Update on Measurements and Simulations at Cambridge: SKALA element + LNA Eloy de Lera Acedo Nima Razavi Ghods Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interface and cabling characterization for SKA Paul van der Merwe Prof. HC Reader Stellenbosch University.
Advertisements

CNR IEIIT – Applied Electromagnetics Group AAVP, Dwingeloo, December AAVS0 Results, Dual-Polarized Vivaldi Antenna G. Virone, R. Tascone, A.
Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate DS4-T4 Wideband Integrated Antennas DS4-T4 Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate ASTRON.
Design of a Low-Noise 24 GHz Receiver Using MMICs Eric Tollefson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Advisor: Dr. L. Wilson Pearson.
2010 SKA Africa Bursary Conference Chalmers University of Technology Jian Yang, Associate Professor Chalmers University of Technology Sweden.
RF Circuit Design Chris Fuller /7/2012.
Sparse Array Geometry Mr. Ahmed El-makadema Professor A.K Brown.
ASTRON / Photonics p1. Photonics and AA station design Peter Maat – ASTRON Photonics and AA station design Peter Maat – ASTRON.
AAVS receiver Federico Perini AAVP December, ASTRON, Dwingeloo.
RFI Characterisation of Karoo Array Telescope Structure P. Gideon Wiid (PhD) Howard C. Reader Riana H. Geschke Stellenbosch University December 2008.
ULg - EMC Lab Cost 286 Wroclaw1 Research activities in Liège Ir. V. Beauvois, Ir. S. Coets, Ir. M. Renard and Ir. Ph. Camus
BDT Radio – 2b – CMV 2009/10/09 Basic Detection Techniques 2b (2009/10/09): Focal Plane Arrays Case study: WSRT System overview Receiver and.
Rapidly Deployable Radio Network 5.3 GHz Microstrip Patch Antennas
Prototype SKA Technologies at Molonglo: 2. Antenna and Front End G.B. Warr 1,2, J.D. Bunton 3, D. Campbell-Wilson 1, R.G. Davison 1, R.W. Hunstead 1, D.A.
Sascha D-PAD Sparse Aperture Array.
Marco de Vos Summary, Conclusions & ActionsAAVP 2010 Summary, Conclusions and Actions Marco de Vos
SKA AA-low: LPD antenna (SKALA) & path towards AAVS0 at Cambridge Eloy de Lera Acedo University of Cambridge 1 AAVP 2011: Taking the AA programme into.
ATA Antennas Feeds and Systems NSF Review 8/05/08 Jack Welch.
Performance of station array configurations Sparse vs. Dense, Regular vs Random Jaap D. Bregman AAVP Workshop,Cambridge,
Dec 2010 AAVP Cambridge workshop AAVP AAVS1/2-low demonstrators Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate.
Antenna, Feed, and LNA Integration S. Weinreb, May 7, 2009, LAX Antenna Working Group Meeting 1.Issues 2.Feed Summary 3.LNA Summary 4.Differential LNA’s.
Feed/Receiver Developments ATA-TAP December 17, 2002 WJW.
Keith Grainge Calibration requirementsAAVP 2010 Calibration and Imaging Requirements Keith Grainge (plus teams at ASTRON, Oxford, Cambridge)
Array Antenna Designs for the SKA-AAlo Eloy de Lera Acedo 1 AAVP 2010, Cambridge, UK. 10/12/10.
AA-mid demonstrator Dion Kant AAVP – 10 December 2010, Cambridge, UK.
LOFAR Antenna Systems Dion Kant, Wim van Cappellen AAVP – 10 December 2010, Cambridge, UK.
Name1 title 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 Progress in Active Antenna Design and Developement - FIDA3 Timothy Finn FG-IGN
Name1 SKA(DS) System Design Aspects 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 SKA(DS) System Design Aspects: building a system Laurens Bakker.
June 29-July 2, 2010, Nantes, France Didier Charrier, Subatech, Nantes, France “ Antenna development for astroparticles.
Meteor Receiver Olajide Durosinmi Hugh Kinsel Kenny Mills Austin Pierce Nick Stelmashenko October 21, 2009.
AA-Low Technical Progress Meeting, October 2012, Medicina, Italy AAVS0 & AAVS0.5: System Design and Test Plan Nima Razavi-Ghods Eloy de Lera Acedo.
SKA AA-Low Station Configurations and Trade-off Analysis Nima Razavi-Ghods, Ahmed El-Makadema AAVP 2011, ASTRON, Dwingeloo Dec
Efficient design of a C-band aperture-coupled stacked microstrip array using Nexxim and Designer Alberto Di Maria German Aerospace Centre (DLR) – Microwaves.
Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,
Eloy de Lera Acedo 2 nd SKADS Workshop October 2007 DS4T4 Differential Dual Polarized Antenna Array Design - Eloy de Lera Acedo - Research Associate.
Main beam representation in non-regular arrays
Analysis of Low Frequency Phased Array Stations Dr. Nima Razavi-Ghods Dr. Eloy de Lera Acedo Cambridge AAVP 2010, 09/12/10 1.
Noise Coupling in Focal Plane Arrays
1 of 22 Glaciers and Ice Sheets Interferometric Radar (GISIR) Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
Investigating EMC policies for the SKA Paul van der Merwe Prof. HC Reader Stellenbosch University.
Widefield Astronomy and Technologies for the SKA November 2009 at Limelette, Belgium The SKA AA-lo array; E.M. simulation and design Eloy de Lera.
18/10/20151 Calibration of Input-Matching and its Center Frequency for an Inductively Degenerated Low Noise Amplifier Laboratory of Electronics and Information.
Judd D. Bowman Arizona State University Alan Rogers MIT/Haystack Observatory May 26, 2011 Experiment to Detect the Global EoR Signature (EDGES)
Integrated receivers for mid-band SKA Suzy Jackson Engineer, Australia Telescope National Facility SKADS FP6 Meeting – Chateau de Limelette – 4-6 November,
Characterization of radiated sparking noise in the SKA environment Philip Kibet Prof HC Reader Stellenbosch University SKA Postgraduate Bursary and Postdoctoral.
The Very Small Array Angela Taylor & Anze Slosar Cavendish Astrophysics University of Cambridge.
LNA implementation Federico Perini AA-low Technical Progress Meeting Medicina, September 2012.
System designAA Consortium - BolognaOctober 2012 AA Consortium The path to AAVS1 22 October 2012.
Amplifiers Amplifier Parameters Gain = Po/Pi in dB = 10 log (Po/Pi)
1 Practical considerations on train antenna design CSEM.
O. García-Pérez (FG-IGN) 1FIDA3 Wide Field Astronomy and Technologies for the SKA, Limelette, 4-6 November 2009 FIDA3: A Novel Active Array for the Mid-SKA.
CODALEMA A Cosmic Ray Radio Detection Array ICRC 2007, 3-11 July Merida, Mexico CODALEMA A Cosmic Ray Radio Detection Array Didier Lebrun, LPSC Grenoble.
Corot:Ubatuba Nov The Ground Segment: Data Processing. Software development in laboratories. Brazilian contribution. Michel Auvergne Réza Samadi.
Rick PerleyEVLA Front-End CDR – On the Sky Tests April 24, EVLA Front-End CDR On the Sky Tests.
Keith Grainge Calibration issuesAA-low Technical Progress meeting Calibration Issues Keith Grainge.
Dr Danielle Kettle1 LNA progress 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 LNA progress.
Dr.F. Arteche EMC DEPFET Project: A general overview.
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.
2016 AADC - LFAA AADC: Aperture Array Design & Construction Consortium LFAA: Low Frequency Aperture Array Array Prototypes Bologna, 11 May 2016, 9:30 AM.
Nicolas Fagnoni – Cosmology on Safari – 14th February 2017
Lets Design an LNA! Anurag Nigam.
Beam Measurement Characterization and Optics Tolerance Analysis of a 900 GHz HEB receiver for the ASTE telescope Alvaro Gonzalez, K. Kaneko, Y. Uzawa.
Mid Frequency Aperture Arrays
Sensitivity, the Challenges
AAVS1 Calibration Aperture Array Design & Construction Consortium
Phased Array Feeds SKANZ 2012 John O’Sullivan
Phased Array Feeds Wim van Cappellen
Sub – 1 Ohm Broadband Impedance Matching Network
Overview Calibration Exciter Receiver Oscillators
Radio Astronomy Spectrum Management in practice – Australia (ATNF)
Presentation transcript:

Update on Measurements and Simulations at Cambridge: SKALA element + LNA Eloy de Lera Acedo Nima Razavi Ghods Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK. 1 AA-low technical progress meeting 23/10/12 Medicina, Italy

 Design and Simulations  Measurements  Impedance and coupling (AAVS0 array)  Pattern  LNA  Future work and conclusions  SKALA with integrated ground plane  Cross-polarization Overview

Design  Dual-polarization from (50) (600) MHz  Element gain ~ 7dB  Receiver noise < 35 K above 100 MHz  Receiver gain > 36 dB (2 stages)

Design and Simulations  The antenna was designed using CST  The simulations of the element were confirmed using HFSS  The MoM/MBF specialized code (UCL/UCAM) was used to verify the behaviour at array level (SKA stations)  Mutual coupling analysis (averages out for random configurations)  Low order models for calibration Objective of the measurement campaign with single elements and the AAVS0 array: Confirm that these simulations are correct. We design the SKA with simulations!

EM characterization of SKA arrays – Mutual coupling effects randomize out in quasi-random configurations.** *Gonzalez-Ovejero, D., De Lera Acedo, E., Razavi-Ghods, N., and Craeye, C. (2009) *Gonzalez-Ovejero, D., De Lera Acedo, E., Razavi-Ghods, N., Garcia, E., and Craeye, C. (2011)

EM characterization of SKA arrays – Accurate EM simulations can be useful for the telescope calibration.** *De Lera Acedo, E., Razavi-Ghods, N., Gonzalez-Ovejero, D., Sarkis, R., and Craeye, C. (2011) **Craeye, C., Gonzalez-Ovejero, D., Razavi-Ghods, N., and de Lera Acedo, E. (2012) + Q=3 =

EM characterization of SKA arrays – The method has been tested before.* *Raucy, C., De Lera Acedo, E., Craeye, C., Gonzalez-Ovejero, D., and Razavi-Ghods, N. (2012)  Measurements  Simulations MoM  Simulations MBF

EM characterization of SKA arrays: Antenna model in simulations CSTMoM spine

Design and Simulations  Important for a SKA antenna element (embedded in a station) Calibratability Sensitivity Effective aperture Noise (sky, ground, LNA) Pattern Antenna impedance LNA noise & gain LNA intermodulation Cost (including deployment and durability) Cross-polarization Element’s footprint Material properties Materials, construction, assembly, maintenance, etc. Power consumption LNA power consumption Linearity, stability, ripple

Design and Simulations  Sensitivity (“Antenna Standardization report”: Shantanu Padhi, Ver: 2.0, 1 August 2012) ~1,300 m^2/K for 500,000 elements

Measurements  We can measure most of what we can simulate *See more about future measurements in Nima’s talk (test plan) Calibratability Sensitivity Effective aperture Noise (sky, ground, LNA) Pattern Antenna impedance LNA noise & gain LNA intermodulation Cost (including deployment and durability) Cross-polarization Element’s footprint Material properties Materials, construction, assembly, maintenance, etc. Power consumption LNA power consumption Linearity, stability, ripple

Measurements: Impedance and coupling tests  Scaled prototype VNA Zdiff

Measurements: Impedance and coupling tests  SKALA element CST MoM Test board

SKALA element Measurements: Impedance and coupling tests

*B. Fiorelli

2 SKALA elements 1.5 m apart Measurements: Impedance and coupling tests  AAVS0 array

TOP VIEW 1.5 m Measurements: Impedance and coupling tests

 Common-mode currents (with Howard Reader – April 2012)

Measurements: Impedance and coupling tests

Measurements: Pattern  Scaled prototype:  Direct line of sight range (main reflected ray absorbed).  Using Spectrum analyser, signal generator and power combiner.  At Lords Bridge. Easy, quick and great results.

Measurements: Pattern

 SKALA element (at QinetiQ)  Arch above antenna (near field).  Ground refection range.

Measurements: Pattern

E-plane cut

Measurements: Pattern H-plane cut 200 MHz

Measurements: Pattern  SKALA element (with Howard Reader)  At Stellenbosch University.  Ground refection range.

Measurements: Pattern  Near field pattern measurement (AAVS0)

Measurements: LNA  Concept COAX LNA 1 LNA 2

LNA  Design AVAGO MGA nd stage amplifier Transformer

LNA  Simulations

Measurements: LNA  Gain

Measurements: LNA  Hot/cold measurement with 150 Ω load.  Liquid Nitrogen (77 K)  Room temperature (290 K)  Filtering

Measurements: LNA  1 st stage amplifier with Agilent noise analyser in reverberation chamber.

Measurements: LNA  Noise tuner and noise parameter measurement in reverberation chamber at ASTRON.

Measurements: LNA  Intermodulation  Not great expectations (by design):  OIP2: 17 dBm  OIP3: 19 dBm  Others:  Tests on single transistors.  Connection to antenna and noise measurement in reverberation chamber.  RFI monitoring.

Future work and conclusions  SKALA with integrated ground plane

Future work and conclusions  Cross-polarization (“IXR SKALA with GP vs Vivaldi V2 with Soil C”, 08/10/2012 – B. Fiorelli)

Future work and conclusions  Most measurements already done.  The performance is looking like the simulations said.  Element  LNA  More measurements to be done, using a back-end (see Nima’s talk).  More development coming.  Even cheaper element, long lasting materials, integrated ground plane.  Lower power consumption for LNA, better IP2/3.

Lord’s Bridge Observatory SKALA-AAVS0

Thank you! Any questions?