THE YAZOO DARTER : DISCUSSIONS AND STRATEGIES FOR HEALTHY POPULATIONS STREAM ECOLOGY LAB, OXFORD, MS., SEPTEMBER 11- 12, 2012 Daniel J. Drennen Mississippi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Advertisements

Little Canyon Creek Subwatershed Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project Sponsored by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Planning for fish bearing waters between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead.
Range-wide Conservation Strategy for the Gopher Tortoise (DRAFT)
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Management Plans Wildlife Conservation Wildlife Conservation.
Strengthening the Gopher Tortoise CCA Matt Hinderliter U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service June 21, 2012.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Endangered Species Act
NOAA’s Protected Resources Recovery Program Donna Wieting Director Office of Protected Resources MAFAC September 24, 2014 Silver Spring, MD.
Careers for Graduates of OSU ’ s Natural Resource Ecology and Management Department.
Preventing Endangered Species Listings with the Tongass Conservation Strategy Steve Brockmann U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Indian Valley Meadow Restoration acre meadow located atop the Sierra Crest in Alpine County, CA. Headwaters of the Mokelumne River. Source for agricultural,
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Slide 1 Our Mission: “Working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for.
404 Species Mega-petitioned from Center of Biological Diversity: Where are we now? Presented by: Channing St. Aubin US Fish and Wildlife Service Panama.
Kyle Abraham Effectiveness Monitoring Coordinator Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
Trista Dillon THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (1973, 1982, 1985, 1988)
Clackamas River Basin Council Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan Implementer’s Perspective August 19, 2013.
Molalla River Knotweed Mapping, Outreach and Control Program Clackamas Soil & Water Conservation District.
The Endangered Species Act: Species Listings and Implications for Development in Alaska Presented by: Cherise Oram Stoel Rives LLP.
The History of Wildlife
PROJECT DATE April 18, 2011 Sue Ireland Kootenai Tribe of Idaho Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative and KVRI Burbot Subcommittee Kootenai River Burbot.
Chumstick Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land development, road construction, and other human activities have affected channel migration and sediment.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
How healthy is your watershed? Indicators and Performance Measures for the North Bay Kat Ridolfi San Francisco Estuary Institute North Bay Watershed Council.
Species Listing and Critical Habitat Regulations Endangered Species Act.
Economic and Environmental Sustainability: Working with New Partners and Incentives Frank Casey, Ph.D Conservation Economics Program Defenders of Wildlife.
Conservation of Lake Sammamish Kokanee A Briefing for the City of Bellevue Planning Commission David St. John – Lake Sammamish Kokanee Work Group
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
By: Helena Brantz Period 2 APES-Rall.  Draft Years: 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988  National Scope: First signed by Nixon in As of November 2011, there.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 By Tristan Armstrong.
US Environmental Policy Introduction
Phase 3 Environmental Documentation Process SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST AND GIANT SEQUOIA NATIONAL MONUMENT.
Endangered Species Act of 1973, 1982, 1985, and 1988 By: Nicole Wypychowski Period 6 President Nixon signed the bill December 28, 1973 ESA is administered.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988
Photo by Mike Danzenbaker.  Proposed rules to add Gunnison sage-grouse to the list of threatened and endangered species and designate critical habitat.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
Providing Threatened and Endangered Species Assurances For Prescribed Burning Projects.
Wildlife Protection Adapting to Change NASF Annual Meeting Lake Tahoe, California September 16, 2015 Lisa Allen Missouri State Forester.
More People Working for More Fish Overview of the National Fish Habitat Action Plan.
Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview MARY ANDREWS NOAA JULIE DEVERS USFWS ERIK MARTIN THE NATURE CONSERVANCY CHESAPEAKE BAY FISH PASSAGE.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans021-1 Unit 21 Endangered Species Endangered Species Act of 1973.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Oregon Chub (oregonichthys crameri) Critical Habitat Designation Chris Cusack Judith Dempsey Biao Huang Tae-Young Kim Caiwen Wu.
Regional Peer Learning Workshop: Accelerated Landscape Restoration Siuslaw Stewardship Model and Collaborative Engagement.
Goals, Priorities, & Outcomes Fostering Participation in the Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture.
Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.
Overview & Implementation January 30, Large geographic area (22,360 square miles primarily in VA, NC, and TN)
Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26, 2016 James Capurso, PhD Regional Fisheries Biologist Pacific Northwest Region USDA Forest Service.
Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
Willamette River Initiative Willamette and tributary restoration through large-scale floodplain forest re-vegetation and in-stream habitat improvement.
The Oregon Watershed Council Model, USA
Critical Linkages: Identifying Culvert Replacement Priorities to Maintain Connectivity of Cold Water Streams in the Face of Climate Change Scott Jackson,
THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
MRBI WREP OCTOBER 2014 Summary.
A Community-Based Approach to
One Perspective on an effort to improve the implementation of the Endangered Species Act David Bernhardt.
The Endangered Species Act
The Endangered Species Act
The Endangered Species Act 1973 ,1982,1985,1988
Endangered Species Act of 1973
funding opportunities for environment and nature conservation
Oregon’s Investment in a Water Future
Native Fish Conservation Areas Partnership Proposal
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
Presentation transcript:

THE YAZOO DARTER : DISCUSSIONS AND STRATEGIES FOR HEALTHY POPULATIONS STREAM ECOLOGY LAB, OXFORD, MS., SEPTEMBER , 2012 Daniel J. Drennen Mississippi Field Office WELCOME!

Little conservation measures exists for the protection and enhancement of the Yazoo Darter within the species range. There is basic natural history information available but little is applied to the field for management besides typical BMP’s. Some successful projects regarding soil conservation in the watershed have occurred such as erosion control. Efforts of agencies and stakeholders working as a unified coalition are essential in preventing conservation issues and problems in the future. JUSTIFICATION OF ACTION

THE USFWS IS PROPOSING : -To identify landowners and partners within the range of the Yazoo Darter - The formation of a Yazoo Darter Enhancement Group that begins dialogs that includes stakeholders, landowners, agencies, governments, academia and interested individuals, to share information, conservation practices, landowner enhancements and other factors to promote and encourage the conservation of the Yazoo Darter and its’ habitat along with landowner priorities. By the following initial steps:

1)agencies meetings (Federal, State, NGO, Academia, others) 2)identification of stakeholders/ landowners; 3)landowner meeting/field days and outreach in the watersheds 4)identification and implementation of a model short term project(s) and research needs 5)public outreach, networking and publicity of projects

6) long term partners projects and other projects to insure the recovery/stability of the species and the utilization of the watershed for economic processes by the landowners along with outreach 7) continuing monitoring and evaluating the watersheds along with the recovery/stability of the species by acquiring funding sources, new partners, sustaining current partners and monitoring results

Tentative Time Frame 1 ) Spring/Fall 2013; agency meetings; 2) Fall 2013-Winter 2014; identification of landowners, stakeholders, academia and projects; 3) Winter 2014; Landowner meeting and watershed field day; 4) Spring 2013/Winter 2015; Proposal for funding of projects (ongoing) 5) Spring/Summer 2015; implementation of project(s) and initiation of other projects. Evaluation. 6) Fall onward; continuation of projects, project proposals, evaluation, etc.

IMPERILLED FRESHWATER FISH

PROJECTS MAY INCLUDE MAKING SURE THE HABITAT IS CONNECTED: CONTINUED MAPPING AND EVALUATION OF ROAD CROSSINGS

POSSIBLY FISH PASSAGE PROJECTS FOR THE YAZOO DARTER AND OTHER SPECIES Not a Yazoo Darter!!

BASIC BMP’S FOR EROSION CONTROL!!

PARTNERS PROJECTS WITH LANDOWNERS AND OTHERS

Borrowed from: STREAM TEMPERATURE RELATIONSHIPS TO FISH AND CRAYFISH DISTRIBUTIONS IN NORTH MISSISSIPPI: Adams and Warren, /srs php Natural History Information about the Yazoo Darter and Habitat (Little Tallahatchie River watershed)

WE WOULD LIKE TO PREVENT THIS! ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: FIVE FACTORS Sec. 4.(a) General- …determine if any species is endangered or threatened because of: A)The present or threatened destruction, modification or curtailment of its habitat or range; B)Over utilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; C)Disease or predation; D)The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; E)Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence.