Women of Color Faculty in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM): Experiences in Academia* AERA 2013 San Francisco, CA Sylvia Hurtado.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Do Female and Male Faculty Members Construct Job Satisfaction? Diana Bilimoria, Susan R. Perry, Xiangfen Liang, Patricia Higgins, Eleanor P. Stoller,
Advertisements

Academic Achievement among STEM Aspirants: Why do Black and Latino Students Earn Lower Grades than their White and Asian Counterparts? Jessica Sharkness,
College of Education Gender Equity Study Mitzi Schumacher, Chair Mindy Isaacs, Graduate Assistant President’s Commission on Women Subcommittee on Economic.
Expanding and Diversifying STEM Degree Recipients: What We Know From Students' Experiences NIH Interventions Meeting Sylvia Hurtado, UCLA Higher Education.
SEEKING SOLUTIONS Maximizing American Talent by Advancing Women of Color in Academia Summary of a Conference.
A Measure of Equity Caryn McTighe Musil The Association of American Colleges and Universities CCAS Conference – New Orleans Gender Issues Breakfast November.
LULAC’S 84 TH NATIONAL CONVENTION AND EXPOSITION STEM EDUCATION: CREATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUCCESS.
{ Driving Up or Dialing Down Competition in Introductory STEM Courses: Individual and Classroom Level Factors Bryce E. Hughes, Sylvia Hurtado, and M. Kevin.
NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity ADVANCE Faculty Work Life Survey: Comparison of Statistically Significant Gender Differences.
ADVANCE Implementation Mentors (AIM) Network Women of Color Survey and Interview Results Funding for this presentation was made possible through the National.
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
+ Association for Institutional Research May 2013 Long Beach, California Making It!... Or Not: Institutional Contexts & Biomedical Degree Attainment Tanya.
Reversing Underrepresentation: The Impact of Undergraduate Research Programs on Enrollment in STEM Graduate Programs Sylvia Hurtado, M. Kevin Eagan, Tanya.
Campus Climate for UNC Charlotte Faculty Findings from the 1998, 2001, & 2004 UCLA HERI Faculty Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of.
The Transition to College for Underrepresented Students: Results for Biomedical Aspirants and Racial/Ethnic Minority Students Symposia on Diversity in.
Where You Go, What You Do, What You Know? Understanding the Influences of Campus Experiences on the Academic Achievement and Self-Concept of Black Undergraduates.
WOMEN FACULTY AND THE SOCIAL–CULTURAL NEXUS IN HIGHER EDUCATION Karla A. Henderson, North Carolina State University To examine the social- cultural nexus.
Bryce E. Hughes, Juan C. Garibay, Sylvia Hurtado, & Kevin Eagan UCLA American Educational Research Association San Francisco, CA May 1,
+ Adjusting to the Graduate Environment: A Focus on URM Students in STEM Tanya Figueroa and Sylvia Hurtado UCLA Association for the Study of Higher Education.
Response Rates Overall response rate of 60.3% (N=1340) Women: 68.4% Higher response from female nonwhites 63 URM*, 326 majority, 10 missing data Men:
ADVANCE PAID Program Office of Academic Personnel Setting the UC Context for Issues of the Double Bind Yolanda Moses Associate Vice Chancellor for Diversity,
Attracting the Best and Brightest Minds to Science Geraldine Richmond University of Oregon.
Ethnicity and Gender in Academia Ann Q. Gates Associate Professor Computer Science The University of Texas at El Paso.
STEM Faculty from Underrepresented Groups at MSI and TWI Institutions: are their lives different? Muriel Poston, Ph.D. Dean of the Faculty and Professor,
ASHE Annual Conference November 17, 2011 Maintaining Career Aspirations in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics (STEM) among College Students.
Retention Survey Report Submitted March 22, 2004; corrections March 29, 2004 Presented to the Provost on May 28, 2004 Recruitment and Retention Subcommittee,
HERI FACULTY SURVEY Surveys mailed through campus mail to all Full-Time faculty during the Spring 2005 semester A follow-up second mailing for non- respondents.
Task Force Members Mickey Abel, College of Visual Arts & Design Christy Crutsinger, Provost Office, Chair Tracy Everbach, Frank W. and Sue Mayborn School.
Diversifying the Science & Engineering Workforce: Academic Employment Issues Portrait of an Intractable Problem Cathy A. Trower, Ph.D. January 15, 2005.
Return to Table of Contents Grand Valley State University HERI Faculty Survey 2014 Results Full-Time Undergraduate Teaching Faculty Grand Valley State.
Background: The status of women in academia Percent of faculty who are women decreases with  rank Few women in positions of leadership Little change in.
Task Force on Women Faculty Report for the Advisory Committee on Faculty Well-Being August 28, 2008.
What Matters in STEM: Institutional Contexts That Influence STEM Bachelor’s Degree Completion Rates Kevin Eagan Sylvia Hurtado Mitchell Chang Higher Education.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ARHU Report.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: A Quick Look at A Few Things that Matter to Faculty Presentation for NC State University Board of Trustees Academic Affairs.
Faculty Survey Highlights University Council Presentation Lynn McCloskey Edward S. Macias April 7, 2008.
Engaging Undergraduates in Science Research: Not Just about Faculty Willingness Kevin Eagan, Jessica Sharkness, Sylvia Hurtado, Mitchell Chang & Cynthia.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Some Select Findings for Vice Provosts to Pique Curiosity in What the Data Can Tell Us Presentation for Vice Provosts.
Outline Survey overview Instrument Construction Survey Logistics Response Rates Uses of Survey Data Communication with campus groups Program evaluation.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Reappointment, Promotion & Tenure & Post-Tenure Review Presentation for NC State Faculty Senate February 27, 2007 Nancy.
David Steer Department of Geology & Environmental Sciences University of Akron August 2007 Moving Forward: Your Own Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: BMGT Report.
Bias Tidbits Multidisciplinary Work A forthcoming paper in the American Journal of Evaluation by Irwin Feller discusses the issues, noting that in disciplines.
Copyright © 2012 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved
Contact Information: Authors:
Faculty Diversity & Work Life Survey Review
Part #3 Beyond Bias and Barriers
Damani White-Lewis, Tanya Figueroa, Sylvia Hurtado, Kevin Eagan
The Faculty We Want The Faculty We Need
IDEAL–N Kent State University
Hanivharot "The chosen”/team
How Do Female and Male Faculty Members Construct Job Satisfaction?
Black Women in the Academy
Trends & Pathways for STEM Major Aspirants:
IPEDS COMPARISON FALL 2010 – FALL 2014
K. El Hassan, PhD. Director OIRA
The 2015 COACHE Survey YORK COLLEGE Faculty Satisfaction
COACHE Survey Results Monday, February 5, 2018
MALE INITIATIVE COMMITTEE
Senate Ad hoc Committee for the Assessment of the Higher Education Research Institute (HERI) Faculty Survey Report on Findings Felicia Lassk, Associate.
Hartnell Climate Results
Preliminary Findings from the 2008 ISU Faculty Needs Assessment
Review Committee Training – BEST Practices
"Evaluating Students' Evaluations of Teaching: Bias and Beyond"
UNC Charlotte Score Card
College of Liberal Arts & Science Scorecard
College of Business Scorecard
College of Computing & Informatics Scorecard
College of Health & Human Services Scorecard
College of Education Scorecard
Presentation transcript:

Women of Color Faculty in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM): Experiences in Academia* AERA 2013 San Francisco, CA Sylvia Hurtado and Tanya Figueroa Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA * in press (proceedings of National Academy of Sciences: Prepared for Seeking Solutions: Maximizing American Talent by Advancing Women of Color in Academia). June 2012, Washington, DC.

A Word about Intersectionality Women of color face a “double bind” for having two identities that are especially undervalued in STEM contexts The intersection of both gender and race is reflected in women of color’s unique perceptions of the workplace in academia The purpose of this paper is to explore the experiences of underrepresented women of color in academia. We compare URM women with STEM colleagues in terms of sources of stress, workload demands, and satisfaction.

Data Source HERI Faculty Survey, administered triennially 2010 Individual institutional administration 2010 STEM Supplement-NSF sponsored 2007 98 Institutions added to augment sample Sample: 673 four-year colleges and universities 11, 039 STEM faculty (unweighted) 272 Women of Color in STEM 2013 Faculty Survey: www.heri.ucla.edu

Sample: Rank, Race and Gender in STEM Professor Associate Assistant Lecturer/ Instructor URM Women 272 (2.5%) 16.2% 24.6% 31.3% 23.5% Asian Women 258 (2.3%) 18.6% 29.5% 30.2% 15.1% White Women 3,857 (34.9%) 22.5% 28.8% 29.6% 14.4% URM Men 374 (3.4%) 28.6% 27.8% 21.9% 16.3% Asian Men 565 (5.1%) 30.8% 24.1% 6.5% White Men 5,713 (51.8%) 41.8% 26.3% 17.8% 8.6% Percentages by row may not add to 100% because we are missing rank data for those people.

Top 10 Sources of Stress Comparisons URM Females 86.4 Lack of personal time 82.4 Self-imposed high expectations 79.0 Managing household duties 69.9 Working w underprepared students 66.0 Institutional budget cuts 65.8 Personal finances 61.8 Research or publishing demands 61.0 Institutional 'red tape' 61.0 Teaching load 58.5 Students White Males Lower on: Lack of personal time Self-imposed high expectations Managing household duties Institutional ‘red tape’ (Higher) White Females Students (Higher) URM Males Managing household duties

Women of color are significantly more likely to report stress in the last two years related to subtle discrimination than either male or female faculty in STEM. Note Asian women are as likely to report this source of stress as URM women, there are no statistical differences between those groups. * Astroids on the bar signify that the mean for that group is stat different from URM females Note: Significant male/female differences within group** p=<.01; * < .05.

The average amount of stress faculty experience related to their career. Includes sources of stress: committee work, colleagues, students, research or publishing demands, institutional procedures/red tape, teaching load, lack of personal time, and self-imposed high expectations. URM women have among the highest reported levels of career-related stress, higher than white women at the associate level but lower than white women at the lower ranks.

Workloads for STEM Tenure Track Faculty (5+ hrs/wk on respective task) Advising Counseling Students White URM Asian Male 38.5* 42.7 43.2 Female 43.6 48.5 44.3 Committee Work or Meetings 36.1** 38.6 32.3** 43.8 40.8 Research and Scholarly Writing 59.8* 66.2** 73.3* 44.9 49.5 60.2 Note: Significant differences with URM females, **= p<.01; *=p<.05.

Work Environment White URM Asian Male 79.3** 77.0 83.3** Female 72.7 My Research is Valued by Faculty in My Department White URM Asian Male 79.3** 77.0 83.3** Female 72.7 69.7 77.6 I Have to Work Harder Than My Colleagues to be Perceived as a Legitimate Scholar 52.4** 60.1** 74 66.6* 79.1 80.9 Note: Significant comparisons with URM females; **=p <.01; *=p<.05.

Mean satisfaction with compensation is measured by responses to the following items: Salary, retirement benefits, opportunity for scholarly pursuits, teaching load, job security, and prospects for career advancement. While URM women are more satisfied than Asian Females or URM males at the assistant professor level, this pattern quickly changes once one is tenured. URM female professors are least satisfied.

Conclusion and Implications URM women share many of the same experiences as other women in STEM but also have unique sources of stress, as well as lower satisfaction and respect. Salary equity studies, professional development support & dept. support for advancement. Assessment challenge: Severe underrepresentation makes the data difficult to collect because of their vulnerablity/identification. How to use information to change dept. climate, navigating political issues.