Case Story from Novo Nordisk: CCS — Control Chart Script Jørgen Iwersen, Principal Scientist Torben Koustrup Sørensen, Principal Scientist Presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2013 IBM Corporation Reducing Cost with R in IBM Storage Products Manufacturing Elaine Jones Integrated Supply Chain Engineering.
Advertisements

CAP/POCT 2003 Carol Riley-Hunte, RRT Senior Education Specialist Bayer HealthCare.
Intracompany Stock Transfer Scenario Overview
Change Detection C. Stauffer and W.E.L. Grimson, “Learning patterns of activity using real time tracking,” IEEE Trans. On PAMI, 22(8): , Aug 2000.
Use Case & Use Case Diagram
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Chapter 11: Classes and Objects
December 10, 2007 Multi-family Residential Unit Audits - Garden Apts and Smaller housing stocks1 Multi-Family Residential Unit Audits Garden Apartments.
INTRODUCTION The need to have a capable and stable process is increasing as specifications and customers’ requirements are getting more stringent and.
Standardisation of Trial Design Definitions in CDW at Novo Nordisk
Page 1 More information at; gaddsoftware.comgaddsoftware.com.
1 Chapter 12: Decision-Support Systems for Supply Chain Management CASE: Supply Chain Management Smooths Production Flow Prepared by Hoon Lee Date on 14.
Control Charts for Variables
Data Warehouse success depends on metadata
15 Statistical Quality Control CHAPTER OUTLINE
Laboratory Information Management Systems. Laboratory Information The sole product of any laboratory, serving any purpose, in any industry, is information.
CEN th Lecture CEN 4021 Software Engineering II Instructor: Masoud Sadjadi Change Control.
Guidelines for Carbon Fiber Tape Prepreg Specifictions W.T.McCarvill S.Ward August 6, 2002.
Chapter 4-1. Chapter 4-2 Database Management Systems Overview  Not a database  Separate software system Functions  Enables users to utilize database.
Copyright © 2006, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Enterprise Guide 4.2 : A Primer SHRUG : Spring 2010 Presented by: Josée Ranger-Lacroix SAS Institute.
CompuCell Software Current capabilities and Research Plan Rajiv Chaturvedi Jesús A. Izaguirre With Patrick M. Virtue.
1. What ??? Why ??? Automation ??? INTRODUCTION Where Do we Need Automation ????? Future Applications ??? Coding ???? IT ??? REPITITIONS.
Canada’s NDS Experience Office of Controlled Substances An Overview May 8, 2007.
DEVELOPMENT QA REPORTS A Series of Reports to Enforce Compliance with Your PeopleSoft Development Standards Leandro Baca.
Calculation BIM Curriculum 07. Topics  Calculation with BIM  List Types  Output.
Hydrologic Modeling: Verification, Validation, Calibration, and Sensitivity Analysis Fritz R. Fiedler, P.E., Ph.D.
© 2008 Ocean Data Systems Ltd - Do not reproduce without permission - exakom.com creation Dream Report O CEAN D ATA S YSTEMS O CEAN D ATA S YSTEMS The.
Understanding Variation in Your Charts Module 5. What is the state of Statistical Control? A stable mean over time with only random variation about that.
© 2013 Fluor. All Rights Reserved. Process Data in SmartPlant Instrumentation Fluor’s SmartPlant Implementation Initiative By: John Dressel.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Seasonal Adjustment Process with Demetra+ Anu Peltola Economic Statistics Section, UNECE.
Examples of Computing Uses for Statisticians Data management : data entry, data extraction, data cleaning, data storage, data manipulation, data distribution.
Site Specification Management Using the RtPM Platform
Creating Classes and Objects Chapter Microsoft Visual Basic.NET: Reloaded 1.
C6 Databases. 2 Traditional file environment Data Redundancy and Inconsistency: –Data redundancy: The presence of duplicate data in multiple data files.
Touchstone Automation’s DART ™ (Data Analysis and Reporting Tool)
Page 1 Non-Payroll Cost Transfer Enhancements Last update January 24, 2008 What are the some of the new enhancements of the Non-Payroll Cost Transfer?
Site Specification Management Using the RtPM Platform Ray Hall.
FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN Users Group Meeting: Recent Code Updates and Future Plans Ken Geelhood Walter Luscher Carl Beyer Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Thomas Kern | The system documentation as binding agent for and in between internal and external customers April 24th, 2009 | Page 1 The system documentation.
Why Do Our Indices Differ? (The Devil’s in the Details) Presented by Norma Hubele & Lora Zimmer Industrial Engineering Department Arizona State University.
Enhancements to IIIG LTMS By: Todd Dvorak
1 Project Quality Management QA and QC Tools & Techniques Lec#10 Ghazala Amin.
Session id: Darrell Hilliard Senior Delivery Manager Oracle University Oracle Corporation.
CABLING SYSTEM WARRANTY REGISTRATION. PURPOSE OF CABLING REGISTRATION.
David M. Kroenke and David J. Auer Database Processing Fundamentals, Design, and Implementation Appendix B: Getting Started in Systems Analysis and Design.
TEXFIRS Summary Data Reports. NFIRS 5.0 Web-based Summary Output Reports Tool Run summary and statistical calculations on the data saved to the national.
EQUIPMENT and METHOD VALIDATION
 Andersen Consulting IM01 - Organizational Structure & Master Data in IM November, 2000.
Energy Efficiency and Savings Calculation, Top-down and Bottom- up Methods, CEN Task XXI experts meeting October 2010.
 1- Definition  2- Helpdesk  3- Asset management  4- Analytics  5- Tools.
Spreadsheet Manager Training Module
Make-to-Stock Scenario Overview
IST 220 – Intro to Databases
Oracle Subledger Accounting
Overview – SOE PatchTT November 2015.
Intracompany Stock Transfer Scenario Overview
Overview – SOE PatchTT December 2013.
9/11/2018 4:10 AM © 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION.
Chapter 8 – Software Testing
Make-to-Stock Scenario Overview
Intracompany Stock Transfer Scenario Overview
12 Product Configurator
Intracompany Stock Transfer Scenario Overview
Metadata The metadata contains
Computer Science The 6 Programming Steps.
Integrated Statistical Production System WITH GSBPM
Presentation transcript:

Case Story from Novo Nordisk: CCS — Control Chart Script Jørgen Iwersen, Principal Scientist Torben Koustrup Sørensen, Principal Scientist Presentation titleDate 1

CCS is an GxP-critical IT-system for automated generation of control charts and trend reports in the production area of Novo Nordisk A/S Current version is using of-the-shelf products such as SAS JMP ®, Citrix and Microsoft Excel CCS is by and large a JMP-script. Code modification is dependant of SAS JMP–programmers CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 2

The number of users on CCS has increased from 600 users in 2011 to over 1100 users in start 2013 and the system is in use in all production areas of Novo Nordisk A/S CCS is currently handling over 5000 control charts. This number is steadily increasing CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 3

CCS generates a control chart and report through information from user defined Control Chart Definition Files The control chart and report can be saved in HTML and viewed on the Novo Nordisk Intranet As a minimum a CCS-report is composed of the control chart itself and an information block documenting the control chart parameters. Optionally the report can contain a distribution- and capability analysis and a table with selected raw data CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 4

Computer systems used in the pharmaceutical industry with GxP-impact are subject to the most strict quality management requirements, including document control and retention Control charts used in the GxP-environment are updated based on controlled and approved process results stored in the GxP-data warehouse (QDW) CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 5

CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 6

The properties of the control chart, e.g. range span/sample size etc., are controlled in the main parameter file CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 7

Data flow Live data are accessed from a qualified and validated data warehouse that contains relevant GxP-data and non-GxP data. Data are extracted from the data warehouse to Excel and imported into JMP CCS is used for both in-process data (non-GxP data) and release data (GxP data) from production sites CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 8

GxP data In the GxP-environment relevant QDW data can be chemical analysis results from analytic laboratories for release test activities. The measurements are transferred to the data warehouse on a daily basis. CCS is updating control charts and the CCS Report ‘Review of Submission results’ non-GxP data IPC-charts used in non_GxP-environment can be elaborated from data automatically entered into excel files from local process equipment CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 9

Elaboration of Control Charts The first step in calculating the control limits for a control chart is choosing/selecting data from a time period in which the natural variation of the process are represented. In most cases chemists are to choose data from a relatively stable and constant period of time covering at least 20 observations sampled under normal manufacturing conditions. Data from a time period of one year are typically used in GxP-Control Charts. Control limits can be adjusted for controllable variation. Season variation is a typical variance component that often has to be accounted for in chemical manufacturing. Control limits can be adjusted by season, in which change in the process level can be correlated to temperature, relative humidity, pressure etc. Run rules can be applied. The recommended run rules are Run Rule No.1 (in JMP Test 1) “One point beyond Zone A” and Run Rule No. 5 (Test 5) “Two out of three points in a row in Zone A or beyond”. When elaborating a control chart for a new process the functionality of the control chart is tested in a test environment in CCS – the CCS Sandbox. In CCS it is possible to apply the use of action limits. Action limits are typically in between control- and specification limits for the process. When the distance from control limits to specification limits are very large action limits can be added on the control chart. Action limits are often used when the analytic results are close to e.g. LoD – Limit of Detection, and in similar situations where the variance estimates are invalidated. Updating Control Charts Updating the control charts are scheduled and regulated in CCS and must be undertaken as a minimum every year and after implementing process changes. CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 10

Elaboration of Control Charts When elaborating a control chart for a new process the functionality of the control chart is tested in a test environment in CCS – the CCS Sandbox Selection of data period: data should come from a time period in which the natural variation of the process are represented In most cases chemists are to choose data from a relatively stable and constant period of time covering at least 20 observations sampled under normal manufacturing conditions Data from a time period of one year are typically used in GxP-Control Charts CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 11

Presentation titleDate 12 Figure 1. Overview of data flow in CCS

Elaboration of Control Charts Run rules can be applied. The recommended run rules are Run Rule No.1 (in JMP Test 1) “One point beyond Zone A” and Run Rule No. 5 (Test 5) “Two out of three points in a row in Zone A or beyond” Control limits can be adjusted for controllable variation. Season variation is a typical variance component that often has to be accounted for in chemical manufacturing. Control limits can be adjusted by season, in which change in the process level can be correlated to temperature, relative humidity, pressure etc. CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 13

In CCS it is possible to apply the use of action limits. Action limits are typically in between control- and specification limits for the process Action limits can be used when the analytic results are close to e.g. LoD – Limit of Detection, and in similar situations where the variance estimate is invalidated CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 14

Updating control charts Updating the control charts are scheduled and regulated in CCS and must be undertaken as a minimum every year and after implementing process changes CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 15

Example: CCS control chart for xxx_Ethanol Data from a period of three months has been sampled for a the GxP- parameter The CCS report presents the following descriptive statistics from JMP CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 16

CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 17 Individual Measurement (I) chart vs. Submission Creation Date Numerical Result vs. Sample

Presentation titleDate 18

Presentation titleDate 19

Advancement of CCS On-going CCS development activities are focusing on capacity expansion and incorporation of customer claimed enhancements to the system Control charts and other statistical techniques for control and surveillance are planned to be rolled out in the framework of a new version of CCS covering a broader spectrum than the production areas Future versions of CCS should account for a diverse SPC system landscape – from control of laboratory analysis methods to surveillance of marketed products CCS – Control Chart Script Presentation titleDate 20