Difficult Concepts in Science and Engineering: Identifying, Assessing, and Helping Students Learn Them Ruth Streveler (CSM), Mary Nelson (CU-Boulder),

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Professional Development Supporting Teachers in Developing Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) Abstract Research is needed to identify and.
Economic Education and How People Learn Scott Simkins, Interim Director Academy for Teaching and Learning (ATL) North Carolina A&T State University Acknowledgements:
2 It is assessment that occurs regularly It informs both students and teachers about their progress and where they need to grow It should be used to.
DATA TRACKING AND EVALUATION 1. Goal of the STEP program: To increase the number of STEM graduates within the five-year period of the grant. You have.
Assessing student learning. Diagnostic - The gathering of information at the outset of a course or program of study to provide information for both the.
Holyoke Public Schools Professional Development By, Judy Taylor
Understanding the Research Base Presentation to CSSS October 1, 2011.
INTERACTIVE LEARNING IN THE LECTURE-CLASS SETTING Alan Slavin Department of Physics and Jonathan Swallow (deceased) Instructional Development Centre TRENT.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
Teaching Science with Case Studies: A National Survey of Faculty Perceptions Mary Lundeberg Professor, Teacher Education Michigan State University Aman.
Lesson Planning Educ 3100.
Unit 3 Engaging the Three Components of Rigor Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
Lessons from America A success story in high school physics education. Presented by Barbara McKinnon, JMSS.
Modeling Instruction Lessons from America. Mechanics Modeling Workshop 90 hours of professional development consisting of intensive immersion in the mechanics.
Classroom Test and Assessment
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Ideas for Educational Components of CAREER Proposals Jeffrey Froyd Director of Faculty and Organizational Development Office.
Subject Matter Expert/Author: Assoc. Prof. Dr Rashid Johar (OUM) Faculty of Science and Foundation Studies Copyright © ODL Jan 2005 Open University Malaysia.
Welcome! Sign in at front table Find a spot Grab a snack (we will have more substantial snacks later ) Self assess on the Sticky Dot Poster at back of.
1 / 27 California Educational Research Association 88 th Annual Conference Formative Assessment: Implications for Student Learning San Francisco, CA November.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
Karen Parks, Haibei Zhang, Huong Hoang -Fall EPSY 335 Learning Theories.
Project Evaluation Don Millard John Yu March 27, 2012 Guy-Alain Amoussou Lou Everett
Understanding of the fundamentals ◦ By the end of the class, 70% of the students will be able to:  Correctly draw freebody diagrams of 2D truss structures.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
A Hands-on Approach to Teaching Electricity and Conductivity in 8th Grade Science Introduction The Tennessee 8th grade science curriculum contains several.
TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
Learning Progressions: A Discussion Ravit Golan Duncan Rutgers University Ravit Golan Duncan Rutgers University.
1 Diagnostic Measurement and Reporting on Concept Inventories Lou DiBello and Jim Pellegrino DRK-12 PI Meeting Washington, DC December 3, 2010.
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
What is the TPA? Teacher candidates must show through a work sample that they have the knowledge, skills, and abilities required of a beginning teacher.
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series A Framework for Formative Assessment November 15, 2011 Dr. Dorothea Shannon Dr. Greg Wheeler.
Inquiry and the IB. Stuents do not learn by doing. on what they have done. Rather, they learn by and.
Presented by Ava D. Rosales, PhD Instructional Supervisor Miami-Dade County Public Schools Division of Mathematics, Science and Advanced Academic Programs.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
David Pundak, Shmaryahu Rozner Ort Braude Engineering College & Kinneret College Israel Advanced Technologies in Education Ellinogermaniki Agogi Greece,
Classroom Diagnostic Tools. Pre-Formative Assessment of Current CDT Knowledge.
Constructing Ideas in Physical Science Joan Abdallah, AAAS Darcy Hampton, DCPS Davina Pruitt-Mentle, University of Maryland CIPS Workshop for Middle School.
Teaching Improvement Program Labs, Students, and Teaching – Oh My! January 17, 2008.
York Public Schools Curriculum Design December 1, 2010 Toby Boss ESU 6.
SHOW US YOUR RUBRICS A FACULTY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP SERIES Material for this workshop comes from the Schreyer Institute for Innovation in Learning.
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
Adding Quantitative Reasoning to Your Course Some Ideas and Places to Begin.
ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT Kansas State Department of Education Introduction and Overview Welcome !
Diagnostic Testing David E. Meltzer University of Washington.
PLC Team Leader Meeting
Assessment Power! Pamela Cantrell, Ph.D. Director, Raggio Research Center for STEM Education College of Education University of Nevada, Reno.
Instructional Leadership Supporting High Standards.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Part 2 Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-Based Reading Instruction K-5 Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform H325A
MSP Program Evaluation Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. TRC Project Director Meetings 1/27/09 and 2/5/09 Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. TRC Project Director Meetings.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Part 1 Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
BIOLOGY CONCEPT INVENTORIES: Development and Use.
Comparison of Student Learning in Challenge-based and Traditional Instruction in Biomedical Engineering Others: Taylor Martin, Stephanie D. Rivale, and.
Supervision Workshop for Multiple Subject Student Teachers and Interns.
Language Testing How to make multiple choice test.
Diagnoser.com: Online learning & assessment tools for Physics
Cohort Curriculum Spring 2010 ESU 6. Goals Participants will develop curriculum products. Participants will design collaboration networks.
The Relationship Between Conceptual Learning and Teacher Self-Reflection Kathleen Falconer Dept of Elementary Education and Reading, SUNY- Buffalo State.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Ronica Pardesi 30/09/08 DEVELOPING ESSENTIAL NUMERACY SKILLS IN THE FOUNDATION PHASE MISCONCEPTIONS AND THE METHODS OF REMEDIATION.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
1 Using team based learning (TBL) to maximise the effectiveness of flipped learning School of Law Zoe Swan Sally Gill Kristian P Humble.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Research on Geoscience Learning
Strategies for Managing Effective Pre K Small-Group
Presentation transcript:

Difficult Concepts in Science and Engineering: Identifying, Assessing, and Helping Students Learn Them Ruth Streveler (CSM), Mary Nelson (CU-Boulder), Barbara Olds (CSM), Ron Miller (CSM)

Workshop Overview äWhat science and engineering concepts seem to be most difficult for students to learn? äWhy some concepts are so difficult to learn äSome ways to measure students’ misunderstanding of these concepts. äSome ideas for designing instruction to make these concepts easier to learn

What science and engineering concepts are most difficult? äParticipant introductions –Participants team with those in related fields äExercise –What concepts do the students you are most difficult to learn? Individually write down answers (2 minutes)Individually write down answers (2 minutes) Share with your team (6 minutes)Share with your team (6 minutes) –Report back to the whole group

Why are these concepts difficult?

From the Video... “Sometimes the simplest problems in science defy intuition and the most basic technology is surprisingly difficult to grasp. Is it because we weren’t taught? Or is it because of something deeper? Something about the way we think?”

Video Exercise äWhy are some concepts in science and engineering so difficult to learn? Is it because students weren’t taught? Or is it something about the way students think? –Individually write down ideas (2 mins) –Share with your group (6 mins)

What is a Misconception? äIn terms of a constructivist view of learning and knowledge, students create mental models describing their view of the world äModels which inaccurately describe phenomena are termed misconceptions or alternate conceptions

Misconceptions and Prior Knowledge äStudents come to your classes with at least partially developed mental models which we may term prior knowledge äPrior knowledge is often formed using everyday experience and may involve significant, robust misconceptions

How can misconceptions be identified? äResearch methods –interviews –“think aloud” problem-solving –verbal protocol analysis äConcept inventories –multiple choice instruments with conceptual questions (answer list includes common misconceptions as distractors)

A Concept Inventory Exercise äIndividually, complete the 4 question concept inventory (2 minutes) äYour team compare answers; develop a consensus answer for each question (5 minutes) äBe prepared to report to the full group

Concept Inventories Promote Learning äUnderstanding misconceptions is an essential component of pedagogy äIgnoring micro-level misconceptions and focusing only at the macro-level prevents deep understanding äMicro-level understanding promotes learning transfer Shulman, 1986

Expert Blind Spot (EBS) äEBS is the “inability to perceive the difficulties that novices will experience as they approach a new domain of knowledge that arises as a consequence of well- developed subject matter knowledge.” Nathan, Koedinger and Alibali, 2001 äConcept inventories are designed to identify those micro-level difficulties that teachers sometimes overlook because of EBS.

Importance of Identifying Misconceptions äStudents will cling to misconceptions unless these fallacies are addressed äIf teachers merely “tell” students the correct answer without addressing the misconception, students will cling to their initial (mis)understanding

Importance of Identifying Misconceptions äConcept inventories can be effectively used to inform teaching strategies äConcept inventories help teachers to focus on the benefits of formative assessment rather than just summative

Some Guidelines for Repairing Misconceptions äThink about the conceptual knowledge you want students to acquire äUse methods to uncover student pre- or misconceptions of these concepts äAllow students to “experiment” with the concepts äHelp students construct a new conceptual framework for understanding these concepts äFind ways to gather feedback about students’ understanding

Helping students construct a new conceptual framework äExample from Chemistry –Mole seen as “mass” not “amount of molecules” äOther examples

Misconception Activity äList as many misconceptions in your discipline as you can think of (3 min.) äShare your list with your team and select one important misconception (5 min.) äDiscuss how you might identify the misconception and how you might design a course unit to repair it (10 min.)

Our Current Projects äDeveloping an Outcomes Assessment Instrument for Identifying Engineering Student Misconceptions in Thermal and Transport Sciences (NSF DUE ) äCenter for the Advancement of Engineering Education (NSF ESI )

Project Goal “To develop an easy-to-use outcomes assessment tool (concept inventory) that will allow engineering faculty at the course and program levels to identify fundamental student misconceptions in thermal and transport science courses.”

Project Objectives äDevelop lists of significant student misconceptions in: –Fluid mechanics, heat transfer, and thermodynamics –Solid mechanics –Electrical engineering äCreate multiple-choice instruments patterned after the Force Concept Inventory äField test the instruments to demonstrate validity and reliability

Our Progress to Date äDelphi survey –Methodology Generative roundGenerative round Three iterations to rate itemsThree iterations to rate items –Preliminary results See handoutSee handout

For more information äCheck the CSM Center for Engineering Education website: mines.edu/research/cee/ Check CAEE web site