1 CANARY Laser Guide Star Multi-Object Adaptive Optics (LGS MOAO) E-ELT PATHFINDER ON-SKY DEMONSTRATOR FOR EAGLE Richard Myers Durham University Royal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Subaru AO in future. Outline Overview of AO systems at Mauna Kea and in the world. Ongoing plan of AOS at Subaru and Mauna Kea. What’s in future.
Advertisements

GLAO Workshop, Leiden; April 26 th 2005 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics, N. Hubin Ground Layer Adaptive Optics Status and strategy at ESO Norbert Hubin European.
19-24 June 2005 Philippe Feautrier - SDW Zero noise wavefront sensor development within the Opticon European network Philippe Feautrier a, Thierry.
The Adaptive Optics Lucky Imager High-resolution imaging in the visible on large ground-based telescopes Jonathan Crass Institute of Astronomy, University.
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
Thomas Stalcup June 15, 2006 Laser Guidestar System Status.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
Page 1 Lecture 17 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO Claire Max AY 289 UC Santa Cruz March 7, 2013.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
System-wide issues Before we get to the telescope System integration and verification at the telescope Operations Maintenance and support.
NGAO 1-tier Draft Optical Relay Design P. Wizinowich 12/7/07.
Keck Next Generation Adaptive Optics Team Meeting 6 1 Optical Relay and Field Rotation (WBS , ) Brian Bauman April 26, 2007.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Architecture Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Alignment Plan See KAON 719 P. Wizinowich. 2 Introduction KAON 719 is intended to define & describe the alignments that will need to be performed.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
PSWG March Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT Peter McGregor.
Don Gavel: Keck NGAO meeting April 25, LAO Activities Relevant To Keck NGAO Donald Gavel NGAO Team Meeting 6 April 26, 2007.
Design Team Report: AO Operational Tools (aka Acquisition and Diagnostics) Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory (for the Operational tools team) Keck.
5 th February 2010 FP7 Prep WP9000 Progress Meeting 1 Update Tim Morris Durham University FP7 Prep WP 9340.
NGAO Controls Team Kickoff Meeting August 5, 2008 Erik Johansson.
MCAO A Pot Pourri: AO vs HST, the Gemini MCAO and AO for ELTs Francois Rigaut, Gemini GSMT SWG, IfA, 12/04/2002.
AO proposal for FP7 June 2006, N. Hubin Proposal for a European Adaptive Optics Program to be funded in the frame of FP7 N. Hubin European Southern Observatory.
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics Ground layer wavefront reconstruction using dynamically refocused Rayleigh laser beacons C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart,
MULTIPLE OBJECT ADAPTIVE OPTICS Mixed NGS/LGS Tomography Tim Morris (Durham University, UK) and Eric Gendron, Alastair Basden, Olivier Martin, David Henry,
Laboratory prototype for the demonstration of sodium laser guide star wavefront sensing on the E-ELT Sexten Primary School July 2015 THE OUTCOME.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
GLAO simulations at ESO European Southern Observatory
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
Our Mission Visible detectors fully matching the requirements of Adaptive Optics wavefront sensors for 10m class telescopes do not yet exist: current detectors.
Edimburg June 2006 Fast detectors 1 Fast detectors (for E-ELT AO) Philippe Feautrier INSU/CNRS-LAOG.
1 Manal Chebbo, Alastair Basden, Richard Myers, Nazim Bharmal, Tim Morris, Thierry Fusco, Jean-Francois Sauvage Fast E2E simulation tools and calibration.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
AO for ELT – Paris, June 2009 MAORY Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for the E-ELT Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna)
The on-sky NGS/LGS MOAO demonstrator for EAGLE Tim Morris Durham University.
The AO system for the GTC -an update Nicholas Devaney, Dolores Bello, Bruno Femenía, Alejandro Villegas, Javier Castro Grantecan, Instituto de Astrofísica.
 MOAO description  MOAO on the E-ELT  CANARY Phase A  System calibration  On-sky results  CANARY Phase B.
Real-time control system verification for ELT AO systems Alastair Basden 1, Richard Myers 1, Tim Morris 1, Ali Bharmal 1, Urban Bitenc 1, Nigel Dipper.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
The VLT Adaptive Optics Facility
February 2013 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics (GLAO) Experiment on Mauna Kea Doug Toomey.
Future Plan of Subaru Adaptive Optics
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
Conference “Feeding the Giants: ELTs in the era of Surveys” -- Ischia 31/08/2011 Large field of view and ELTs: an impossible marriage? Paolo Ciliegi (INAF.
Status report of AO188+LGS (+future AO) Yutaka Hayano (Subaru Telescope, NAOJ) S. Oya, M. Hattori, Y. Saito, Y. Minowa, M. Ito, H. Terada, T.S. Pyo, H.
Proposed Joint Research Activity: Technologies for Advanced Instrumentation Colin Cunningham.
Shack-Hartmann tomographic wavefront reconstruction using LGS: Analysis of spot elongation and fratricide effect Clélia Robert 1, Jean-Marc Conan 1, Damien.
Introduction of RAVEN Internal meeting on future instrument projects at Subaru Shin Oya ( Subaru Telescope/NAOJ) ‏ Hilo.
Experimental results of tomographic reconstruction on ONERA laboratory WFAO bench A. Costille*, C. Petit*, J.-M. Conan*, T. Fusco*, C. Kulcsár**, H.-F.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Tomography in Adaptive Optics Multiple Object Adaptive Optics CANARY Status and Results Impact on future AO systems.
Pre-focal wave front correction and field stabilization for the E-ELT
Overview Science drivers AO Infrastructure at WHT GLAS technicalities Current status of development GLAS: Ground-layer Laser Adaptive optics System.
AO4ELT, Paris A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes Center for Adaptive Optics.
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Beyond Basic AO François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Page 1 Lecture 15 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO Claire Max AY 289 March 3, 2016.
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
WP12200: Instrumentation, measurements and modelling
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

1 CANARY Laser Guide Star Multi-Object Adaptive Optics (LGS MOAO) E-ELT PATHFINDER ON-SKY DEMONSTRATOR FOR EAGLE Richard Myers Durham University Royal Astronomical Society

9 May RAS Overview CANARY Collaboration CANARY Collaboration LGS MOAO LGS MOAO General General EAGLE EAGLE Technical challenges Technical challenges Principles of CANARY demonstrator Principles of CANARY demonstrator Rayleigh LGS Rayleigh LGS Role of WHT Role of WHT Demonstration stages and timescales Demonstration stages and timescales Risk mitigation Risk mitigation Current status Current status Funding status Funding status Why “CANARY”? Falcon: 8m MOAO (study) EAGLE: 42m MOAO CANARY: MOAO demo on 4.2m WHT on La Palma, Canary Islands

9 May RAS CANARY Consortium Overlaps with EAGLE AO design team and SESAME team Observatoire de Paris LESIADurham UniversityIsaac Newton Group Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille UK Astronomy Technology Centre Fanny Chemla, Eric Gendron, Zoltàn Hubert, Aglaé Kellerer, Michel Marteaud, Gérard Rousset, Fabrice Vidal, Ali Basden, Sofia Dimoudi, Nigel Dipper, Colin Dunlop, Deli Geng, Andres Gueselaga, Dani Guzman, Mark Harrison, Tim Morris, Richard Myers, James Osborn, Chris Saunter, Gordon Talbot, Laura Young, Eddy Younger, Don Carlos Abrahams, René Rutten, Thierry Fusco, David Henry, Andy Longmore, Brice Leroux ONERA

9 May RAS Laser Guide Star Multi-Object Adaptive Optics (LGS MOAO) LGS MOAO Schematic [Courtesy ESO]

9 May RAS EAGLE MOAO requirements and baseline implementation NIR Multi-Integral Field Unit (IFU) for 42m E-ELT NIR Multi-Integral Field Unit (IFU) for 42m E-ELT Wide IFU patrol field ≥ 5 arcmin with ≥ 20 such IFUs Wide IFU patrol field ≥ 5 arcmin with ≥ 20 such IFUs ≥ 30% energy in arcsec spatial element in H-band ≥ 30% energy in arcsec spatial element in H-band Multiple LGS (≥ 6), multiple NGS (≥ 3) Multiple LGS (≥ 6), multiple NGS (≥ 3) Closed loop control of M4 telescope adaptive mirror Closed loop control of M4 telescope adaptive mirror Open loop control of high order (≥ 100x100 actuator) Deformable Mirror (DM) in each IFU channel Open loop control of high order (≥ 100x100 actuator) Deformable Mirror (DM) in each IFU channel

9 May RAS Technical challenge and proposed mitigation Open loop control of high order DMs Open loop control of high order DMs calibration calibration ELT LGS ELT LGS Spot elongation Spot elongation High accuracy wide field tomography High accuracy wide field tomography Real-time control (RTC) Real-time control (RTC) Algorithms Algorithms Scale of implementation Scale of implementation Laboratory Demonstration: SESAME: working now Staged On-sky Demonstration of SINGLE channel: CANARY: Goals: * demonstrate MOAO in EAGLE configuration, * verify design models, * develop techniques, e.g., calibration, RTC

9 May RAS LGS Wavefront Sensor (WFS) Spot Elongation due to sodium layer depth (central LGS) Cone Effect LGS WORSE for ELTs turbulence

9 May RAS CANARY LGS MOAO demo method Key technology: RAYLEIGH LGS (RLGS) (e.g., SOR, WHT, MMT, SOAR, LBT LGS study) These use pulsed lasers with temporal WFS range gating These use pulsed lasers with temporal WFS range gating to select LGS height and extension (range gate depth) to select LGS height and extension (range gate depth) The Rayleigh LGS Altitude and extension are programmable The Rayleigh LGS Altitude and extension are programmable They can emulate the spot elongation & cone-effect geometry of a SODIUM LGS on a MUCH LARGER telescope They can emulate the spot elongation & cone-effect geometry of a SODIUM LGS on a MUCH LARGER telescope SO: SO: 85 km sodium LGS → 8.5km Rayleigh LGS 85 km sodium LGS → 8.5km Rayleigh LGS 10km sodium layer → 1km range gate depth 10km sodium layer → 1km range gate depth 42m E-ELT → 4.2m WHT 42m E-ELT → 4.2m WHT In principle: can emulate sodium density evolution too In principle: can emulate sodium density evolution too

9 May RAS However… BUT: BUT: This scaling is not perfect This scaling is not perfect Atmosphere and wavelength are not scaled Atmosphere and wavelength are not scaled There will be additional uncorrected turbulence in demo compared to ELT There will be additional uncorrected turbulence in demo compared to ELT Need to reduce LGS separation to emulate ELT meta- pupil overlap at a given altitude Need to reduce LGS separation to emulate ELT meta- pupil overlap at a given altitude SO NEED: SO NEED: Concurrent Natural Guide Star (NGS) tomography Concurrent Natural Guide Star (NGS) tomography Record corrected wavefront (truth sensor) as well as the near-IR image (Point Spread Function) Record corrected wavefront (truth sensor) as well as the near-IR image (Point Spread Function) To check that current MOAO correction is as predicted for current atmosphere To check that current MOAO correction is as predicted for current atmosphere

9 May RAS William Herschel Telescope 4.2m Alt-Az, La Palma 4.2m Alt-Az, La Palma Operational Rayleigh LGS: GLAS Operational Rayleigh LGS: GLAS Grond-laag Laser Adaptieve optiek Systeem (Ground-layer Laser AO System) 18 W 515nm 18 W 515nm Launch System Launch System 35cm telescope above M2 35cm telescope above M2 Safety Infrastructure Safety Infrastructure No fly zone No fly zone Launch permission Launch permission Traffic Control Traffic Control MK clone MK clone MASS/DIMM 20m from WHT MASS/DIMM 20m from WHT SCIDAR 340m from WHT SCIDAR 340m from WHT

9 May RAS GLAS WHT LGS Facility ING - Astron - Durham Variation of closed-loop (●) and open-loop (○) Gaussian fit FWHM versus angular distance from centre of field for a 20s J-band image. Turbulence profile approx 50% at ground, 15% at 4km, and 35% at 16km. LGS altitude of 15km. NAOMI AO System: UKATC-Durham-ING INGRiD imager: ING OASIS IFU: Lyon

9 May RAS GLAS Software Description

9 May RAS WHT Nasmyth (GHRIL) Large, undedicated Nasmyth enclosure for guest instruments Large, undedicated Nasmyth enclosure for guest instruments 2.5 × 1.34 m opt bench 2.5 × 1.34 m opt bench Services Services

9 May RAS GHRIL NASMYTH

9 May RAS CANARY Demo Stages Phase A 2010 Phase A × Natural Guide Stars (in 3’ field) open loop control of low order (8 × 8 actuator) Deformable Mirror (DM) 3 × Natural Guide Stars (in 3’ field) open loop control of low order (8 × 8 actuator) Deformable Mirror (DM) Natural Guide Star Truth Wavefront Sensor, Near-IR imager Natural Guide Star Truth Wavefront Sensor, Near-IR imager Phase B 2011 Phase B 2011 Add 4 × LGS open loop control of low order DM Add 4 × LGS open loop control of low order DM Concurrent NGS tomography maintained Concurrent NGS tomography maintained Phase C 2012 Phase C 2012 Closed loop LGS/NGS control of low-order DM Closed loop LGS/NGS control of low-order DM Open loop control of high-order DM (up to 32 × 32 actuator) Open loop control of high-order DM (up to 32 × 32 actuator) Full-up EAGLE demo Full-up EAGLE demo

9 May RAS Phase A : NGS MOAO Components: Components: Low-order 8x8 DM Low-order 8x8 DM 3 x EMCCD open-loop NGS WFSs 3 x EMCCD open-loop NGS WFSs Open-loop optimised Fast Steering Mirror (SPHERE design) Open-loop optimised Fast Steering Mirror (SPHERE design) Diagnostic Systems: Diagnostic Systems: 1 x EMCCD closed-loop NGS WFS (Truth Sensor) 1 x EMCCD closed-loop NGS WFS (Truth Sensor) High speed DM figure sensor High speed DM figure sensor NIR Imaging camera (loan courtesy ESO) NIR Imaging camera (loan courtesy ESO) WHT Nasmyth Calibration Unit NGS Pickoffs 3 x NGS WFS NGS FSM Low-order DM Science Verification Truth Sensor Figure Sensor GHRIL Derotator Phase A: NGS MOAO

9 May RAS Phase B: Low-order LGS MOAO New modules include: New modules include: Electronically shuttered LGS WFS CCD (Lincoln Lab) Electronically shuttered LGS WFS CCD (Lincoln Lab) Modified GLAS launch, LGS dichroic and relay system Modified GLAS launch, LGS dichroic and relay system WHT Nasmyth Calibration Unit NGS Pickoffs 3 x NGS WFS NGS FSM Low-order DM Science Verification Truth Sensor LGS Pickoffs 4 x LGS WFS GHRIL Derotator Figure Sensor GLAS Laser LGS Rotator GLAS BLT Diffractive Optic LGS FSM LGS Dichroic Phase B: Low-order LGS MOAO

9 May RAS Phase C: High-order LGS MOAO Closest resemblance to proposed EAGLE MOAO implementation Closest resemblance to proposed EAGLE MOAO implementation Closed-loop low-order DM conjugated to ground layer Closed-loop low-order DM conjugated to ground layer Open-loop MEMS DM Open-loop MEMS DM SPARTA (ESO VLT) type accelerated Real-Time Computer SPARTA (ESO VLT) type accelerated Real-Time Computer NOTE: LOW-ORDER LTAO CAPABILITY NOTE: LOW-ORDER LTAO CAPABILITY WHT Nasmyth Calibration Unit NGS Pickoffs 3 x NGS WFS NGS FSM Low-order DM Science Verification Truth Sensor Figure Sensor LGS Pickoffs 4 x LGS WFS GHRIL Derotator MEMS DM GLAS Laser LGS Rotator GLAS BLT Diffractive Optic LGS FSM LGS Dichroic Phase C: High-order woofer-tweeter LGS MOAO (woofer closed loop)

9 May RAS Key Components NGS WFS NGS WFS E2V EMCCDs (asterisms with 4 NGS in 3’ needed) E2V EMCCDs (asterisms with 4 NGS in 3’ needed) LGS WFS LGS WFS Lincoln Lab Gated CCDs Lincoln Lab Gated CCDs Fast Steering Mirror Fast Steering Mirror Surface Sensing SPHERE Design Surface Sensing SPHERE Design Low order DM Low order DM Adonis (ESO 3.6m) Adonis (ESO 3.6m) High order DM High order DM BMM 32 × 32 MEMS – just delivered BMM 32 × 32 MEMS – just delivered Real-time Computer Real-time Computer PC-based with Evolution to ESO SPARTA system PC-based with Evolution to ESO SPARTA system Phase A NGS Design: Paris LESIA

9 May RAS“De-Risking” Figure Sensor (DMC) Figure Sensor (DMC) High-speed LUPA 300 CMOS detector + FPGA (IAC collab) High-speed LUPA 300 CMOS detector + FPGA (IAC collab) Proof of concept trial currently being integrated in Durham Proof of concept trial currently being integrated in Durham RTC RTC First version based on working PC-based system First version based on working PC-based system Contract with ONERA/Shaktiware Contract with ONERA/Shaktiware On-site component tests October 2008 On-site component tests October 2008 LGS asterism test: Diffractive Optical Element (Herriot-Watt) LGS asterism test: Diffractive Optical Element (Herriot-Watt) Gated CCD test on-sky Gated CCD test on-sky Test Figure Sensor in WHT environment Test Figure Sensor in WHT environment

9 May RAS Current Status NGS main path opto- mechanical concept complete NGS main path opto- mechanical concept complete Alignment/calibration procedures Alignment/calibration procedures LGS pickoff and relay optical design complete LGS pickoff and relay optical design complete 2 simulations running 2 simulations running using YAO run by A. Kellerer using YAO run by A. Kellerer Using Durham AO simulation platform (DASP) by A. Basden Using Durham AO simulation platform (DASP) by A. Basden Next: Next: Comparative simulation using EAGLE design codes Comparative simulation using EAGLE design codes ONERA/Durham ONERA/Durham Design Reviews June 2008 Design Reviews June 2008 Phase A PDR, B/C CoDR Phase A PDR, B/C CoDR RTC first contract June 2008 RTC first contract June 2008 Phase A Space Envelope At WHT Nasmyth Phase B Optics

9 May RAS PHASE B

9 May RAS Phase C

9 May RAS

9 May RAS

9 May RAS Funding Status UK (STFC) UK (STFC) France (various) France (various) EU FP7 Preparatory Fund EU FP7 Preparatory Fund EU OPTICON JRA-1 – applied EU OPTICON JRA-1 – applied ESO-led ESO-led Includes additional WHT nights Includes additional WHT nights Further STFC support for final phase - applied Further STFC support for final phase - applied Further French funding proposals - to be made Further French funding proposals - to be made Funded, enough for first two phases