SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Gregory Martin U.S. Department of Education Session FF-09.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
§§668.16(e), (f) and  The institution must establish a reasonable SAP policy  WHAT MUST A RESONABLE POLICY CONTAIN? ◦ The policy must.
Advertisements

Satisfactory Academic Progress: Does your Policy make the Grade? Presented by David Bartnicki Federal Training Officer
Featuring Elena Olivier & Yolanda Cleveland. SSatisfactory Academic Progress SSchool must have a published policy for monitoring a student’s progress.
Gisella Baker Director of Financial Aid Hawkeye Community College The following is a presentation prepared for IASFAA’s 2014 Conference in Davenport, November.
S ATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Sandy Neel SASFAA Past President Bellarmine University.
S ATISFACTORY A CADEMIC P ROGRESS FASFAA Region V Spring Workshop April 1, 2011 Nova Southeastern University Presented by Anh Do, St. Thomas University.
Satisfactory Academic Progress. Title IV Requirements Same or more strict than the college’s standards for a student enrolled in the same educational.
Satisfactory Academic Progress 2012 All Directors Training Tim Bonnel Chancellor’s Office.
OCTOBER 18, 2011 Satisfactory Academic Progress. New SAP Policy Elements 1 st SAP evaluation after 7/1/11 must meet new rules (excluding summer term)
MASFAA Conference November 7, Satisfactory Academic Progress2 Authority Provisions of New SAP Regulations School Requirements Definitions, Terms.
The Office of Financial Aid McAllen Phone Number: Website:
Satisfactory Academic Progress Marilyn Baker Angela Karlin.
Jamie A. Malone | Nov U.S. Department of Education 2012 Fall Conference Foreign Schools Satisfactory Academic Progress Session 38.
Satisfactory Academic Progress
With CONSUELA MITCHELL YOLANDA CLEVELAND. Satisfactory Academic Progress School must have a published policy for monitoring a student’s progress Standards.
Satisfactory Academic Progress –Managing the Components Qualitative (grade-based) and Quantitative (time-based) measures.
SAP SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS PASFAA CONFERENCE OCTOBER, LANCASTER, PA.
The following is a presentation prepared for the 2005 FALL MASFAP CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 6-8.
Basics of Satisfactory Academic Progress
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Annmarie Weisman U.S. Department of Education PASFAA Conference – Oct Pittsburgh, PA a.
SAP Satisfactory Academic Progress Schools must have a published policy for monitoring a student’s progress Standards include  Qualitative  Quantitative.
Satisfactory Academic Progress Standards Claire “Micki” Roemer School Services and Training Federal Student Aid Dan Klock Federal Student Aid.
Vera Senese, Compliance Officer, City University of New York Gail Baksh-Jarrett, Senior Director of Enrollment and Student Financial Services, LaGuardia.
Hosted by Yolanda Cleveland. Satisfactory Academic Progress School must have a published policy for monitoring a student’s progress Standards include.
The following is a presentation prepared for:. Slide 2 © NASFAA 2012 David Tolman Training Specialist Division of Training & Regulatory Assistance, NASFAA.
MASFAA 2013 October 6 th – 9 th, 2013 Indianapolis, Indiana Satisfactory Academic Progress Tara Piantanida-Kelly, USA Funds.
New Aid Officer Training Satisfactory Academic Progress Alicia Scott Atlanta Metropolitan College.
A Workshop on Satisfactory Academic Progress FYA101 Fall 2012.
SAP Components 3 Components to SAP  Minimum Grade Point Average  Undergraduate Students: 2.0  Graduate Students: 3.0  Completion Rate  Each student.
Satisfactory Academic Progress MASFAA October 17, 2006 Patsy Myers Emery Director, Financial Aid Operations Office of Financial Aid Northwestern University.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Program Integrity Final Rule.
PASFAA Conference, Harrisburg PA Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Annmarie Weisman |
SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS (SAP). Defining SAP SAP stands for Satisfactory Academic Progress For a student to be eligible for Federal Student Aid,
The New & Improved SAP Rules Rick Shipman Director of Financial Aid Michigan State University October, 2011 Grand Rapids, Michigan.
44 th NYSFAAA Conference “On Track for Excellence” Satisfactory Academic Progress Thomas J. Dalton, Excelsior College & Curt Gaume, Canisius College.
What You Should Know About Financial Aid and TOPS
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) U.S. Department of Education NJASFAA 2011 Sandy Santana a.
RMASFAA 2012 SAP. SAP – a new beginning? (RMASFAA 2012) So, it’s been a year: what have you learned? Takeaways? Full Implementation?
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Eastern Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Annmarie Weisman U.S. Department of Education May 2012.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Annmarie Weisman U.S. Department of Education WVASFAA Conference Morgantown, WV April 2011.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) 1. What we will cover… 2 Changes in Federal Regulations SAP Policy Requirements Maximum Credits/Timeframe SAP Reviews.
Session Then: Standing in line at the bank.
Satisfactory Academic Progress Managing the Components & Monitoring Compliance.
Satisfactory Academic Progress To be eligible for FSA funds, a student must make Satisfactory Academic Progress, and your school must have a reasonable.
Satisfactory Academic Progress Keep Your Students on the Path to Completion.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Roundtable
Advanced Satisfactory Academic Progress
The following is a presentation prepared for:
Satisfactory Academic Progress A NASFAA Authorized Event Presented by [Name of Presenter/Association] [Location] [Date], 2017.
Satisfactory Academic Progress
Janet Dodson, presenter
Director of Financial Assistance Services
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP)
The Must & may of SAP Danchees Ingram Tarrant County College
Satisfactory Academic Progression (SAP) Policy
Satisfactory Academic Progress Standards (SAP)
Office of Financial Aid and Scholarships
Monitoring Satisfactory Academic Progress
MASFAA Conference November , 2015
6/23/16 SAP versus Academic Standing Georgia Military College Brooke Bruton – Dean of Students/Assistant Director June 23rd at 9:30AM.
It’s Time to Light the Lights 2016 ILASFAA Annual Conference
TASFAA 2017 Education Is Key
SAP: Must or may 2018 new aid officer workshop Danchees Ingram
SAP Who? & R2T4 What? Danchees Ingram Tarrant County College
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP)
Don’t let SAP get you into sticky situations!
Office of Student Financial Aid UT Southwestern Medical Center
The Financial Aid Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Appeal Process
The Financial Aid Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Policy
Satisfactory Academic Progress
Presentation transcript:

SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Gregory Martin U.S. Department of Education Session FF-09

2 Student Eligibility Maintains satisfactory progress in his/her course of study according to school’s published standards (f)

3 Administrative Capability Establishes, publishes, and applies reasonable standards for measuring if a student is maintaining satisfactory progress in his/her educational program  (e)

4 Consumer Information Publish and make readily available to current and prospective students  standards for making satisfactory progress  criteria for reestablishing eligibility if SAP is violated (c)(2)

5 SAP Standards Apply to all Title IV programs

6 SAP Standards Must Be Consistently Applied Reasonable

7 SAP Standards Must be same as or stricter than standards for non-Title IV students in same educational program  Are you using your school’s academic standards or standards specifically for Title IV?

8 SAP Standards Must Include Two Components Qualitative Quantitative  Both must be cumulative

9 Qualitative Standard To assess quality of academic work Use standards measurable against a norm  grades,  work projects May use fixed or graduated standard

10 Fixed Standard Example A student must maintain a cumulative grade point average of 2.0 after two terms of enrollment, and subsequently, each academic year.

11 Graduated Standard Example Grade Point Average Requirements  1 to 30 credits = 1.6  31 to 60 credits = 1.8  61 to graduation = 2.0

12 Academic Programs Longer Than Two Years By the end of the second academic year, student must have:  a “C” average or its equivalent OR  academic standing consistent with graduation requirements Years measured in time, not grade level

13 Mitigating Circumstances Regarding “C” After Two Years These standards may be set aside if certain circumstances affect progress  death of a relative  injury or illness of student  other special circumstances

14 Quantitative Standard To measure progress toward course completion

15 Maximum Time Frame Undergraduates may receive aid for a maximum of 150% of the published length of the educational program  cumulative, including periods without Title IV assistance

16 Graduate Max Time School must develop a written policy establishing a maximum time frame in which a graduate student must complete the program.

17 Credit Hour Schools May define maximum time frame in  Academic Years  Credit Hours Attempted  Terms

18 Academic Years Degree program takes 4 years to complete è 4 X 150% = 6 years is maximum time frame è 4 X 125% = 5 years is maximum time frame

19 Credit Hours Attempted Degree program requires 120 credits for completion  120 X 150% = 180 attempted credits is maximum time frame

20 Terms Degree program takes 6 terms to complete  6 X 150% = 9 terms is maximum time frame

21 Clock Hour Max Time Must use calendar time 900 clock hour program takes 8 months to complete  8 X 150% = 12 months is maximum time frame

22 Evaluating Students’ Progress How often should students’ progress be evaluated?

23 Maximum Time Frame Must be divided into equal evaluation periods  Evaluation periods cannot exceed the lesser of one half of the program or one academic year

24 Programs One Year Or Less School must evaluate progress at least once, at the half-way point

25 Clock Hour Program Example 8 months/900 clock hours  program is one year in length  one half of the program = 4 month evaluation periods

26 Credit Hour Non-Term Program Example 6 months/24 quarter credits  program is less than one year  one half of the program = 3 month evaluation periods

27 Programs Longer Than One Year School must evaluate progress at least once per academic year

28 Credit Hour Term Degree Program Must evaluate progress at least once academic year May evaluate progress at end of each term

29 Evaluating Students’ Progress How much work must be completed at end of each evaluation period?

30 Student Must Complete Within Maximum Time Frame Your policy may require  a fixed amount of work that must be completed in each evaluation period  a percentage of work that must be completed in each evaluation period

31 Credit Hour - 6 Year Max Time Student must complete 1/6 of the work required for the degree each year  degree requires 120 credits  1/6 =  20 credits per year required to finish within 6 years

32 Credit Hour - Attempted Credits 120 credits / 180 credits = 67%  Student must earn 67% of credit hours attempted

33 Clock Hour Program - 12 Month Max Time 4 months / 12 months = 34%  34% X 900 = 306 clock hours  306 clock hours in 4 month period

34 Course Repeats How do these affect progress??  Qualitative - average grades, count both grades, or count the higher grade  Quantitative - included in maximum time frame  May only count toward enrollment status if receiving credit

35 What About? Incompletes Withdrawals Non-credit remedial courses

36 Transfer Students May make initial disbursement If no credits transferred in, then SAP evaluated solely on work at current school If received transfer credits, those must be included when determining progress toward maximum time frame

37 Probation/Warning Optional How long? What stipulations must student meet? Notification process

38 Major/Degree Changes How will you deal with maximum timeframe?  Take credits earned and apply toward max time  Student eligible for aid for 150% of remaining required credits  Does it require an appeal?

39 Appeal Policy Specific procedures for student to appeal if not making satisfactory progress Who will decide appeals?

40 How To Re-establish Eligibility What happens once a student fails to meet the standards?  No appeal or disapproved appeal

41 Disbursement Of Funds Make certain that student meets satisfactory academic progress standards as of last time your policy required evaluation

42 Contact Information Your feedback and comments are appreciated. Gregory Martin Training Officer