LFA Logical Framework Approach

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HOW TO DEVELOP THE PROJECT IDEA Training unit 2.2 Definition of objectives in the action.
Advertisements

Action Planning. After self evaluation: Action Planning 'Action Planning' is an activity designed to assist in achieving goals by recognising the tasks.
STRENGTHENING FINANCING FOR DEVELOPMENT: PROPOSALS FROM THE PRIVATE SECTOR Compiled by the UN-Sanctioned Business Interlocutors to the International Conference.
DECENTRALIZATION AND FINANCING OF SERVICES Gordana Matković Sofia, July 2007.
MAPP Process & Outcome Evaluation
Joint presentation by respective units in DGs AGRI, EMPL and REGIO IPA Components III, IV and V: Conditions for successful preparation and absorption of.
Implications for Think Tanks Need to be able to: –Understand the political context –Do credible research –Communicate effectively –Work with others Need.
Cohesion Policy focus on performance experiences of the Hungarian Presidency Dr. Györgyi Nyikos Deputy State Secretary for Development Affairs Ministry.
PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM)
 Capacity Development; National Systems / Global Fund Summary of the implementation capacities for National Programs and Global Fund Grants For HIV /TB.
GOAL ORIENTED PROJECT PLANNING GOPP WORKSHOPS
NATIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING FORTHE DEVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY FOR THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Monitoring, Review and Reporting Project Cycle Management A short training course in project cycle management for subdivisions of MFAR in Sri Lanka.
Sultanate of Oman Oman Drinking Water Safety Plan.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
DEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT IDEAS
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
IWRM PLAN PREPARED AND APPROVED. CONTENT Writing an IWRM plan The content of a plan Ensuring political and public participation Timeframe Who writes the.
Strategic Planning and Monitoring of projects and programs
Objective- and Strategic Analysis
Nine steps of a good project planning
PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.
Community Participation in Recovery Jon Bennett Director, Oxford Development Consultants Wenchuan Earthquake Response, China Workshop, July 14-15, 2008,
Welcome everyone. Introduction of the facilitator
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Objectives: 1. To learn why advocacy is one of the roles of CSOs. 2. To learn the process for developing an effective strategic advocacy campaign 3. To.
The role of assumptions
Developing Indicators
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Stakeholder Analysis.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
DESIGNING A PROJECT: FROM ACTIVITY BASED TO RESULTS / QUALITY BASED MANAGEMENT.
MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.
The local development strategy content Jela Tvrdonova, 2012.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
CONSISTENCY AND RESULTS EVALUATION IN MEXICO SEMPTEMBER 2008 Gonzalo Hernández Licona.
PARIS21/CARICOM Workshop on NSDS, Trinidad and Tobago, July 2009 NSDS Overview Presentation by PARIS21 Secretariat.
Participatory Planning Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Project Management Learning Program July 2008, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Project Design and Planning Sequence of Systematic Project Design.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
Seite 1 Capacity WORKS The GTZ Management Model for Sustainable Development.
Summary FACT Trajectory & preparatory Workshop FACT lessons learnt Workshop Agriterra.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
Stakeholder Participation and Analysis.  What is meaningful participation?  What is a stakeholder?  Why stakeholder participation?  What is participation?
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Cindy Damons 28 May 2008 The role of municipalities in managing and giving effect to.
Grant Application Form (Annex A) Grant Application Form (Annex A) 2nd Call for Proposals.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Logical Framework Approach 1. Approaches to Activity Design Logical Framework Approach (LFA) – Originally developed in the 1970s, this planning process.
EH/GE 3131 PROJECT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT 3/10/20161 Mr. Idrissa Y. H. Geography & Environment Department of Social Science School of Natural and Social.
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
12. Identifying measures to remove barriers 20 min Chapter 6 Ivan Nygaard.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Project design & Planning
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
LFA Revisited Pramod Shrestha 28 June 2016.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 5. Review of the organizational strategy.
Chapter 03 Project Design
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Results Oriented Program Formulation
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
Project Proposal Template
Project Management.
Logical Framework I want to design a project by planning out the logic
Rural Partnerships between Small Farmers and Private Sector
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Presentation transcript:

LFA Logical Framework Approach Goal Oriented Project Planning Kari Örtengren Project Design AB Sweden

Project Success How? Engagement Ownership clearly defined Clear division of responsibilities Realism!! (purpose) Connection Activities – Objectives Capacity to handle risks Flexibility Beneficiaries engaged in project planning …..LFA is a useful tool to reach success!

LFA Characteristics Finding the “roots” before setting the objectives Objectives & beneficiary oriented Participatory/Ownership! Consensus oriented Focus on logical links Systematic common sense!!!

Why LFA? RELEVANCE, FEASIBILITY & SUSTAINABILITY Situation and weaknesses are analysed correct solutions (activities) Mistakes are avoided Facilitates implementation Identifies indicators of the projects achievements

The nine steps of an LFA analysis 1 Analysis of project´s Context 2 Analysis of Stakeholders 3 Problem Analysis/Situation Analysis 4 Objectives Analysis 5 Plan of Activities 6 Plan of Resources/Inputs 7 Indicators/measurements 8 Risk Analysis 9 Analysis of Assumptions

Step 1: Projects Context Changes/projects are part of a larger context/a situation Which environment will the project be situated in? Which factors are of importance for achieving the objectives? Analysis of Context made through a study and/or through making a “SWOT” analysis

SWOT analysis* Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats A tool for auditing /identifying e.g. an environment, agency,company etc: Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats *Not LFA , SWOT is a separate method, which may be used for the analysis of the project’s Context

Step 2: Stakeholder Analysis Stakeholders - those who are influenced by and exert an influence on the project entity Mapping of stakeholders and their respective roles Who will be influenced, positively or negatively, by the project Which stakeholders should be involved in planning and/or implementing the project

Step 2 Stakeholder Analysis Four main groups of stakeholders: Beneficiaries Implementers Financing agents Decision makers

PROBLEMANALYSIS CRUCIAL! As with weeds, the roots must be tackled, if the weeds are to disappear

Step 3: Problem Analysis Finding “the roots of the evil” Which is the problem to be solved? Who owns the problem? One focal problem, focus! Find the causes and effects to the focal problem The causes of the problem shall be “tackled” through activities within the framework of the project in order to solve the problem in a sustainable way

Why a Problem Tree? Problem Tree Effects Focal problem Causes Objective Tree Overall objectives Project Purpose Results

Step 4: Objectives Analysis Three levels 1 Overall Objectives/Development Objectives: Often Governmental level, long term perspective, i e social welfare, economic growth.The positive situation of the effects of the focal problem identified. Time frame: Long term, 5-10 years (e.g Living conditions of local people improved or Investments into agricultural export crops increased ) 2 Project objectives or Project Purpose: Which are the objectives that the intervention/project should be able to achieve. The positive solution to the focal problem, the solved focal problem. The reason why the project.is implemented. Time frame:Medium term 0-3 years (e.g River water quality improved or Road network meets traffic demands) . 3 Outputs/Targets/Results: The outputs/results describe the services to be produced by the project. What services do the beneficiary get access to? Connected to the causes of the focal problem identified. Achieved through the activities. Time frame: Short term/directly after the project activities have been implemented (e.g. Direct discharge of wastewater decreased or road network expanded) .

LFA Overall Objectives Step 4 Long-term social and or economic benefits, to which the project will contribute Not achieved by the project on its own, several projects contribute States the positive state for the beneficiaries and for the society Examples; - Improved social well fare - Economic growth in region X - Food supply stabilised

LFA Project Purpose, Step 4 The main reason for having a project ! WHY a project Connection to the “focal” problem Sets out the benefits, which the beneficiaries derive from the project Implementing agencies should enable for the beneficiaries to achieve the benefits by delivering the required services/results Examples; - Improved labour productivity for crop X achieved.., - Health hazards (for certain diseases) of the population in area X reduced to a certain standard - River water quality improved etc...

LFA Results Step 4 Connected to the causes of the focal problem Sets out the services which the beneficiaries will receive from the implementing agency through the project Examples; - Farmers able to apply more efficient maize production techniques, - Adequate mother and child care provided to the people in region X, - Improved transport between A and B

Specific Measurable Accurate or Approved Realistic Time bound SMART project purpose Specific Measurable Accurate or Approved Realistic Time bound

Step 5: Activities Tackle the causes of the focal problem What will be done under the project to deliver the services/results required by the beneficiaries Usually expressed as an action Means to achieve the objectives, not the objectives Examples; - Rehabilitate health posts, - Train rural health staff, - Re-construct road from A to B

Step 6: Inputs/Resources Experts and personnel (local and foreign, counter part, project group) Financing (loans, grants, funds) cost sharing? Future long term financing? Equipment Premises

Step 7: Indicators Measure achievements A baseline study might be needed to be able to measure the final results? The process of setting up indicators shows if the objectives are vague Indicators should answer the questions: For whom? What? When? Where? How much? What quality?

Step 8: Risk Analysis Analysis of factors which may influence the implementation of the project and hence the achievement of objectives Internal and External risks Alternative strategies may be needed? Risk management !!!

Step 9: Analysis of Assumptions The project in the perspective of society/ institutional situation in a country (laws, political commitments, financing) Assumptions describe situations and conditions, which are necessary for project success, but which are largely beyond the control of the project management Assumptions on each level of objective (results, project purpose and overall objectives) Examples: Delivery in time of equipment, at least five of the trained personnel stays within the company for 5 more years, prevailed stable political situation

Why different steps in LFA? Relevance; Step 1 – 4 Context, Stakeholder-, Problem- and Objectives analysis. Logical links between problems and solutions, Relevant to support? (in accordance with strategies and problems in the country/sector?) Feasible; Step 5 – 7 Plan of Activities, Resources/inputs and Indicators. Are the resources sufficient to achieve the objectives? (Resources: Personnel, time, funding, equipment) Sustainable; Step 8 – 9 Risk analysis and Assumptions. If the project is sustainable, will the effects of the project remain without continuos external assistance outside?

Internet information on LFA www.google.com/logical framework approach http://www.ausaid.gov.au/ausguide/ausguidelines/1.html http://lgausa.com/logframe_approach.htm http://www.cgiar.org/isnar/gender/hambly.htm http://www.pcm-group.com/services_helpdesk_faq.jsp http://europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/evaluation/methods/PCM_Manual_EN-march2001.pdf

LFA matrix/Log Frame

LFA summary Relevant, Feasible and Sustainable projects/programs - success! Participation & ownership! Joint approach to project Make problem analysis with accuracy /time to correctly analyze causes & effects Connection problems and objectives Add analysis such as cost effectiveness and gender, study on environmental aspects and make a clear division of responsibilities LFA during all phases of the project

How the LFA method works depends on its users LFA is no better and no worse than its users

Why GOPP (LFA) workshop ? Relevant, feasible and sustainable projects. To overcome major errors in planning structure! All key stakeholders participation & efficiency, correct situation analysis correct solutions (activities) Shared understanding of the situation and of different needs and interest - transparency ! Ownership and responsibility

LFA STEPS in a workshop STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS PROBLEM ANALYSIS OBJECTIVES ANALYSIS PLAN of ACTIVITIES (overall “brainstorming” ideas) RISK ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS LOG FRAME/MATRIX LFA/GOPP WORKSHOP answers WHAT TO DO, not HOW. The detailed planning is made later by the project group