NHCS READY Report December 2013. Presentation Format Curriculum Change Rationale and Timeline Proficiency for Grades 3-8 School Growth Proficiency for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Shelby High School Performance Composite Components of the Performance Composite shown on the next two slides represent the adjusted data from.
Advertisements

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL 1 Superintendents’ Regional Meetings.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
A New School Accountability Model. Draft – March Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
Accountability Services North Carolina Department of Public Instruction January 14, 2015 School Performance Grades.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
K-2 Assessments by Tara Roy 6-8 Common Exams by Myra Holloway 9-12 Common Exams by Allison Castle CTE Post-Assessments by Lynn Hartley High School Graduation.
2012 ACT Reports: ACT and WorkKeys WS/FCS Board of Education October 23, 2012.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
New Graduation Requirements November 10, Outline 1.Update on Graduation Requirements Work 2.Job Skills Assessment Recommendations 3. Substitute.
Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
NOVEMBER 12, 2013 Math Department Team Leaders’ Meeting.
State law and the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act require Report Cards for every local school, every school district and for the state.
Accountability Updates NCAEE Region 1 May 2, 2014 M. E. (Butch) Hudson, Jr. Regional Accountability Coordinator Accountability Region 4.
KCS DATA OVERVIEW. Accountability Results Composite School Performance School Year Change 2-Year Change Met All AMO Targets?Growth?
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.
1 Superintendents’ Quarterly Meeting A Next Generation Accountability Model March 25, 2010.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Brad McMillen and Sonya Stephens Data and Accountability September 19, 2013.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
1 1 Next Generation School Assessment and Accountability Thursday, November 17, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
: ABCs and AMO Accountability Results WS/FCS Board of Education August 21, 2012.
Accountability & Quality Update. – ACCESS ELLs/Alternate ACCESS March 20 th end of testing window. Materials should be returned within two instructional.
Academic Achievement Gaps in WCPSS Presented To Raising Achievement, Closing Gaps Taskforce September 18, 2009 Wake County Public School System.
 Student supports and interventions  Dropout prevention  Literacy  Transitions – to and from high school  Senior year  Teacher quality and professional.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
RESULTS Spring 2015 End-Of-Course tests Student Score Interpretation Guide.
NHCS READY Report October READY Annual Report Contents Growth Proficiency: Detail for Grades 3- 8 and High School Progress: Annual Measurable Objectives.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Ohio’s State Tests Information for Students and Families.
Graduation Rate: A Process; A Product New Hanover County Schools September 2012.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
Eustis High School Scheduling School Year Upcoming Juniors and Seniors Cohorts: 2012 and 2013.
South Carolina Succeeds
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
Globalization. Innovation. Graduation.  Transition to Five Achievement Levels  School Performance Grades (A–F)  EVAAS as a Tool NC READY ACCOUNTABILITY.
Data Overview Faculty Meeting-October 14,2014 Mission Possible: MOTIVATE, EDUCATE, GRADUATE!!!
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Communication Webinar:
Pathways to Graduation
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Future ready PA Index Update 5/23/17.
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Hickory Public Schools Accountability Update - Math
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
Texas State Accountability
A-F Accountability and Special Education
Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

NHCS READY Report December 2013

Presentation Format Curriculum Change Rationale and Timeline Proficiency for Grades 3-8 School Growth Proficiency for High School Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) Individual School Profiles Overview of the new READY Accountability Model Testing Updates School Report Card Timeline EVAAS Roster Verification State Exam Score Delay Testing Schedule/Required Tests

New READY Model Grades 3-8High School Proficiency Growth Attendance Math Course Rigor ACT WorkKeys Graduation Project Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) Graduation Rate

NC Curriculum Revision and Proficiency Trends: Percent of Students Proficient in BOTH Math and English Language Arts (ELA) Beginning of Accountability Model More rigorous Math Standards More rigorous Reading Standards **No Retest More rigorous Math and ELA Standards 32.0**

Score Detail

3-5 EOG Reading Cut Scores Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 3 rd Grade < – – 451> 451 < 2525 – 3536 – 40> 40 < 57%57% - 80%82% - 91%> 91% 4 th Grade < – – 459> 459 < 2626 – 3334 – 40> 40 < 59%59% - 75%77% - 91%> 91% 5 th Grade < – – 463> 463 < 2525 – 3334 – 40> 40 < 57%57% - 75%77% - 91%> 91% 44 items

3-5 Extend 2 Reading Cut Scores Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 3 rd Grade < – – 379> 379 < 2929 – 3536 – 39> 39 < 73%73% - 88%90% - 98%> 98% 4 th Grade < – – 377> 377 < 3131 – 3637 – 39> 39 < 78%78% - 90%93% - 98%> 98% 5 th Grade < – – 376> 376 < 3232 – 3839> 39 < 80%80% - 95%98%> 98% 40 items

6-8 EOG Reading Cut Scores Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 6 th Grade < – – 464> 464 < 2323 – 3435 – 42> 42 < 48%48% - 71%73% - 88%> 88% 7 th Grade < – – 468> 468 < 2323 – 3435 – 42> 42 < 48%48% - 71%73% - 88%> 88% 8 th Grade < – – 472> 472 < 2323 – 3334 – 41> 41 < 48%48% - 69%71% - 85%> 85% 48 items

6-8 Extend 2 Reading Cut Scores Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 6 th Grade (41 Items) < > 376 < 2929 – 3738 – 39> 39 < 71%71% - 90%93% - 95%> 95% 7 th Grade (41 Items) < > 376 < 3030 – 3839 – 40> 40 < 73%73% - 93%95% - 98%> 98% 8 th Grade (40 Items) < > 378 < 2626 – 3536 – 38> 38 < 65%65% - 88%90% - 95%> 95%

3-5 EOG Math Cut Scores Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 3 rd Grade < – – 459> 459 < 2121 – 2930 – 37> 37 < 48%48% - 66%68% - 84%> 84% 4 th Grade < – – 459> 459 < 1919 – 2728 – 37> 37 < 43%43% - 61%64% - 84%> 84% 5 th Grade < – – 459> 459 < 1818 – 2526 – 35> 35 < 41%41% - 57%60% - 80%> 80% 44 items

3-5 Extend 2 Math Cut Scores Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 3 rd Grade (40 Items) < – – 275> 275 < 3030 – 3637 – 38> 38 < 75%75% - 90%93% - 95%> 95% 4 th Grade (38 Items) < – – 278> 278 < 2727 – 3334 – 36> 36 < 71%71% - 87%89% - 95%> 95% 5 th Grade (37 Items) < – – 276> 276 < 2424 – 2930 – 32> 32 < 65%65% - 78%81% - 86%> 86%

6-8 EOG Math Cut Scores Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 6 th Grade < – – 460> 460 < 2020 – 2728 – 39> 39 < 40%40% - 54%56% - 78%> 78% 7 th Grade < – – 460> 460 < 1919 – 2728 – 39> 39 < 38%38% - 54%56% - 78%> 78% 8 th Grade < – – 462> 462 < 1919 – 2829 – 40> 40 < 38%38% - 56%58% - 80%> 80% 50 items

6-8 Extend 2 Math Cut Scores Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 6 th Grade (39 Items) < – – 276> 276 < 2929 – 3132 – 33> 33 < 74%74% - 79%82% - 85%> 85% 7 th Grade (36 Items) < – – 282> 282 < 2323 – 3031 – 32> 32 < 64%64% - 83%86% - 89%> 89% 8 th Grade (36 Items) < – – 285> 285 < 2121 – 2627 – 33> 33 < 58%58% - 72%75% - 92%> 92% 50 items

5 th and 8 th EOG Science Cut Scores Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 5th Grade < – – 262> 262 < 2727 – 3940 – 50> 50 < 45%45% - 65%67% - 83%> 83% 8 th Grade < – – 259> 259 < 2323 – 3132 – 47> 47 < 38%38% - 52%53% - 78%> 78% 60 Items

5 th and 8 th Extend 2 Science Cut Scores Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 5th Grade (45 Items) < – – 375> 375 < 3030 – 3536 – 41> 41 < 67% 67% - 78% 80% - 91% > 91% 8 th Grade (46 Items) < – – 374> 374 < 2727 – 3233 – 40> 40 < 59% 59% - 70% 72% - 87% > 87%

EOC Cut Scores Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 Math I (49 Items) < – – 263> 263 < 1919 – 2526 – 38> 38 < 39%39% - 51%53% - 78%> 78% English II (56 Total Number of Points) < > 164 < > 47 < 41%41% - 60%61% - 84%> 84% Biology (60 Items) < – – 260> 260 < 3030 – 4142 – 52> 52 < 50%50% - 68%70% - 87%> 87%

EOC Extend 2 Cut Scores Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 Math I (31 Items) < – – 169> 169 < – 21> 21 < 58%58%61% - 68%> 68% English II (43 Total Number of Score Points) < – > 184 < > 42 < 65%65% - 72%74% - 98%> 98% Biology (46 Items) < – – 378> 378 < 3232 – 3738 – 43> 43 < 70%70% - 80%82% - 93%> 93%

Annual READY Report Contents  Baseline Proficiency and Growth  NHCS Results v Other Urban Districts  Career and College Readiness Indicators  Graduation Statistics  Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) Status  Performance Details for Individual Schools

Performance Composite Baseline CMS - Charlotte-Mecklenburg

ELA and Math Grades 3-8 Baseline Math Grades 3-8ELA Grades 3-8 Wake54.1 NHCS50.9 CMS45.5 State43.9 Pender43.8 Brunswick43.8 Cumberland41.2 Guilford41.1 Durham33.4 Wake54.3 NHCS51.5 CMS46.4 State42.3 Guilford41.6 Pender38.1 Brunswick38.0 Cumberland34.5 Durham30.5

Target Group Proficiency: ELA Grades 3-8 Baseline CMS71.7 Wake70.5 Durham67.7 NHCS63.5 Guilford61.6 State56.6 Cumberland55.4 Pender51.4 Brunswick50.0 WhiteBlack CMS30.2 Wake29.5 Cumberland29.5 State25.6 Guilford25.4 Durham24.5 Brunswick24.3 Pender23.3 NHCS21.6 Range 21.7Range 8.6 Hispanic Cumberland41.3 NHCS37.2 Brunswick32.8 Wake31.8 CMS30.7 Pender30.1 State28.8 Guilford27.8 Durham22.4 Range 18.9

Target Group Proficiency: ELA Grades 3-8 Baseline Economically Disadvantaged Range 12.7 Students with Disabilities Range 9.5 Brunswick33.6 NHCS32.5 Cumberland31.3 Pender31.0 State28.7 CMS28.7 Wake27.0 Guilford25.8 Durham20.9 Wake17.6 NHCS13.5 State12.9 Guilford12.1 Cumberland11.8 CMS11.1 Brunswick10.8 Durham9.8 Pender8.1

Target Group Proficiency: Math Grades 3-8 Baseline WhiteBlack Range 29.6Range 8.4 Hispanic Range 18.8 CMS27.5 Wake25.8 Guilford24.0 Cumberland22.6 State22.2 Brunswick20.6 NHCS20.3 Durham19.9 Pender19.1 NHCS43.3 CMS36.7 Cumberland36.2 Wake35.4 Guilford34.0 State32.7 Brunswick31.7 Pender27.9 Durham24.5 CMS72.6 Wake70.7 NHCS64.0 Durham62.2 Guilford61.1 State53.8 Cumberland47.8 Pender44.7 Brunswick43.0

Target Group Proficiency: Math Grades 3-8 Baseline Economically Disadvantaged (ED) Range 13.9 Students with Disabilities (SWD) Range 10.9 NHCS33.7 Brunswick30.0 CMS30.0 State27.7 Wake27.3 Guilford26.9 Pender26.2 Cumberland25.7 Durham19.8 Wake18.1 Guilford13.0 State12.4 NHCS12.1 CMS11.4 Cumberland9.7 Durham8.9 Brunswick8.5 Pender7.2

Science: Grades 5 and 8 Baseline NHCS64.0 Wake56.5 CMS47.3 Cumberland47.3 State45.4 Pender41.7 Brunswick40.5 Guilford37.2 Durham35.7 Science Grade 5Science Grade 8 Wake69.9 Pender67.8 NHCS60.6 CMS60.2 State59.1 Cumberland57.7 Guilford52.9 Brunswick49.8 Durham48.4

Academically Intellectually Gifted Proficiency (AIG)

High School End-of-Course (EOC) Baseline Results Wake58.5 Pender53.2 NHCS51.5 Guilford47.8 CMS47.2 State45.5 Brunswick42.4 Cumberland41.5 Durham41.4 Biology Wake53.0 NHCS52.8 Guilford46.5 Brunswick45.5 CMS45.4 Pender42.7 State42.6 Cumberland35.1 Durham27.8 Math I (Algebra I)English II Wake63.1 NHCS57.5 Pender56.8 CMS53.2 Brunswick52.0 Guilford51.4 State51.1 Cumberland48.0 Durham44.2

Target Group Proficiency: High School EOC Baseline Range 22.4 Range 6.6 White Black Hispanic Wake30.3 CMS29.5 Guilford28.2 Cumberland27.0 Durham25.2 Pender24.9 NHCS24.8 State24.5 Brunswick23.7 Cumberland42.1 NHCS41.9 Pender41.2 Wake40.8 Guilford37.0 Brunswick35.9 CMS35.8 State33.5 Durham30.2 CMS72.8 Wake72.4 Durham69.9 Guilford66.1 NHCS60.5 Pender56.9 State55.8 Cumberland52.7 Brunswick50.4 Range 11.9

Target Group Proficiency: High School EOC Baseline ED SWD Pender35.8 Brunswick34.2 NHCS33.9 Wake30.8 CMS30.2 Guilford29.2 State28.4 Cumberland27.6 Durham23.6 Range 12.2Range 12.9 Wake21.1 NHCS13.8 CMS12.8 State12.2 Pender10.8 Guilford10.7 Cumberland10.0 Durham8.8 Brunswick8.2

College and Career Readiness: ACT Percent of Juniors Meeting UNC Admission Requirements* *Composite Score 17

Additional College and Career Readiness Indicators Math Course Rigor * WorkKeys ^ Graduation Rate *Percent of student successfully completing Algebra II ^Percent of CTE Concentrators achieving silver, gold or platinum certificates Pender87.2 Guilford86.2 Brunswick85.7 State82.5 NHCS82.4 Cumberland81.7 CMS81.0 Wake81.0 Durham79.6 Wake79.6 CMS68.9 State67.3 Guilford60.1 Brunswick59.8 Durham59.4 Pender59.0 NHCS58.7 Cumberland58.6 NHCS95.6 State95.0 Pender95.0 Brunswick95.0 CMS95.0 Durham95.0 Cumberland95.0 Guilford95.0 Wake93.9

Career and Technical Education (CTE)  District Proficiency 82.2% Career Development, Business and IT, and Marketing programs showed continued improvement.  NHCS students earned 1427 credentials, indicating a growing number of workforce- ready students.

Graduation Rate SWD Brunswick92.2 Pender87.4 Guilford83.5 Cumberland80.0 Durham78.1 State77.5 CMS76.6 NHCS74.2 Wake68.9 Brunswick86.7 Cumberland84.6 Pender82.5 Guilford81.2 NHCS80.0 State75.3 CMS71.1 Durham66.8 Wake65.7 Hispanic Pender82.3 Guilford81.7 Brunswick79.1 Cumberland76.7 State76.1 CMS74.5 NHCS72.8 Durham72.6 Wake64.9 ED Guilford67.4 State62.3 Brunswick62.0 Pender64.3 Wake59.5 NHCS58.5 Cumberland54.6 Durham54.3 CMS53.5 Black

Graduation Rate: Target Groups *The American Indian group is significantly smaller than the other groups. In NHCS in 2013, ten out of fifteen American Indian students graduated. Student Group NHCS Percent Graduating in 2012 NHCS Percent Graduating in 2013 NHCS Change State Percent Graduating in NHCS v State All Students Male Female 85.0 No change American Indian * Asian 93.8> >5.1 Black Hispanic Two or More Races White Economically Disadvantaged 72.8 No change Limited English Proficient (LEP) Students With Disabilities (SWD)

School Growth Status ExceedsMet Not Met

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO)

ELA Proficiency, Math Proficiency, Participation in ELA, Participation in Math  American Indian  Asian  Black  Hispanic  Two or More  White  Attendance/Graduation Rate o Economically Disadvantaged o Limited English Proficient o Students with Disabilities o All Students

NHCS Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) Targets Met Student Group Not Met Grades 3-8 Reading/ELA19/20Black Grades 3-8 Math19/20Black Grade 10 Reading/ELA16/16N/A Grade 10 Math15/15N/A Attendance1/1N/A Graduation7/7N/A

READY Report Section II  Individual School Reports Individual School Reports

NC School Report Card (SRC) Dec Submit Welcome Letter Jan 2-13 Preview period for LEA and principals Jan SRC released for printing Jan 28 Public release Jan 30 Send SRC home with report cards

EVAAS Roster Verification Fall Semester

EOC Exam Score Delay  English II Delay Students may receive “Incomplete” grade on report card. This delay applies to both online and paper/pencil test versions  NC Final Exam (NCFE) Delay All NCFE students receive incompletes OR District applies local standards.

Grades 3-8 Proposed EOG Schedule