Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2013 USCOTS Writing More Effective NSF Proposals Lee Zia Division Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation May 19, 2013.
Advertisements

Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
 Introductions  Webinar etiquette ◦ Please place your phone on MUTE if you are not asking a question or not responding to the presenters. ◦ If you encounter.
NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Cedric L. Williams, Ph. D. Professor Dept. of Psychology and Graduate Program in Neuroscience University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA Council on Undergraduate.
NSF East Asia and Pacific Summer Institutes (EAPSI) Shelley Hawthorne Smith UA Graduate College Office of Fellowships and Community Engagement
NSF Merit Review Criteria Revision Background. Established Spring 2010 Rationale: – More than 13 years since the last in-depth review and revision of.
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center The NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center The NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
The Proposal Review Process Matt Germonprez Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor ISQA College of IS&T.
Preparation/Content of an NSF proposal NSF proposals are uploaded to the Fastlane website prior to submission (NIH uses Grants.gov): 1.Cover sheet (basic.
NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants Improve dissertation research – Provide funds not normally available to graduate students significant data-gathering.
DIMACS/CCICADA/DIMATIA/Rutgers Math REU
How to Write Grants Version 2009.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
EAS 299 Writing research papers
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,
responsive to modifications in NSF merit review criteria GPG 13.1
Proposal Strengths and Weakness as Identified by Reviewers Russ Pimmel & Sheryl Sorby FIE Conference Oct 13, 2007.
NSERC has an overview of the discovery grant program on their website:
Effective proposal writing Session I. Potential funding sources Government agencies (e.g. European Union Framework Program, U.S. National Science Foundation,
WE ARE A COMPLEX LAND. MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS DESIRE TO HELP OTHERS MEANING TO LIFE ESTEEM NEEDS RECOGNITION & APPRECIATION BELONGINGNESS AND LOVE.
Directorate for Education and Human Resources (EHR) EHR Core Research Program (ECR) Program Announcement: NSF
Company LOGO Broader Impacts Sherita Moses-Whitlow 07/09/09.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Grant Research Basics. Asking the Question  Before you start, you must have both clearly stated research question and primary outcome measure.  What.
NSF CAREER Program & CAREER Proposals Claudia Rankins Program Director, Directorate of Education and Human Resources NSF CAREER Program.
A New Collaborative to Improve Broader Impacts Kevin Niemi, U. Wisconsin-Madison Kemi Jona, Northwestern U. Jane Horwitz, U. Penn
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Promoting Diversity at the Graduate Level in Mathematics: A National Forum MSRI October 16, 2008 Deborah Lockhart Executive Officer, Division of Mathematical.
 How the knowledge created advances our theoretical understanding of the study topic, so that others interested in similar situations but in a different.
Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal
National Science Foundation Overview. Agenda Our Legacy: About NSF Our Work: Programs & The Merit Review Process Our Opportunities: Working at the NSF.
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal Delta Program in Research, Teaching, and Learning Trina McMahon Professor of Civil and Environmental.
2014 NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) Shelley Hawthorne Smith UA Graduate College
Making USDA grant submission more successful: A panelist’s perspective Brian S. Baldwin Dept. of Plant & Soil Sciences
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal Delta Program in Research, Teaching, and Learning Trina McMahon Associate Professor of Civil and.
Funding Caroline Wardle Senior Science Advisor, CISE Directorate National Science Foundation
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal Delta Program in Research, Teaching, and Learning Trina McMahon Professor of Civil and Environmental.
NSF Peer Review: Panelist Perspective QEM Biology Workshop; 10/21/05 Dr. Mildred Huff Ofosu Asst. Vice President; Sponsored Programs & Research; Morgan.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Tackling the Broader Impacts Challenge: Advice and Resources Nathan Meier Director of Research Strategy Office of Research and Economic Development October.
S L I D E 0 An Introduction to the National Science Foundation (NSF) and its Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) Program.
NSF Funding Opportunities Anthony Garza. General Funding Opportunities Standard proposals or investigator-initiated research projects (submission once.
1 Grant Applications Rachel Croson, PhD Dean, College of Business UT Arlington (formerly DD SES/SBE NSF)
Pre-Submission Proposal Preparation Proposal Processing & Review.
Images: Images are extremely important to publicize the results of NSF investments. In general, graphs, spectra, and reaction diagrams are not compelling.
NSF Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program February 25, 2016.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
Understanding NSF Broader Impact Criterion
CARER Proposal Writing Workshop November 2004
Helpful Hints & Fatal Flaws
Helpful Hints & Fatal Flaws
FISH 521 Further proceedings Peer review
Partnerships for International Research and Education (PIRE)
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Writing a Project Summary
Welcome and thanks for coming.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Welcome and thanks for coming.
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521

Further plans Feb 9: Intellectual Merit and Broader Impact –Due Thursday Feb 16: Holiday –Full proposal draft (Thursday) Feb 23: Penny Dalton –Full proposal  review panel March 2: Peer review –Full proposal + reviews  decision panel March 9: Panel reviews –Evaluations online

NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit –Scientific merit of the proposal Broader Impact –‘outreach’, public understanding of science, engagement plan Why is this important? –Almost all other agencies want something similar Your tax dollars at work Keep stakeholders happy Foundations: show all the good work they are doing –NSF is leading the pack Other agencies are likely to follow

NSF Reviewer form 3 points –Intellectual merit –Broader impact –Summary statement Re-emphasized to panelists Think about it carefully –Include in other aspects of proposal New: similar forms for project summary –Summary –Intellectual Merit –Broader Impact

Intellectual Merit Potential –Importance to advancing knowledge within field or across different fields –Evidence for creative, original or potentially transformative concepts –Show the wider scientific impact of your project Link to significance statement / intro Provide alternative hook –Not just stamp collecting Must be important beyond your system –Potentially transformative concepts Revolutionize entire disciplines Creating entire new fields Disrupting accepted theories

Intellectual Merit Feasibility –Concept and organization of research –Qualifications of investigator –Access to resources –Can it be done? –Does proposal show testable hypotheses, a good work plan and good presentation?

G. Muller-Parker, NSF

Broader impact G. Muller-Parker, NSF

Broader Impact NSF GPG 1.What is the potential for the proposed activity 1.b. to benefit society or advance desired societal outcomes? 2.To what extent do the proposed activities suggest and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts? 3.Is the plan for carrying out the proposed activities well-reasoned, well-organized, and based on a sound rationale? Does the plan incorporate a mechanism to assess success? 4.How well qualified is the individual, team, or organization to conduct the proposed activities? 5.Are there adequate resources available to the PI (either at the home organization or through collaborations) to carry out the proposed activities? Aim Rationale –Preliminary data Workplan Resources, qualifications etc

What are ‘desired societal outcomes’? Varies among funding agencies –Common themes Outreach, public scientific education Involvement of underrepresented minorities Integration of learning and teaching NSF Advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning; Broaden participation of underrepresented groups; Enhance infrastructure for research and education; Broad dissemination to enhance scientific and technological understanding; and Benefits to society.

Check out strategic plans NSF performance goals –(NSF strategic plan ) Transform the frontiers of science Invest in fundamental research to ensure significant continuing advances across science, engineering, and education Integrate education and research to support development of a diverse STEM workforce with cutting-edge capabilities Provide world-class research infrastructure to enable major scientific advances. –Innovate for society Strengthen the links between fundamental research and societal needs through investments and partnerships. Build the capacity of the Nation to address societal challenges using a suite of formal, informal, and broadly available STEM educational mechanisms Make sure to read plans –And explicitly refer to them

Integrating broader impacts Ideally should be part of project –Collaboration / Assistance by underrepresented groups –Using some study sites as outreach/teaching sites –Dissemination to non-scientific audiences Lawmakers, public managers, media Collaborate –There are people who do this for a living Outreach programs (e.g. Sea Grant, COMPASS) Teachers Aquariums, zoos Consider in budget –Hire assistance –Allow for costs –Don’t overdo it Not –Graduate student education –Talks at scientific meetings and workshops –Publications in peer reviewed journals –Website

Conclusion Broader impact won’t save your proposal if the science is bad However, a good broader impact statement may save your proposal if you are in the grey zone –Not only NSF – –Any ideas?

Your proposal Write 1-2 pages IM and BI Intellectual Merit –After describing the details, what’s the cool scientific aspect (transformative) of your research? –Why are you the best person to do it (expertise (preliminary data), resources, access to sites, etc)? Broader Impact –What is your objective? –What will you do? –Why can you do it? –What is the expected outcome?

Panel Exercise Work Plan vs Budget –Discuss link and justifiability of objectives –Discuss link to objectives –Discuss specificity Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact –Discuss in connection to work plan & budget revise –Reconsider what you wrote in the summary