COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 CLASS 3 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer Jan. 21, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THEMES IN FAMILY LAW. WHO Regulates: State vs. Federal Law WHY Regulate: Goals of Family Law HOW to Regulate: Discretion vs. Rules LIMITS on Regulation:
Advertisements

COPYRIGHT LAW 2002: CLASS 5 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY 28, 2002.
Legal Realism Jerome Frank.
Copyright Law Boston College Law School January 14, 2003 Requirements - Originality.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008: CLASS 7 THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Sept. 10, 2008.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 14 FRENCH CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Feb. 11, 2002.
Sharing Information and Controlling Content: Continuing Challenges for Higher Education Susanna Frederick Fischer Assistant Professor Columbus School of.
COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002: CLASS 3 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 14, 2002.
THEMES IN FAMILY LAW.  WHO Regulates: State vs. Federal Law  WHY Regulate: Goals of Family Law  HOW to Regulate: Discretion vs. Rules  LIMITS on Regulation:
Civil Law. Sources of American Law Constitutional Law – Supreme law of the land, limits government and defines rights Statutory Law – Written by Legislative.
3-1 Chapter 3— The Court System REED SHEDD PAGNATTARO MOREHEAD F I F T E E N T H E D I T I O N McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
C H A P T E R 18 The Federal Court System
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003: CLASS 5 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY 22, 2003.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL FALL 2008 CLASS 4 COPYRIGHTABILITY I Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer August 27, 2008.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer March
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class of APRIL 7, 2004.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003: CLASS 6 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY 27, 2003.
COPYRIGHT : FAIR USE Professor Fischer The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law March 31, 2003.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Sept
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System
25-1 Chapter 1 Legal Heritage and the Digital Age.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer April 18, 2006.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 4 SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION I – Federal Question Jurisdiction Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 22 Infringement November 3, 2008.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 8: September 15, 2008.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA FEB 4, 2004.
COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2002: CLASS 1 Professor Fischer Introduction to Copyright January 7, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008: CLASS 2 Professor Fischer Introduction to Copyright 2: Historical Background AUGUST 20, 2008.
WRAP UP: Termination Know the difference between s. 203 and s. 304(c)
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 Professor Fischer CLASS of April 16, 2003 A LITTLE MORE ON PREEMPTIONREMEDIES.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004: CLASS 7 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 Professor Fischer CLASS of April : TECHNOLOGICAL PROTECTION MEASURES/DIGITAL MUSIC.
SOURCES AND CATEGORIES OF LAW
INTRO TO IP LAW FALL 2009: CLASS 2 Professor Fischer Copyrightability: The Originality and Fixation Requirements AUGUST 25, 2009.
COPYRIGHT : FAIR USE CONT’D Professor Fischer The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law April 2, 2003.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 Professor Fischer CLASS of April THE LAST CLASS!!!
Introduction to Intellectual Property Class One: TYPES OF IP Prof. Susanna Frederick Fischer The Catholic University of America August 25, 2003.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 CLASS 4 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer August 30, 2006.
COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2003: CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Originality and the Idea Expression Dichotomy January 15, 2003.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 7: September 13, 2006.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2008 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 27: November 19, 2008.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 CLASS 2 The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer Jan. 8, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 CLASS 2 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer Jan. 9, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2001 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 19 (MARCH 26, 2002)
Professor El Aouni Zouhair
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer April 3, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 28 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America November 29, 2001.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 Professor Fischer CLASS of April : PREEMPTION.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer CLASS of April
COPYRIGHT LAW 2008 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer November 17, 2008.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 21 Infringement November 1, 2006.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer April 5, 2004.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 8: September 18, 2006.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 4, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 25 (APRIL 17, 2002)
Copyright Clause Congress shall have Power … To promote the Progress of Science and the useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors.
Chapter 1.  That which must be obeyed and followed by citizens, subject to sanctions or legal consequences  A body of rules of action or conduct prescribed.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer March 19, 2003.
judicial review  the court’s authority to review a law to determine whether the law is in conflict with the Constitution.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2008 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA OCT
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 25 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 22, 2003.
Copyright Law: Spring 2006 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS of March 16, 2006.
Introduction to Intellectual Property Law Fall 2003 Class of October Introduction to Copyright Law.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006 CLASS 4 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer Jan. 19, 2006.
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH COURTS, JUDGES, AND THE LAW. MAIN ROLE Conflict Resolution! With every law, comes potential conflict Role of judicial system is to.
CHAPTER 2 LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
Legal Heritage and the Information Age
name: Winnie copyright infringement case
Each state has its own judicial system that hears nonfederal cases
Presentation transcript:

COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 CLASS 3 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer Jan. 21, 2003

QUIZZES COPYRIGHTABILITY Handed Out Feb 18 Due Feb 25 DURATION Handed out March 17 Due March 24 INFRINGEMENT Handed out April 7 Due April 14

WRAP-UP: Historical Trends 1. Progressive expansion of copyrightable subject matter 2. Progressive expansion of copyright duration 3. Growing U.S. participation in the international copyright system 4. Steadily reduced importance of formalities

WHO DOES COPYRIGHT BENEFIT? Authors Authors’ Families Corporate Interests - Publishers, Distributors, Producers Society, General Public/Government Lawyers

WHO DOES COPYRIGHT BURDEN?

COPYRIGHT PERSONAL RIGHT (MORAL RIGHT)? PROPERTY RIGHT? MONOPOLY?

Economic Analysis of Copyright Doctrine William M. Landes and Judge Richard A. Posner, An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law, 18 J. Legal Stud. 325 (1989) Are their arguments valid in a digital age?

THREE IMPORTANT COPYRIGHT LAW CASES 1. Burrow-Giles Lithographic Society v. Sarony (1884) - CB p Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographic Co. (1903) - CB p J. Alfred Bell & Co. v. Catalda (2d Cir. 1951) - CB p. 51

Burrow-Giles Lithographic Society v. Sarony (1884) CB 29 What were the 2 important constitutional questions on which the Supreme Court had to rule in this case?

Some other Photos by Napoleon Sarony

Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. (1903) CB 33 Is this decision consistent with the Patent and Copyright clause?

Alfred Bell & Co. v. Catalda (2d Cir. 1951) CB 51 Were the plaintiff’s mezzotints copyrightable, according to Justice Frank? Do you agree? Why or why not?

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.