 Premise 1 – What we don’t want ◦ We don’t want to own it. ◦ We don’t want to pay for it. ◦ We don’t want to maintain it.  Premise 2 – What we want ◦ A little lease money for “worthless” property ◦ Education Kiosks  Administration Building  PDK Park ◦ A little Goodwill  Premise 3 – When in doubt refer to Premise 1

 Whereby every geographic area within the state shall be assigned to AN (singular) electric supplier… ◦ Reasons  Most efficient, economical, & orderly  Inhibit duplication of the lines of suppliers  To protect lines lawfully constructed by electric suppliers  Preservation & enhancement of the state’s physical environment  Limited private producers access to the grid ◦ Enabled private business to USE power they created with the benefit of tax credits and accelerated depreciation – not available to tax exempt organizations or governments

 Georgia Power will issue Power Purchase Agreements for 825 MW of new solar facilities ◦ Issued by lottery ◦ Will pay producers FMV  Retail vice wholesale

 Issued RFQ for consultant selection ◦ RFQ delineated the following priorities  Showcase project for City, County, Airport  Develop the project without major capital investment  Educational asset  Maintenance cost reduced or eliminated  Lease income  Recommend technology to be used  Recommend location based on completion of FAA approved glare study

 Photovoltaic solar panels ◦ Locally produced (5 miles from PDK) ◦ Highly efficient  FAA approved glare study ◦ Used to identify potential sites that minimize or eliminates potential glare for air traffic and air traffic control ◦ FAA approved software   Identified preferred ownership option  Identified ONE potential site at PDK

1750’ into RPZ

 Submit request to FAA IAW Ref doc – FAA Interim Guidance on Land Uses Within a Runway Protection Zone 9/27/12  Expect updated land use AC 2014 ◦ Request required when “A local development proposal” includes land within RPZ  Identify alternatives  Identify where in the RPZ ◦ Cautiously optimistic – Interim Guidance slanted towards requirements (e.g. a new approach, new critical aircraft, runway extension) and leaves little room for “discretionary” projects.