Chapter 2 Modeling the Process and Life Cycle Shari L. Pfleeger

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unified process(UP) UP is an OO system development methodology offered by Rational(Rational Rose) s/w, now a part of IBM Developed by Booach,Rambaugh,Jacobson--
Advertisements

Agile Software Development کاری از : مهدی هوشان استاد راهنما : استاد آدابی.
AGILE DEVELOPMENT Outlines : Quick Look of agile development Agility
The System and Software Development Process Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
ISBN Prentice-Hall, 2006 Chapter 2 Modeling the Process and Life Cycle Copyright 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Software Development Life-Cycle Models
Software Life Cycle Requirements analysis System design Program design Program implementation (coding) Unit testing Integration testing System testing.
PROC-1 3. Software Process. PROC-2 What’s a process? Set of activities in creating software It involves creativity –hard to automate –Requires human judgment.
©Ian Sommerville 2006Software Engineering, 8th edition. Chapter 4 Slide 1 Software Processes.
Chapter 2 Modeling the Process and Life Cycle Shari L. Pfleeger
CSE 470 : Software Engineering The Software Process.
Modeling the Process and Life Cycle CSCI 411 Advanced Database and Project Management Monday, February 2, 2015.
Chapter 2 Modeling the Process and Life Cycle Shari L. Pfleeger Joanne M. Atlee 4th Edition.
SEP1 - 1 Introduction to Software Engineering Processes SWENET SEP1 Module Developed with support from the National Science Foundation.
Alternate Software Development Methodologies
Agile Process Models. Prescriptive models don’t work It is unrealistic to not have changes. Why? The Agile Manifesto: Individuals and interactions over.
Chapter 2 Modeling the Process and Life Cycle Shari L. Pfleeger
CH02: Modeling the process and life cycle Process of developing software (organization and discipline in the activities) contribute to the quality of the.
Software Life Cycles ECE 417/617: Elements of Software Engineering
Agile
 The Rise of Computer Science ◦ Machine Language (1 st Gen) ◦ Assembly Language (2 nd Gen) ◦ Third Generation Languages (FORTRAN, BASIC, Java, C++, etc.)
Computer Engineering 203 R Smith Agile Development 1/ Agile Methods What are Agile Methods? – Extreme Programming is the best known example – SCRUM.
Lecturer: Dr. AJ Bieszczad Chapter 22-1 Process includes: all major process activities resources used, subject to set of constraints (such as schedule)
Agile Process: Overview n Agile software engineering represents a reasonable compromise to conventional software engineering for certain classes of software.
An Agile View of Process
Software engineering Process models Pavel Agejkin.
An Overview of Agile L e a d i n g C h a n g e T h r o u g h C o l l a b o r a t i o n.
1 These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 5/e and are provided with permission by.
Modelling the Process and Life Cycle
Agile Software Development What is Agile? And How are we implementing Agile?
Chapter 3 – Agile Software Development 1Chapter 3 Agile software development.
Chapter 3 – Agile Software Development Lecture 1 1Chapter 3 Agile software development.
Chapter 4 Agile Development
Chapter 5 Software Process Models. Problems with “Traditional” Processes 1.Focused on and oriented towards “large projects” and lengthy development time.
Current Trends in Systems Develpment
1 Chapter 2 The Process. 2 Process  What is it?  Who does it?  Why is it important?  What are the steps?  What is the work product?  How to ensure.
Software Engineering Environment  A quality focus: constant incremental improvement  Process: framework to organize development activities  Methods:
1 Software Process Models-ii Presented By; Mehwish Shafiq.
Chapter 2 Modeling the Process and Life Cycle Shari L. Pfleeger Joanne M. Atlee 4 th Edition.
Chapter 2 Modelling the Process and Life Cycle. Pfleeger and Atlee, Software Engineering: Theory and PracticeChapter 2.2 Contents 2.1 The Meaning of Process.
Extreme Programming (XP). Agile Software Development Paradigm Values individuals and interactions over processes and tools. Values working software over.
Chapter 2 Iterative, Evolutionary, and Agile You should use iterative development only on projects that you want to succeed. - Martin Fowler 1CS
Chapter 3 Agile Software Development (1/2) Yonsei University 2 nd Semester, 2015 Sanghyun Park.
K.Ingram 1 Sept 2007 Agile Software Development. K.Ingram 2 Sept 2007 Contents Agile Software Development: 1.What is it? 2.Agile’s Values, Principles,
CS3100 Software Project Management Agile Approaches.
The System and Software Development Process Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
Requirements Engineering Requirements Engineering in Agile Methods Lecture-28.
Agile Methods Presentation By: Jason Abbett. Definition A process to rapidly develop software Many kinds of agile methods but few are practiced.
Agile. Processes Waterfall Traditional With prototyping Sprial Agile Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM) Scrum Crystal eXtreme Programming (XP)
Modelling the Process and Life Cycle. The Meaning of Process A process: a series of steps involving activities, constrains, and resources that produce.
SOFTWARE PROCESS MODELING Benjamin Dixon U
It’s Agile …. like! A Corkman’s introduction to Agile software delivery.
Chapter 2 Software Development Model and 1. Topics covered Software process models Process iteration Process activities The Rational Unified Process Computer-aided.
Copyright 2015, Robert W. Hasker. Classic Model Gathering Requirements Specification Scenarios Sequences Design Architecture Class, state models Implementation.
Extreme Programming מתודולוגיה לפיתוח פרויקטי תוכנה.
Project Management Software development models & methodologies
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 17 Slide 1 Rapid software development.
Embedded Systems Software Training Center
Software & Software Engineering Pertemuan-4 Dosen :Kundang K Juman
Waterfall and Agile Quality Techniques
Introduction to Software Engineering
Chapter 2 Modeling the Process and Life Cycle Shari L. Pfleeger Joanne M. Atlee 4th Edition.
Agile Process: Overview
Chapter 2 Modeling the Process and Life Cycle Shari L. Pfleeger
Copyright 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Project Lifecycle and IT Product Life Cycle
Chapter 2 Modeling the Process and Life Cycle Shari L. Pfleeger
Chapter 2 Software Processes
Chapter 5: New and Emerging Process Methodologies
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 2 Modeling the Process and Life Cycle Shari L. Pfleeger Joanne M. Atlee 4th Edition

2.1 The Meaning of Process A process: a series of steps involving activities, constrains, and resources that produce an intended ouput of some kind A process involves a set of tools and techniques

2.1 The Meaning of Process Process Characteristics Prescribes all major process activities Uses resources, subject to set of constraints (such as schedule) Produces intermediate and final products May be composed of subprocesses with hierarchy or links Each process activity has entry and exit criteria Activities are organized in sequence, so timing is clear Each process guiding principles, including goals of each activity Constraints may apply to an activity, resource or product

2.2 Software Process Models Software Life Cycle When a process involves building a software, the process may be referred to as software life cycle Requirements analysis and definition System (architecture) design Program (detailed/procedural) design Writing programs (coding/implementation) Testing: unit, integration, system System delivery (deployment) Maintenance

2.2 Software Process Models Software Development Process Models Waterfall model V model Prototyping model Operational specification Transformational model Phased development: increments and iteration Spiral model Agile methods

2.2 Software Process Models Waterfall Model One of the first process development models proposed Works for well understood problems with minimal or no changes in the requirements Simple and easy to explain to customers It presents a very high-level view of the development process sequence of process activities Each major phase is marked by milestones and deliverables (artifacts)

2.2 Software Process Models Waterfall Model (continued)

2.2 Software Process Models Waterfall Model (continued) There is no iteration in waterfall model Most software developments apply a great many iterations

2. 2 Software Process Models Sidebar 2 2.2 Software Process Models Sidebar 2.1 Drawbacks of The Waterfall Model Provides no guidance how to handle changes to products and activities during development (assumes requirements can be frozen) Views software development as manufacturing process rather than as creative process There is no iterative activities that lead to creating a final product Long wait before a final product

2.2 Software Process Models Waterfall Model with Prototype A prototype is a partially developed product Prototyping helps developers assess alternative design strategies (design prototype) users understand what the system will be like (user interface prototype) Protopyping is useful for verification and validation

2.2 Software Process Models Waterfall Model with Prototype Waterfall model with prototyping

2.2 Software Process Models Prototyping Model Allows repeated investigation of the requirements or design Reduces risk and uncertainty in the development

2.2 Software Process Models Phased Development: Increments and Iterations Shorter cycle time System delivered in pieces enables customers to have some functionality while the rest is being developed Allows two systems functioning in parallel the production system (release n): currently being used the development system (release n+1): the next version

2.2 Software Process Models Phased Development: Increments and Iterations

2.2 Software Process Models Phased Development: Increments and Iterations Phased development is desirable for several reasons Training can begin early, even though some functions are missing Markets can be created early for functionality that has never before been offered Frequent releases allow developers to fix unanticipated problems globaly and quickly The development team can focus on different areas of expertise with different releases

2.2 Software Process Models Agile Methods Emphasis on flexibility in producing software quickly and capably Agile manifesto Value individuals and interactions over process and tools Prefer to invest time in producing working software rather than in producing comprehensive documentation Focus on customer collaboration rather than contract negotiation Concentrate on responding to change rather than on creating a plan and then following it

2.2 Software Process Models Agile Methods: Examples of Agile Process Extreme programming (XP) Crystal: a collection of approaches based on the notion that every project needs a unique set of policies and conventions Scrum: 30-day iterations; multiple self- organizing teams; daily “scrum” coordination Adaptive software development (ASD)

2.2 Software Process Models Agile Methods: Extreme Programming Emphasis on four charateristics of agility Communication: continual interchange between customers and developers Simplicity: select the simplest design or implementation Courage: commitment to delivering functionality early and often Feedback: loops built into the various activitites during the development process

2.2 Software Process Models Agile Methods: Twelve Facets of XP The planning game (customer defines value) Small release Metaphor (common vision, common names) Simple design Writing tests first Refactoring Pair programming Collective ownership Continuous integration (small increments) Sustainable pace (40 hours/week) On-site customer Coding standard

2.2 Software Process Models Sidebar 2.2 When Extreme is Too Extreme? Extreme programming's practices are interdependent A vulnerability if one of them is modified Requirements expressed as a set of test cases must be passed by the software System passes the tests but is not what the customer is paying for Refactoring issue Difficult to rework a system without degrading its architecture