Dark Energy as the Gravitational Feedback of Mass-Varying Dark Matter André Füzfa* F.N.R.S. Postdoctoral Researcher GAMASCO, University of Namur, Belgium.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Testing CPT with CMB 李明哲 University of Bielefeld 2008 年 4 月 28 日.
Advertisements

P ROBING SIGNATURES OF MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS OF DARK ENERGY Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
CMB but also Dark Energy Carlo Baccigalupi, Francesca Perrotta.
Dark Energy and Extended Gravity theories Francesca Perrotta (SISSA, Trieste)
Observational Constraints on Sudden Future Singularity Models Hoda Ghodsi – Supervisor: Dr Martin Hendry Glasgow University, UK Grassmannian Conference.
Cosmodynamics. Quintessence and solution of cosmological constant problem should be related !
Primordial Neutrinos and Cosmological Perturbation in the Interacting Dark-Energy Model: CMB and LSS Yong-Yeon Keum National Taiwan University SDSS-KSG.
Quintessence and the Accelerating Universe
Neutrino Mass due to Quintessence and Accelerating Universe Gennady Y. Chitov Laurentian University, Canada.
Álvaro de la Cruz-Dombriz Theoretical Physics Department Complutense University of Madrid in collaboration with Antonio L. Maroto & Antonio Dobado Different.
Spherical Collapse in Chameleon Models Rogerio Rosenfeld Rogerio Rosenfeld Instituto de Física Teórica Instituto de Física Teórica UNESP UNESP 2nd Bethe.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
José Beltrán and A. L. Maroto Dpto. Física teórica I, Universidad Complutense de Madrid XXXI Reunión Bienal de Física Granada, 11 de Septiembre de 2007.
Quintessence from time evolution of fundamental mass scale.
Physical Constraints on Gauss-Bonnet Dark Energy Cosmologies Ishwaree Neupane University of Canterbury, NZ University of Canterbury, NZ DARK 2007, Sydney.
PRE-SUSY Karlsruhe July 2007 Rocky Kolb The University of Chicago Cosmology 101 Rocky I : The Universe Observed Rocky II :Dark Matter Rocky III :Dark Energy.
Quintessence – Phenomenology. How can quintessence be distinguished from a cosmological constant ?
1 L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page
Lecture 1: Basics of dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science) ``Welcome to the dark side of the world.”
Dark Energy Bengt Gustafsson: Current problems in Astrophysics Lecture 3 Ångström Laboratory, Spring 2010.
Dynamical Dark Energy. What is dynamical dark energy ?
1 f(R) Gravity and its relation to the interaction between DE and DM Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Chaplygin gas in decelerating DGP gravity Matts Roos University of Helsinki Department of Physics and and Department of Astronomy 43rd Rencontres de Moriond,
Structure formation in dark energy cosmology La Magia, April 2005.
Dark Energy Sean Carroll, Caltech SSI Evidence for Dark Energy 2.Vacuum Energy and the Cosmological Constant 3.Dynamical Dark Energy and Quintessence.
Emergent Universe Scenario
Large distance modification of gravity and dark energy
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity IGC Penn State May 2008 Roy Maartens ICG Portsmouth R Caldwell.
Modified (dark) gravity Roy Maartens, Portsmouth or Dark Gravity?
Relic Neutrinos as a Source of Dark Energy Neal Weiner New York University IDM04 R.Fardon, D.B.Kaplan, A.E.Nelson, NW What does dark energy have to do.
Jochen Weller Benasque August, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, , 2006.
Dark Matter and Dark Energy from the solution of the strong CP problem Roberto Mainini, L. Colombo & S.A. Bonometto Universita’ di Milano Bicocca Mainini.
Lecture 3: Modified matter models of dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Dark Energy & High-Energy Physics Jérôme Martin Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris.
Dark Energy The first Surprise in the era of precision cosmology?
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Varying fundamental constants - a key property and key problem of quintessence.
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity Shinji Tsujikawa (Gunma National College of Technology ) Collaborations with L. Amendola, S. Capozziello, R. Gannouji,
1 Dark Energy & MSSM Jérôme Martin Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP)
The dark universe SFB – Transregio Bonn – Munich - Heidelberg.
Big bang or freeze ?. conclusions Big bang singularity is artefact Big bang singularity is artefact of inappropriate choice of field variables – of inappropriate.
Studying Dark Energy with Nearby Dwarf Galaxies Arthur D. Chernin Sternberg Astronomical Institute Moscow University In collaboration with I.D. Karachentsev,
From Dark Energy to Dark Force Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma.
Dark Energy in f(R) Gravity Nikodem J. Popławski Indiana University 16 th Midwest Relativity Meeting 18 XI MMVI.
Hunting for Chameleons Centre for Theoretical Cosmology University of Cambridge Moriond 2008 astro-ph/ PRL J. Khoury and A.W astro-ph/ PRD.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
Dark energy from various approaches Archan S. Majumdar S. N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences BSM, Quy nhon, vietnam.
Bin Wang Fudan University Shanghai Signature on the interaction between dark energy and dark matter.
ERE 2008September 15-19, Spanish Relativity Meeting 2008, Salamanca, September (2008) Avoiding the DARK ENERGY coincidence problem with a COSMIC.
Testing Chameleon Dark Energy Amanda Weltman University of Cambridge Portsmouth June 2008 University of Cape Town.
Theoretical Aspects of Dark Energy Models Rong-Gen Cai Institute of Theoretical Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences CCAST, July 4, 2005.
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
Degenerate neutrino as a Dark Energy 12 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting, July 2009, Paris Hyung Won Lee, Inje University July 15, 2009 Collaboration.
Neutrino Model of Dark Energy Yong-Yeon Keum Academia Sinica/Taiwan Mujuresort, Feb./16-19/2005.
GRAVITON BACKREACTION & COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT
Interaction between dark energy and dark matter Bin Wang Shanghai JiaotongUniversity.
“Planck 2009” conference Padova May 2009 Facing Dark Energy in SUGRA Collaboration with C. van de Bruck, A. Davis and J. Martin.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Cosmology in Eddington- inspired Born-Infeld gravity Hyeong-Chan Kim Korea National University of Transportation 19 Feb 2013 The Ocean Suites Jeju, Asia.
The HORIZON Quintessential Simulations A.Füzfa 1,2, J.-M. Alimi 2, V. Boucher 3, F. Roy 2 1 Chargé de recherches F.N.R.S., University of Namur, Belgium.
Spherical Collapse and the Mass Function – Chameleon Dark Energy Stephen Appleby, APCTP-TUS dark energy workshop 5 th June, 2014 M. Kopp, S.A.A, I. Achitouv,
Phantom Dark Energy Zong-Kuan Guo (advisor: Yuan-Zhong Zhang)
Observational Constraints on the Running Vacuum Model
Interacting Dark Energy
Probing the Coupling between Dark Components of the Universe
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Cosmology with Supernovae
cosmodynamics quintessence fifth force
The dark matter sector and new forces mediated by dark energy
Presentation transcript:

Dark Energy as the Gravitational Feedback of Mass-Varying Dark Matter André Füzfa* F.N.R.S. Postdoctoral Researcher GAMASCO, University of Namur, Belgium Jean-Michel Alimi LUTh, Observatory of Paris-Meudon * Associated Researcher at LUTh, Observatory of Paris and CP3, UCL

The AWE-full problems of concordance cosmology  Physical nature of Dark Matter (DM) AND Dark Energy (DE) →Why  baryons =0.04,  CDM =0.2 and   =0.76? (Triple coincidence) →Physical relation between DM and DE?  Negative Pressures of DE  Fate of the Universe →Eternal cosmic acceleration →de Sitter asymptotic state (asymmetrical non-trivial vacuum)  Coincidence Problem →Why DE appeared so recently? →Which low-energy physics behind DE? (Fine-tuning of parameters) Cosmological Constant   CDM Effective DE

The Dark Cosmology Iceberg  DE frozen in a false vacuum  DE with minimal coupling  SEP!  Scalar-tensor gravity (WEP but no SEP)  Gravitation without WEP Cosmological Constant Quintessence Extended Quintessence AWE Hypothesis Coincidence?  New DOF! Only gravitational interactions?  No Strong Equivalence Principle! Universality of NM couplings?  No Weak Equivalence Principle! DM-DE unification…?

 The Abnormally Weighting Energy Hypothesis Gravitation Abnormally Weighting Invisible Sector Normally Weighting Visible Sector Space-time dependent nonuniversal interactions AWE Mechanism: →Competition between different non-minimal couplings →No WEP  gravitationally bound AWE objects ≠ grav. bound matter ones  no SEP →AWE Dynamics allows to retrieve locally the Equivalence Principles →Bare Space-time →Running coupling  g ¤ ¹º  A. Füzfa, J.-M. Alimi, PRD (2007)  A. Füzfa, J.-M. Alimi, PRL 97, (2006)  A. Füzfa, J.-M. Alimi, PRD73 (2006)

The AWE Hypothesis  Relaxation of WEP:  Restricted WEP on visible matter (« normally weighting » sector)  one space-time but two couplings G awe and G m (« minimal » WEP violation)  Einstein frame: decoupled degrees-of-freedom  Separated spin-2 and spin 0 dofs but free-fall not along geodesics  Effective theories of gravitation* (string theory, modified gravity…)  Dicke-Jordan Observable frame: mixed degrees-of-freedom  (ordinary) matter follow geodesics of metric not of pure spin-2  Invisible sector has varying mass  T. Damour et al. PRL 64, 123 (1990)  T. Damour, D. Polyakov, Nucl.Phys. B 423 (1994)

AWE as a generalization of Chameleons  Chameleon action in Einstein frame:  How does AWE generalize Chameleon approaches?  Scalar field stabilization of  : A m (  ) vs A awe (  only  and not A m,awe (  vs V(   No need of well-shaped potential to provide cosmic acceleration  Definition of Observable frame : WEP violation is not observed directly  Non-linear nonminimal couplings  BD  : ln A m,awe (    (local validity of GR) Mach-Dirac Mechanism Mass-varying DM => No WEP => No SEP! DM is the source of WEP and SEP violations!

 Dynamics during matter-dominated era: →WEP OK if universal couplings (  m =  awe ) and/or  m >>>  awe  Attraction mechanism is conserved but becomes density-dependent! The AWE Dark Matter GR-like attractors GR at CMB  J. Khoury, A. Weltman, PRL 93, (2004), PRD 69, (2004)  P. Brax et al., Phys. Rev. D 70, (2004)  D. F. Mota & D. J. Shaw, PRL (2006); PRD 75, (2007)  D. F. Mota, J. D. Barrow, MNRAS 349, 291 (2004) Chameleon Effect! ' Effective potential

Dark Energy as a gravitational feedback  Friedmann equation  Acceleration equation →EP violation terms constitute an exotic DE fluid with negative pressures →Ghost effective equation of state  FLRW-like but →DM not scaling in a -3 (varying mass) →Exotic DE tracking DM and baryons  A. Füzfa, J.-M. Alimi, PRD (2007)  A. Füzfa, J.-M. Alimi, PRD73 (2006)

AWE Dark Matter and cosmic acceleration  Large-scale cosmological dynamics →Free parameters: R i, R ,  R and coupling strength k m →  starts frozen at CMB near GR values (  a    R ) ii AWE DM : (3DOF) ─  ²/dof= 1.04 (  awe =0.26,  m =0.04) ─  ²/dof= 1.05 ─  ²/dof= 1.04  CDM (   =0.7 ; 1DOF) ─  ²/dof= 1.03 Some Models fitting SNLS data Fate of the Universe  CDM : →  -dominated de Sitter Universe, eternal cosmic acceleration AWE DM : → matter-dominated Einstein-de Sitter Universe when GR is retrieved Past Future Today

Is  the anomalous weight of CDM?  Constraints from SNe Ia Hubble diagrams* (sample of 10 6 models)  Measurement of baryons and DM distribution from SNe Ia alone!  Independent predictions close to that of  CDM !  A.G. Riess et al., Astrophys. J (2004).  P. Astier et al., Astron. Astrophys (2006). AWE Predictions on HST (SNLS) at 95%C.L. →R i = (R i = ) →  m = (  m = ) →  awe = (  awe = ) →  DE = 1-  m -  awe →t 0 =13.2Gyr ( t 0 =14.1Gyr ) for h=0.7 AWE  CDM Matter  baryons  DE

A keystone between microphysics and gravitation?  Relation between G and M DM (x µ )?  When M DM vary, the product of the gravitational masses is conserved!  A fundamental relation between Planck and DM running scales?!  A glimpse at the intimate nature of gravitation?  J.-M. Alimi & A. Füzfa, under preparation (at 68% C.L.)

The AWEsome properties of Dark Matter  Nature of DE?  Anomalous gravity of mass-varying DM (m DM (  )) →Cosmic acceleration from a Mach-Dirac Mechanism M DM ↔ G →Independent determination of  baryon and  DM from supernovae alone! →Explanation to why concordance cosmology appears correct →Running fundamental scales of gravitation and DM are linked! (m b m DM /m Pl 2 ~cst) →Scale-dependent violation of Equivalence Principle (chameleon effect)  No need for negative pressures →Ghost equation of state (p/  <-1) from a frame effect →Can lead to larger age of the Universe than in quintessence,  CDM  Fate of the Universe →Transient cosmic acceleration →GR is finally retrieved (Einstein-de Sitter asymptotic state)  Coincidence Problem →DE tracks DM and baryons densities, coincidence during matter-dominated era →Couplings to scalar mode  of the same amplitude of those to the tensorial g  →Variation of DM mass of 30% around T~10 -3 eV

What lies behind the AWE action? Thank you for your attention!