1 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Thoughts on transverse energy profile for e/m showers David Ward  We have work from G.Mavromanolakis on this.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Calice Analysis 02/03/09 David Ward ECAL alignment update David Ward  A few thoughts about ECAL alignment  And related issue of the drift velocity.

Advertisements

1 Calice UK Analysis Meeting 23/1/07David Ward Cambridge data analysis work David Ward Main focus – data-MC comparisons Using “official” reconstructed.

Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.

April 19th, 2010Philippe Doublet (LAL) Hadronic showers in the SiW ECAL (with 2008 FNAL data) Philippe Doublet.

1 Calice Meeting Lyon 16/09/09Tak Goto + DRW Analysis of pion showers in the ECAL from CERN Oct 2007 Data Takuma Goto (+David Ward)  We study the properties.

INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.

1 Calice LCUK Bristol 24/03/09 David Ward WP1 : Test Beam.

1 Calice Meeting 20/9/06David Ward What did we learn from DESY 2005 run? DESY run May CERN run August Data/MC comparisons for ECAL.

1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.

1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.

Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.

Page 1 Calculating the Beam Position at the Ecal for DESY Run (Independent of Tracking) Hakan Yilmaz.

Calice Meeting / DESY/January 2004D.R. Ward1 David Ward University of Cambridge Test beam requirements? Studies of cuts and models Fluka studies Clustering.

Longitudinal shower profile of the DESY and CERN testbeam data in the electromagnetic calorimeter Valeria Bartsch (UCL) & Nigel Watson (Birmingham)

1 Calice Analysis Meeting 13/02/07David Ward Just a collection of thoughts to guide us in planning electron analysis In order to end up with a coherent.

1 Calice UK Analysis Meeting 23/1/07David Ward/Nige Watson UK Analysis tasks (WP1) David Ward Nige Watson TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint.

SiD Cal R. Frey1 Some EGS Studies… Compare with Geant4  Questions of range/cutoff parameters EM Resolution understood? Moliere radius – readout gap relation.

1 Calice UK s/w meeting RHUL 24/1/06D.R. Ward David Ward Have previously reported on comparison of Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 Monte Carlos. Issues with.

Track Extrapolation/Shower Reconstruction in a Digital HCAL – ANL Approach Steve Magill ANL 1 st step - Track extrapolation thru Cal – substitute for Cal.

Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.

1 Calice UK 17/4/08David Ward Analysis highlights from Argonne meeting  Entirely plagiarised from other people’s talks:  Marcel Reinhard – calibration.

Pion test beam from KEK: momentum studies Data provided by Toho group: 2512 beam tracks D. Duchesneau April 27 th 2011 Track  x Track  y Base track positions.

Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.

Interactions of pions in the Si-W ECAL prototype Towards a paper Naomi van der Kolk.

1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.

Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory 1 LCWS 2013, Tokyo, Japan November , 2013.

Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia 1 CALICE Meeting LAPP, Annecy, France September 9 – 11, 2013.

LAr Response to pions: Data vs MC S.Paganis (Wisconsin) with Isabelle Winterger,Martin Aleksa LAr Week CTB Meeting, CERN, 10-May-2005.

DHCAL - Resolution (S)DHCAL Meeting January 15, 2014 Lyon, France Burak Bilki, José Repond and Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory.

1 Calice UK Meeting 27/03/07David Ward Plans; timescales for having analysis results for LCWS Status of current MC/data reconstruction Reconstruction status;

Update on Material Studies - Progress on Linearity using calib-hits (very brief) - Revisiting the material problem: - a number of alternative scenarios.

Update on Mistag in 5GeV Single γ Events Elizabeth Brost, Jim Brau, and Chaowaroj Wanotayaroj SiD PFA Meeting 8/18/

Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.

CTB04: electron Data vs MC Stathes Paganis University of Sheffield LAr CTB04 WG 25-Aug-05.

May 3rd, 2010Philippe Doublet (LAL) Hadronic interactions in the SiW ECAL (with the 2008 data) Philippe Doublet, Michele Faucci-Giannelli, Roman Pöschl,

© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.

First look at non-Gaussian tails with the new Reconstruction Stathes Paganis Univ. of Sheffield LAr-H8 Working Group, 18-Oct-05.

1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.

Cedar and pre-Daikon Validation ● CC PID parameter based CC sample selections with Birch, Cedar, Carrot and pre-Daikon. ● Cedar validation for use with.

Validation of EM Part of Geant4

Min-DHCAL: Measurements with Pions Benjamin Freund and José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting Max-Planck-Institute, Munich.

DESY Beam Test of a EM Calorimeter Prototype with Extruded Strip Scintillator DongHee Kim Kyungpook National University Daegu, South Korea.

Longitudinal shower profile - CERN electron runs Valeria Bartsch University College London.

Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.

1 IWLC 2010 Geneva Oct.’10David Ward Tests of GEANT4 using the CALICE calorimeters David Ward  Electromagnetic particles (, e) were used to understand.

Two-particle separation studies with a clustering algorithm for CALICE Chris Ainsley University of Cambridge CALICE (UK) meeting 10 November 2004, UCL.

Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.

CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.

Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.

Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,

Interactions of pions in the Si-W ECAL prototype Towards a paper Naomi van der Kolk.

Electrons in CTB: status of data/MC comparisons LAr & Inner Detector H8 CTB groups Physics Week, CERN, 30-May-2006.

ECAL Alignment with e and π data D. BOUMEDIENE LPC Clermont-Ferrand CALICE meeting – Argonne 19/03/2008.

Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS WITW June 05 An Update on Using QE Events to Estimate the Neutrino Flux and Some Preliminary Data/MC Comparisons for a QE Enriched.

DESY BT analysis - updates - S. Uozumi Dec-12 th 2011 ScECAL meeting.

1 Calice Analysis 21/7/08David Ward Quick look at 2008 e - data; low energy hits in 2006  2008 e - data from Fermilab; July’08  Looked at several runs.

R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti

Michele Faucci Giannelli

Material in front of the calorimeter: Analysis from the data using the sub-detectors response L.Basara, A.Fiasson, C.Goy, M.Paniccia, S.Rosier.

CALICE scintillator HCAL

EM Linearity using calibration constants from Geant4

Fluka, comparison of hadronic models

Comparison between Geant4, Fluka and the TileCal test-beam data

Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration

longitudinal shower profile

Reports for highly granular hadron calorimeter using software compensation techniques Bing Liu SJTU February 25, 2019.

Michele Faucci Giannelli

Song LIANG ihep.ac.cn CMS-IHEP, China

Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation

Some EGS Studies… Compare with Geant4 Questions of range/cutoff

Presentation transcript:

1 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Thoughts on transverse energy profile for e/m showers David Ward  We have work from G.Mavromanolakis on this topic.  Hope to publish along with Valeria’s longitudinal shower shape study.  But George’s work doesn’t include any comparisons with MC. Try to address this.  Has thrown up some issues, on which feedback would be appreciated.

2 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Hit energies data c.f. MC. Standard e - data and MC four energies. Reasonable, but not perfect agreement. Follow George’s method, and separate hits into four ranges: Ehit<2MIP 2<Ehit<10MIP 10<Ehit<50MIP Ehit>50MIP Select events in same central region of all energies: | h x i | < 15 mm | h y i | < 10 mm 10GeV 45GeV30GeV 20GeV

3 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Shower profile in x : 30GeV Symmetric Narrower as we increase hit energy, of course. Small shift in highest energy hits – could reflect beam tilt in data

4 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Shower profile in y : 30GeV Slight aymmetry Attributable to interwafer gap.

5 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Radial shower profile : 30 GeV Square events? ? Small offset – beam tilts?

6 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward The same on log scale : 30 GeV ??? But is it important?

7 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Radial shower profile : 10 GeV

8 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Radial shower profile : 20 GeV

9 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Radial shower profile : 45 GeV

10 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Radial profile vs depth : 30 GeV Shower tail broadens with depth, as expected.

11 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Radial profile vs depth (contd.) : 30 GeV

12 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward “Effective Molière radius” Method: Take energy- weighted r hit distribution and find the radii at which 90% or 95% of the shower energy is contained: r 90 and r 95. Stacks all weighted equally. Maybe this isn’t right?

13 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Effective Molière radius vs e - energy Pretty good agreement, to ~2%, except at 10 GeV. But MC is systematically lower. Likely to be linked with cut used for removal of double showers (upstream showering).

14 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward T max is parameter used to remove double showers 10GeV 45GeV30GeV 20GeV

15 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Effective Molière radius vs T max Largely confirms that data/MC discrepancy is associated with residual double showers present in data. Should we cut lower? But then biasing the result (though not much, if we believe MC).

16 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward However…..  So far so good.  All this was based on the same data and MC samples as used for Cristina’s paper.  But, since Mokka we have a revised G10 density for the ECAL.  This has a significant impact on the shower width, and reduces both r 90 and r 95 by ~1mm at all energies.  This destroys the agreement between data and MC   (But I believe it improves Valeria’s longitudinal analysis).  Not sure what to do about this.