MERCED CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2002 REPORT ON THE CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TESTS AND STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elmhurst Community Unit District 205s REACH Program.
Advertisements

Testing for Tomorrow Growth Model Testing Measuring student progress over time.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Understanding Stanford 10 Results
Common Core Aligned Report Card Report Card
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
PREPARING STUDENTS FOR SUCCESS: NEW TESTS. NEW RESULTS.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
Pay for Performance Programs in Arizona CPRE Conference February 21, 2007 Arizona Performance Based Compensation SystemArizona Performance Based Compensation.
San Juan High School Intermediate Intervention/Under-performing School Program By Mike Peebles, Teacher Partial fulfillment of ED251 Instructors: Duane.
Fidelity Support Fall 2012 Continue with Next Steps.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing the Accountability of Teachers to Reach all Students and their Needs Raymon J. Smith References.
Buckeye Elementary School District’s Curriculum Mapping Initiative
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
1 Curriculum and Instruction Report Pocantico Hills School February 28, 2005.
The Common Core: Moving Ohio Forward Stan W. Heffner Superintendent of Public Instruction February 15, 2012.
SECONDARY MONITORING REPORT HIGHLIGHTS MAY MONITORING REPORT NOTES REFLECT STUDENTS SCORING 85% OR BETTER IN THEIR COURSE AVERAGES (NYS) ADDITIONAL.
The difference between learning goals and activities
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation January 24, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team.
Student Impact Rating Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Daviess County Public Schools.
Jim Lloyd_2007 Educational Value Added Assessment System (EVAAS) Olmsted Falls City Schools Initial Presentation of 4 th Grade Students.
RESULTS FOR ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOLS 2013 Statewide Test Data.
Mission: The Hancock Central School District believes that every child can learn and challenges all students to reach their full potential in a caring.
Instructional Coach Training September 30, 2010 AIMS: Generating Reports to Use with CFIP 1.
Administrative Retreat: Assessment System Common Assessments to MAP to KPREP June 7, 2013 Woodford County Schools Curriculum and Instruction.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Goal and Target Setting - What’s my role? Module 3.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 5 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
The Do’s and Don’ts of High-Stakes Student Achievement Testing Andrew Porter Vanderbilt University August 2006.
MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.
Presented by: Shawna Howard Research Professor: Andres Garcia, Ed.D
Darla Stynen. The subject matter I am teaching in my classroom, as prescribed by the school district.
SEPT 2014 Administrator Student Growth Goal Planning.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Math Results.
Science Instructional Guide For High School Integrated Coordinated Science Biology and Chemistry Professional Development Module 1 Introduction to the.
NECAP Results and Accountability A Presentation to Superintendents March 22, 2006.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
The Learning Journey Christie Kay, Teacher, Solana Pacific School Lisa Denham, Principal, Skyline School Leslie Fausset, Superintendent.
Standards-Based Grading
Welcome to MMS MAP DATA INFO NIGHT 2015.
The Pike County School Corporation “The Role of the School Administrator In School Improvement” The Learning Conference Indianapolis, IN January 30, 2006.
Mini-Project #2 Quality Criteria Review of an Assessment Rhonda Martin.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Carol Stewart Kennesaw State University. Purpose  To conduct a comprehensive needs assessment of the school that addresses academic areas of math and.
Measuring College and Career Readiness 2015 PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE EDGEWATER SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEANOR VAN GELDER SCHOOL.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Office of Service Quality
Smarter Balanced assessment. What is the Smarter Balanced assessment?  The new state assessment, based on state standards in English language arts and.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Planning, Assessment & Research Analysis and Use of Student Data Part I Administrative Academy Los Angeles Unified School District.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
S TAR Assessment New Teacher Orientation
Curriculum Night Elementary. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
Curriculum Night Middle School. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
State Standards The standards provide a clarity of focus for all students, staff and parents. The clarity of focus will present a picture of a well-educated.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Research and Evaluation
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS)
California Assessment of Student Progress and Performance
Local Control Accountability Plan
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS)
Presentation transcript:

MERCED CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2002 REPORT ON THE CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TESTS AND STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST

“NO WIND CAN DO HIM GOOD WHO STEERS FOR NO PORT” - OLD PROVERB UNLESS WE HAVE A SENSE OF DIRECTION NO AMOUNT OF EFFORT WILL HELP US REACH OUR DESTINATION IT IS TESTING AND ASSESSMENT THAT HELPS US KNOW IF WE ARE ON COURSE TOWARD THAT DESTINATION ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

§CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TESTS §REQUIRED BY LAW (PSAA OF 1998) §SHOW HOW STUDENTS PERFORM ON TESTS THAT MEASURE STATE STANDARDS §EMPHASIS IS ON MASTERY §REFLECTS THE SUPERINTENDENT’S PRIORITY §WILL ACCOUNT FOR 60% OF NEXT YEAR’S API §STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST §REQUIRED BY LAW (PSAA OF 1998) §SHOW HOW STUDENTS PERFORM ON A NORM REFERENCED TEST RELATIVE TO OTHERS IN THE NATION  EMPHASIS IS ON COMPARISON §DECREASING PRIORITY AT THE DISTRICT AND STATE LEVEL §WILL ACCOUNT FOR 40% OF NEXT YEAR’S API §WILL BE REPLACED BY THE CAT/6

STUDENTS ARE STEADILY DEMONSTRATING INCREASED ACCURACY ON READING STANDARDS TESTS STUDENTS ARE STEADILY DEMONSTRATING INCREASED ACCURACY ON MATH STANDARDS TESTS

IT MEANS: §STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN READING, MATH, LANGUAGE, AND SPELLING ARE SHOWING A CONSISTENT, LONG-TERM, AND SIGNIFICANT UPWARD TREND §COMPARED TO STUDENTS IN THE NATION, MCSD STUDENTS ARE SCORING NEAR THE MEAN, AT THE MEAN, AND IN SOME CASES ABOVE THE MEAN §A VERY HAPPY SUPER!

TO WHAT DOES THE DISTRICT ATTRIBUTE THE INCREASES IN STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT? §SKILLS AND TALENTS ON THE PART OF TEACHERS, ADMINISTRATORS, SUPPORT STAFF, AND CLASSIFIED STAFF §CAREFUL ATTENTION AND FOCUS ON STATE AND LOCAL STANDARDS §IMPROVED ALIGNMENT BETWEEN ASSESSMENT AND CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION §WELL ORGANIZED STAFF DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

CONT: §CLEAR AND SPECIFIC CURRICULUM PLAN FOR TEACHERS §EFFECTIVE TEXTBOOK ADOPTION PROCESS §MATH MATTERS STRATEGIES §NEW TEACHER ORIENTATION AND MENTORING

HOW DO STUDENTS PERFORM WHO HAVE BEEN IN THE DISTRICT FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME? WHILE THERE ARE RELIABILITY ISSUES INHERENT IN THESE METHODS, THE CENTRAL FEATURE IS THE IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING OF A STUDENT GROUP AS IT PROGRESSES THROUGH THE GRADES AND RECEIVES CONTINUOUS MERCED CITY SCHOOLING TO DETERMINE THIS, WE MUST USE WHAT IS CALLED A “COHORT”, “SAME SUBJECT”, OR “LONGITUDINAL” DESIGN. WAIT UNTIL YOU SEE THIS

THIS IS NEWSWORTHY!! NOTE: A SHIFT OF 3 OR MORE POINTS IS CONSIDERED SIGNIFICANT FOR STUDENTS TRACKED FROM SECOND GRADE IN 1998 TO SIXTH GRADE IN 2002: ACHIEVEMENT GROWTH IN SPELLING WAS 11 POINTS. THIS WAS STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT ACHIEVEMENT GROWTH IN LANGUAGE WAS 14 POINTS. THIS WAS STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT ACHIEVEMENT GROWTH IN READING WAS 11 POINTS. THIS WAS STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT ACHIEVEMENT GROWTH IN MATH WAS 13 POINTS. THIS WAS STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT

IMPROVEMENTS IN STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DO NOT OCCUR WITHOUT THE CONCERTED EFFORT OF CLASSROOM TEACHERS WITH THE SUPPORT OF CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES AND ADMINISTRATION. AND CONGRATULATIONS TO OUR STUDENTS