Satisfactory Academic Progress 2012 All Directors Training Tim Bonnel Chancellor’s Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
§§668.16(e), (f) and  The institution must establish a reasonable SAP policy  WHAT MUST A RESONABLE POLICY CONTAIN? ◦ The policy must.
Advertisements

Satisfactory Academic Progress: Does your Policy make the Grade? Presented by David Bartnicki Federal Training Officer
Featuring Elena Olivier & Yolanda Cleveland. SSatisfactory Academic Progress SSchool must have a published policy for monitoring a student’s progress.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Presents … © NASFAA 2011 Satisfactory Academic Progress.
Gisella Baker Director of Financial Aid Hawkeye Community College The following is a presentation prepared for IASFAA’s 2014 Conference in Davenport, November.
S ATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Sandy Neel SASFAA Past President Bellarmine University.
S ATISFACTORY A CADEMIC P ROGRESS FASFAA Region V Spring Workshop April 1, 2011 Nova Southeastern University Presented by Anh Do, St. Thomas University.
SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Gregory Martin U.S. Department of Education Session FF-09.
Satisfactory Academic Progress. Title IV Requirements Same or more strict than the college’s standards for a student enrolled in the same educational.
OCTOBER 18, 2011 Satisfactory Academic Progress. New SAP Policy Elements 1 st SAP evaluation after 7/1/11 must meet new rules (excluding summer term)
MASFAA Conference November 7, Satisfactory Academic Progress2 Authority Provisions of New SAP Regulations School Requirements Definitions, Terms.
Jamie A. Malone | Nov U.S. Department of Education 2012 Fall Conference Foreign Schools Satisfactory Academic Progress Session 38.
Satisfactory Academic Progress
With CONSUELA MITCHELL YOLANDA CLEVELAND. Satisfactory Academic Progress School must have a published policy for monitoring a student’s progress Standards.
Satisfactory Academic Progress –Managing the Components Qualitative (grade-based) and Quantitative (time-based) measures.
SAP SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS PASFAA CONFERENCE OCTOBER, LANCASTER, PA.
 Three components that we check after every semester. 1. GPA Requirement – 2.0 for sophomore and above. 1.5 for freshman. 2. Pace of Progression.
Basics of Satisfactory Academic Progress
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Annmarie Weisman U.S. Department of Education PASFAA Conference – Oct Pittsburgh, PA a.
SAP Satisfactory Academic Progress Schools must have a published policy for monitoring a student’s progress Standards include  Qualitative  Quantitative.
UC Berkeley Stay Day 2013 Jennifer French Carlos Perez Yolanda Smith
Vera Senese, Compliance Officer, City University of New York Gail Baksh-Jarrett, Senior Director of Enrollment and Student Financial Services, LaGuardia.
Satisfactory Academic Progress UNM Student Financial Aid Office Brian Malone.
Hosted by Yolanda Cleveland. Satisfactory Academic Progress School must have a published policy for monitoring a student’s progress Standards include.
The following is a presentation prepared for:. Slide 2 © NASFAA 2012 David Tolman Training Specialist Division of Training & Regulatory Assistance, NASFAA.
MASFAA 2013 October 6 th – 9 th, 2013 Indianapolis, Indiana Satisfactory Academic Progress Tara Piantanida-Kelly, USA Funds.
New Aid Officer Training Satisfactory Academic Progress Alicia Scott Atlanta Metropolitan College.
SAP Components 3 Components to SAP  Minimum Grade Point Average  Undergraduate Students: 2.0  Graduate Students: 3.0  Completion Rate  Each student.
Satisfactory Academic Progress MASFAA October 17, 2006 Patsy Myers Emery Director, Financial Aid Operations Office of Financial Aid Northwestern University.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Program Integrity Final Rule.
Satisfactory Academic Progress SAP – it’s not just for making syrup anymore!
PASFAA Conference, Harrisburg PA Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Annmarie Weisman |
SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS (SAP). Defining SAP SAP stands for Satisfactory Academic Progress For a student to be eligible for Federal Student Aid,
Annual Conference May 19 – 22, 2015 St. Augustine, FL.
The New & Improved SAP Rules Rick Shipman Director of Financial Aid Michigan State University October, 2011 Grand Rapids, Michigan.
44 th NYSFAAA Conference “On Track for Excellence” Satisfactory Academic Progress Thomas J. Dalton, Excelsior College & Curt Gaume, Canisius College.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) U.S. Department of Education NJASFAA 2011 Sandy Santana a.
RMASFAA 2012 SAP. SAP – a new beginning? (RMASFAA 2012) So, it’s been a year: what have you learned? Takeaways? Full Implementation?
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Eastern Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Annmarie Weisman U.S. Department of Education May 2012.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Annmarie Weisman U.S. Department of Education WVASFAA Conference Morgantown, WV April 2011.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) 1. What we will cover… 2 Changes in Federal Regulations SAP Policy Requirements Maximum Credits/Timeframe SAP Reviews.
Satisfactory Academic Progress Managing the Components & Monitoring Compliance.
Satisfactory Academic Progress To be eligible for FSA funds, a student must make Satisfactory Academic Progress, and your school must have a reasonable.
Presented By: Ma. Isabel Woods Texas A&M International University.
Satisfactory Academic Progress Keep Your Students on the Path to Completion.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Roundtable
Advanced Satisfactory Academic Progress
The following is a presentation prepared for:
Satisfactory Academic Progress A NASFAA Authorized Event Presented by [Name of Presenter/Association] [Location] [Date], 2017.
Satisfactory Academic Progress
Janet Dodson, presenter
Director of Financial Assistance Services
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP)
The Must & may of SAP Danchees Ingram Tarrant County College
Satisfactory Academic Progression (SAP) Policy
Satisfactory Academic Progress Standards (SAP)
Office of Financial Aid and Scholarships
Monitoring Satisfactory Academic Progress
6/23/16 SAP versus Academic Standing Georgia Military College Brooke Bruton – Dean of Students/Assistant Director June 23rd at 9:30AM.
It’s Time to Light the Lights 2016 ILASFAA Annual Conference
TASFAA 2017 Education Is Key
SAP: Must or may 2018 new aid officer workshop Danchees Ingram
SAP versus Academic Standing Georgia Military College Robin Knight – Associate VP Academic Records Brooke Bruton – Dean of Students/Assistant Director.
SAP Who? & R2T4 What? Danchees Ingram Tarrant County College
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP)
Don’t let SAP get you into sticky situations!
Office of Student Financial Aid UT Southwestern Medical Center
The Financial Aid Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Appeal Process
The Financial Aid Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Policy
Satisfactory Academic Progress
Presentation transcript:

Satisfactory Academic Progress 2012 All Directors Training Tim Bonnel Chancellor’s Office

Agenda Federal SAP Standards SAP Evaluation Options Appeals and Probation

The Standards Qualitative – Grade Point Average (GPA) Quantitative – Pace Quantitative – Maximum Time Frame Institutional Policies

Qualitative – Grade Point Average (GPA) Students must have a cumulative GPA of 2.00 at each SAP evaluation Grades for remedial and ESL courses count in the GPA calculation Grades changed due to academic renewal/amnesty must be included

Quantitative – Pace Students must successfully complete at least 67% of the cumulative number of units attempted at each SAP evaluation – % set locally but can be no lower than 67%, and must be at least as high as the college % Computed by dividing the total number of units the student has successfully completed by the total number of units attempted Must include courses with earned “W” and units transferred in to the school, as well as academic renew/amnesty courses Many colleges also have pace requirements for each term

Quantitative – Maximum Time Frame A period of time that is no longer than 150% of published length of the program in which the student is enrolled For degree and transfer programs of 60 units, maximum time frame is 90 units For eligible certificate programs maximum time frame varies (i.e. 30 unit program = 45 units maximum, 18 unit program = 27 unit maximum). Requires that the student be enrolled in a Title IV eligible program leading to degree, certificate or transfer (basic financial aid requirement) Must include courses with earned “W” and units transferred in to the college, as well as academic renew/amnesty courses

Institutional Policies The regulations allow some flexibility in these areas – Remedial/ESL coursework may be excluded from the Pace and Maximum Time Frame calculations – The college may elect to have graduated GPA and Pace standards (i.e. lower for freshman and higher for sophomores) – College policies must address how the standards are affected by withdrawals and transfer units (not noted previously), and incompletes and repetitions – College policies must also address changes to goal/objective and/or program of study. The number of allowed changes may be limited in the policy – College policies may be more strict than federal standards and may include additional SAP requirements

The Evaluation Colleges can choose to evaluate SAP after each payment period or annually at the end of a payment period. Each of the three federal standards, plus any institutional policies, must be measured at each evaluation.

Evaluations Done Each Payment Period Students not making SAP may be automatically placed on one payment period of “warning” status. Students not making SAP at the end of the warning period are determined to be ineligible for federal financial aid until they meet SAP standards

Annual Evaluations Students not making SAP at the annual evaluation are determined to be ineligible for federal financial aid until they meet SAP standards No warning period is allowed

Appeals

Institutional Policies Colleges are not required to offer an appeal process for SAP, but are for aid award determination College appeal policies must be publicized and include an explanation of the process and documentation requirements Must explain how students can regain eligibility outside of an approved appeal by meeting SAP standards “Sitting out” or terms for which no aid is received are not sufficient reasons for reestablishing eligibility

Student Appeals Student documentation must include: – An explanation of why the student failed to meet SAP, including the related extenuating circumstances – An explanation of what has changed that will allow the student to make SAP Colleges may include other requirements and documentation for the appeal; need to publicize these requirements Outcome is a PJ decision, case-by-case and not capricious nor discriminatory

Probation Successful appeals result in the student being put on SAP probation Students may receive financial aid during terms of probation Student can regain eligibility by making documented SAP at the end of one term of probation or Student can be put on an academic plan designed to meet SAP standards by a specific period of time or at program completion – Institutional policy will determine what is included in an academic plan – The college must verify and document each term that the student is following the academic plan and/or meeting terms of probation; if not, the student becomes ineligible for federal student aid until SAP standards are met