Potential of Public Health Systematic Reviews to Impact on Primary Research Professor Laurence Moore September 2007.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

"How's our impact?: Developing a survey toolkit to assess how health library services impact on patient care" Alison Weightman July 2008.

Advertisements

Mixed methods synthesis ESRC Methods Festival 2006 James Thomas Institute of Education, University of London.

When quality meets quantity: the role of qualitative data in framing health inequalities policy Chris Carmona, Catherine Swann and Mike Kelly National.

Introduction to the unit and mixed methods approaches to research Kerry Hood.

Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.

A MERICAN I NSTITUTES FOR R ESEARCH An Analysis of the Research and Impact of ICT in Education in Developing Country Contexts Nitika Tolani-Brown, PhD.

Protocol Development.

E.g Act as a positive role model for innovation Question the status quo Keep the focus of contribution on delivering and improving.

US Office of Education K

Measuring Value: Using Program Evaluation to Understand What’s Working -- Or Isn’t Juliana M. Blome, Ph.D. , MPH Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation.

Demonstration of sustained effective leadership in academic practice and academic development Evidence of impact on high quality student learning Draw.

Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.

Sharing research data: expectations of research funders Nature Publishing Group meeting 14 November 2014 Dave Carr Wellcome Trust

Mixed methods in health services research: Pitfalls and pragmatism Robyn McDermott Mixed Methods Seminar JCU October 2014.

Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 1: An Introduction to KT Lesson 1 - Knowledge Translation: The Basics.

Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.

Summarizing Community-Based Participatory Research: Background and Context for the Review Lucille Webb, MEd Eugenia Eng, DrPH Alice Ammerman, DrPH Meera.

Risk Management and Strategy Prioritisation Intelligence Step 8 - Risk Management and Strategy Prioritisaiton Considering the risks associated with action.

PPA 502 – Program Evaluation

Delegation and Supervision for Victorian Nurses and Midwives

Translating the Core Competencies for Public Health into Action September 23, 2009 “Relationship between the Core Competencies for Public Health and PHN.

From Evidence to EMS Practice: Building the National Model Eddy Lang, MD, CFPC (EM), CSPQ SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Montreal, Canada.

Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Their contribution to knowledge Morag Heirs. Research Fellow Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York PhD student (NIHR funded) Health.

Richard J.T. Klein Stockholm Environment Institute and Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Linköping University.

Whilst the pharmaceutical industry plays a key role in developing and producing medicines, there is a tension between industry’s need to expand product.

From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.

Moving from Development to Efficacy & Intervention Fidelity Topics National Center for Special Education Research Grantee Meeting: June 28, 2010.

Impact assessment framework

The impact of public involvement Sarah Buckland Director INVOLVE

1 Knowledge Transfer Experiences in Obstetrics: A Systematic Review of Evidence-based Strategies to effectively change behaviors Nils Chaillet, Ph.D :

How qualitative research contributes to evaluation Professor Alicia O’Cathain ScHARR University of Sheffield 22 June 2015.

Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.

1 Hsin Chu, August 2012 Regulatory Impact Assessment Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance, Paris

Accountability in Health Promotion: Sharing Lessons Learned Management and Program Services Directorate Population and Public Health Branch Health Canada.

Introduction to MAST Kristian Kidholm Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.

Randomized Clinical Trials: The Versatility and Malleability of the “Gold Standard” Wing Institute Jack States Ronnie Detrich Randy Keyworth “Get your.

Group Technical Assistance Webinar August 5, CFPHE RESEARCH METHODS FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.

Plymouth Health Community NICE Guidance Implementation Group Workshop Two: Debriding agents and specialist wound care clinics. Pressure ulcer risk assessment.

Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.

Maria E. Fernandez, Ph.D. Associate Professor Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences University of Texas, School of Public Health.

Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Helen Timperley, Aaron Wilson and Heather Barrar Learning Languages March 2008.

1 Cohesion Policy Evaluation Network Meeting: Brussels, September 2009 Ex post evaluation of Cohesion policy programmes co-financed.

Systematic Reviews Michael Chaiton Tobacco and Health: From Cells to Society September 24, 2014.

Question-led mixed methods research synthesis Centre launch 21 June 2005 David Gough and Sandy Oliver Institute of Education, University of London.

Government Social Research Unit Quality and purpose: issues and approaches Teresa Williams Head, Government Social Research Unit Research Methods Festival.

Adapting Guidelines for Local Implementation: Fusion Cuisine or Fast Food Leftovers Eddy Lang MDCM CCFP(EM) Head Department of Emergency Medicine Senior.

1 Assessing quality in systematic reviews of the effectiveness of health promotion and public health (HP/PH): Areas of consensus and dissension Dr Jonathan.

What evidence can help practice decisions about what works and what doesn’t? Elizabeth Waters Chair in Public Health School of Health and Social Development,

Workshop A. Development of complex interventions Rob Anderson, PCMD Nicky Britten, PCMD.

Research article structure: Where can reporting guidelines help? Iveta Simera The EQUATOR Network workshop 10 October 2012, Freiburg, Germany.

EVIDENCE BASED POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS – TAKE AWAY LESSONS ON HOW TO PROGRESS EFFECTIVE ALCOHOL EDUCATION BETSY THOM Drug and Alcohol Research Centre MIDDLESEX.

BEST PRACTICE PORTAL BEST PRACTICE PORTAL project presentation to the Scientific Committee Ferri et al Lisbon, 16th July 2010.

Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,

Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.

Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 27 Systematic Reviews of Research Evidence: Meta-Analysis, Metasynthesis,

Implementation Science: Finding Common Ground and Perspectives Laura Reichenbach, Evidence Project, Population Council International Conference on Family.

Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.

+ Culturally grounded evaluation & research. + Evaluation & research: the same or different? Evaluation and research are related but are not the same.

DATA COLLECTION METHODS IN NURSING RESEARCH

Module 2 The SDG Agenda: No-one left behind

Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.

Raising the bar Meeting Europe’s future challenges

The Use and Impact of FTA

Research design and techniques Workshop ICBEDC 2010

CEng progression through the IOM3

Presentation transcript:

Potential of Public Health Systematic Reviews to Impact on Primary Research Professor Laurence Moore September 2007

What role can systematic reviews play? Key source of evidence based information to »support and develop practice, »support professional development by helping to identify new and emerging developments and gaps in knowledge Systematic reviews provide a synthesis of robust studies which no policy maker or practitioner, however diligent, could possibly hope to read themselves

Value of systematic reviews Systematic reviews seek to extract information systematically from studies which meet inclusion criteria Recommendations for research and practice »Policy-research-policy, relevance and impact Intervention choice, research questions, implementation »Research Methods Research and evaluation design

HPPH Guidelines Advisory Group of users and researchers Policy relevant interventions Broad scope of study designs Quality assessment Theoretical framework Integrity of intervention Integrating qualitative and quantitative studies Heterogeneity Ethics, Equity and inequalities Sustainability Context Applicability

Guidelines and Primary Research Used to inform primary research design, implementation and evaluation Ensuring primary research meets requirements of systematic reviews »Quality »Rigour »Applicability and transferability »Equity

Complexity of interventions to change behaviour Effective interventions are likely to: »Be theoretically based »Involve complex interactions »Of sufficient intensity »Reinforced at multiple levels »Vary in effectiveness depending on context

Naïve interventions Not theoretically based Not fully developed Feasibility and acceptability untested Relatively easy to get funding to do trials of such interventions, rather than to obtain funding for pilot / feasibility / development studies of more sophisticated interventions

Evidence base conundrum Good quality RCTS successfully conducted, evaluating weak interventions. Small effect sizes. Good quality complex interventions evaluated using weak research designs. Biased effect estimates.

Complexity and research synthesis in public health / health promotion Complexity of behavioural change RCT design questioned Expert group / consensus statements High chance of dogma and received wisdom prevailing over data and evidence New methodological tools Mixed methods research designs Implementation and context What works »For whom, how, in what circumstances Carpe deum

Specific impacts on public health research (1) Improve study quality »Promote research rigour and stronger study design »Promote mixed methods Improve reporting of studies Enhance evidence base on equity »Reporting of SES sub-group analyses »Assess context-dependent heterogeneity »Assess implementation-dependent heterogeneity

Specific impacts on public health research (2) Visible source of expertise, advice, feasibility »Move away from the ‘black box’ Increase sophistication of research funders and consumers Heighten awareness among policy/practice of wider value of evaluations – not to judge but to learn

Conclusions Systematic reviews have an important role in informing and promoting high quality primary research Advancing SR methods for PH contributes to evidence base beyond the end product of a SR Contribution of PHRG to both reviews and primary research Bicycle lane analogy