.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Approved Plots from CMS Cosmic Runs (mostly CRUZET, some earlier)
Online Software Status
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
ATLAS DC2 & Continuous production
Offline framework for conditions data
Presentation transcript:

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS Andrea Dell’Acqua - CERN PH/SFT on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS2 The ATLAS detector Easily the most ambitious (and complex) ever Diameter25 m Barrel toroid length26 m End-cap end-wall chamber span46 m Overall weight 7000 Tons

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS3 The road to data taking Two years from the first collisions Activity is becoming hectic… building the detector… building the community… building the software (online and offline) tools… ATLAS takes up the challenge

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS4 Building the detector…

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS5 Building a community Only 2 years from data taking and so many things to do… People becoming aware the experiment is coming up and willing to get going at analysis What? How?? Set up a full-scale exercise which looks at the experiment in its initial phase Still, a small-scale exercise when compared to real life…

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS6 The Rome Physics Workshop 441 registered participants 91 entries (out of about 100 talks), 21 F plus 70 M (preliminary)

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS7 The Rome Workshop Concentrate on the initial phases of the experiment Priority to e.g. SM physics rather than rare channels Initial layout of the detector Use the latest SW tools First “exposure” (for many) to Distributed production (Grid) Athena Geant4 “Event Data Model” New analysis style/tools Physics results presented at this conference

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS8 The Rome aftermath The exercise was a terrific success from many respects The “user” community was bootstrapped They like what they used (constructive feedback) They ran the whole chain …and now ask for more and more…. basically all SW tools delivered in a timely fashion and in good shape The meeting set a checkpoint for the computing community: we know now we are going in the right direction… It set also a baseline for future activities

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS9 This is the first successful use of the grid by a large user community, which has however also revealed several shortcomings which need now to be fixed as LHC turn-on is only two years ahead! Very instructive comments from the user feedback have been presented at the Workshop (obviously this was one of the main themes and purposes of the meeting) All this is available on the Web

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS10 What is next? Continuous production and physics analysis Keep the momentum, improve on what we’ve got until now, help the “users” become “experts” Commissioning of the offline computing Aim at having a functional system by mid ‘06 Commissioning of the experiment It’s already happening, now, as we speak Another large-scale physics exercise? Last chance before… Show time…

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS11 Offline computing commissioning Major commissioning exercise of all aspects of the offline computing during the first half of 2006 Formerly called “DC3” More a running-in of continuous operation than a stand-alone challenge Main aim of Computing System Commissioning will be to test the software and computing infrastructure that we will need at the beginning of 2007 Calibration and alignment procedures and conditions DB Full trigger chain Tier-0 reconstruction and data distribution Distributed access to the data for analysis At the end (summer 2006) we will have a working and operational system, ready to take data with cosmic rays at increasing rates

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS12 The ATLAS Event Data Model RAW: “ByteStream” format, ~1.6 MB/event ESD (Event Summary Data): Full output of reconstruction in object (POOL/ROOT) format: Tracks (and their hits), Calo Clusters, Calo Cells, combined reconstruction objects etc. Nominal size 500 kB/event currently 2.5 times larger: contents and technology under revision, following feedback on the first prototype implementation AOD (Analysis Object Data): Summary of event reconstruction with “physics” (POOL/ROOT) objects: electrons, muons, jets, etc. Nominal size 100 kB/event currently 70% of that: contents and technology under revision, following feedback on the first prototype implementation TAG: Database used to quickly select events in AOD and/or ESD files

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS13 Offline SW: Architecture The architecture of the Athena framework is based on Gaudi: Separation of data from algorithms Separation of transient (in-memory) from persistent (in-file) data Extensive use of abstract interfaces to decouple the various components Backbone of the ATLAS computing system Quite extensively used It scales, it works…

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS14 Offline SW: Detector description The GeoModel detector description system provides us with an application- independent way to describe the geometry In this way Simulation, Reconstruction, Event Display etc. use by definition the same geometry Geometry data are stored in a database with a Hierarchical Versioning System Alignment corrections are applied with reference to a given baseline geometry Time to be even more ambitious!

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS15 Offline SW: Simulation Event generator framework interfaces multiple packages including the Genser distribution provided by LCG-AA Simulation with Geant4 since early 2004 automatic geometry build from GeoModel (~5M volumes) >25M events fully simulated up to now since mid-2004 Digitization tested and tuned with Test Beam Fast simulation also used for preliminary large-statistics (physics) background level studies

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS16 Offline SW: Reconstruction Separation of data and algorithms: Tracking code: Calorimetry code: Resource needs (memory and CPU) currently larger than target values Optimization and performance, rather than functionality, will be the focus of developments until detector turn-on

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS17 Offline SW: Physics Analysis Tools The Physics Analysis Tools group develops common utilities for analysis based on the Athena framework classes for selections, sorting, combinations etc. of data objects constituent navigation (e.g. jets to clusters) and back navigation (e.g. AOD to ESD) UserAnalysis package in Athena interactive analysis in Athena analysis in Python interfaces to event displays testing the concept of “Event View”: a coherent list of physics objects that are mutually exclusive any object appears only once in the list of reconstructed objects available for analysis

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS18 Still, all of this is just simulation, right?

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS19 The ATLAS Combined Test Beam Full “vertical slice” of ATLAS tested on CERN H8 beam line May-November 2004 x z y Geant4 simulated layout of the test-beam set-up For first time, all ATLAS sub-detectors integrated and run together with common DAQ, “final” electronics, slow-control, etc. Gained lot of global operation experience during ~ 6 month run. Common ATLAS software used to analyze the data

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS20 TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS End-cap Muon chambers ~ 90 million events collected ~ 4.5 TB of data: e ,   1  250 GeV  ,  , p up to 350 GeV  ~ 30 GeV B-field = 0  1.4 T

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS GeV ,  =1.2  Z-position: Muon system vs Inner Detector ECAL vs HCAL  energy A few very preliminary results LVL1 trigger vs ECAL energy 25 ns beam structure (B=1.4 T) 9 GeV pion track in Pixels, SCT, TRT ATLAS

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS22 Validating detector simulation at the CTB E = 100 GeV  = 16  m Simulated data,  = 17  m Simulated data,  = 23  m E = 180 GeV  = 22  m Pixels SCT ATLAS preliminary

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS23 Validating detector simulation at the CTB E [MeV] Due to different reconstruction between G4 and data _ G4 Data LAr _ G4 Data TileCal _ G4 Data Total _ G4 Data LAr _ G4 Data TileCal _ G4 Data Total Too few energy in data or too much in G4 ? E = 350 GeVE = 20 GeV ATLAS preliminary

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS24 Next stop: detector commissioning Phase A System commissioning to ROD level. System commissioning for LVL1 and DAQ Check cable connections. Infrastructure commissioning (refrigerators, water cooling, etc.) Phase C System/Trigger/DAQ combined commissioning Phase D Global commissioning cosmic ray runs, planning for initial physics runs; initial off-line analysis software available, first collisions. Phase B ROD – Local DAQ connections established. Calibration runs on local systems. Skeleton TTC system needs to be available. 1/03 03/04 08/06 11/06 Commissioning with “physics data” starts here

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS25 ATLAS is taking data! ATLAS Tile calorimeter already recording cosmics going through More detectors to follow soon Sub-detector commissioning starting

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS26 Cosmic muons in ATLAS pit in 0.01 s …. From full simulation of ATLAS (including cavern, overburden, surface buildings) + measurements with scintillators in the cavern:  ~ 10 6 events in ~ 3 months of data taking  enough for initial detector shake-down (catalog problems, gain operation experience, some alignment/calibration, detector synchronization, …) Through-going muons ~ 25 Hz (hits in ID + top and bottom muon chambers) Pass by origin ~ 0.5 Hz (|z| < 60 cm, R < 20 cm, hits in ID) Useful for ECAL calibration ~ 0.5 Hz (|z| 100 MeV, ~ 90 0 ) Check detector operation with cosmic muons

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS27 One track reconstructed in Muon chambers Two tracks reconstructed in Inner Detector Will happen every ~10 s A “typical” event

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS28 Beam-halo Simulation of machine background performed by LHC crew (V. Talanov): -- based on MARS; recent machine optics V scoring plane at the cavern entrance before ATLAS shielding (z =  23 m from IP)  then particles are transported by ATLAS full simulation Beam-gas Beam-halo Scoring plane Single beam period: beam-halo muons and beam-gas events

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS29 Examples of beam-halo muons in ATLAS A typical snake … Total  rate 105 kHz E  > 10 GeV 16 kHz E  > 100 GeV 1 kHz E  > 1 TeV 10 Hz L=10 34 Muons at cavern entrance

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS30 Beam-gas Beam-halo Scoring plane Beam-gas: -- p(7 TeV) on p(rest) -- vertices uniformly distributed over  23 m --  (pH, pC, pO, …)   (pp)×A 0.7 (inelastic only) -- vacuum estimate: ~ Torr (~10 15 mol/m 3 ) Single beam period: beam-halo muons and beam-gas events

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS31 Beam-gas collisions are essentially boosted minimum-bias events  low-p T particles Rate : ~ 2500 interactions/m/s

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS32 What more? Detector “as-built” Reproduce the situation as in the pit Calorimeters are “pear-shaped” The LAr barrel in not centered on the beam line A barrel coil is not at its nominal position … Good reproduction of “inert” material Pipes, rails, gangways, elevators, cables and what not… Alignment Field ….

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS33 Are we done now? Not quite, yet… EDM evolution (ESD/AOD as per user feedback) Analysis model Distributed production Distributed analysis Tier-0 operations Condition DBs … …but the tunnel is past

Preparing for data analysis in ATLAS34 Summary The ATLAS detector is coming up, steadily and on schedule. It will be there for the first collisions The ATLAS collaboration is getting prepared for data analysis. All major bits & pieces are falling in place There is still a looong road in front of us, and time is getting tight, but we now believe we can make it Quite an interesting list of things to do even before the first collisions